https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3506-4111
References
- Liu L, Lu ST, Liu AH, et al. Comparison of complications in cranioplasty with various materials: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Neurosurg 2020;1–9. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1742291
- Malcolm JG, Mahmooth Z, Rindler RS, et al. Autologous cranioplasty is associated with increased reoperation rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;116:60–8.
- Malcolm JG, Rindler RS, Chu JK, Grossberg JA, Pradilla G, Ahmad FU. Complications following cranioplasty and relationship to timing: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Neurosci 2016;33:39–51.
- Morselli C, Zaed I, Tropeano MP, et al. Comparison between the different types of heterologous materials used in cranioplasty: a systematic review of the literature. J Neurosurg Sci 2019;63:723–36.
- Klieverik VM, Miller KJ, Singhal A, Han KS, Woerdeman PA. Cranioplasty after craniectomy in pediatric patients-a systematic review. Childs Nerv Syst 2019;35:1481–90.
- Bobinski L, Koskinen LO, Lindvall P. Complications following cranioplasty using autologous bone or polymethylmethacrylate-retrospective experience from a single center. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2013;115:1788–91.
- Beez T, Munoz-Bendix C, Ahmadi SA, Steiger HJ, Beseoglu K. From decompressive craniectomy to cranioplasty and beyond-a pediatric neurosurgery perspective. Childs Nerv Syst 2019;35:1517–24.
- Huang GJ, Zhong S, Susarla SM, Swanson EW, Huang J, Gordon CR. Craniofacial reconstruction with poly(methyl methacrylate) customized cranial implants. J Craniofac Surg 2015;26:64–70.
- Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H, et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2006;148:535–40.
- Zanotti B, Zingaretti N, Verlicchi A, Robiony M, Alfieri A, Parodi PC. Cranioplasty: Review of Materials. J Craniofac Surg 2016;27:2061–72.