What matters in processing German object relative clauses in aphasia – timing or morpho-syntactic cues?

References

• Adani, F., Forgiarini, M., Guasti, M. T., & Van der Lely, H. K. J. (2014). Number dissimilarities facilitate the comprehension of relative clauses in children with (Grammatical) specific language impairment. Journal of Child Language, 41, 811–841. doi:10.1017/S0305000913000184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adani, F., van der Lely, H. K. J., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120, 2148–2166. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adelt, A., Stadie, N., Lassotta, R., Adani, F., & Burchert, F. (2017). Feature dissimilarities in the processing of German relative clauses in aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 44, 17–37. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adobe Systems Incorporated. (2012). Adobe Flash Professional CS6.
   Google Scholar
• Allopenna, P. D., Magnuson, J. S., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1998). Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: Evidence for continuous mapping models. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 419–439. doi:10.1006/jmla.1997.2558
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altmann, G. T. M., & Kamide, Y. (2004). Now you see it, now you don’t: Mediating the mapping between language and the visual world. In J. M. Henderson & F. Ferreira (Eds.), The interface of language, vision and action (pp. 347–386). Hove: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arosio, F., Yatsushiro, K., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2012). Morphological information and memory resources in children’s processing of relative clauses in German. Language Learning and Development, 8, 340–364. doi:10.1080/15475441.2011.634691
   Google Scholar
• Bader, M., & Meng, M. (1999). Subject-object ambiguities in German embedded clauses: An across-the-board comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 121–143. doi:10.1023/A:1023206208142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, D. J. (2008). Analyzing ‘visual world’ eyetracking data using multilevel logistic regression. Journal of Memory and Language, 59(4), 457–474. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, E., Friederici, A., & Wulfeck, B. (1987). Comprehension in aphasia: A cross-linguistic study. Brain and Language, 32, 19–67. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(87)90116-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L. (2012). Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122, 1053–1069. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Sonntag, K. (2003). Does morphology make the difference? Agrammatic sentence comprehension in German. Brain and Language, 87, 323–342. doi:10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00132-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burchert, F., Lorenz, A., Schröder, A., De Bleser, R., & Stadie, N. (2011). Sätze verstehen: Neurolinguistische Materialien für die Untersuchung von morphosyntaktischen Satzverständnisstörungen bei Aphasie. Hofheim: NAT-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Burkhardt, P., Avrutin, S., Pin, M. M., & Ruigendijk, E. (2008). Slower-than-normal syntactic processing in agrammatic Broca’s aphasia: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 120–137. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Waters, G., Dede, G., Michaud, J., & Reddy, A. (2007). A study of syntactic processing in aphasia I: Behavioral (psycholinguistic) aspects. Brain and Language, 101, 103–150. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Miceli, G. (1991). Selective impairment of thematic role assignment in sentence processing. Brain and Language, 41, 402–436. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90164-V
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., Choy, J. J., & Thompson, C. K. (2007). Real-time comprehension of wh-movement in aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking while listening. Brain and Language, 100, 1–22. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2006.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickey, M. W., & Thompson, C. K. (2009). Automatic processing of wh- and NP-movement in agrammatic aphasia: Evidence from eyetracking. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 22, 563–583. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.06.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, S., Shapiro, L. P., & Love, T. (2018). Proform-antecedent linking in individuals with agrammatic aphasia: A test of the intervener hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2017.10.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fodor, J. D., & Inoue, A. (2000). Syntactic features in reanalysis: Positive and negative symptoms. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 29, 25–36. doi:10.1023/A:1005168206061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friederici, A. D., Steinhauer, K., Mecklinger, A., & Meyer, M. (1998). Working memory constraints on syntactic ambiguity resolution as revealed by electrical brain responses. Biological Psychology, 47, 193–221. doi:10.1016/S0301-0511(97)00033-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2008). Traceless relatives: Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses with resumptive pronouns. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 138–149. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2006.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Reznick, J., Dolinski-Nuger, D., & Soboleva, K. (2010). Comprehension and production of movement-derived sentences by Russian speakers with agrammatic aphasia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23, 44–65. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2009.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Rizzi, L., & Belletti, A. (2017). No case for case in locality: Case does not help interpretation when intervention blocks A-bar chains. Glossa, 2(1), 33. doi:10.5334/gjgl.165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 177–197. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Blumstein, S. E., Gleason, J. B., Hyde, M. R., Green, E., & Statlender, S. (1979). The effect of syntactic encoding on sentence comprehension in aphasia. Brain and Language, 7, 201–209. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(79)90017-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, P. C., Hendrick, R., & Johnson, M. (2001). Memory interference during language processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1411–1423. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.27.6.1411
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2005). Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension. In S. Blaho, L. Vicente, & E. Schoorlemmer (Eds.), Proceedings of ConSOLE XIII (pp. 107–120). Leiden: Leiden University.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2008). Generalized Minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia ( PhD dissertation distributed by LOT). University of Utrecht, the Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2009). Generalized Minimality: Feature impoverishment and comprehension deficits in agrammatism. Lingua, 119, 1426–1443. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1989). Agrammatic comprehension of relative clauses. Brain and Language, 37, 480–499. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(89)90031-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., Stavrakaki, S., & Arosio, F. (2008). Number and Case in the comprehension of relative clauses: Evidence from Italian and Greek. STiL - Studies in Linguistics, 2, 102–119.
   Google Scholar
• Haegeman, L. (1994). Introduction to government and binding theory (2nd ed.). Blackwell: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Haendler, Y., & Adani, F. (2018). Testing the effect of an arbitrary subject pronoun on relative clause comprehension: A study with Hebrew-speaking children. Journal of Child Language, 45, 959–980. doi:10.1017/S0305000917000599
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haendler, Y., Kliegl, R., & Adani, F. (2015). Discourse accessibility constraints in children’s processing of object relative clauses. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00860
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haider, H. (2010). The syntax of German. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hanne, S., Burchert, F., De Bleser, R., & Vasishth, S. (2015). Sentence comprehension and morphological cues in aphasia: What eye-tracking reveals about integration and prediction. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 34, 83–111. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2014.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanne, S., Sekerina, I. A., Vasishth, S., Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2011). Chance in agrammatic sentence comprehension: What does it really mean? Evidence from eye movements of German agrammatic aphasic patients. Aphasiology, 25, 221–244. doi:10.1080/02687038.2010.489256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heister, J., Würzner, K.-M., Bubenzer, J., Pohl, E., Hanneforth, T., Geyken, A., & Kliegl, R. (2011). dlexDB – Eine lexikalische Datenbank für die psychologische und linguistische Forschung. Psychologische Rundschau, 62, 10–20. doi:10.1026/0033-3042/a000029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener Aphasie Test. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Huettig, F., Rommers, J., & Meyer, A. S. (2011). Using the visual world paradigm to study language processing: A review and critical evaluation. Acta Psychologica, 137, 151–171. doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., Caplan, D., Sandberg, C., Levy, J., Berardino, A., Ascenso, E., … Tripodis, Y. (2012). Development of a theoretically based treatment for sentence comprehension deficits in individuals with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21, S88–S102. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0106)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., & Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82(13). doi:10.18637/jss.v082.i13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Love, T., Swinney, D., Walenski, M., & Zurif, E. (2008). How left inferior frontal cortex participates in syntactic processing: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 107, 203–219. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, W., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2002). The influence of animacy on relative clause processing. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 50–68. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mak, W., Vonk, W., & Schriefers, H. (2006). Animacy in processing relative clauses: The hikers that rocks crush. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 466–490. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2006.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, R. C., & Blossom-Stach, C. (1986). Evidence of syntactic deficits in a fluent aphasic. Brain and Language, 28, 196–234. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(86)90102-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mecklinger, A., Schriefers, H., Steinhauer, K., & Friederici, A. D. (1995). Processing relative clauses varying on syntactic and semantic dimensions: An analysis with event-related potentials. Memory & Cognition, 23, 477–494. doi:10.3758/BF03197249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, M., & Bader, M. (2000). Mode of disambiguation and garden-path strength: An investigation of subject-object ambiguities in German. Language and Speech, 43, 43–74. doi:10.1177/00238309000430010201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nerantzini, M., Papadopoulou, D., & Varlokosta, S. (2014). Testing the relativized minimality approach. Evidence from Wh-question production and comprehension in Greek Aphasia. In N. Lavidas, T. Alexiou, & A.-M. Sougari (Eds.), Major trends in theoretical and applied linguistics (pp. 437–454). London: Versita.
   Google Scholar
• Nerantzini, M., Varlokosta, S., Papadopoulou, D., & Bastiaanse, R. (2014). Wh-questions and relative clauses in Greek agrammatism: Evidence from comprehension and production. Aphasiology, 28, 490–514. doi:10.1080/02687038.2013.870966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozzan, L., & Trueswell, J. C. (2015). Revise and resubmit: How real-time parsing limitations influence grammar acquisition. Cognitive Psychology, 80, 73–108. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.03.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. (2014). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schriefers, H., Friederici, A. D., & Kuhn, K. (1995). The processing of locally ambiguous relative clauses in German. Journal of Memory and Language, 34, 499–520. doi:10.1006/jmla.1995.1023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schröder, A., Gemballa, T., Ruppin, S., & Wartenburger, I. (2012). German norms for semantic typicality, age of acquisition, and concept familiarity. Behavior Research Methods, 44, 380–394. doi:10.3758/s13428-011-0164-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumacher, R., Cazzoli, D., Eggenberger, N., Preisig, B., Nef, T., Nyffeler, T., … Müri, R. M. (2015). Cue recognition and integration: Eye tracking evidence of processing differences in sentence comprehension in aphasia. PloS One, 10(11), e0142853. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0142853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., Fink, R. B., Myers, J. L., & Martin, N. (1994). Mapping therapy: A treatment programme for agrammatism. Aphasiology, 8, 19–54. doi:10.1080/02687039408248639
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism: I. Comprehension. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekerina, I. A., Campanelli, L., & Van Dyke, J. A. (2016). Using the visual world paradigm to study retrieval interference in spoken language comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 873. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00873
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SensoMotoric Instruments GmbH. (2014). SMI Experiment Center.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. M., Walenski, M., Love, T., & Shapiro, L. P. (2015). The auditory comprehension of wh-questions in aphasia: Support for the intervener hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58, 781–797. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0099
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadie, N., Schröder, A., Postler, J., Lorenz, A., Swoboda-Moll, M., Burchert, F., & De Bleser, R. (2008). Unambiguous generalization effects after treatment of non-canonical sentence production in German agrammatism. Brain and Language, 104, 211–229. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.08.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanenhaus, M. K., Spivey-Knowlton, M. J., Eberhard, K. M., & Sedivy, J. C. (1995). Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science, 268, 1632–1634. doi:10.1126/science.7777863
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terzi, A., & Nanousi, V. (2018). Intervention effects in the relative clauses of agrammatics: The role of gender and case. Glossa, 3(1), 17. doi:10.5334/gjgl.274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, C. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (2005). Treating agrammatic aphasia within a linguistic framework: Treatment of underlying forms. Aphasiology, 19, 1021–1036. doi:10.1080/02687030544000227
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Traxler, M. J., Morris, R. K., & Seely, R. E. (2002). Processing subject and object relative clauses: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Memory and Language, 47, 69–90. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trueswell, J. C., Kaufman, D., Hafri, A., & Lidz, J. (2012). Development of parsing abilities interacts with grammar learning: Evidence from Tagalog and Kannada. In A. K. Biller, E. Y. Chung, & A. E. Kimball (Eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Boston University Conference on Language Development (pp. 620–632). Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varlokosta, S., Nerantzini, M., Papadopoulou, D., Bastiaanse, R., & Beretta, A. (2014). Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension: The role of lexical restriction and feature impoverishment. Lingua, 148, 80–94. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2014.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulfeck, B., Bates, E., & Capasso, R. (1991). A crosslinguistic study of grammaticality judgments in Broca’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 41, 311–336. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(91)90158-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar