Assessing the Social Licence to Operate of Development Cooperation Organizations: A Case Study of Mercy Corps in Samtskhe-Javakheti, Georgia

References

• Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility. 2013. Definition of the social license to operate [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://www.accsr.com.au/index.php; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. M. 2012. Nonprofit organizations and outcome measurement: From tracking program activities to focusing on frontline work. American Journal of Evaluation 33 (3): 431–47.10.1177/1098214012440496
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boutilier, R. G., and I. Thomson 2011. Modelling and measuring the social license to operate: Fruits of a dialogue between theory and practice [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://socialicense.com/publications/Modelling%20and%20Measuring%20the%20SLO.pdf; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, A. L., D. Stehlik, and A. Buckley. 2011. Social licences to operate: For better not for worse; for richer not for poorer? The impacts of unplanned mining closure for “fence line” residential communities. Local Environment 16 (7): 707–25.10.1080/13549839.2011.592183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1983. Rural development: Putting the last first. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1993. Challenging the professions: Frontiers of rural development. London: IT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, R. 1997. Whose reality counts? Putting the first last. London: IT Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Clarkson, M. B. 1995. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review 20 (1): 92–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conlin, S., and R. Stirrat. 2008. Current challenges in development evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 14 (2): 193–208.10.1177/1356389007087539
   Google Scholar
• Dare, M., F. Vanclay, and J. Schirmer. 2011. Understanding community engagement in plantation forest management: Insights from practitioner and community narratives. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management 54 (9): 1149–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare, M., F. Vanclay, and J. Schirmer. 2012. Public participation in commercial environments: Critical reflections on community engagement methods used in the Australian plantation forestry industry. Australian Forestry 75 (3): 180–91.10.1080/00049158.2012.10676400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dare, M., J. Schirmer, and F. Vanclay. 2014. Community engagement and social licence to operate. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal 32 (4). in press.
   Google Scholar
• Deegan, C., M. Rankin, and J. Tobin. 2004. An examination of the corporate social and environmental disclosures of BHP from 1983–1997: A test of legitimacy theory. In New library of international accounting, vol. 5, edited by C. B. Roberts, pp. 491–522. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Duban, E. 2010. Gender assessment. Tbilisi, GA: USAID. Available from http://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNADS884.pdf; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., D. Franks, and F. Vanclay. 2012. Social impact assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 30 (1): 35–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esteves, A. M., and F. Vanclay. 2009. Social development needs analysis as a tool for SIA to guide corporate-community investment: Applications in the minerals industry. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29 (2): 137–45.10.1016/j.eiar.2008.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franks, D., and Tamar Cohen. 2012. Social licence in design: Constructive technology assessment within a mineral research and development institution. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (7): 1229–40.10.1016/j.techfore.2012.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, R. E. 2010. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Journal. 2013. Top 100 NGOs 2013 [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://theglobaljournal.net/group/top-100-ngos/; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, M., J. Schirmer, M. Lockwood, F. Vanclay, and D. Hanson. 2013. Being good neighbours: Current practices, barriers, and opportunities for community engagement in Australian plantation forestry. Land Use Policy 34: 62–71.10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.02.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., R. Kagan, and D. Thornton. 2004. Social license and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29 (2): 307–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanna, P., and F. Vanclay. 2013. Human rights, indigenous peoples and the concept of free, prior and informed consent. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 31 (2): 146–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Institute for Environment and Development, and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. 2002. Breaking new ground: Mining, minerals, and sustainable development. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, H., and N. Yakovleva. 2012. Corporate social responsibility in the mining industry: Exploring trends in social and environmental disclosure. Journal of Cleaner Production 14 (3–4): 271–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacey, J., R. Parsons, and K. Moffat. 2012. Exploring the concept of a social licence to operate in the Australian minerals industry: Results from interviews with industry representatives. Brisbane: CSIRO.
   Google Scholar
• Langbroek, M., and F. Vanclay. 2012. Learning from the social impacts associated with initiating a windfarm near the former island of Urk. The Netherlands, Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 30 (3): 167–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch-Wood, G., and D. Williamson. 2007. The social licence as a form of regulation for small and medium enterprises. Journal of Law and Society 34 (3): 321–41.10.1111/jols.2007.34.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mercy Corps ‘alliances against poverty’ project website [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://alliances.ge/; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Mercy Corps website [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://www.mercycorps.org; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Mineral Council of Australia. 2005. Enduring value: The Australian minerals industry framework for sustainable development [cited 25 July 2013]. Available from http://www.minerals.org.au/focus/sustainable_development/enduring_value; INTERNET.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. K., B. R. Agle, and D. J. Wood. 1997. Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review 22 (4): 853–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mühlfried, F. 2005. Banquets, grant-eaters and the red intelligentsia in post-soviet Georgia. Central Eurasian Studies Review 4 (1): 16–19.
   Google Scholar
• Nelsen, J. 2006. Social license to operate. International Journal of Mining, Reclamation and Environment 20 (3): 161–2.10.1080/17480930600804182
   Google Scholar
• Owen, J., and D. Kemp. 2013. Social licence and mining: A critical perspective. Resources Policy 38: 29–35.10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.06.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg, L., and F. Vanclay. 2013. Credible claim or corporate spin? A checklist to evaluate corporate sustainability reports. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 15 (3): 1350012 (21 pp.).10.1142/S1464333213500129
   Google Scholar
• Prno, J., and S.D. Slocombe. 2012. Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’ in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources Policy 37: 346–57.10.1016/j.resourpol.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabedashvili, T. 2007. Gender and democratization: The case of Georgia 1996–2006. Tbilisi, GA: Heinrich Boll Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Spence, C. 2007. Social and environmental reporting and hegemonic discourse. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal 20 (6): 855–82.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. 2002. Conceptualising social impacts. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 22 (3): 183–211.10.1016/S0195-9255(01)00105-6
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. 2003. International principles for social impact assessment. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 21 (1): 5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. 2004. The triple bottom line and impact assessment: How do TBL, EIA, SIA, SEA and EMS relate to each other? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy & Management 6 (3): 265–88.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. 2012. The potential application of social impact assessment in integrated coastal zone management. Ocean & Coastal Management 68: 149–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F. 2013. The potential application of qualitative evaluation methods in European regional development: Reflections on the use of performance story reporting in Australian natural resource management. Regional Studies. doi:10.1080/00343404.2013.837998.
   Google Scholar
• Vanclay, F., J. Baines, and C. N. Taylor. 2013. Principles for ethical research involving humans: Ethical professional practice in impact assessment Part I. Impact Assessment & Project Appraisal 31 (4): 243–253. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2013.850307; INTERNET.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warhurst, A. 2001. Corporate citizenship and corporate social investment. Journal of Corporate Citizenship 1: 57–73.10.9774/GLEAF.4700.2001.sp.00008
   Google Scholar
• Warner, R., and R. Sullivan. 2004. Putting partnerships to work: Strategic alliances between government, the private sector and civil society. Sheffield: Greenleaf.
   Google Scholar