Effects of executive attention on sentence processing in aphasia

References

• Bates, E., & Wulfeck, B. (1989). Comparative aphasiology: A cross-linguistic approach to language breakdown. Aphasiology, 3, 111–142. doi:10.1080/02687038908248981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Wulfeck, B., & MacWhinney, B. (1991). Crosslinguistic research in aphasia: An overview. Brain and Language, 41, 123–148. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90149-U
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Garthwaite, P. H. (2002). Investigation of a single case in neuropsychology. Confidence limits on the abnormality of test scores and test score differences. Neuropsychologia, 40, 1196–1208. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(01)00224-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapretto, M., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1999). Form and content: Dissociating syntax and semantics in sentence comprehension. Neuron, 24, 427–432. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(00)80855-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devescovi, A., Bates, E., D’Amico, S., Hernandez, A., Marangolo, P., Pizzamiglio, L., & Razzano, C. (1997). Grammaticality judgments in patients with and without expressive agrammatism. Aphasiology, 11, 543–579. doi:10.1080/02687039708248490
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson, R. J., Goldinger, S. D., & LaPointe, L. L. (1996). Auditory vigilance in aphasic individuals: Detecting nonlinguistic stimuli with full or divided attention. Brain and Cognition, 30, 244–253. doi:10.1006/brcg.1996.0016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L. (1987). Processing syntactic structure: Evidences from Dutch. Natural Languages and Linguistic Theory, 5, 519–559. doi:10.1007/BF00138988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frazier, L., & Fodor, J. D. (1978). The sausage machine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cognition, 6, 291–325. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(78)90002-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1972). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Hanne, S., Burchert, F., & Vasishth, S. (2015). On the nature of the subject–Object asymmetry in wh-question comprehension in aphasia: Evidence from eye tracking. Aphasiology, 30, 435–462. doi:10.1080/02687038.2015.1065469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huck, A., Thompson, R. L., Cruice, M., & Marshall, J. (2017). The influence of sense-contingent argument structure frequencies on ambiguity resolution in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 100, 171–194. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.03.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hula, W. D., & McNeil, M. R. (2008). Models of attention and dual-task performance as explanatory constructs in aphasia. Seminars in Speech and Language, 29, 169–187.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (1983). Boston naming test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, M., & Thompson, C. K. (2000). Patterns of comprehension and production of nouns and verbs in agrammatism: Implications for lexical organization. Brain and Language, 74, 1–25. doi:10.1006/brln.2000.2315
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korda, R. J., & Douglas, J. M. (1997). Attention deficits in stroke patients with aphasia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 525–542. doi:10.1080/01688639708403742
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinis, T. (2003). Psycholinguistic techniques in second language acquisition research. Second Language Research, 19, 144–161. doi:10.1191/0267658303sr217ra
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & He, T. (2004). Semantic short-term memory and its role in sentence processing: A replication. Brain and Language, 89, 76–82. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00300-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Odell, K., & Tseng, C. H. (1991). Toward the integration of resource allocation into a general theory of aphasia. Clinical Aphasiology, 20, 21–39. Retreived from http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/128/June 10, 2018
   Google Scholar
• Meng, M., & Bader, M. (2000). Mode of disambiguation and garden path strength: An investigation of subject-object ambiguities in German. Language and Speech, 43, 43–74. doi:10.1177/00238309000430010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (1999). Attention and aphasia: Theory, research and clinical implications. Aphasiology, 13, 91–112. doi:10.1080/026870399402226
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L. (2000). The effects of varying attentional demands on the word-retrieval skills of adults with aphasia, right-hemisphere brain damage or no brain-damage. Brain and Language, 72, 40–72. doi:10.1006/brln.1999.2281
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Holland, A. L., & Beeson, P. M. (1997). Auditory processing in individuals with mild aphasia: A study of resource allocation. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 40, 792–809. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4004.792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Keeton, R. J., & Karcher, L. (2006). Treating attention in mild aphasia: Evaluation of attention process training-II. Journal of Communication Disorders, 39, 37–61. doi:10.1016/j.jcomdis.2005.06.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray, L. L., Salis, C., Martin, N., & Dralle, J. (2018). The use of standardised short-term and working memory tests in aphasia research: A systematic review. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 28, 309–351. doi:10.1080/09602011.2016.1174718
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: The precedence of global features in visual perception. Cognitive Psychology, 9, 353–383. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(77)90012-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Novick, J. M., Kan, I. P., Trueswell, J. C., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2009). A case for conflict across multiple domains: Memory and language impairments follow damage to ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 26, 527–567. doi:10.1080/02643290903519367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Padeliadu, S., & Sideridis, G. (2000). Discriminant validation of the test of reading performance (TORP) for identifying children at risk of reading difficulties. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 139–146. doi:10.1027//1015-5759.16.2.139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, D. (2006). Cross-linguistic variation in sentence processing. Amsterdam: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Papadopoulou, D., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2005). Morphological cues in children’s processing of ambiguous sentences: A study of subject/object ambiguities in Greek. In A. Brugos, M. R. Clark-Cotton, & S. Ha (Eds.), BUCLD 29: Proceedings of the 29th annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 471–481). Boston: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paradis, M., & Kehayia, E. (1987). Exetasi diglossias gia afasikous. (Greek version) [Bilingual aphasia test]. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Patricacou, A., Psallida, E., Pring, T., & Dipper, L. (2007). The Boston naming test in Greek: Normative data and the effects of age and education on naming. Aphasiology, 21, 1157–1170. doi:10.1080/02687030600670643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peristeri, E., & Tsapkini, K. (2011). A comparison of the BAT and BDAE-SF batteries in determining the linguistic ability in Greek-speaking patients with Broca’s aphasia. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 25, 464–479. doi:10.3109/02699206.2011.560991
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peristeri, E., Tsimpli, I. M., & Tsapkini, K. (2013). The on-line processing of unaccusativity in Greek agrammatism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 233–276. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussou, A., & Tsimpli, I. M. (2006). On Greek VSO again! Journal of Linguistics, 42, 317–354. doi:10.1017/S0022226706003914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschmann, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, L. P., Nagel, N., & Levine, B. (1993). Preferences for a verb’s complements and their use in sentence processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 32, 96–114. doi:10.1006/jmla.1993.1006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. M., Love, T., Midgley, K. J., Holcomb, P. J., & Shapiro, L. P. (2017). Electrophysiology of prosodic and lexical-semantic processing during sentence comprehension in aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 107, 9–24. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.10.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shneiderman, B. (1998). Designing the user interface. Strategies for effective human-computer interaction (3rd ed.). MA: Addison-Wesley Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Slansky, B. L., & McNeil, M. R. (1997). Resource allocation in auditory processing of emphatically stressed stimuli in aphasia. Aphasiology, 11, 461–472. doi:10.1080/02687039708248484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsapkini, K., Vlahou, C., & Potagas, C. (2010). Adaptation and validation of standardized aphasia tests in different languages: Lessons from the Boston diagnostic aphasia examination-short form in Greek. Behavioural Neurology, 22, 111–119. doi:10.3233/ben-2009-0256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyler, L. K., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Randall, B., Wright, P., Devereux, B. J., Zhuang, J., … Stamatakis, E. A. (2011). Left inferior frontal cortex and syntax: Function, structure and behaviour in patients with left hemisphere damage. Brain, 134, 415–431. doi:10.1093/brain/awq369
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuong, L. C., & Martin, R. C. (2015). The role of LIFG-based executive control in sentence comprehension. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32, 243–265. doi:10.1080/02643294.2015.1057558
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weinberg, A. (2001). A minimalist theory of human sentence processing. In S. D. Epstein & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Working minimalist (pp. 283–314). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., & Capasso, R. (1991). A crosslinguistic study of grammaticality judgments in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 311–336. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90158-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar