The Effects of Word Frequency, Age of Acquisition, Animacy, and Grammatical Class on Picture Naming by Volunteers and People with Aphasia

References

• Alario, F., Ferrand, L., Laganaro, M., New, B., Frauenfelder, U. H., & Segui, J. (2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(1), 140–155.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Almeida, J., Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2007). The locus of the frequency effect in picture naming: When recognizing is not enough. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14(6), 1177–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonucci, S. M. (2014). What matters in semantic feature processing for persons with stroke-aphasia: Evidence from an auditory concept–feature verification task. Aphasiology, 28(7), 823–839.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balota, D. A., Cortese, M. J., Sergent-Marshall, S. D., Spieler, D. H., & Yap, M. J. (2004). Visual word recognition of single-syllable words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 283–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C., Hirsh, K. W., Johnston, R. A., & Williams, C. L. (2001). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the locus of repetition priming of picture naming. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(3), 350–375.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, C., Morrison, C. M., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures: Effects of age of acquisition, frequency, and name agreement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Section A, 50(3), 560–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastiaanse, R., Wieling, M., & Wolthuis, N. (2016). The role of frequency in the retrieval of nouns and verbs in aphasia. Aphasiology, 30(11), 1221–1239. doi: 10.1080/02687038.2015.1100709
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D. F. (1988). Anomia in aphasia. Aphasiology, 2(3–4), 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berndt, R. S., Mitchum, C. C., Haendiges, A. N., & Sandson, J. (1997). Verb retrieval in aphasia. 1. Characterizing single word impairments. Brain and Language, 56, 68–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Y., Han, Z., Shu, H., & Caramazza, A. (2007). Nouns, verbs, objects, actions, and the animate/inanimate effect. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 24(5), 485–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2000). Why is a verb like an inanimate object? Grammatical category and semantic category deficits. Brain and language, 72(3), 246–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bird, H., Howard, D., & Franklin, S. (2003). Verbs and nouns: The importance of being imageable. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16(2–3), 113–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bogka, N., Masterson, J., Druks, J., Fragkioudaki, M., Chatziprokopiou, E., & Economou, K. (2003). Object and action picture naming in English and Greek. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 15(3), 371–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnsen, S. K. (1997). Test of nonverbal intelligence (3rd ed.). Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Brysbaert, M., & Ghyselinck, M. (2006). The effect of age of acquisition: Partly frequency related, partly frequency independent. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 992–1011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Mahon, B. Z. (2003). The organization of conceptual knowledge: The evidence from category-specific semantic deficits. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(8), 354–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramazza, A., & Shelton, J. R. (1998). Domain-specific knowledge systems in the brain: The animate-inanimate distinction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10(1), 1–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlson, T., Tovar, D. A., Alink, A., & Kriegeskorte, N. (2013). Representational dynamics of object vision: The first 1000 ms. Journal of Vision, 13(10), 1–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B. ( 1976). Word retrieval latencies as a function of frequency and age‐of‐acquisition priming, repeated trials, and individual differences. ETS Research Bulletin Series, 1976(1), i–48.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. B., & White, M. N. (1973). Word frequency and age of acquisition as determiners of picture-naming latency. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 25(1), 85–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, J., & Elsherif, M. M. (2020). The hunt for the age of acquisition effect: It’s in the links! Acta Psychologica, 209, 103138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, J. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2006). Age of acquisition effects on an object‐name verification task. British Journal of Psychology, 97(1), 1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Catling, J. C., & Johnston, R. A. (2009). The varying effects of age of acquisition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62(1), 50–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catling, J., South, F., & Dent, K. (2013). The effect of age of acquisition on older individuals with and without cognitive impairments. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(10), 1963–1973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlard, M., & Bonin, P. (2006). Age-of-acquisition effects in picture naming: Are they structural and/or semantic in nature? Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 864–883.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Cotelli, M., Manenti, R., Rosini, S., Calabria, M., Brambilla, M., Bisiacchi, P., Zanetti, O., & Miniussi, C. (2010). Action and object naming in physiological aging: An rTMS study. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 2, 151. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2010.00151. eCollection 2010.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, R. M., Anthony, J. C., Bassett, S. S., & Folstein, M. F. (1993). Population-based norms for the Mini-Mental State Examination by age and educational level. JAMA, 269(18), 2386–2391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Aguado, G., Izura, C., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Aphasic naming in Spanish: Predictors and errors. Brain and Language, 82(3), 344–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuetos, F., Monsalve, A., & Pérez, A. (2005). Determinants of lexical access in pure anomia. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 18(5), 383–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, G. A. (2000). Aphasiology: Disorders and clinical practice. Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• De Renzi, E., & Di Pellegrino, G. (1995). Sparing of verbs and preserved, but ineffectual reading in a patient with impaired word production. Cortex, 31(4), 619–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druks, J., & Masterson, J. (2000). An object & naming battery. Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, A. W., & Morrison, C. M. (1998). Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(2), 515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Kellough, S., & Hula, W. D. (2015). Item response theory modeling of the Philadelphia naming test. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 58(3), 865–877.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fergadiotis, G., Swiderski, A., & Hula, W. D. (2019). Predicting confrontation naming item difficulty. Aphasiology, 33(6), 689–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferreira, C. T., Giusiano, B., & Poncet, M. (1997). Category-specific anomia: implication of different neural networks in naming. Neuroreport, 8(7), 1595–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyereisen, P., Van der Borght, F., & Seron, X. (1988). The operativity effect in naming: A re-analysis. Neuropsychologia, 26(3), 401–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., McHugh, P. R., & Fanjiang, G. (2001). Mini-mental state examination: User’s guide. Psychological Assessment Resources.
   Google Scholar
• Francis, W. N., & Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Houghton Mifflin.
   Google Scholar
• Geschwind, N. (1967). The varieties of naming errors. Cortex, 3(1), 97–112.
   Google Scholar
• Ghyselinck, M., Lewis, M. B., & Brysbaert, M. (2004). Age of acquisition and the cumulative-frequency hypothesis: A review of the literature and a new multi-task investigation. Acta Psychologica, 115(1), 43–67.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilhooly, K. J., & Gilhooly, M. L. (1979). Age-of-acquisition effects in lexical and episodic memory tasks. Memory & Cognition, 7(3), 214–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, R., & Halpern, H. (1991). Impairments of naming and word-finding. In C. Code (Ed.), The characteristics of aphasia (pp. 33–52). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Goodglass, H., & Wingfield, A. (1997). Anomia: Neuroanatomical and cognitive correlates. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Granier, J. P., Robin, D. A., Shapiro, L. P., Peach, R. K., & Zimba, L. D. (2000). Measuring processing load during sentence comprehension: Visuomotor tracking. Aphasiology, 14(5), 501–513. doi:10.1080/026870300401270
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm-Estabrooks, N. (1997). Treatment of aphasic naming problems. In H. Goodglass & A. Wingfield (Eds.), Anomia (pp. 189–202). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillis, A. E., & Caramazza, A. (1995). Representation of grammatical categories of words in the brain. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(3), 396–407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, D., Best, W., Bruce, C., & Gatehouse, C. (1995). Operativity and animacy effects in aphasic naming. European Journal of Disorders of Communication, 30(3), 286–302.
   Google Scholar
• Howard, D., & Patterson, K. E. (1992). Pyramids and palm trees. Thames Valley Test Company.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferies, E., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2006). Semantic impairment in stroke aphasia versus semantic dementia: A case-series comparison. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 129(Pt 8), 2132–2147.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Jefferies, E., Patterson, K., & Ralph, M. A. L. (2008). Deficits of knowledge versus executive control in semantic cognition: Insights from cued naming. Neuropsychologia, 46(2), 649–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. A., & Barry, C. (2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 789–845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, R. A., Dent, K., Humphreys, G. W., & Barry, C. (2010). British-English norms and naming times for a set of 539 pictures: The role of age of acquisition. Behavior Research Methods, 42(2), 461–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonkers, R., & Bastiaanse, R. (1998). How selective are selective word class deficits? Two case studies of action and object naming. Aphasiology, 12(3), 245–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juhasz, B. J. (2005). Age-of-acquisition effects in word and picture identification. Psychological Bulletin, 131(5), 684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, J., Lesser, R., & Coltheart, M. (1992). Psycholinguistic assessments of language processing in aphasia. Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kendall, D. L., Rosenbek, J. C., Heilman, K. M., Conway, T., Klenberg, K., Rothi, L. J. G., & Nadeau, S. (2008). Phoneme-based rehabilitation of anomia in aphasia. Brain and Language, 105(1), 1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2003). Anomia. In M. J. Aminoff, & R. B. Daroff (Eds.), Encyclopedia of the neurological sciences (pp. 193–198). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2007). Western aphasia battery-revised. Psychological Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Kittredge, A. K., Dell, G. S., Verkuilen, J., & Schwartz, M. F. (2008). Where is the effect of frequency in word production? Insights from aphasic picture-naming errors. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(4), 463–492.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knobel, M., Finkbeiner, M., & Caramazza, A. (2008). The many places of frequency: Evidence for a novel locus of the lexical frequency effect in word production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 25(2), 256–286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiacona, M., & Capitani, E. (2001). A case of prevailing deficit of nonliving categories or a case of prevailing sparing of living categories? Cognitive Neuropsychology, 18(1), 39–70.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laiacona, M., & Caramazza, A. (2004). The noun/verb dissociation in language production: Varieties of causes. Cognitive neuropsychology, 21(2–4), 103–123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambon Ralph, M. A., & Ehsan, S. (2006). Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 928–948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, S., Kong, A. P., Lai, L. W., & Lai, C. (2015). Effects of context and word class on lexical retrieval in Chinese speakers with anomic aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(1), 81–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesser, R. (1989). Some issues in the neuropsychological rehabilitation of anomia. In X. Seron & G. Deloche (Eds.), Cognitive approaches in neuropsychological rehabilitation (pp. 65–104). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Levelt, W. J., Roelofs, A., & Meyer, A. S. (1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(1), 1–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, M. B. (2006). Chasing psycholinguistic effects: A cautionary tale. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 1012–1026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luzzatti, C., Raggi, R., Zonca, G., Pistarini, C., Contardi, A., & Pinna, G. D. (2002). Verb–noun double dissociation in aphasic lexical impairments: The role of word frequency and imageability. Brain and language, 81(1–3), 432–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, J., Chiat, S., Robson, J., & Pring, T. (1996). Calling a salad a federation: An investigation of semantic jargon. Part 2—Verbs. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 9(4), 251–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterson, J., & Druks, J. (1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity, and age-of-acquisition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11(4), 331–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mätzig, S., Druks, J., Masterson, J., & Vigliocco, G. (2009). Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45(6), 738–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McRae, K., Cree, G. S., Seidenberg, M. S., & McNorgan, C. (2005). Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 37(4), 547–559.
   Google Scholar
• Meschyan, G., & Hernandez, A. (2002). Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 30(2), 262–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., Villa, G., & Caramazza, A. (1984). On the basis for the agrammatic’s difficulty in producing main verbs. Cortex, 20(2), 207–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miozzo, A., Soardi, M., & Cappa, S. F. (1994). Pure anomia with spared action naming due to a left temporal lesion. Neuropsychologia, 32(9), 1101–1109.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirman, D., & Britt, A. E. (2014). What we talk about when we talk about access deficits. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 369, 20120388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., Chappell, T. D., & Ellis, A. W. (1997). Age of acquisition norms for a large set of object names and their relation to adult estimates and other variables. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50A(3), 528–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., & Gibbons, Z. C. (2006). Lexical determinants of semantic processing speed. Visual Cognition, 13(7–8), 949–967.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrison, C. M., Hirsh, K. W., & Duggan, G. B. (2003). Age of acquisition, ageing, and verb production: Normative and experimental data. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 56(4), 1–26.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, H. E., & Tyler, L. K. (2000). A progressive category-specific semantic deficit for non-living things. Neuropsychologia, 38(1), 60–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moss, H. E., Tyler, L. K., Durrant-Peatfield, M., & Bunn, E. M. (1998). ‘Two eyes of a see-through’: Impaired and intact semantic knowledge in a case of selective deficit for living things. Neurocase, 4(4–5), 291–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Navarrete, E., Scaltritti, M., Mulatti, C., & Peressotti, F. (2013). Age-of-acquisition effects in delayed picture-naming tasks. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(1), 148–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newcombe, F. B., Oldfield, R., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Object-naming by dysphasic patients. Nature, 207(5002), 1217–1218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L. (2002). Therapy for naming disorders: Revisiting, revising, and reviewing. Aphasiology, 16(10), 935–979 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nickels, L., & Howard, D. (1995). Aphasic naming: What matters? Neuropsychologia, 33(10), 1281–1303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield, R. C., & Wingfield, A. (1965). Response latencies in naming objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 17(4), 273–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardoe, I. (2020). Applied regression modeling. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K. (1993). Clinical intervention for aphasia in the United States of America. In A. L. Holland, & M. M. Forbes (Eds.), Aphasia treatment: World perspectives (pp. 335–369). Singular.
   Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Coelho, C. (2016). Linking inter-and intra-sentential processes for narrative production following traumatic brain injury: Implications for a model of discourse processing. Neuropsychologia, 80, 157–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Hanna, L. E. (2021). Sentence-level processing predicts narrative coherence following traumatic brain injury: Evidence in support of a resource model of discourse processing. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 36(6), 694–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Reuter, K. A. (2010). A discourse-based approach to semantic feature analysis for the treatment of aphasic word retrieval failures. Aphasiology, 24(9), 971–990.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (Eds.). (2012). Cognition and acquired language disorders: An information processing approach. Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Perret, C., & Bonin, P. (2019). Which variables should be controlled for to investigate picture naming in adults? A Bayesian meta-analysis. Behavior Research Methods, 51(6), 2533–2545.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perret, C., Bonin, P., & Laganaro, M. (2014). Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis. Brain and Language, 135, 20–31.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Räling, R., Hanne, S., Schröder, A., Keßler, C., & Wartenburger, I. (2017). Judging the animacy of words: The influence of typicality and age of acquisition in a semantic decision task. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70(10), 2094–2104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymer, A. M., & Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2018). Aphasia syndromes: Introduction and value in clinical practice. In A.M. Raymer & L.J. Gonzalez Rothi (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of aphasia and language disorders (pp. 3–10). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rochford, G., & Williams, M. (1962). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names: I. The relationship between nominal dysphasia and the acquisition of vocabulary in childhood. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 25, 222–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rochford, G., & Williams, M. (1965). Studies in the development and breakdown of the use of names. IV. The effects of word frequency. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 28(5), 407–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, S. S., Newhoff, M., Peach, R. K., & Shapiro, L. P. (1996). Electrophysiological indices of lexical processing: The effects of verb complexity and age. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 39(5), 1071–1080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruml, W., Caramazza, A., Capasso, R., & Miceli, G. (2005). Interactivity and continuity in normal and aphasic language production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(2),131–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sacchett, C., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(1), 73–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheidler, C., & Bormann, T. (2022). Information about word class is both semantically and lexically represented: Evidence from an advantage for verbs in two speakers with aphasia. Aphasiology, 36(9), 1030–1051.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime user’s guide. Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Silkes, J. P., Dierkes, K. E., & Kendall, D. L. (2013). Masked repetition priming effects on naming in aphasia: A phase I treatment study. Aphasiology, 27(4), 381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveri, M. C., & Di Betta, A. M. (1997). Noun-verb dissociations in brain-damaged patients: Further evidence. Neurocase, 3(6), 477–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snodgrass, J. G., & Yuditsky, T. (1996). Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28(4), 516–536.
   Google Scholar
• Szekely, A., D’Amico, S., Devescovi, A., Federmeier, K., Herron, D., Iyer, G., Jacobsen, T., Analía, L., Arévalo, A. L., Vargha, A., & Bates, E. (2005). Timed action and object naming. Cortex, 41(1), 7–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkhlyutov, V. M., Marina, I. V., & Strelets, V. B. (2014). Event-related spectral EEG power on presentation of pseudowords and words of the “animate” and “inanimate” categories. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 44(1), 16–23.
   Google Scholar
• Vigliocco, G., Vinson, D. P., Druks, J., Barber, H., & Cappa, S. F. (2011). Nouns and verbs in the brain: A review of behavioural, electrophysiological, neuropsychological, and imaging studies. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 35(3), 407–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wepman, J. M., Bock, R. D., Jones, L. V., & Van Pelt, D. (1956). Psycholinguistic study of aphasia: A revision of the concept of anomia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 21(4), 468–477.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Zingeser, L. B., & Berndt, R. S. (1988). Grammatical class and context effects in a case of pure anomia: Implications for models of language production. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(4), 473–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar