Repeated attempts, phonetic errors, and syllabifications in a case study:Evidence of impaired transfer from phonology to articulatory planning

References

• Aichert, I., & Ziegler, W. (2004). Segmental and metrical encoding in aphasia: Two case reports. Aphasiology, 18(12), 1201–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030444000516
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ardila, A., Montanes, P., Caro, C., Delgado, R., & Buckingham, H. (1989). Phonological transformations in Spanish speaking aphasics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 18(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01067780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baayen, R., Piepenbrock, R., & Rijn, H. (1993). The CELEX lexical data base on CD-ROM
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D. J., Blomgren, M., DeLong, C., Berggren, K., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2017). Quantification and systematic characterization of stuttering-like disfluencies in acquired Apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basilakos, A., Rorden, C., Bonilha, L., Moser, D., & Fridriksson, J. (2015). Patterns of poststroke brain damage that predict speech production errors in apraxia of speech and aphasia dissociate. Stroke, 46(6), 1561–1566. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum, S. (1992). The influence of word-length on syllable duration in Aphasia—Acoustic analyses. Aphasiology, 6(5), 501–513. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039208249487
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A. (2009). Minimizing and optimizing structure in phonology: Evidence from aphasia. Lingua, 119(10), 1380–1395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.11.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buchwald, A., & Miozzo, M. (2011). Finding levels of abstraction in speech production: Evidence from sound-production impairment. Psychological Science, 22(9), 1113–1119. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611417723
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, G. J., Trost, J. E., & Burns, M. S. (1985). Contrasting speech patterns in apraxia of speech and phonemic paraphasia. Brain and Language, 24(2), 204–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(85)90131-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caplan, D., Vanier, M., & Baker, C. (1986). A case study of reproduction conduction aphasia I: Word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3(1), 99–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298608252671
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., & Villa, G. (1986). The role of the (output) phonological buffer in reading, writing, and repetition. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 3(1), 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643298608252669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cholin, J. (2008). The mental syllabary in speech production: An integration of different approaches and domains. Aphasiology, 22(11), 1127–1141. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701820352
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christman, S. S., Boutsen, F. R., & Buckingham, H. W. (2004). Perseveration and other repetitive verbal behaviors: Functional dissociations. Seminars in Speech and Language, 25(4), 295–307. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-837243
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Code, C. (1998). Models, theories and heuristics in apraxia of speech. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 12(1), 47–65. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209808985212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C., Ball, M., Tree, J., & Dawe, K. (2013). The effects of initiation, termination and inhibition impairments on speech rate in a case of progressive nonfluent aphasia with progressive apraxia of speech with frontotemporal degeneration. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 26(6), 602–618. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C., Tree, J., & Ball, M. (2011). The influence of psycholinguistic variables on articulatory errors in naming in progressive motor speech degeneration. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 25(11–12), 1074–1080. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2011.601390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Croot, K., Lalas, G., Biedermann, B., Rastle, K., Jones, K., & Cholin, J. (2017). Syllable frequency effects in immediate but not delayed syllable naming in English. Language Cognition and Neuroscience, 32(9), 1119–1132. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1284340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K. T., Haley, K. L., & Jacks, A. (2016). Speech sound distortions in aphasia and apraxia of speech: Reliability and diagnostic significance. Aphasiology, 30(4), 396–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1065470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabul, B. (2000). Apraxia battery for adults (2nd ed.). Pro-Ed Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Darley, F. L. (1968). Apraxia of speech: 107 years of terminological confusions. The American Speech & Hearing Association Convention.
   Google Scholar
• Deal, J., & Darley, F. (1972). Influence of linguistic and situational variables on phonemic accuracy in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 15(3), 639. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1503.639
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Juliano, C., & Govindjee, A. (1993). Structure and content in language production—A theory of frame constraints in phonological speech errors. Cognitive Science, 17(2), 149–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(93)90010-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dell, G. S., Schwartz, M. F., Nozari, N., Faseyitan, O., & Coslett, H. B. (2013). Voxel-based lesion-parameter mapping: Identifying the neural correlates of a computational model of word production. Cognition, 128(3), 380–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.05.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D. B., & Bastiaanse, R. .(2003). Syllable structure at different levels in the speech production process: Evidence from Aphasia. In J. Van De Weijer, V. J. Van Heuven, & H. Van Der Hulst (Eds.), The phonological spectrum. Vol. II: Suprasegmental structure Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 234. (pp. 81–107). John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D.-B. (2002). Segmental vs syllable markedness: Deletion errors in the paraphasias of fluent and non-fluent aphasics. In E. Fava (Ed.), Current issues in linguistic theory (Vol. 227, pp. 23–45). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/cilt.227.05oud
   Google Scholar
• Den Ouden, D.-B., Galkina, E., Basilakos, A., & Fridriksson, J. (2018). Vowel formant dispersion reflects severity of apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 32(8), 902–921. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2017.1385050
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R. (2005). Motor speech disorders: Substrates, differential diagnosis, and management (2nd ed.). Elsevier Mosby.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R., Utianski, R. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2020). Primary progressive apraxia of speech: From recognition to diagnosis and care. Aphasiology, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1787732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, S., Buerk, F., & Howard, D. (2002). Generalised improvement in speech production for a subject with reproduction conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 16(10–11), 1087–1114. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030244000491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., Guariglia, C., & Romani, C. (2015). Phonological simplifications, apraxia of speech and the interaction between phonological and phonetic processing. Neuropsychologia, 71(5), 64–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gandour, J., Akamanon, C., Dechongkit, S., Khunadorn, F., & Boonklam, R. (1994). Sequences of honemic approximations in a Thai conduction aphasic. Brain and Language, 46(1), 69–95. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1994.1005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glasspool, D. W., Shallice, T., & Cipolotti, L. (2006). Towards a unified process model for graphemic buffer disorder and deep dysgraphia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 23(3), 479–512. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290500265109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Blumstein, S. E. (2006). Cascading activation from phonological planning to articulatory processes: Evidence from tongue twisters. Language and Cognitive Processes, 21(6), 649–683. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960500181332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldrick, M., & Rapp, B. (2007). Lexical and post-lexical phonological representations in spoken production. Cognition, 102(2), 219–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2005.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guenther, F. H. (2015). Neural control of speech. The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., De Riesthal, M., Abou-Khalil, R., & Roth, H. L. (2012). Toward a quantitative basis for assessment and diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1502–S1517. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0318)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haley, K. L., Jacks, A., Richardson, J. D., & Wambaugh, J. L. (2017). Perceptually salient sound distortions and Apraxia of speech: A performance continuum. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, T. G., Jacks, A., & Haley, K. L. (2019). Speech fluency in acquired apraxia of speech during narrative discourse: Group comparisons and dual-task effects. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(2), 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-MSC18-18-0107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2004). Dorsal and ventral streams: A framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92(1–2), 67–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2003.10.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickok, G., & Poeppel, D. (2007). Opinion—The cortical organization of speech processing. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(5), 393–402. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton, G. (1990). The problem of serial order: A neural network model of sequence learning and recall. In R. Dale, C. Mellish, & M. Zock (Eds.), Current Research in Natural Language Generation (pp.287-319). London: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton, G. (2018). Action and perception in literacy: A common-code for spelling and reading. Psychological Review,125(1), 83–116. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000084
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacks, A., & Haley, K. L. (2015). Auditory masking effects on speech fluency in apraxia of speech and aphasia: Comparison to altered auditory feedback. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(6), 1670–1686. https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_JSLHR-S-14-0277
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joanette, Y., Keller, E., & Lecours, A. R. (1980). Sequences of phonemic approximations in aphasia. Brain and Language, 11(1), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934x(80)90107-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johns, D., & Darley, F. (1970). Phonemic variability in apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 13(3), 556. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.1303.556
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kawamoto, A. H., Kello, C. T., Higareda, I., & Vu, J. V. Q. (1999). Parallel processing and initial phoneme criterion in naming words: Evidence from frequency effects on onset and rime duration. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Learning Memory and Cognition, 25(2), 362–381. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.362
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1996). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia (PALPA): An introduction. Aphasiology, 10(2), 159–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039608248403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelso, J. A., Tuller, B., Vatikiotis-Bateson, E., & Fowler, C. A. (1984). Functionally specific articulatory cooperation following jaw perturbations during speech: Evidence for coordinative structures. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Human Perception and Performance,10(6), 812–832. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096–1523.10.6.812
   Google Scholar
• Kent, R. D. (1983). The segmental organization of speech. In P. MacNeilage (Ed.), The production of speech (pp. 57–89). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Klapp, S. T. (2003). Reaction time analysis of two types of motor preparation for speech articulation: Action as a sequence of chunks. Journal of Motor Behavior, 35(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222890309602129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohler, K., Bartels, C., Herrmann, M., Dittmann, J., & Wallesch, C. W. (1998). Conduction aphasia—11 classic cases. Aphasiology, 12(10), 865–884. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E. (1984). The nature of the phonological disorder in conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 23(1), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(84)90009-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E. (1989). The nature of the phonemic string deficit in conduction aphasia. Aphasiology, 3(3), 209–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038908248992
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1994). Distinctions between 2 phonological output deficits. Applied Psycholinguistics, 15(1), 75–95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400006986
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohn, S. E., & Smith, K. L. (1995). Serial effects of phonemic planning during word production. Aphasiology, 9(3), 209–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039508248196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laganaro, M. (2012). Patterns of impairments in AOS and mechanisms of interaction between phonological and phonetic encoding. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 55(5), S1535-43. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0316)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior (pp. 112–131). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Lecours, A., & Lhermitte, F. (1976). Pure form of phonetic disintegration syndrome (pure Anarthria)—Anatomo—Clinical report of a historical case. Brain and Language, 3(1), 88–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(76)90008-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38. discussion 38–75 https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X99001776
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liss, J. M. (1998). Error-revision in the spontaneous speech of apraxic speakers. Brain and Language, 62(3), 342–360. https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.1997.1907
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., & Mailend, M.-L. (2012). Speech planning happens before speech execution: Online reaction time methods in the study of apraxia of speech. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research,55(5), S1523-34. https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2012/11-0311)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas, E., Mailend, M.-L., & Guenther, F. H. (2015). Feedforward and feedback control in Apraxia of speech: Effects of noise masking on vowel production. Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research, 58(2), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-13-0300
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackay, D. (1982). The problems of flexibility, fluency, and speed-accuracy trade-off in skilled behavior. Psychological Review, 89(5), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.89.5.483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mailend, M.-L., Maas, E., Beeson, P. M., Story, B. H., & Forster, K. I. (2019). Speech motor planning in the context of phonetically similar words: Evidence from apraxia of speech and aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 127(4), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.02.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, R., & Tompkins, C. (1982). Verbal self-correction behaviors of fluent and non-fluent aphasic subjects. Brain and Language, 15(2), 292–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(82)90061-X
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M., Liss, J. M., Tseng, C. H., & Kent, R. D. (1990). Effects of speech rate on the absolute and relative timing of apraxic and conduction aphasic sentence production. Brain and Language, 38(1), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90106-Q
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Odell, K. H., Miller, S. B., & Hunter, L. (1995). Consistency, variability, and target approximation for successive speech repetitions among apraxic, conduction aphasic, and ataxic dysarthric speakers. In M. L. Lemme (Ed.), Clinical aphasiology, vol 23 (pp. 39–55). Pro-Ed Inc.
   Google Scholar
• McNeil, M. R., Ballard, K. J., Duffy, J. R., & Wambaugh, J. (2016). Apraxia of speech theory, assessment, differential diagnosis, and treatment: Past, present, and future. In P. van Lieshout, B. Maassen, & H. Terband (Eds.), Speech Motor Control in Normal and Disordered Speech: Future Developments in Theory and Methodology (pp. 195–221). Rockville, MD: ASHA Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, A. S. (1991). The time course of phonological encoding in language production—Phonological encoding inside a syllable. Journal of Memory and Language, 30(1), 69–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(91)90011-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. E., & Guenther, F. H. (2020). Modelling speech motor programming and apraxia of speech in the DIVA/GODIVA neurocomputational framework. Aphasiology, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molloy, J., & Jagoe, C. (2019). Use of diverse diagnostic criteria for acquired apraxia of speech: A scoping review. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 54(6), 875–893. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12494
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nespoulous, J.-L., Joanette, Y., Béland, R., Caplan, D., & Lecours, A. R. (1984). Phonologic disturbances in aphasia: Is there a ‘markedness effect’ in aphasic phonetic errors? Advances in Neurology, 42, 203-14. PMID: 6209957
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nespoulous, J.-L., Joanette, Y., Ska, B., Caplan, D., & Lecours, A. (1987). Production deficits in Broca’s and conduction aphasia: Repetition vs. reading.
   Google Scholar
• Odell, K., Mcneil, M., Rosenbek, J., & Hunter, L. (1990). Perceptual characteristics of consonant production by Apraxic Speakers. The Journal of speech and hearing disorders, 55, 345–59. doi:10.1044/jshd.5502.345
   Google Scholar
• Ogar, J., Slama, H., Dronkers, N., Amici, S., & Luisa Gorno-Tempini, M. (2005). Apraxia of speech: An overview. Neurocase, 11(6), 427–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790500263529
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, A., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (2010). Analysis and interpretation of serial position data. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(2), 134–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2010.504580
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Postma, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77(2), 97–132. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00090-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripamonti, E., Frustaci, M., Zonca, G., Aggujaro, S., Molteni, F., & Luzzatti, C. (2018). Disentangling phonological and articulatory processing: A neuroanatomical study in aphasia. Neuropsychologia,121(12), 175–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1996). Serial order in planning the production of successive morphemes of a word. Journal of Memory and Language, 35(6), 854–876. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.1996.0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, A. (1997). The WEAVER model of word-form encoding in speech production. Cognition, 64(3), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(97)00027-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M. A., & Storkel, H. L. (1999). Planning speech one syllable at a time: The reduced buffer capacity hypothesis in apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 13(9–11), 793–805. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., & Galluzzi, C. (2005). Effects of syllabic complexity in predicting accuracy of repetition and direction of errors in patients with articulatory and phonological difficulties. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(7), 817–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000365
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., Bureca, I., & Olson, A. (2011). Effects of syllable structure in aphasic errors: Implications for a new model of speech production. Cognitive Psychology, 62(2), 151–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galluzzi, C., & Olson, A. (2011b). Phonological-lexical activation: A lexical component or an output buffer? Evidence from aphasic errors. Cortex, 47(2), 217–235. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cortex.2009.11.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Galuzzi, C., Guariglia, C., & Goslin, J. (2017). Comparing phoneme frequency, age of acquisition, and loss in aphasia: Implications for phonological universals. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 34(7–8), 449–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643294.2017.1369942
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Olson, A., Semenza, C., & Granà, A. (2002). Patterns of phonological errors as a function of a phonological versus an articulatory locus of impairment. Cortex, 38(4), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70022-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romani, C., Silverstein, P., Ramoo, D., & Olson, A. (in preparation). Effects of length, frequency and preparation on onset RTs and word durations: Articulation cannot be buffered and prepared.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbek, J. C., Kent, R. D., & LaPointe, L. L. (1984). Apraxia of speech: An overview and some perspectives. In M. R. Rosenbek, M. R. McNeil, & A. E. Aronson (Eds.), Apraxia of speech: Physiology, acoustics, linguistics, management (pp. 1–72). College-Hill Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sakai, Y., Nakamura, T., Sakurai, A., Yamaguchi, H., & Hirai, S. (2000). Right frontal areas 6 and 8 are associated with simultanapraxia, a subset of motor impersistence. Neurology, 54(2), 522–524. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.54.2.522
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltzman, E., & Kelso, J. A. (1987). Skilled actions: A task-dynamic approach. Psychological Review, 94(1), 84–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.84
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiller, N. O., Greenhall, J. A., Shelton, J. R., & Caramazza, A. (2001). Serial order effects in spelling errors: Evidence from two dysgraphic patients. Neurocase, 7(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1093/neucas/7.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., Rumiati, R. I., & Zadini, A. (2000). The selective impairment of the phonological output buffer. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 17(6), 517–546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290050110638
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shallice, T., & Warrington, E. K. (1977). Auditory-verbal short-term memory impairment and conduction aphasia. Brain and Language, 4(4), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(77)90040-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staiger, A., & Ziegler, W. (2008). Syllable frequency and syllable structure in the spontaneous speech production of patients with apraxia of speech. Aphasiology, 22(11), 1201–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701820584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2013). A dynamical model of hierarchical selection and coordination in speech planning. PLoS One, 8(4), e62800. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062800
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilsen, S. (2016). Selection and coordination: The articulatory basis for the emergence of phonological structure. Journal of Phonetics, 55, 53–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trost, J. E. (1970). A descriptive study of verbal apraxia in patients with Broca’s aphasia [ Doctoral dissertation]. Northwestern University.
   Google Scholar
• Utianski, R. L., Duffy, J. R., Clark, H. M., Strand, E. A., Botha, H., Schwarz, C. G., Machulda, M. M., Senjem, M. L., Spychalla, A. J., Jack, C. R., Petersen, R. C., Lowe, V. J., Whitwell, J. L., & Josephs, K. A. (2018). Prosodic and phonetic subtypes of primary progressive apraxia of speech. Brain and Language, 184(9), 54–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2018.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdois, S., Joanette, Y., & Nespoulous, J. (1989). Intrinsic organization of sequences of phonemic approximations—A preliminary-study. Aphasiology, 3(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038908248976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Merwe, A. (2020). New perspectives on speech motor planning and programming in the context of the four-level model and its implications for understanding the pathophysiology underlying apraxia of speech and other motor speech disorders. Aphasiology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varley, R., & Whiteside, S. P. (2001). What is the underlying impairment in acquired apraxia of speech? Aphasiology, 15(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040042000115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wambaugh, J., Shuster, L., Bailey, D. J., Mauszycki, S., Kean, J., Nessler, C., Wright, S., & Brunsvold, J. (2016). Self-judgments of word production accuracy in acquired Apraxia of speech. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 25(4S), S716–S728. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, J., & Romani, C. (1998). Serial position effects and lexical activation in spelling: Evidence from a single case study. Neurocase, 4(3), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13554799808410621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E. (1999). The ‘tongue twister’ paradigm as a technique for studying phonological encoding. Language and Speech, 42(1), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/00238309990420010301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilshire, C. E. (2002). Where do aphasic phonological errors come from? Evidence from phoneme movement errors in picture naming. Aphasiology, 16(1–2), 169–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, W. (2009). Modelling the architecture of phonetic plans: Evidence from apraxia of speech. Language and Cognitive Processes, 24(5), 631–661. https://doi.org/10.1080/01690960802327989
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar