5,520
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Creating a novel approach to discourse treatment through coproduction with people with aphasia and speech and language therapists

ORCID Icon, , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon show all
Pages 1159-1181 | Received 05 Dec 2020, Accepted 10 Jun 2021, Published online: 03 Jul 2021

References

  • Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofia-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., & Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002
  • Boyle, M. (2010). Semantic feature analysis treatment for aphasic word retrieval impairments: What’s in a name? Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 17(6), 411–422. https://doi.org/10.1310/tsr1706-411
  • Boyle, M. (2014). Test-retest stability of word retrieval in aphasic discourse. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 57(3), 966–978. https://doi.org/10.1044/2014_JSLHR-L-13-0171
  • Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., & Suleman, R. (2012). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: A systematic review. Health Expectations, 17(5), 637–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x
  • Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
  • Bryant, L., Spencer, E., & Ferguson, A. (2017). Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(10), 1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1239013
  • Charalambous, M., Kambanaros, M., & Annoni, J.-M. (2020). Are people with aphasia (PWA) involved in the creation of quality of life and aphasia impact-related questionnaires? A scoping review. Brain Sciences, 10(10), 688. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci10100688
  • Cook, T., Boote, J., Buckley, N., Vougioukalou, S., & Wright, M. (2017). Accessing participatory research impact and legacy: Developing the evidence base for participatory approaches in health research. Educational Action Research, 25(4), 472–488. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2017.1326964
  • Craig, P., Dieppe, P., Macintyre, S., Michie, S., Nazareth, I., & Petticrew, M. (2008). Developing and evaluation complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ, 337, a1655 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.a1655
  • Cruice, M., Botting, N., Marshall, J., Marshall, J., Hersh, D., Pritchard, M., & Dipper, L. (2020). UK speech and language therapists’ views and reported practices of discourse analysis in aphasia rehabilitation. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 55(3), 417–442. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12528
  • Dimopoulos-Bick, T., Dawda, P., Maher, L., Verma, R., & Palmer, V. (2018). Experience-Based Co-Design: Tackling common challenges. Journal of Health Design, 3(1), 86–93. https://doi.org/10.21853/JHD.2018.46
  • Dipper, L., & Cruice, M. (2018). Personal storytelling in aphasia: A single case study of LUNA therapy [abstract]. Aphasiology, 32(suppl.1), 60–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1487919
  • Dipper, L., Marshall, J., Boyle, M., Botting, N., Hersh, D., Pritchard, M., & Cruice, M. (2020). Treatment for improving discourse in aphasia: A systematic review and synthesis of the evidence base. Aphasiology, 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1765305
  • Dipper, L., Marshall, J., Boyle, M., Hersh, D., Hersh, D., & Cruice, M. (2021). Creating a theoretical framework to underpin discourse assessment and intervention in aphasia. Brain Sciences, 11(2), 183. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11020183
  • Graham, I. D., Logan, J., Harrison, M. B., Straus, S. E., Tetroe, J., Caswell, W., & Robinson, N. (2006). Lost in knowledge translation: Time for a map? The Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions, 26(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/chp.47
  • Health Research Authority/INVOLVE. (2016). Public involvement in research and research ethics committee review. https://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/HRA-INVOLVE-updated-statement-2016.pdf
  • Herbert, D., Patrice Lindsay, M., McIntyre, A., Kirton, A., Rumney, P., Bagg, S., Bayley, M., Dowlatshahi, D., Dukelow, S., Garnhum, M., Glasser, E., Halabi, M.-L., Kang, E., MacKay-Lyons, M., Martino, R., Rochette, A., Rowe, S., Salbach, N., Semenko, B., & Teasell, R. (2016). Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. International Journal of Stroke, 11(4), 459–484. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493016643553
  • Herbert, R., Gregory, E., & Haw, C. (2019). Collaborative design of accessible information with people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 33(12), 1504–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1546822
  • Hersh, D., Israel, M., & Shiggins, C. (2021). The ethics of patient and public involvement across the research process: Towards partnership with people with aphasia. Aphasiology, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1896870
  • Hersh, D., Worrall, L., Howe, T., Sherratt, S., & Davidson, B. (2012). SMARTER goal setting in aphasia rehabilitation. Aphasiology, 26/2(2), 220–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.640392
  • Howe, A., Mathie, E., Munday, D., Cowe, M., Goodmanm, C., Keenan, J., Kendall, S., Poland, F., Staniszewska, S., & Wilson, P. (2017). Learning to work together – lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement. Research Involvement and Engagement, 3(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x
  • Isaksen, J., Shiggins, C., Olsen, A. M., Coath, C., & Mc Menamin, R. (in press). Involvement of people with aphasia in research: A scoping review. Aphasiology.
  • Kagan, A., Simmons-Mackie, N., Gibson, J. B., Conklin, J., & Elman, R. J. (2010). Closing the evidence, research, and practice loop: Examples of knowledge transfer and exchange from the field of aphasia. Aphasiology, 24(4), 535–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902935959
  • Lawton, M., Haddock, G., Conroy, P., Serrant, L., & Sage, K. (2018). People with aphasia’s perception of the therapeutic alliance in aphasia rehabilitation post stroke: A thematic analysis. Aphasiology, 32(12), 1397–1417. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1441365
  • Mc Menamin, R., Griffin, M., Gryzbowska, B., & Pound, C. (in press). Working together: Experiences of people with aphasia as co-researchers in participatory health research studies. Aphasiology. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2021.1923948
  • Mc Menamin, R., Tierney, E., & MacFarlane, A. (2015). Who decides what criteria are important to consider in exploring the outcomes of conversation approaches? A participatory health research study. Aphasiology, 29(8), 914–938. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1006564
  • Neate, T., Bourazeri, K., Roper, A., Stumpf, S., & Wilson, S. (2019). Co-created personas: Engaging and empowering users with diverse needs within the design process. CHI 2019 Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 650). New York, USA.
  • O’Cathain, A., Croot, L., Sworn, K., Duncan, E., Rousseau, N., Turner, K., Yardley, L., & Hoddinott, P. (2019). Taxonomy of approaches to development interventions to improve health: A systematic methods overview. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 5(41), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-019-0425-6
  • O’Malley, M.-P. (2019). Discourse. In J. S. Damico & M. J. Ball (Eds.), Encyclopaedia of human communication sciences and disorders,606–608. SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483380810.n201
  • Phipps, D., Cummings, J., Pepler, D., Craig, W., & Cardinal, S. (2016). The co-produced pathway to impact describes knowledge mobilization processes. Journal of Community Engagement and Scholarship, 91(1), 31–40. https://digitalcommons.northgeorgia.edu/jces/vol9/iss1/5/
  • Power, E., Thomas, E., Worrall, L., Rose, M., Togher, L., Nickels, L., Hersh, D., Godecke, E., O’Halloran, R., Lamont, S., O’Conner, C., & Clark, K. (2015). The development and validation of Australian aphasia rehabilitation Best Practice Statements using the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method. BMJOpen, 5, e007641. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007641
  • Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2017). Reviewing the quality of discourse information measures in aphasia. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 52(6), 689–732. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12318
  • Pritchard, M., Hilari, K., Cocks, N., & Dipper, L. (2018). Psychometric properties of discourse measures in aphasia: Acceptability, reliability, and validity. International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 53(6), 1078–1093. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12420
  • Rose, M., Ferguson, A., Power, E., Togher, L., & Worrall, L. (2014). Aphasia rehabilitation in Australia: Current practices, challenges and future directions. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(2), 169–180. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2013.794474
  • Schanberg, L. E., & Mullins, C. D. (2019). If patients are the true north, patient-centeredness should guide research. Nature Reviews. Rheumatology, 15(1), 5–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41584-018-0129-y
  • Simmons‐Mackie, N., Threats, T., & Kagan, A. (2005). Outcome assessment in aphasia: A survey. Journal of Communication Disorders, 38(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.007
  • Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Simera, I., Seers, K., Mockford, C., Goodlad, S., Altman, D., Moher, D., Barber, R., Denegri, S., Entwhistle, A., Littlejohns, P., Morriss, C., Suleman, R., Thomas, V., & Tysall, C. (2017). GRIPP2 reporting checklists: Tools to improve reporting of patient and public involvement in research. BMJ, 358, j3453. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.j3453
  • Stroke Association (2012). Accessible information guidelines. making information accessible for people with aphasia. https://www.stroke.org.uk/shop/product/accessible-information-guidelines.
  • Swinburn, K., Best, W., Cruice, M., Smith, L., Pearce Willis, E., Ledingham, K., Sweeney, J., & McVicker, S. (2019). A concise patient reported outcome measure for people with aphasia: The aphasia impact questionnaire 21. Aphasiology, 33(9), 1035–1060. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1517406
  • Verna, A., Davidson, B., & Rose, T. (2009). Speech‐language pathology services for people with aphasia: A survey of current practice in Australia. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(3), 191–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549500902726059
  • Wallace, S., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Cruice, M., Isaksen, J., Kong, A., Simmons Mackie, N., Scarinci, N., & Gauvreau, C. (2017a). Which outcomes are most important to people with aphasia and their families? An international nominal group technique study framed within the ICF. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(14), 1364–1379. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2016.1194899
  • Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., & Le Dorze, G. (2017b). Which treatment outcomes are most important to aphasia clinicians and managers? An international e-Delphi consensus study. Aphasiology, 31(6), 643–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1186265
  • Webster, J., Whitworth, A., & Morris, J. (2015). Is it time to stop “fishing”? A review of generalisation following aphasia intervention. Aphasiology, 29(11), 1240–1264. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1027169
  • Wilson, S., Roper, A., Marshall, J., Galliers, J. R., Devane, N., Booth, T., & Woolf, C. (2015). Codesign for people with aphasia through tangible design languages. CoDesign, 11(1), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15710882.2014.997744
  • Worrall, L., Sherratt, S., Rogers, P., Howe, T., Hersh, D., Ferguson, A., & Davidson, B. (2011). What people with aphasia want: Their goals according to the ICF. Aphasiology, 25(3), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.508530
  • Yardley, L., Ainsworth, B., Arden-Close, E., & Muller, I. (2015). The person-based approach to enhancing the acceptability and feasibility of interventions. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 1(37). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-015-0033-z