Can the “Social Licence to Operate” Concept Enhance Engagement and Increase Acceptance of Renewable Energy? A Case Study of Wind Farms in Australia

References

• Arvai, J. L. 2007. Rethinking of risk communication: Lessons from the decision sciences. Tree Genetics & Genomes 3 (2): 173–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth, P., A. Pisarski, and A. Littleboy. 2006. Understanding and incorporating stakeholder perspectives to low emission technologies in Queensland. Brisbane: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Government. 2011. Securing a clean energy future: The Australian Government’s Climate Change Plan. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Banks, B., C. Kroon, J. Klawitter, J. Oldham, K. Moffat, M. Jarvis, and P. Vaanchig. 2010. Research report: Stakeholder perceptions and suggestions—Responsible mineral development initiative. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Boutilier, R., and I. Thompson. 2011. Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice. Cuernavaca: Boutilier & Associates and on Common Ground Consultants.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2009. Renewable energy certificate market—Discussion paper. Melbourne: Clean Energy Council.
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2012. Technologies: Wind [cited 2 August 2012]. Melbourne. Available from http://www.cleanenergycouncil.org.au/technologies/wind.html
   Google Scholar
• CEC. 2013. Community engagement guidelines for the Australian wind industry. Melbourne: Clean Energy Council.
   Google Scholar
• CEDA. 2012. Australia’s unconventional energy options. Melbourne: Committee for Economic Development of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2000. Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln, pp. 509–35. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Corke, C., and T. Latif. 2012. Gone with the wind: Planning laws blow away investment. Climate Spectator, 6 July [cited 2 August 2012]. Available from http://www.climatespectator.com.au; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Corvellec, H. 2007. Arguing for a license to operate: The case of the Swedish wind power industry. Corporate Communications: An International Journal 12 (2): 129–44.10.1108/13563280710744810
   Google Scholar
• Dahl-Østergaard, T. 2003. Community-driven rural development: What have we learned? Washington, DC: Inter-American Development Bank.
   Google Scholar
• DECCW, N. 2010. The wind energy fact sheet. Sydney: NSW Department of Climate Change and Water.
   Google Scholar
• Devine-Wright, P. 2005. Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy 8: 125–39.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DPCD. 2012. Policy and planning guidelines for development of wind energy facilities in Victoria. Melbourne: Victorian Department of Planning and Community Development.
   Google Scholar
• DPLG. 2011. Statewide wind farms: Development plan amendment. Adelaide: South Australian Department of Planning and Local Government.
   Google Scholar
• EPHC. 2010. National wind farm development guidelines—Draft. Canberra: Environment Protection and Heritage Council.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, A., and F. Vanclay. 2009. Using discourse analysis to improve extension practice. Extension Farming Systems Journal 5 (1): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Fontana, A., and J. Frey. 2000. The interview: From structured questions to negotiated text. In Handbook of qualitative research, edited by N. Denzin, and Y. Lincoln, pp. 645–72. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• George, M. 2012. Miles George’s address to the PwC renewable energy breakfast [cited 23 August 2012]. Available from http://www.infigenenergy.com/about-us/news/miles-georges-address-to-the-pwc-renewable-energy-breakfast.html; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, C. 2007. Community perspectives of wind energy in Australia: The application of a justice and community fairness framework to increase social acceptance. Energy Policy 35: 2727–36.10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., R. Kagan, and D. Thornton. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29: 307–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, B. 2011. Social licence to operate is good business. Achieve 4. [cited 23 August 2012]. http://www.SKMConsulting.com/Knowledge-and-Insights/Achieve-Magazine/Issue4-2011/cover.aspx; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, B., and D. Brereton. 2005. Emerging models of community engagement in the Australian minerals industry. Brisbane: UN conference on engaging communities.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmarsh, R. 2010. Wind farms and community engagement in Australia: A critical analysis for policy learning. East Asian Science, Technology and Society 4 (4): 541–63.10.1215/s12280-010-9155-9
   Google Scholar
• Hobman, E., P. Ashworth, P. Graham, and J. Hayward. 2012. The Australian public’s preferences for energy sources and related technologies. Canberra: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Hoepfl, M. 1997. Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education 9 (1): 47–63.
   Google Scholar
• Horbaty, R., and S. Huber. 2012. Final report: IEA wind task 28 on social acceptance of wind energy projects 2008–2011. Paris: International Energy Agency.
   Google Scholar
• van Hoven, B., and A. Poelman. 2003. Using computers for qualitative data analysis: An example using NUD.IST. Journal of Geography in Higher Education 27 (1): 113–20.10.1080/03098260120084403522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IAP2. 2004. IAP2 spectrum of public participation. Thornton: International Association for Public Participation.
   Google Scholar
• Kann, S. 2009. Overcoming barriers to wind project finance in Australia. Energy Policy 37: 3139–48.10.1016/j.enpol.2009.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J., R. Parsons, and K. Moffat. 2012. Exploring the concept of a social licence to operate in the Australian minerals industry: Results from interviews with industry representatives. EP125553. Brisbane: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. 2003. Design issues. In Qualitative research practice, edited by J. Ritchie, and J. Lewis, pp. 47–76. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, C., G. Paxton, J. Parr, and N. Boughen. 2010. Charting the territory: Exploring stakeholder reactions to the prospect of seafloor exploration and mining in Australia. Marine Policy 34: 1374–80.10.1016/j.marpol.2010.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moffat, K., R. Parsons, and J. Lacey 2011. How does a social licence operate? Sustainable Development Indicators in the Mining Industry Conference. Aachen, Germany.
   Google Scholar
• NSW Legislative Council. 2009. Final report: Rural wind farms (Report 31), p. 5. Sydney: NSW Legislative Council General Purpose Standing Committee No.
   Google Scholar
• NSW P&I. 2011. NSW planning guidelines: Wind farms (Draft). Sydney: NSW Planning and Infrastructure.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2011. OECD environmental outlook to 2050. Paris: OECD Environment Directorate and the PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, G. 2011. Can wind beat the noise? June 24 [Cited June 24 2011]. http://www.climatespectator.com.au/commentary/can-wind-beat-noise?utm_source=Climate%2BSpectator%2Bdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Climate%2BSpectator%2Bdaily; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, R., and K. Moffat. 2014. Constructing the meaning of ‘social licence’. Social Epistemology, This issue.
   Google Scholar
• RMDI. 2010. Research report: Stakeholder perceptions and suggestions, responsible mineral development initiative 2010. Geneva: World Economic Forum in collaboration with Australia’s Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research organisation and the World Bank Institute.
   Google Scholar
• ROAM Consulting. 2010. The true costs and benefits of the enhanced RET: Report CEC00003. Melbourne: Clean Energy Council.
   Google Scholar
• Seeger, C. 2011. Unpacking the social licence to operate. Achieve 4 [cited 23 August 2012]. Available from http://www.SKMConsulting.com/Knowledge-and-Insights/Achieve-Magazine/Issue4-2011/article1.aspx; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Senate. 2011. Inquiry report: The social and economic impact of rural wind farms. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. 2008. Gaining a social licence to mine. MINING.com, Vol. 1, pp. 20–3.
   Google Scholar
• SKM Consulting 2012. Wind farm investment, employment and carbon abatement in Australia. Melbourne: Clean Energy Council.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford, J., and M. Slattery. 2010. Public attitudes of wind energy in Texas: Local communities in close proximity to wind farms and their effect on decision-making. Energy Policy 38 (5): 2508–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, I., and R. Boutilier. 2011. Social licence to operate. In Engineering handbook, edited by SME Mining, pp. 1779–96. Englewood, CO: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.
   Google Scholar
• Tognato, C., and J. Spoehr. 2012. The energy to engage: Wind farm development and community engagement in Australia. Adelaide: Australian Workplace Innovation and Social Research Centre, The University of Adelaide.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, G., and P. Devine-Wright. 2008. Community renewable energy: What should it mean? Energy Policy 36 (2): 497–500.10.1016/j.enpol.2007.10.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. 2007. Wind power implementation: The nature of public attitudes: Equity and fairness instead of ‘backyard motives’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 11 (6): 1188–207.10.1016/j.rser.2005.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar