City-regional Systems and Competitive Internet Economies

REFERENCES

• AMIN. A. 1998: An Institutionalist Perspective on Regional Economic Development. Proceedings of OECD Conference on "New Challenges in Regional Policies', Boras: Sweden. 28-29 January 1998.
   Google Scholar
• AMIN, A. and THRIFT, N. (eds) 1995: Globalisation, Institutions, and Regional Development in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• BRACZYK, H., COOKE, P. and HEIDENREICH, M. (eds) 1998: Regional Innovation Systems. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• BRESCHI, S. and MALERBA, F. 1997: Sectoral Innovation Systems: Technological Regimes, Schumpeterian Dynamics, and Spatial Boundaries. In Edquist, C. (ed.) Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organisations, London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• BUCKLEY, P. J., PASS, C. L and PRESCOTT, K. 1988: Measures of International Competitiveness: A Critical Survey. Journal of Marketing Management, VoI 4, 175-200.
   Google Scholar
• CABINET OFFICE PERFORMANCE AND INNOVATION UNIT 1999: [email protected]. London : UK Government.
   Google Scholar
• CAMAGNI. R. 1991 : Local 'milieu', uncertainty and innovation networks: towards a new dynamic theory of economic space. In Camagni, R. (ed.) Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• CASTELLS, M and HALL, P. 1994: Technopoles of the World: The Making of 21st Century Industrial Complexes. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• COOKE, P. 1998: Global Clustering and Regional Innovation: systemic integration in Wales. In Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich, M (eds.) Regional Innovation System: The role of governance in a globalized world, London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• COOKE, P. and MORGAN, K. 1994: The regional innovation system of BadenWurttemberg. International Journal of Technology Management, VoI 9, 394-429.
   Google Scholar
• COOKE, P. and SCHIENSTOCK.G. 1998: Preface. In Braczyk, H., Cooke, P. and Heidenreich;, M (eds.) Regional Innovation System: The role of governance in a globalized world, London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• CRAMPTON, G. and EVANS, A. 1991: The Agglomeration Economy of London. Urban Studies, Vol 24, 259-71.
   Google Scholar
• DIGITAL MEDIA ALLIANCE 1998: Recommendations for Growth: UK Digital Media. London: Digital Media Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• DOSI, G. 1988: Sources, Procedures and Microeconomic Effects of Innovation. Journal of Economic literature, VoI 36, 1126-71.
   Google Scholar
• DOSI, G., PAVIIT, K. and SOETE, L 1990: The Economics of Technical Change and International Trade. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
   Google Scholar
• DTI, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE and INDUSTRY 1998a: Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy (White Paper). London: UK Government, December 1998.
   Google Scholar
• DTl, DEPARTMENT OF TRADE AND INDUSTRY 1998b: Our Competitive Future: Building the Knowledge Driven Economy (Digital Economy). London: UK Government, December 1998.
   Google Scholar
• FORESIGHT COMMISSION, 1998: InterAction 2: Driving the Digital Media Economy. Department of Trade and Industry, London, July 1998.
   Google Scholar
• FREEMAN, C. 1995: The National System of Innovation' in Historical Perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, VoI 19, 5-24.
   Google Scholar
• FREEEMAN, C and PEREZ, C: 1988: Structural crises of adjustment, business cycles and investment behaviour. In Dosi, G., Freeman, C, R., N., G. S. and L S. (eds) Technical Change and Economic Theory, London: Pinter, 38-66.
   Google Scholar
• GATES, B. 1995: The Road Ahead. London: Viking.
   Google Scholar
• GELSING, L 1992: Innovation and the development of industrial network. In Lund vall, B. (ed.) National Systems of Innovation, London: Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• GEORGHIOU, L G. and METCALFE, J. S. 1993: Evaluation of the Impact of European Community Research Programmes upon Industrial Competitiveness. R&D Management, VoI 3, 161-9.
   Google Scholar
• HITCHENS, D. M. W., O'FARRELL, P. N. and CONWAY, C;. D. 1996: The competitiveness of business services in the Republic of Ireland, Northern Ireland, Wales, and the South East of England. Environmental and Planning A, VoI 28, 1299-1313.
   Google Scholar
• KRUGMAN, P. 1995: Development, Geography and Economic Theory. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• MALBCKI, E 1997: Technology and Economic Development: The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness. Essex: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• MARSHALL, A. 1890: Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• MORGAN, K. 1997: The Learning Region: Institutions, Innovation and Regional Renewal. Regional Studies, VoI 31, 491503.
   Google Scholar
• NEGROPONTE, N. 1995: Being Digital. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
   Google Scholar
• POKIER, M 1990: The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press, Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• SCOTT, A. J. 1995: The geographic foundations of industrial performance. Competition and Change, VoI 1, 51-66.
   Google Scholar
• STERNBERG, R. 1996: Technology Policies and the Growth of Regions: Evidence from Four Countries. Small Business Economics, VoI 89, 75-86.
   Google Scholar
• STORPER, M. 1995: The Resurgence of Regional Economies, Ten Years Later: The Region as a Nexus of Untraded Interdependencies. European Urban and Regional Studies, VoI 2, 191-221.
   Google Scholar
• SWANN, P. and PREVEZER, M. 1996: A comparison of the dynamics of industrial clustering in computing and biotechnology. Research Policy, VoI 25, 1139-57.
   Google Scholar
• THOMAS, K. 2000: Creating Regional Cultures of Innovation? The Regional Innovation Strategies in England and Scotland. Regional Studies, VoI 34, 190-8.
   Google Scholar
• TUSHMAN, M. and ANDERSON, P. 1986: Technological Discontinuities and Organisational Environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, VoI 31.
   Google Scholar
• UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS 1999: The Internet Economy Indicators. Centre for Research in Electronic Commerce, University of Texas, http://www.internetindicators.com/, July 1999.
   Google Scholar
• WONG, C 1998: Determining Factors for Local Economic Development: The Perception of Practitioners in the North West and Eastern Regions of the UK Regional Studies, VoI 32, 707-20.
   Google Scholar