Percutaneous endoscopic posterior lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerative lumbar diseases: a technical note and summary of the initial clinical outcomes

References

• Lan T, Hu S-Y, Zhang Y-T, et al. Comparison between posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World Neurosurg 2018;112:86–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleege C, Rickert M, Rauschmann M. The PLIF and TLIF techniques. Indication, technique, advantages, and disadvantages. Orthopäde 2015;44:114–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talia AJ, Wong ML, Lau HC, Kaye AH. Comparison of the different surgical approaches for lumbar interbody fusion. J Clin Neurosci 2015;22:243–51.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. Die posteriore, lumbale, interkorporelle Fusion in unilateraler transforaminaler Technik. Orthop Traumatol 1998;10:90–102.
   Google Scholar
• Harms J, Rolinger H. A one-stager procedure in operative treatment of spondylolistheses: dorsal traction-reposition and anterior fusion. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 2008;120:343–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley KT, Lefkowitz MA. Advances in minimally invasive spine surgery. Clin Neurosurg 2002;49:499–517.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kim JS, Jung B, Lee SH. Instrumented minimally invasive spinal-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF): minimum 5-year follow-up with clinical and radiologic outcomes. Clin Spine Surg 2018b;31:E302–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin GX, Park CK, Hur JW, Kim JS. Time course observation of outcomes between minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Neurol Med Chir 2019;59:222–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi KY, Cheng SH, Kuo YK, Lin EY, Kang YN. Safety of lumbar interbody fusion procedures for degenerative disc disease: a systematic review with network meta-analysis of prospective studies. Global Spine J 2020;Jul 28:2192568220938024. doi: 10.1177/2192568220938024. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 32720524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mobbs RJ, Phan K, Malham G, Seex K, Rao PJ. Lumbar interbody fusion: techniques, indications and comparison of interbody fusion options including PLIF, TLIF, MI-TLIF, OLIF/ATP, LLIF and ALIF. J Spine Surg 2015;1:2–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wu J, Liu H, Ao S, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and preliminary clinical experience with 2-year follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang J, Liu C, Hai Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report of seven cases with 12-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:3091459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridwell KH, OʼBrien MF, Lenke LG, Baldus C, Blanke K. Posterior spinal fusion supplemented with only allograft bone in paralytic scoliosis. Does it work? Spine 1994; 19:2658–66.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohtori S, Orita S, Yamauchi K, et al. Mini-open anterior retroperitoneal lumbar interbody fusion: oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar spinal degeneration disease. Yonsei Med J 2015;56:1051–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, Kosmopoulos V. Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience. Int Orthop 2009;33:1683–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li HM, Zhang RJ, Shen CL. Radiographic and clinical outcomes of oblique lateral interbody fusion versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar disease. World Neurosurg 2019;122:e627–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahn Y. Endoscopic spine discectomy: indications and outcomes. International Orthopaedics 2019;43:909–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HS, Paudel B, Jang JS, Lee K, Oh SH, Jang IT. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for all types of lumbar disc herniations (LDH) including severely difficult and extremely difficult LDH cases. Pain Physician 2018a;21:E401–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li Z, Zhang C, Chen W, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy versus conventional open lumbar discectomy for upper lumbar disc herniation: a comparative cohort study. Biomed Res Int 2020;2020:1852070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardenbrook M, Lombardo S, Wilson MC, Telfeian AE. The anatomic rationale for transforaminal endoscopic interbody fusion: a cadaveric analysis. FOC 2016;40:E12.
   Google Scholar
• Morgenstern R, Morgenstern C, Jane R, Lee SH. Usefulness of an expandable interbody spacer for the treatment of foraminal stenosis in extremely collapsed disks: preliminary clinical experience with endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal approach. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011;24:485–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lee SH, Erken HY, Bae J. Corrigendum to “percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: clinical and radiological results of mean 46-month follow-up”. Biomed Res Int 2017;2017:3431257.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heo DH, Son SK, Eum JH, Park CK. Fully endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion using a percutaneous unilateral biportal endoscopic technique: technical note and preliminary clinical results. Neurosurg Focus 2017;43:E8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar