Functional and usage-based approaches to aphasia: the grammatical-lexical distinction and the role of frequency

References

• Arnon, I., McCauley, S. M., & Christiansen, M. H. (2017). Digging up the building blocks of language: Age-of-acquisition effects for multiword phrases. Journal of Memory and Language, 92, 265–280. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avrutin, S. (2000). Comprehension of D-linked and non-D-linked wh-questions by children and Broca’s aphasics. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain (pp. 295–313). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avrutin, S. (2006). Weak syntax. In K. Amunts & Y. Grodzinsky (Eds.), Broca’s region (pp. 49–62). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baayen, R. H., Milin, P., & Ramscar, M. (2016). Frequency in lexical processing. Aphasiology, 30, 1174–1220. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1147767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, D., & Siewierska, A. (2007). Another take on the notion of subject. In M. Hannay & G. Steen (Eds.), Structural-functional studies in english grammar (pp. 141–158). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the snodgrass and vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency and name agreement. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 560–585. doi:10.1080/783663595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Bennis, H. (2018). Productie en begrip van voorzetsels bij sprekers met agrammatische en vloeiende afasie. Nederlandse Taalkunde, 23, 3–22. doi:10.5117/NEDTAA2018.1.BAST
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Perspectives on agrammatism. Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennis, H., Prins, R., & Vermeulen, J. (1983). Lexical-semantic versus syntactic disorders in aphasia: The processing of prepositions. Publikaties Van Het Instituut Voor Algemene Taalwerenschap, 40, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Franklin, S., & Howard, D. (2001). Age of acquisition and imageability ratings for a large set of words, including verbs and function words. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 33, 73–79. doi:10.3758/BF03195349
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blumstein, S. (1973). A phonological investigation of aphasic speech. Mouton: The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Boye, K., & Bastiaanse, R. (2018). Grammatical versus lexical words in theory and aphasia: Integrating linguistics and neurolinguistics. Glossa: a Journal of General Linguistics, 3, 29. doi:10.5334/gjgl.436
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boye, K., Bastiaanse, R., Harder, P., & Martínez-Ferreiro, S. (submitted). Agrammatic aphasia in a usage-based theory of grammar.
   Google Scholar
• Boye, K., & Harder, P. (2012). A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language, 88, 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Ellis, A. W. (2016). Aphasia and age of acquisition: Are early-learned words more resilient? Aphasiology, 30, 1240–1263. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1106439
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., & Hildebrandt, N. (1988). Disorders of syntactic comprehension. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G., Kennedy, D., Alpert, N., Makris, N., DeDe, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia II: Neurological aspects. Brain and Language, 101, 151–177. doi: 10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
   Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, M. H., Kristensen, L. B., Vinther, N. M., & Boye, K. (Submitted). Grammar is background in sentence processing.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, M. H., Kelly, M. L., Shillcock, R. C., & Greenfield, K. (2010). Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism. Cognition, 116, 382–393. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C. (1982). Neurolinguistic analysis of recurrent utterances in aphasia. Cortex, 18, 141–152. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(82)80025-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar: Syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dąbrowska, E. (2015). What exactly is universal grammar, and has anyone seen it? Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 852. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00852
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Bleser, R., & Poeck, K. (1985). Analysis of prosody in the spontaneous speech of patients with CV-recurring utterances. Cortex, 21, 405–415. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(85)80005-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2012). Lexical and prosodic effects on syntactic ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 387–408. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9191-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013a). Effects of verb bias and syntactic ambiguity on reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 1408–1425. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.843151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeDe, G. (2013b). Verb transitivity bias affects on-line sentence reading in people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 27, 326–343. doi:10.1080/02687038.2012.725243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S. (1990). Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on phonological speech errors. Language and Cognitive Processes, 5, 313–349. doi:10.1080/01690969008407066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devers, C., Martínez-Ferreiro, S., & Arslan, S. (2018). Using support vector machines to identify determinants of pronoun difficulty in aphasia: A preliminary critical review and meta-analysis of individual data. Stem-, Spraak- En Taalpathologie, 23, 15–18.
   Google Scholar
• Diessel, H. (2017). Usage-based linguistics. In M. Aronoff (Ed.), Oxford research encyclopedia of Linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Retreieved from http://linguistics.oxfordre.com/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780199384655.001.0001/acrefore-9780199384655-e-363?rskey=ivWwgv&result=2
   Google Scholar
• Dik, S. C. (1997). Functional Grammar, part 1: The structure of the clause, ed. by K. Hengeveld. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (1998). Diversity in the lexical and syntactic abilities of fluent aphasic speakers. Aphasiology, 12, 99–117. doi:10.1080/02687039808250466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, V. (2014). The language myth: Why language is not an instinct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucambert, D., & Zuniga, M. (2012). Effects of grammatical categories on letter detenction in continuous text. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 41, 33–49. doi:10.1007/s10936-011-9175-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. (1982). Syntactic and semantic processes in aphasic deficits: The availability of prepositions. Brain and Language, 15, 249–258. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(82)90059-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2001). Agrammatism and the psychological reality of the syntactic tree. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 71–90. doi:10.1023/A:1005256224207
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Grodzinsky, Y. (1997). Tense and agreement in agrammatic production: Pruning the syntactic tree. Brain and Language, 56, 397–425. doi:10.1006/brln.1997.1795
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromkin, V. (2000). Brain, language, and linguistics. Brain & Language, 71, 72–74. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2216
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Froud, K. (2001). Prepositions and the lexical/functional divide: Aphasic evidence. Lingua, 111, 1–28. doi:10.1016/S0024-3841(00)00026-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S. (2002). Lexical biases in aphasic sentence comprehension: An experimental and corpus linguistic study. Aphasiology, 16, 1173–1198. doi:10.1080/02687030244000428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., & Menn, L. (2016). Usage-based approaches to aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 1361–1377. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1140120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gahl, S., Menn, L., Ramsberger, G., Jurafsky, D. S., Elder, E., Rewega, M., & Audrey, L. (2003). Syntactic frame and verb bias in aphasia: Plausibility judgments of undergoer-subject sentences. Brain & Cognition, 53, 223–228. doi:10.1016/S0278-2626(03)00114-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gentner, D. (1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. In S. I. Kuczaj (Ed.), Language development: Language, thought and culture (pp. 301–334). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Christiansen, J. A., & Gallagher, R. (1993). Comparison of morphology and syntax in free narrative and structured tests: Fluent vs. nonfluent aphasics. Cortex, 29, 377–407. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(13)80250-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1988). Syntactic representations in agrammatic aphasia: The case of prepositions. Language and Speech, 31, 115–134. doi:10.1177/002383098803100202
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarmann, H. J., & Kolk, H. H. J. (1991). A computer model of the temporal course of agrammatic sentence understanding: The effects of variation in severity and sentence complexity. Cognitive Science, 15, 49–87. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog1501_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harley, H. (2006). English words: A linguistic introduction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hatchard, R. (2015). A construction-based approach to spoken language in aphasia. University of Sheffield thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Hengeveld, K., & Mackenzie, J. L. (2008). Functional discourse grammar. A typologically-based theory of language structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, P. J., & Traugott, E. C. (2003). Grammaticalization (2nd edition ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibbotson, P., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Evidence Rebuts Chomsky’s theory of language learning. Scientific American, 315. Retreived from http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ishkhanyan, B., Sahraoui, H., Harder, P., Mogensen, J., & Boye, K. (2017). Grammatical and lexical pronoun dissociation in French speakers with agrammatic aphasia: A usage-based account and REF-based hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackendoff, R. (1973). The base rules for prepositional phrases. In S. Anderson & P. Kiparsky (Eds.), A festschrift for Morris Halle, 345–35 (pp. 6. N). Rienhart and Winston: ew York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Jakobson, R. (1956). Two aspects of language and two types of aphasic disturbances. In R. Jakobson & M. Halle (Eds.), Fundamentals of language (pp. 55–82). The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Jap, B. A., Martinez-Ferreiro, S., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). The effect of syntactic frequency on sentence comprehension in standard Indonesian Broca’s aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 1325–1340. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1148902
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkers, R. (1993). Het werkwoordgebruik in de spontane taal van Nederlandstalige afasiepatienten. Stem-, Spraak- En Taalpathologie, 2, 162–177.
