Evaluating circumlocution in naming as a predictor of communicative informativeness and efficiency in discourse

References

• Andreetta, S., Cantagallo, A., & Marini, A. (2012). Narrative discourse in anomic aphasia. Neuropsychologia, 50(8), 1787–1793, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.04.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci, S. M., & MacWilliam, C. (2015). Verbal description of concrete objects: a method for assessing semantic circumlocution in persons with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 24(4), S828–S837, https://doi.org/10.1044/2015_AJSLP-14-0154
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E. (2000). Aphasic discourse analysis: The story so far. Aphasiology, 14: 9, 875–892, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030050127685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., & Kok, B. (2011). Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: Some initial comparisons. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1347–1371, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.577204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, E., & Ferguson, A. (2010). Language, meaning, context, and functional communication. Aphasiology, 24(4), 480–496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, A. D., Ford, M., & Podell, K. (2007). Ethnic differences in functional and neuropsychological test performance in older adults. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 309–318, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., & Jonkers, R. (1998). Verb retrieval in action naming and spontaneous speech in agrammatic and anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 12(11), 951–969, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687039808249463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Wayland, S., Rochon, E., Saffran, E., & Schwartz, M. (2000). Quantitative production analysis: A training manual for the analysis of aphasic sentence production. Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bond, B., & Gooch, J. (2016, November). An examination of the prevalence of diagnostic testing modifications to assess communication disorders in African-Americans. Poster presented at the 2016 Annual Convention of the American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Boone, K. B., Victor, T. L., Wen, J., Razani, J., & Pontón, M. (2007). The association between neuropsychological scores and ethnicity, language, and acculturation variables in a large patient population. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 22(3), 355–365, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2007.01.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortnik, K. E., Boone, K. B., Wen, J., Lu, P., Mitrushina, M., Razani, J., & Maury, T. (2013). Survey results regarding use of the Boston Naming Test: Houston, we have a problem. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35(8), 857–866, https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2013.826182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518, https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, S. P., White, B. M., Magwood, G., Ellis, C., Logan, A., Jones Buie, J. N., & Adams, R. J. (2019). Racial and ethnic disparities in stroke outcomes: a scoping review of post-stroke disability assessment tools. Disability and rehabilitation, 41(15), 1835–1845, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1448467
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahana-Amitay, D., Albert, M. L., Pyun, S. B., Westwood, A., Jenkins, T., Wolford, S., & Finley, M. (2011). Language as a stressor in aphasia. Aphasiology, 25(5), 593–614, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2010.541469
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapey, R., Duchan, J. F., Elman, R. J., Garcia, L. J., Kagan, A., Lyon, J. G., & Simmons Mackie, N. (2000). Life participation approach to aphasia: A statement of values for the future. The ASHA Leader, 5(3), 4–6, https://doi.org/10.1044/leader.FTR.05032000.4
   Google Scholar
• Cho-Reyes, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2012). Verb and sentence pro- duction and comprehension in aphasia: Northwestern Assessment of Verbs and Sentences (NAVS). Aphasiology, 26(10), 1250–1277, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2012.693584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covington, M. A., & McFall, J. D. (2010). Cutting the Gordian knot: The moving-average type–token ratio (MATTR). Journal of quantitative linguistics, 17(2), 94–100, https://doi.org/10.1080/09296171003643098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, K. T., & Haley, K. L. (2020). Measuring lexical diversity for discourse analysis in aphasia: Moving-average type–token ratio and word information measure. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(3), 710–721, https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, J. R., Boyle, M., & Plattner, L. (1980). Listener reactions to personal characteristics of fluent and nonfluent aphasic speakers. In Clinical Aphasiology: Proceedings of the Conference 1980 (pp. 117–126). BRK Publishers, http://aphasiology.pitt.edu/id/eprint/574
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, L. A., & Kiran, S. (2006). Effect of semantic naming treatment on crosslinguistic generalization in bilingual aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 49, 729–748, https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2006/053)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, C., & Peach, R. K. (2017). Racial-ethnic differences in word fluency and auditory comprehension among persons with poststroke aphasia. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(4), 681–686, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, W. S., Hula, W. D., Quique, Y., & Starns, J. J. (2020). How much time do people with aphasia need to respond during picture naming? Estimating optimal response time cutoffs using a multinomial ex-Gaussian approach. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 63(2), 599–614. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_JSLHR-19-00255
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falconer, C., & Antonucci, S. M. (2012). Use of semantic feature analysis in group discourse treatment for aphasia: Extension and expansion. Aphasiology, 26(1), 64–82, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.602390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fama, M. E., Snider, S. F., Henderson, M. P., Hayward, W., Friedman, R. B., & Turkeltaub, P. E. (2019). The subjective experience of inner speech in aphasia is a meaningful reflection of lexical retrieval. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 62(1), 106–122, https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-18-0222
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., & Wright, H. H. (2016). Modelling confrontation naming and discourse performance in aphasia. Aphasiology, 30, 364–380, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1067288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, A., Miles, J., & Field, Z. (2012). Discovering statistics using R. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Field, A. P., & Wilcox, R. R. (2017). Robust statistical methods: A primer for clinical psychology and experimental psychopathology researchers. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 98, 19–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Francis, D. R., Clark, N., & Humphreys, G. W. (2002). Circumlocution-induced naming (CIN): A treatment for effecting generalisation in anomia?. Aphasiology, 16(3), 243–259, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridriksson, J., Bonilha, L., Baker, J. M., Moser, D., & Rorden, C. (2010). Activity in preserved left hemisphere regions predicts anomia severity in aphasia. Cerebral Cortex, 20(5), 1013–1019.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• German, D. J. (1990). TAWF: Test of adolescent/adult word finding. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., Kaplan, E., & Weintraub, S. (2001). BDAE: The Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (1997). Word-finding deficits in aphasia: Brain—behavior relations and clinical symptomatology. Anomia (pp. 3-27). Academic Press, https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012289685-9/50002-8
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. K. (2008). Measuring the lexical semantics of picture description in aphasia. Aphasiology, 22(7–8), 839–852. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701820063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon, T. G., Jacks, A., Haley, K. L., & Faldowski, R. A. (2016). Listener perceptions of simulated fluent speech in nonfluent aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(8), 922–942, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1077925
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herbert, R., Hickin, J., Howard, D., Osborne, F., & Best, W. (2008). Do picture‐naming tests provide a valid assessment of lexical retrieval in conversation in aphasia?. Aphasiology, 22(2), 184–203, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701262613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holland, A. L. (1982). Observing functional communication of aphasic adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 47(1), 50–56, https://doi.org/10.1044/jshd.4701.50
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hudley, A. H. C., & Mallinson, C. (2015). Understanding English language variation in US schools. Teachers College Press, https://doi.org/10.1080/09500782.2011.611418
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, B. J. (2001). Social validity of changes in informativeness and efficiency of aphasic discourse following linguistic specific treatment (LST). Brain and Language, 78(1), 115–127, https://doi.org/10.1006/brln.2001.2452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kambanaros, M. (2010). Action and object naming versus verb and noun retrieval in connected speech: Comparisons in late bilingual Greek–English anomic speakers. Aphasiology, 24(2), 210–230, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030902958332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan, E., Goodglass, H., & Weintraub, S. (2001). Boston Naming Test. Philadelphia, PA: Lea and Febiger, https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t27208-000
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. L., Brookshire, C. E., Minkina, I., & Bislick, L. (2013). An analysis of aphasic naming errors as an indicator of improved linguistic processing following phonomotor treatment. American Journal of Speech-language Pathology, 22(2), S240–9, https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2012/12-0078)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). The Western Aphasia Battery – Revised. New York: Grune & Stratton.
   Google Scholar
• Kiran, S., & Thompson, C. K. (2003). The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: Training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality. Journal of Speech, Language & Hearing Research, 46(3), https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2003/061)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kong, A. P. H., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2018). An integrative analysis of spontaneous storytelling discourse in aphasia: Relationship with listeners’ rating and prediction of severity and fluency status of aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 27(4), 1491–1505, https://doi.org/10.1044/2018_AJSLP-18-0015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2019). Revisiting the correct information unit: Measuring informativeness in unstructured conversations in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1099–1114.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leaman, M. C., & Edmonds, L. A. (2021). Assessing language in unstructured conversation in people with aphasia: Methods, psychometric integrity, normative data, and comparison to a structured narrative task. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(11), 4344–4365, https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-20-00641
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnik, A., Bastiaanse, R., & Höhle, B. (2016). Discourse production in aphasia: A current review of theoretical and methodological challenges. Aphasiology, 30(7), 765–800, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1113489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechler M, Rousseeuw P, Croux C, Todorov V, Ruckstuhl A, Salibian-Barrera M, Verbeke T, Koller M, Conceicao EL, Anna di Palma M (2022). robustbase: Basic Robust Statistics. R package version 0.95-0, http://robustbase.r-forge.r-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Marini, A., Caltagirone, C., Pasqualetti, P., & Carlomagno, S. (2007). Patterns of language improvement in adults with non‐chronic non‐fluent aphasia after specific therapies. Aphasiology, 21(2), 164–186, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600633799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, J., & Murray, L. (2003). Functional measures of naming in aphasia: Word retrieval in confrontation naming versus connected speech. Aphasiology, 17(5), 481–497, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030344000148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHugh, M. L. (2012). Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia medica, 22(3), 276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, L. H., Faroqi-Shah, Y., & Corcoran, C. D. (2014). Normative data for the WAB-R: A comparison of monolingual English speakers, Asian Indian-English bilinguals, and Spanish-English bilinguals.
   Google Scholar
• Minkina, I., Oelke, M., Bislick, L. P., Brookshire, C. E., Hunting Pompon, R., Silkes, J. P., & Kendall, D. L. (2016). An investigation of aphasic naming error evolution following phonomotor treatment. Aphasiology, 30(8), 962–980, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1081139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molrine, C. J., & Pierce, R. S. (2002). Black and White adults’ expressive language performance on three tests of aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11, 139–150, https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/014)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Na, S. & King, T. Z. (2019) Performance discrepancies on the Boston Naming Test in African-American and non-Hispanic White American young adults. Applied Neuropsychology: Adult, 26: 3, 236–246, https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2017.1393427
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD). (2015, December). Aphasia. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/aphasia.
   Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1993). A system for quantifying the informativeness and efficiency of the connected speech of adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 36(2), 338–350, https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3602.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., & Brookshire, R. H. (1995). Presence, completeness, and accuracy of main concepts in the connected speech of non-brain-damaged adults and adults with aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 38, 145–156. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3801.145
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nicholas, L. E., Brookshire, R. H., MacLennan, D. L., Schumacher, J. G., & Porrazzo, S. A. (1989). The Boston Naming Test: revised administration and scoring procedures and normative information for non-brain-damaged adults. Clinical aphasiology, 18, 103–115.
   Google Scholar
• Pashek, G. V., & Tompkins, C. A. (2002). Context and word class influences on lexical retrieval in aphasia. Aphasiology, 16(3), 261–286, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000573
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedraza, O., Graff-Radford, N. R., Smith, G. E., Ivnik, R. J., Willis, F. B., Petersen, R. C., & Lucas, J. A. (2009). Differential item functioning of the Boston Naming Test in cognitively normal African American and Caucasian older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(5), 758–768, https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709990361
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., & Dalton, S. G. (2016). Main concepts for three different discourse tasks in a large non-clinical sample. Aphasiology, 30(1), 45–73, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1057891
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, J. D., Hudspeth Dalton, S. G., Fromm, D., Forbes, M., Holland, A., & MacWhinney, B. (2018). The relationship between confrontation naming and story gist production in aphasia. American journal of speech-language pathology, 27(1S), 406–422, https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_AJSLP-16-0211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roach, A., Schwartz, M. F., Martin, N., Grewal, R. S., & Brecher, A. (1996). The Philadelphia naming test: scoring and rationale. Clinical aphasiology, 24, 121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Rohde, A., Worrall, L., Godecke, E., O’Halloran, R., Farrell, A., & Massey, M. (2018). Diagnosis of aphasia in stroke populations: A systematic review of language tests. PloS one, 13(3), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saffran, E. M., Berndt, R. S., & Schwartz, M. F. (1989). The quantitative analysis of agrammatic production: Procedure and data. Brain and language, 37(3), 440–479, https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(89)900308)900308
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, R., García, C. B., & García, J. (2018). Variance inflation factor and condition number in multiple linear regression. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 88(12), 2365–2384, https://doi.org/10.1080/00949655.2018.1463376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons-Mackie, N., Threats, T. T., & Kagan, A. (2005). Outcome assessment in aphasia: A survey. Journal of communication disorders, 38(1), 1–27, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2004.03.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, B. C. (2019). A comparison of three discourse elicitation methods in aphasia and age-matched adults: Implications for language assessment and outcome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1067–1083, https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Susanti, Y., Pratiwi, H., Sulistijowati, S., & Liana, T. (2014). M estimation, S estimation, and MM estimation in robust regression. International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics, 91(3), 349–360, http://dx.doi.org/10.12732/ijpam.v91i3.7
   Google Scholar
• RStudio Team (2021). RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Templin, M. C. (1957). Certain language skills in children; their development and interrelationships. University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.5749/j.ctttv2st
   Google Scholar
• Tierney-Hendricks, C., Schliep, M. E., & Vallila-Rohter, S. (2022). Using an implementation framework to survey outcome measurement and treatment practices in aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(3), 1133–1162, https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00101
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Togher, L. (2001). Discourse sampling in the 21st century. Journal of communication disorders, 34(1–2), 131–150, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9924(00)000459)000459
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tompkins, C. A., Scharp, V. L., & Marshall, R. C. (2006). Communicative value of self-cues in aphasia: A re‐evaluation. Aphasiology, 20(7), 684–704, https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030500334076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 3.0]. (2016). Retrieved from https://support.pstnet.com/.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G. M., & Schwartz, M. F. (2012). Short-form Philadelphia naming test: rationale and empirical evaluation. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 21(2), S140–S140, https://eric.ed.gov/?redir=http%3a%2f%2fdx.doi.org%2f10.1044%2f1058-0360(2012%2f11-0089)
   Google Scholar
• Webster, J., & Morris, J. (2019). Communicative informativeness in aphasia: Investigating the relationship between linguistic and perceptual measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1115–1126, https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar