References
- Choudhari K A. ISUIA, ISAT and the National Study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: changing trends and implications for neurovascular services in the United Kingdom and Ireland. Br J Neurosurg 2006; 20: 375–378
- National Study of Subarachnoid Haemorrhage, London. Clinical Effectiveness Unit, Royal College of Surgeons of England. February, 2006; 1–56, Available at: http://www.rcseng.ac.uk/rcseng/content/publications/docs/nat_study_subarachnoid_haem_feb2006.html (accessed 15th July 2007)
- Molyneux A, Kerr R, Stratton I, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised trial. Lancet 2002; 360: 1267–1274
- Molyneux A J, Kerr R S, Yu L M, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005; 366: 809–817
- Peto R, Collins R, Gray R. Large-scale randomized evidence: large, simple trials and overviews of trials. J Clin Epidemiol 1995; 48: 23–40
- Davey Smith G. Cross design synthesis: a new strategy for studying medical outcomes?. Lancet 1992; 340: 944–946
- Byar D P. Problems with using observational databases to compare treatments. Stat Med 1991; 10: 663–666
- Laitt R D. How much can be concluded from ISAT?. Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21: 9–10
- Tait M J, Critchley G R, Norris J S. How much can be concluded from the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT)?. Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21: 3–6
- Javadpour M. ISAT: Will the results stand the test of time?. Br J Neurosurg 2007; 21: 7–8
- David Moher, Kenneth F Schulz, Douglas G Altman, for the CONSORT Group. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001; 357: 1191–1194
- Cochrane Collaboration Glossary. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/resources/handbook/ (accessed 15th July 2007)
- Rothman K J, Greenland S. Modern Epidemiology2nd revised edn. Lippincott-Raven, Philadelphia 1998
- Sackett D L, Haynes R B, Tugwell P. Clinical Epidemiology2nd revised edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Boston 1991
- Grobbee D E, Hoes A W. Confounding and indication for treatment in evaluation of drug treatment for hypertension. BMJ 1997; 315: 1151–1154
- Bandolier. Confounding. Available at: http://www.jr2.ox.ac.uk/bandolier/booth/glossary/confound.html (accessed 15th July 2007).
- Gardner M J, Altman D G. Estimating with confidence. BMJ 1988; 296: 1210–1211
- Van der Schaaf I, Algra A, Wermer M, et al. Endovascular coiling versus neurosurgical clipping for patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. Cochrane Database System Rev 2005, Issue 4
- Lilford R, for the Fetal Compromise Group. Formal measurement of clinical uncertainty: prelude to a trial in perinatal medicine. BMJ 1994; 308: 111–112
- The GRIT Study Group. A randomised trial of timed delivery for the compromised preterm fetus: short term outcomes and Bayesian interpretation. Br J Obst Gynaecol 2003; 110: 27–32
- Johnston S C. Effect of endovascular services and hospital volume on cerebral aneurysm treatment outcomes. Stroke 2000; 31: 111–117
- Berman M F, Solomon R A, Mayer S A, Johnston S C, Yung P P. Impact of hospital-related factors on outcome after treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Stroke 2003; 34: 2200–2207