   Google Scholar
• Kean, M. L. (1977). The linguistic interpretation of aphasic syndromes: Agrammatism in Broca’s aphasia, an example. Cognition, 5, 9–46. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(77)90015-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., & Heeschen, C. (1992). Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language. Language and Cognitive Processes, 7, 89–129. doi:10.1080/01690969208409381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., & van Grunsven, M. J. E. (1985). Agrammatism as a variable phenomenon. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 347–384. doi:10.1080/02643298508252666
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolk, H. H. J., & Weijts, M. (1996). Judgements of semantic anomaly in agrammatic patients: Argument movement, syntactic complexity and the use of heuristics. Brain and Language, 54, 86–135. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 1: theoretical prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Langacker, R. W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar, vol. 2: descriptive application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, V. M., Messerschmidt, M., & Boye, K. (2018). Contrasting grammatical and lexical determiners. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 4, 467. doi:10.1007/s10936-017-9531-x
   Google Scholar
• Lange, V. M., Messerschmidt, M., Harder, P., Hartwig, G., Siebner, R., & Boye, K. (2017). Planning and production of grammatical and lexical verbs in multi-word messages. PloS One, 12. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lapointe, S. G. (1985). A theory of verb form use in the speech of agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 24, 100–155. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(85)90100-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, C. (2015). Thoughts on grammaticalization, 3rd ed. Berlin: Language Science Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lonzi, L., & Luzzatti, C. (1993). Relevance of adverb distribution for the analysis of sentence representation in agrammatic patients. Brain and Language, 45, 306–317. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1048
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacDonald, M. C. (2013). How language production shapes language form and comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–16. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mardale, A. (2011). Prepositions as a semilexical category. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics, 13, 35–50. doi:halshs-00663128
   Google Scholar
• Martínez-Ferreiro, S., Ishkhanyan, B., Rosell-Clarí, V., & Boye, K. (2018). Prepositions and pronouns in connected discourse of individuals with aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics. [Epub ahead of print]. doi:10.1080/02699206.2018.1551935
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., & Bastiaanse, R. (2016). Beyond Chomsky versus Skinner: Frequency, language processing and aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 1169–1173. doi:10.1080/02687038.2016.1168920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menn, L., & Obler, L. K. (1990). Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative sourcebook. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Messerschmidt, M., Boye, K., Overmark, M. M., Kristensen, S. T., & Harder, P. (2018). Sondringen mellem grammatiske og leksikalske præpositioner [The distinction between grammatical and lexical prepositions]. Ny Forskning I Grammatik, 25. doi:10.7146/nfg.v26i25.109304
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., & Mazzucchi, A. (1990). Agrammatism in Italian: Two case studies. In L. Menn & L. K. Obler (Eds.), Agrammatic aphasia: A cross-language narrative source book (pp.717–816). Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, C., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1989). Variation in the pattern of omissions and substitutions of grammatical morphemes in the spontaneous speech of so-called agrammatic patients. Brain & Language, 36, 447–492. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90079-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20, 207–220. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(84)80038-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1995). The roles of word frequency and age of acquisition in word naming and lexical decision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 21, 116–133.doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.21.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J.-L., Dordain, M., Perron, C., Ska, B., Bub, D., Caplan, D., … Lecours, A. R. (1988). Agrammatism in sentence production without comprehension deficits: Reduced availability of syntactic structures and/or of grammatical morphemes? A case study. Brain and Language, 33, 273–295. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(88)90069-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, D., & Pizzamiglio, L. (1970). Syntactic comprehension in aphasia. Cortex, 6, 204–215. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(70)80028-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pawley, A. (2006). Where have all the verbs gone? Remarks on the organisation of languages with small, closed verb classes. 11th Biennenial Rice University Linguistics Symposium. Rice University, Houston, Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Perkins, M. (1994). Repetitiveness in language disorder: A new analytical procedure. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 8, 321–336. doi:10.3109/02699209408985315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piñango, M. (2000). Canonicity in Broca’s sentence comprehension: The case of psychological verbs. In Y. Grodzinsky, L. P. Shapiro, & D. Swinney (Eds.), Language and the brain (pp. 327–350). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pulvermüller, F., Capelle, B., & Shtyrov, Y. (2013). Brain basis of meaning, words, constructions, and grammar. In T. Hoffmann & G. Trousdale (Eds.), The oxford handbook of construction grammar. Oxford Handbooks Online. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195396683.013.0022.
   Google Scholar
• Russo, K. D., Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. (1998). Verb preference effects in the sentence comprehension of fluent aphasic individuals. Aphasiology, 12, 537–545. doi:10.1080/02687039808249556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and Language, 37, 440–479. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90030-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism. I. Comprehension. Brain & Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shewan, C. M., & Canter, G. L. (1971). Effects of vocabulary, syntax, and length on auditory comprehension in aphasic patients. Cortex, 7, 209–226. doi:10.1016/S0010-9452(71)80001-1
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart, J. (2015). Learning Functional Prepositions. City University of New York: Phd Thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Tissot, R. J., Mounin, G., & Lhermitte, F. (1973). L’agrammatism. Brussels, Belgium: Dessart.
   Google Scholar
• Tomasello, M. (2009). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Valin, R. D., Jr., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning & function. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varley, R. (1993). Deictic terms, lexical retrieval and utterance length in aphasia: An investigation of inter-relations. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 28, 23–41. doi:10.3109/13682829309033141
   Google Scholar
• Vermeulen, J., & Bastiaanse, R. (1984). Stoornissen in de spontane taal bij afasiepati€enten: Een faktoranalytisch onderzoek. Report for Stichting Afasie Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Vinther, N. M., Boye, K., & Kristensen, L. B. (2014). Grammatikken i baggrunden: Opmærksomhed under læsning [Grammar in the background: Attention during reading]. NyS, 47, 99–139. doi:10.7146/nys.v47i47.19918
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, H. A. (1971). On the representation of language in the human brain. Edmonton: Linguistic Research, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Cowell, P. E., & Varley, R. A. (2014). Artificial grammar learning in individuals with severe aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 53, 25–38. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.10.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Dabrowska, E., & Varley, R. A. (in preparation). The syntax-lexicon continuum: Explaining variation in aphasic language.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Newman, L., Thomson, R., Coleman, M., & Varley, R. (2018). Automated analysis of language production in aphasia and right hemisphere damage: Frequency and collocation strength. Aphasiology, 32, 1267–1283. doi:10.1080/02687038.2018.1497138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., & Wibrow, M. (2015). Frequency in language analysis tool.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Wibrow, M., & Varley, R. A. (2016). Formulaic language in people with probable Alzheimer’s disease: A frequency-based approach. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease,53, 1145–1160.doi: 10.3233/JAD-160099
   Google Scholar
• Zingeser, L., & Berndt, R. (1988). Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pre anomia: Implications for models of language processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 473–516. doi:10.1080/02643298808253270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurif, E. B., & Caramazza, A. (1976). Psycholinguistic structures in aphasia: Studies in syntax and semantics. In H. Whitaker & H. A. Whitaker (Eds.), Studies in  Neurolinguistics (pp. 261-292). New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar