Narrative review of the psychometric properties of language tests used in anomia treatment for primary progressive aphasia (PPA)

References

• Andresen, E. (2000). Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, S15–S20. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.20619
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bak, T., & Hodges, J. (2003). Kissing and dancing - A test to distinguish the lexical and conceptual contributions to noun/verb and action/object dissociation. Preliminary results in participants with frontotemporal dementia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 169–181. doi:10.1016/S0911-6044(02)00011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Battista, P., Miozzo, A., Piccininni, M., Catricalà, E., Capozzo, R., Tortelli, R., & Logroscino, G. (2017). Primary progressive aphasia: A review of neuropsychological tests for the assessment of speech and language disorders. Aphasiology, 31, 1359–1378. doi:10.1080/02687038.2017.1378799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beeson, P., King, R., Bonakdarpour, B., Henry, M., Cho, H., & Rapcsak, S. (2011). Positive effects of language treatment for the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia. Journal of Molecular Neuroscience, 45, 724–736. doi:10.1007/s12031-011-9549-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bier, N., Macoir, J., Gagnon, L., Linden, M., Louveaux, S., & Desrosiers, J. (2009). Known, lost, and recovered: Efficacy of formal-semantic therapy and spaced retrieval method in a case of semantic dementia. Aphasiology, 23, 210–235. doi:10.1080/00207590801942906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, D. (2003). Test for reception of grammar – version 2 (TROG-2). San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Borod, J., Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1980). Normative data on the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination, parietal lobe battery, and the Boston naming test. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2, 209–215. doi:10.1080/01688638008403793
   Google Scholar
• Bozeat, S., Ralph, M., Patterson, K., Garrard, P., & Hodges, J. (2000). Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1207–1215. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(00)00034-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Hanna, J. (1998). Sentence production by aphasic patients in a constrained task. Brain and Language, 63, 184–218. doi:10.1006/brln.1998.1930
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J., Strand, E., & Josephs, K. (2014). Motor speech disorders associated with primary progressive aphasia. Aphasiology, 28, 1004–1017. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.869307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L., & Dunn, D. (1997). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, T., & Kennedy, P. (2004). Treatment of depression following spinal cord injury: An evidence-based review. Rehabilitation Psychology, 49, 134–139. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.49.2.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Baresi, B. (2001). Boston diagnostic aphasia examination. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams and Williams.
   Google Scholar
• Gorno-Tempini, M., Dronkers, N., Rankin, K., Ogar, J., Phengrasamy, L., Rosen, H., … Miller, B. (2004). Cognition and anatomy in three variants of primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 55, 335–346. doi:10.1002/ana.10788
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorno-Tempini, M., Hillis, A., Weintraub, S., Kertesz, A., Mendez, M., Cappa, S., … Grossman, M. (2011). Classification of primary progressive aphasia and its variants. Neurology, 76, 1006–1014. doi:10.1212/WNL.0b013e31821103e6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henry, M., Rising, K., DeMarco, A., Miller, B., Gorno-Tempini, M., & Beeson, P. (2013). Examining the value of lexical retrieval treatment in primary progressive aphasia: Two positive cases. Brain Language, 127, 145–156. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2013.05.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees: A test of semantic access from pictures and words. Bury St Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener aphasie test. Goettingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., & Willmes, K. (1984). The aachen aphasia test. In F.C. Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology (Vol. 42). New York: Raven Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jokel, R., & Anderson, N. (2012). Quest for the best: Effects of errorless and active encoding on word re-learning in semantic dementia. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 22, 187–214. doi:10.1080/09602011.2011.639626
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokel, R., Cupit, J., Rochon, E., & Leonard, C. (2009). Relearning lost vocabulary in nonfluent progressive aphasia with moss talk words. Aphasiology, 23, 175–191. doi:10.1080/02687030801943005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia: Lea and Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10, 159–215. doi:10.1080/02687039608248403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (1982). Western aphasia battery. New York, NY: Grune and Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, E., Kirschner, K., Bode, R., Heinemann, A., & Goodman, R. (2005). Construct and predictive validity of the repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status in the evaluation of stroke patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 27, 16–32. doi:10.1080/138033990513564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lezak, M. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mesulam, M. (2001). Primary progressive aphasia. Annals of Neurology, 49, 425–432. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1531-8249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N., Willmes, K., & Bleser, R. (2000). The psychometric properties of the English language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT). Aphasiology, 14, 683–722. doi:10.1080/026870300410946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D., & PRISMA Group (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine, 6, 264–269. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-151-4-200908180-00135
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L., & Brookshire, R. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 36, 338–350. doi:10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholas, L., Brookshire, R., Maclennan, D., Schumacher, J., & Porrazzo, S. (1989). The Boston naming test: Revised administration and scoring procedures and normative information for non-brain-damaged adults. Boston: College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16, 935–979. doi:10.1080/02687030244000563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randolph, C. (1998). The repeatable battery for the assessment of neuropsychological status. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Reilly, J., Martin, N., & Grossman, M. (2005). Verbal learning in semantic dementia: Is repetition priming a useful strategy? Aphasiology, 19, 329–339. doi:10.1080/02687030444000787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M., Martin, N., Grewal, R., & Brecher, A. (1996). The philadelphia naming test: Scoring and rationale. In Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Pro-Ed: Austin. ISBN: 0890796955.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson, S., Druks, J., Hodges, J., & Garrard, P. (2009). The treatment of object naming, definition, and object use in semantic dementia: The effectiveness of errorless learning. Aphasiology, 23, 749–775. doi:10.1080/02687030802235195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, K., Jutai, J., Teasell, R., Foley, N., & Bitensky, J. (2005). Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF body functions. Disability and Rehabilitation, 27, 191–207. doi:10.1080/09638280400014766
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, J., Langan, S., & Williams, H. (2007). What are the best outcome measurements for atopic eczema? A systematic review. Journal of Allergy Clinical Immunology, 120, 1389–1398. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2007.08.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sivan, M., O’Connor, R., Makower, S., Levesley, M., & Bhakta, B. (2011). Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 181–189. doi:10.2340/16501977-0674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tombaugh, T., Kosak, J., & Rees, L. (1999). Normative data stratified by age and education for two measures of verbal fluency: FAS and animal naming. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 14, 167–177. doi:10.1016/S0887-6177(97)00095-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Gorp, W., Satz, P., Kiersch, M., & Henry, R. (1986). Normative data on the Boston naming test for a group of normal older adults. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 702–705. doi:10.1080/01688638608405189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villanelli, F., Russo, A., Nemni, R., & Farina, E. (2011). Effectiveness (or not?) of cognitive rehabilitation in a person with semantic dementia. In Non-pharmacological therapies in different types of dementia and mild cognitive impairment: A wide perspective from theory to practice (pp.113-119). Nova Science Publishers, Inc. ISBN: 9781633218789, 9781633218604.
   Google Scholar
• Weintraub, S., Mesulam, M., Wieneke, C., Rademaker, A., Rogalski, E., & Thompson, C. (2009). The Northwestern Anagram Test: Measuring sentence production in primary progressive aphasia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 24, 408–416. doi:10.1177/1533317509343104
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. (2007). EVT-2: expressive vocabulary test. Minneapolis: Pearson Assessments.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J., & Young, N. (1997). A comparison of different indices of responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 239–246. doi:10.1016/S0895-4356(96)00373-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar