Syntactic complexity in the presence of an intervener: the case of an Italian speaker with anomia

References

• Adani, F., van der Lely, H. K. J., Forgiarini, M., & Guasti, M. T. (2010). Grammatical feature dissimilarities make relative clauses easier: A comprehension study with Italian children. Lingua, 120, 2148–2166. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.03.018.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnon, I. (2005). Relative clause acquisition in Hebrew: Towards a processing-oriented account. Proceedings of the 29th BUCLD. Boston.
   Google Scholar
• Avrutin, S. (1999). Development of the syntax discourse interface. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & van Zonneveld, R. (1998). On the relation between verb inflection and verb position in Dutch agrammatic aphasics. Brain and Language, 64, 165–181. doi:10.1006/brln.1998.1972.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, A. (2014). Notes on passive object relatives. In P. Svenonius (Ed.), Functional structure from top to toe (pp. 97–114). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., & Contemori, C. (2010). Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian (young) children and adults. Proceedings of Gala 2009. Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., Friedmann, N., Brunato, D., & Rizzi, L. (2012). Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua, 122, 1053–1069. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2012.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., & Guasti, M. T. (2015). The acquisition of Italian. Morphosyntax and its interfaces in different modes of acquisition. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2013). Intervention in grammar and processing. In C. Cecchetto & I. Caponigro (Eds.), From grammar to meaning (pp. 294–311). Cambridge, MA, USA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berndt, S., & Caramazza, A. (1980). A redefinition of the syndrome of Broca’s aphasia: Implications for a neuropsychological model of language. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 225–278. doi:10.1017/S0142716400000552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caloi, I. (2013). The comprehension of relative clauses in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. In E. Servidio (Ed.), STiL - studies in linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 5–22). Siena: CISCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Zurif, E. B. (1976). Dissociation of algorithmic and heuristic processes in language comprehension: Evidence from aphasia. Brain and Language, 3, 572–582. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(76)90048-1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chinellato, P. (2003). The recovery of subject clitics in mild agrammatism: A generative approach to treatment. Rivista Di Grammatica Generativa, 28, 31–44. URL: http://hdl.handle.net/11707/393 and ISSN: 11224428
   Google Scholar
• Collins, C. (2005). A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax, 8, 81–120. doi:10.1111/synt.2005.8.issue-2.
   Google Scholar
• Contemori, C., & Belletti, A. (2014). Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 1021–1053. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Contemori, C., & Garraffa, M. (2010). Comparison of modalities in SLI syntax: A study on the comprehension and production of non-canonical sentences. Lingua, 120, 1940–1955. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2010.02.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, J. R., & Howell, D. C. (1998). Comparing an individual’s test score against norms derived from small samples. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 12, 482–486. doi:10.1076/clin.12.4.482.7241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., & Bayer, J. (1985). German word formation and aphasia. The Linguistic Review, 5, 1–40. doi:10.1515/tlir.1986.5.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J. (2016). Contemporary and emergent theories of agrammatism. London and New York: Routledge, Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durrleman, S., Marinis, T., & Franck, J. (2016). Syntactic complexity in the comprehension of Wh-questions and relative clauses in typical language development and autism. Applied Psycholinguistics, 37, 1501–1527. doi:10.1017/S0142716416000059.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Lassi, G., Frauenfelder, U., & Rizzi, L. (2006). Agreement and movement: A syntactic analysis of attraction. Cognition, 101, 173–216. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.10.003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franck, J., Vigliocco, G., & Nicol, J. L. (2002). Subject-verb agreement errors in French and English: The role of syntactic hierarchy. Journal of Language and Cognitive Processes, 17, 371–404. doi:10.1080/01690960143000254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2001). Agrammatism and the psychological reality of the syntactic tree. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30, 71–90. doi:10.1023/A:1005256224207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2002). Syntactic tree pruning and question production in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 83, 117–120. doi:10.1006/brnl.2001.2587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2005). Degrees of severity and recovery in agrammatism: Climbing up the syntactic tree. Aphasiology, 19, 1037–1051. doi:10.1080/02687030544000236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N. (2006). Speech production in Broca’s agrammatic aphasia: Syntactic tree pruning. In Y. Grodzinsky (Ed.) Broca’s region (pp. 63–82). New York: Oxford University Press. A. K.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (2009). Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua, 119, 67–88. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2004). The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language, 31, 661–681. doi:10.1017/S0305000904006269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., & Novogrodsky, R. (2008). Subtypes of SLI: SySLI, PhoSLI, LeSLI, and PraSLI. In A. Gavarrò & F. M. João (Eds.), Language acquisition and development (pp. 205–217). Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Olenik, D., & Gil, M. (2000). From theory to practice: Treatment of agrammatic production in Hebrew based on the tree pruning hypothesis. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 13, 250–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Rizzi, L., & Belletti, A. (2017). No case for case in locality: Case does not help interpretation when intervention blocks A-bar chains. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics, 2, 33. doi:10.5334/gjgl.165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Szterman, R., & Haddad-Hanna, M. (2010). The comprehension of relative clauses and Wh questions in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic hearing impairment. Proceedings of GALA 2009.  Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, N., Yachini, M., & Szterman, R. (2015). Relatively easy relatives: Children with syntactic SLI avoid intervention. In E. Di Domenico, C. Hamann, & S. Matteini (Eds.), Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today (Vol. 223, pp. 303–320). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M. (2007). Impoverishment of grammatical features in a non-fluent aphasic speaker: The grammatical nature of minimal structures (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Siena, Siena, Italy. .
   Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M. (2008). Minimal structures in aphasia: A study on agreement and movement in a non-fluent aphasic speaker. Lingua, 119, 1444–1457. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2008.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Grillo, N. (2008). Canonicity effects as grammatical phenomena. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 21, 177–197. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2007.09.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garraffa, M., & Learmonth, G. (2013). Sentence comprehension and memory load in Aphasia: The role of resource reduction. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 94, 143–144. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.070.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Berko, J. (1960). Agrammatism and inflectional morphology in English. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 3, 257–267. doi:10.1044/jshr.0303.257.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2005). Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension. ConSOLE XIII, 107–120. Vitoria-Gasteiz.
   Google Scholar
• Grillo, N. (2008). Generalized minimality: Syntactic underspecification in Broca’s aphasia (Doctoral dissertation). Utrecht University, LOT, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Grodzinsky, Y. (1990). Theoretical perspectives on language deficits. Cambridg, London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., & Arosio, F. (2009). Agreement in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Proceedings of XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa. Siena.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., Branchini, C., & Arosio, F. (2012). Interference in the production of Italian subject and object wh-questions. Applied Psycholinguistics, 33, 185–223. doi:10.1017/S0142716411000324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., & Cardinaletti, A. (2003). Relative clause formation in Romance child production. Probus, 15, 47–89. doi:10.1515/prbs.2003.005.
   Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., Papagno, C., Vernice, M., Cecchetto, C., Giuliani, A., & Burdo, S. (2012). The effect of language structure on linguistic strengths and weaknesses in children with cochlear implants: Evidence from Italian. Applied Psycholinguistics, 35, 739-764. doi:10.1017/S0142716412000562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guasti, M. T., & Rizzi, L. (2002). Agreement and tense as distinctive syntactic positions. Evidence from acquisition. In G. Cinque (Ed.), Functional Structure in DP and IP: The cartography of syntactic structures (Vol. 1, pp. 167–194). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hagiwara, H. (1995). The breakdown of functional categories and the economy of derivation. Brain and Language, 50, 92–116. doi:10.1006/brln.1995.1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Avrutin, S. (1996). Comprehension of Wh-Questions in Two Broca’s Aphasics. Brain and Language, 52, 314–327. doi:10.1006/brln.1996.0014.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., Zurif, E., & Canseco-Gonzalez, E. (1993). Structural description of agrammatic comprehension. Brain and Language, 45, 371–395. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1051.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 98, 122–149. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, C.-J. C., & Bever, T. (2006). Chinese is no exception: Universal subject preference of relative clause processing. Proceedings of the 25th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Washington.
   Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (1996). Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Versione Italiana. Firenze, Italia: Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Martini, K. (2015) Effetti di località e complessità grammaticale nel comportamento linguistico di un parlante Italiano afasico (MA Thesis). University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Laudanna, A., Burani, C., & Capasso, R. (1994). Batteria per l’Analisi dei Deficit Afasici. B.A.D.A. Roma, Italia: CEPSAG.
   Google Scholar
• Novogrodsky, R., & Friedmann, N. (2006). The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 8, 364–375. doi:10.1080/14417040600919496.
   Google Scholar
• Riches, N. G., & Garraffa, M. (2017). A discourse account of intervention phenomena: An investigation of interrogatives. Glossa, 2, 74. doi:10.5334/gjgl.100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (1990). Relativized Minimality. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, L. (2004). The structure of CP and IP. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigendijk, E. (2002) Case assignment in agrammatism: A cross-linguistic study (Doctoral dissertation). Groningen University, Groningen, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Ruigendijk, E., & Bastiaanse, R. V. Z. R. (1999). Case assignment in agrammatism. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 42, 962–971. doi:10.1044/jslhr.4204.962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F., Saffran, E. M., & Marin, O. S. M. (1980). The word order problem in agrammatism. Brain and Language, 10, 249–262. doi:10.1016/0093-934X(80)90055-3.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. M., Walenski, M., Love, T., & Shapiro, L. P. (2015). The auditory comprehension of wh-questions in aphasia: Support for the intervener hypothesis. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 58, 781–797. doi:10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0099.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starke, M. (2001). Move Dissolves into Merge (Doctoral Dissertation). University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Terzi, A., & Nanausi, V. (2018). Intervention effects in the relative clauses of agrammatics: The role of gender and case. Glossa, 3(1), 17. doi:10.5334/gjgl.274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volpato, F., & Adani, F. (2009). The subject/object relative clause asymmetry in hearing-impaired children: Evidence from a comprehension task.Proceedings of XXXV Incontro di grammatica generativa. Siena.
   Google Scholar
• Volpato, F., & Vernice, M. (2014). The production of relative clauses by Italian cochlear-implanted and hearing children. Lingua, 139, 39–67. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2013.10.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zingeser, L. B., & Berndt, R. S. (1990). Retrieval of nouns and verbs in agrammatism and anomia. Brain and Language, 39, 14–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zurif, E. B., Swinney, D., Prather, P., Solomon, J., & Bushell, C. (1993). An on-line analysis of syntactic processing in Broca’s and Wernike’s aphasia. Brain and Language, 45, 448–456. doi:10.1006/brln.1993.1054.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar