To make a long story short: A descriptive study of formulaic language use in post-stroke fluent aphasia

References

• Armstrong, E., Ciccone, N., Godecke, E., & Kok, B. (2011). Monologues and dialogues in aphasia: Some initial comparisons. Aphasiology, 25(11), 1347–1371. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2011.577204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brownsett, S.L.E., Ramajoo, K., Copland, D., McMahon, K.L., Robinson, G., Drummond, K., Jeffree, R.L., Olson, S., Ong, B., & De Zubicaray, G. (2019). Language deficits following dominant hemisphere tumour resection are significantly underestimated by syndrome-based aphasia assessments. Aphasiology, 33(10), 1163–1181. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.209.1614760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Ferguson, A., & Spencer, E. (2016). Linguistic analysis of discourse in aphasia: A review of the literature. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 30(7), 489–518. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699206.2016.1145740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryant, L., Spencer, E., & Ferguson, A. (2017). Clinical use of linguistic discourse analysis for the assessment of language in aphasia. Aphasiology, 31(10), 1105–1126. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1239013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chin Li, E., Williams, S.E., & Della Volpe, A. (1995). The effects of topic and listener familiarity on discourse variables in procedural and narrative discourse tasks Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 39–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0021/924(95)91023-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, S., & Gordon, J.K. (2020). Fluent or nonfluent? Part A. Underlying contributors to categorical classifications of fluency in aphasia. Aphasiology, 34(15), 515–539. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2020.1727709
   Google Scholar
• Code, C., Tree, J.J., & Dawe, K. (2009). Opportunities to say ‘yes’: Rare speech automatisms in a case of progressive nonfluent aphasia and apraxia. Neurocase, 15(6), 445–458. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13554790902911634
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coehlo, C.A., Cherney, L.R., & Shadden, B.B. (Eds.). 2023. Discourse analysis in adults with and without communication disorders. Plural.
   Google Scholar
• Conklin, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). The processing of formulaic language. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 32, 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190512000074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dipper, L., Pritchard, M., Walkden, E., & Cruice, M. (2018). How do speakers with and without aphasia use syntax and semantics across two discourse genres? Aphasiology, 32(6), 720–738. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1447642
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fromm, D, Greenhouse, J., Pudil, M., Shi, Y., & MacWhinney, B. (2022). Enhancing the classification of aphasia: A statistical analysis using connected speech. Aphasiology,36(12), 1492–1519. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1975636
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami, L., Karimi, M. N., & Atai, M. R. (2017). Formulaic focus-on-form episodes in adult EFL communicative interactions. System, 68, 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M., & Chen, R. (2013). The spectrum of aphasia subtypes and etiology in subacute stroke. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 22(8), 1385-1392.doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2013.04.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertesz, A. (2006). Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R) [ Database record]. APA PsycTests. https://doi.org/10.1037/t15168-000
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, M.C., & Archer, B. (2023). Choosing discourse types that align with person-centered goals in aphasia rehabilitation: A clinical tutorial. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 8, 254–273. https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_PERSP-22-00160
   Google Scholar
• Leaman, M.C., & Edmonds, L.A. (2023). Analysing language in the picnic scene picture and in conversation: The type of discourse sample we choose influences findings in people with aphasia. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 32, 1413–1430.https://doi.org/10.1044/2023_AJSLP-22-00279
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacWhinney, B. (2000). The CHILDES project: Tools for analyzing talk (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Nekrasova, T.M. (2009). English L1 and L2 speakers’ knowledge of lexical bundles. Language Learning, 59(3), 647–686. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00520.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Northcott, S., Simpson, A., Thomas, S., Barnard, R., Burns, K., Hirani, S.P., & Hilari, K. (2021). “Now I am myself”: Exploring how people with poststroke aphasia experienced solution-focued brief therapy within the SOFIA trial. Qualitative Health Research, 31(11), 2041–2055. doi:10.1177/10497323211020290
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidtis, J. J., Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Dhawan, V., & Eidelberg, D. (2018). Switching language modes: Complementary brain patterns for formulaic and propositional language. Brain Connectivity, 8(3), 189–196. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2017.0573
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, B. C. (2019). A comparison of three discourse elicitation methods in aphasia and age-matched adults: Implications for language assessment and outcome. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 28(3), 1067–1083.https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_AJSLP-18-0265
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrington Eaton, C., & Burrowes, L. (2021). Comparing patterns of familiar language use across spontaneous speech contexts in individuals with nonfluent aphasia and healthy controls. Aphasiology, 36(12), 1399–1418. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2021.1966375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2004). When novel sentences spoken or heard for the first time in the history of the universe are not enough: Toward a dual-process model of language. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders, 39(1), 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820310001601080
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D. (2020). Familiar phrases in language competence: Linguistic, psychological, and neurological observations support a dual process model of language. In A. Haselow & G. Kaltenböck (Eds.), Grammar and cognition: Dualistic models of language structure and language processing (pp. 29–57). John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/hcp.70.01van
   Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., Postman, W.A., & Glosser, G. (2004). Feast or famine. Fixed expressions in the spontaneous speech of left hemisphere- and right hemisphere-damaged subjects Brain and Language, 91, 47–48. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2004.06.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lancker Sidtis, D., & Yang, S. Y. (2017). Formulaic language performance in left-and right- hemisphere damaged patients: structured testing. Aphasiology, 31(1), 82–99.https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2016.1157136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkmer, A., Farrington-Douglas, C., Crutch, S.J., Beeke, S., Warren, J.D., & Yong, K.X.X. (2022). Better conversations: A language and communication intervention for aphasia in posterior cortical atrophy. Neurocase, 28(4), 356–363. doi:10.1080/13554794.2022.2125326
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitworth, A., Leitão, S., Cartwright, J., Webster, J., Hankey, G.J., Zach, J., Howard, D., &Wolz, V. (2015). NARNIA: a new twist on an old tale. A pilot RCT to evaluate a multilevel approach to improve discourse in aphasia. Aphasiology, 29(11), 1345-1382.https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2015.1081143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S.E., Li, E.C., Volpe, A.D., & Ritterman, S.I. (1994). The influence of topic and listener familiarity on aphasic discourse. Journal of Communication Disorders, 27, 207–222. doi:10.1016/0021-9924(94)90001-9
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wilson, S.M., Entrup, J.L., Schneck, S.M., Onuscheck, C.F., Levy, D.F., Rahman, M., Willey, E., Casilio, M., Yen, M., Brito, A.C., Kam, W., David, L.T., de Riesthal, M., & Kirshner, H.S. (2023). Recovery from aphasia in the first year after stroke. Brain, 146, 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awac129
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wray, A. (2017). Formulaic sequences as a regulatory mechanism for cognitive perturbations during the achievement of social goals. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(3), 569–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12257
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerer, V. C., Newman, L., Thomson, R., Coleman, M., & Varley, R. A. (2018). Automated analysis of language production in aphasia and right-hemisphere damage: frequency and collocation strength. Aphasiology, 32(11), 1267–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687038.2018.1497138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar