Update on the psychometric properties for the Italian version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (IT-AAT)

References

• Basso, A. (1967). Studio neuropsicologico di alcune forme ‘dissociate’ di afasia. Unpublished dissertation, Universita‘ Cattolica di Milano.
   Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Bracchi, M., Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., & Zanobio, M. E. (1987). Age and evolution of language area functions. A study on adult stroke patients. Cortex, 23(3), 475–483.https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(87)80008-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Capitani, E., Laiacona, M., & Luzzatti, C. (1980). Factors influencing type and severity of aphasia. Cortex, 16(4), 631–636. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(80)80011-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basso, A., Capitani, E., Luzzatti, C., & Spinnler, H. (1981). lntelligence and left hemisphere disease: The role of aphasia, apraxia and size of lesion. Brain, 104(4), 721–734. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/104.4.721
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canter, D. (ed.). (1985). Facet theory: Approaches to social research. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A. (1986). On drawing inferences about the structure of normal cognitive systems from the analysis of impaired performances: The case for single cases studies. Brain and Cognition, 5(1), 45–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0278-2626(86)90061-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, C., Crockett, D. J., & Klonoff, H. (1979). Factor analysis of the porch index of communication ability. Brain and Language, 7(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(79)90001-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code, C., Torney, A., Gildea-Howardine, E., & Willmes, K. (2010). Outcome of a one-month therapy intensive for chronic aphasia: Variable individual responses. Seminars in Speech and Language, 31(1), 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1244950
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Crocker, L., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
   Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Denes, G., Luzzatti, C., Mazzucchi, A., Poeck, K., Spinnler, H., & Willmes, K. (1986). L’ Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). I. Problemi e soluzioni per una versione italiana del test e per uno studio crosslinguistico dei disturbi afasici. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 47 (2) , 209–237.
   Google Scholar
• De Bleser, R., Willmes, K., Graetz, P., & Hagoort, P. (1991). De akense afasie test (2): Psychometrische aspecten van de Nederlandstalige versie. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63 (5) , 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• De Renzi, E., & Faglioni, P. (1978). Normative data and screening power of a shortened version of the token test. Cortex, 14(1), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-9452(78)80006-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El Hachioui, H., Visch-Brink, E. G., de Lau, L. M. L., van de Sandt-koenderman, M. W. M. E., Nouwens, F., Koudstaal, P. J., & Dippel, D. W. J. (2017). Screening tests for aphasia in patients with stroke: A systematic review. Journal of Neurology, 264(2), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-016-8170-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Urban, S. (2016). Age and aphasia: A review of presence, type, recovery and clinical outcomes. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 23(6), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749357.2016.1150412
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fyndanis, V., Lind, M., Varlokosta, S., Kambanaros, M., Soroli, E., & Howard, D. (2017). Cross-linguistic adaptations of the comprehensive aphasia test: Challenges and solutions. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 31(7–9), 697–710. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699206.2017.1310299
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godefroy, O., Dubois, C., Debachy, B., Leclerc, M., & Kreisler, A. (2002). Vascular aphasias main characteristics of patients hospitalized in acute stroke units. Stroke, 33(3), 702–705. https://doi.org/10.1161/hs0302.103653
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Fernández, M., Davis, C., Molitoris, J. J., Newhart, M., Leigh, Hillis, A. E., & Leigh, R. (2011). Formal education, socioeconomic status, and the severity of aphasia after stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 92(11), 1809–1813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.026
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Kaplan, E. (1983). The assessment of aphasia and related disorders, 2nd edition. Lea & Febiger.
   Google Scholar
• Graetz, P., De Bleser, R., Willmes, K., & Heeschen, C. (1991). De akense afasie test (1): Constructie van de Nederlandstalige versie van de AAT. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63(3), 58–68.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(6), 930–944. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164406288165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartigan, J. A. (1975). Clustering algorithms. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, H. P. (1973). Psychometrische Einzelfalldiagnastik. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Willmes, K. (1983). Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, W., Poeck, K., & Willmes, K. (1984). The aachen aphasia test. In F. Clifford-Rose (Ed.), Advances in neurology (Vol. 42, pp. 291–303). Raven Press. Progress in Aphasiology
   Google Scholar
• The jamovi project (2021). jamovi (version 1.6) [Computer software]. https://www.jamovi.org
   Google Scholar
• JASP Team (2020). JASP (Version 0.14.1) [Computer software] https://jasp-stats.org
   Google Scholar
• Kasselimis, D. S., Simos, P. G., Peppas, C., Evdokimidis, I., & Potagas, C. (2017). The unbridged gap between clinical diagnosis and contemporary research on aphasia: A short discussion on the validity and clinical utility of taxonomic categories. Brain and Language, 164, 63–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.10.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelter, R. (2020). Analysis of Bayesian posterior significance and effect size indices for the two-sample t-test to support reproducible medical research. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-00968-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krippendorff, K. (1970). Estimating the reliability, systematic error and random error of interval data. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(1), 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447003000105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhard, W., & Lenhard, A. (2014). Hypothesis tests for comparing correlations. Psychometrica. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.1.2954.1367
   Google Scholar
• Lord, F. M., & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., Bisiacchi, P., De Bleser, R., Faglia, L., Mazzucchi, A., Posteraro, L., & Taricco, M. (1987). L’Aachener Aphasie Test (A.A.T.) · Il: Proprietà Psicometriche della versione italiana. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 48 (4) , 480–519.
   Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (1996). Aachener Aphasie Test: Versione Italiana (Seconda edizione). Organizzazioni Speciali.
   Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Willmes, K., De Bleser, R., Bianchi, A., Chiesa, G., De Tanti, A., Gonella, M. L., Lorenzi, L., & Pozzoli, C. (1994). Nuovi dati normativi per la versione italiana dell’Aachener Aphasie Test (AAT). Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 55 (6) , 1086–1131.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardsen, J. (1969). The natural history of acute cerebrovascular disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 45 Suppl. 38 , 9–181.
   Google Scholar
• Marquardsen, J. (1978). The epidemiology of cerebrovascular disease. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, 67 (Suppl) , 57–75.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, J. C. (1986). The description and interpretation of aphasic language disorders. Neuropsychologia, 24(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/0028-3932(86)90040-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P. (1970). The theoretical foundations of principal factor analysis, canonical factor analysis, and alpha factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 23(1), 1–21.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1970.tb00432.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McManus, I. C. (2012). The misinterpretation of the standard error of measurement in medical education: A primer on the problems, pitfalls and peculiarities of the three different standard errors of measurement. Medical Teacher, 34(7), 569–576. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.670318
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, N., Willmes, K., & De Bleser, R. (2000). The psychometric properties of the English language version of the Aachen Aphasia Test (EAAT). Aphasiology, 14(7), 683–722. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870300410946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink, L. B., Boers, M., van der Vleuten, C. P. M., Bouter, L. M., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., de Vet, H. C. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2020). COSMIN risk of bias tool to assess the quality of studies on reliability or measurement error of outcome measurement instruments: A delphi study. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 20(1), 293. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-020-01179-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nunnari, D., Bramanti, P., & Marino, S. (2014). Cognitive reserve in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. Neurological Sciences, 35(10), 1513–1518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-014-1897-z.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obler, L. K., Albert, M. L., Goodglass, H., & Benson, D. F. (1978). Aphasia type and aging. Brain and Language, 6(3), 318–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(78)90065-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orgass, B. (1976). Eine Revision des Token Tests, Teil l und II. Diagnostica, 22 (4) , 70–87, 141–156.
   Google Scholar
• Padilla, M. A. (2019). A primer on reliability via coefficient alpha and omega. Archives of Psychology, 3(8), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.31296/aop.v3i8.125
   Google Scholar
• Poeck, K. (1983). What do we mean by “Aphasic Syndromes?” A neurologist’s view. Brain and Language, 20(1), 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90034-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (1997). Estimation of composite reliability for congeneric measures. Applied Psychological Measurement, 21(2), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/01466216970212006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raykov, T. (1998). A method for obtaining standard errors and confidence intervals of composite reliability for congeneric items. Applied Psychological Measurement, 22(4), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/014662169802200406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinvang, I. (1985). Aphasia and brain organization. Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savalei, V., & Reise, S. P. (2019). Don’t forget the model in your model-based reliability coefficients: A reply to McNeish (2018). Collabra: Psychology, 5(1), 36. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.247
   Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. F. (1984). What the classical aphasia categories can’t do for us and why. Brain and Language, 21(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(84)90031-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spinnler, H., & Tognoni, G. (1987). Standardizzazione e taratura italiana di test neuropsicologici. Italian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 8(suppl. 8), 1–120.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Swinburn, K., Porter, G., & Howard, D. (2004). The comprehensive aphasia test. Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terwee, C. B., Bota, S. D. M., deBoera, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & deVet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremblay, P., & Dick, A. S. (2016). Broca and wernicke are dead, or moving past the classic model of language neurobiology. Brain and Language, 162, 60–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandl.2016.08.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Le Dorze, G., Brandenburg, C., Foulkes, J., & Rose, T. A. 2020. Many ways of measuring: A scoping review of measurement instruments for use with people with aphasia. Aphasiology. 1–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1836318. 18-December-2020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace, S. J., Worrall, L., Rose, T., Le Dorze, G., Breitenstein, C., Hilari, K., Babbitt, E., Bose, A., Brady, M., Cherney, L. R., Copland, D., Cruice, M., Enderby, P., Hersh, D., Howe, T., Kelly, H., Kiran, S., Laska, A.-C., Marshall, J., … Webster, J. (2019). A core outcome set for aphasia treatment research: The ROMA consensus statement. International Journal of Stroke, 14(2), 180–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493018806200
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weniger, D., Willmes, K., Huber, W., & Poeck, K. (1981). Der Aachener Aphasie Test: Reliabilität und Auswertungsobjektivität. Nervenarzt, 52(5), 269–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K. (1985). An approach to analyzing a single subject’s scores obtained in a standardized test with application to the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT). Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 7(4), 331–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/01688638508401268
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K. (2010). The methodological and statistical foundations of neuropsychological assessment. In J. M. Gurd, U. Kischka, & J. C. Marshall (Eds.), The handbook of clinical neuropsychology ((2nd edition) ed., pp. 28–49). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., Graetz, P., De Bleser, R., Schulte, B., & Keyser, A. (1991). De akense afasie test (3): Procedure voor individuele diagnostiek. Logopedie en Foniatrie, 63 (4) , 375–386.
   Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., Luzzatti, C., Mazzucchi, A., De Bleser, R., Colombo, C., & Bisiacchi, P. (1988). L’Aachener Aphasie test (AAT). III. Procedimento diagnostico per casi singoli. Archivio di Psicologia, Neurologia e Psichiatria, 49 (4) , 47–82.
   Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., & Poeck, K. (1984). Results of a multicenter study on the spontaneous prognosis of aphasias of vascular etiology. Nervenarzt, 55(2), 62–71.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willmes, K., Poeck, K., Weniger, D., & Huber, W. (1983). Facet theory applied to the construction and validation of the aachen aphasia test. Brain and Language, 18(2), 259–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(83)90020-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakarias, L., & Lukacs, A. (2021). The Comprehensive Aphasia Test–Hungarian: Adaptation and psychometric properties. Aphasiology, 1–19. in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1937921
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar