A Social Licence for Science: Capturing the Public or Co-Constructing Research?

References

• BBC. 2007. Biofuels “crime against humanity” [cited February 18 2013]. Available from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/7065061.stm.
   Google Scholar
• Benneworth, P. 2013. Exploratory analysis of researcher behaviour challenges the assumption that STEM subjects are more societally useful than SSH [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/2013/10/28/challenging-assumptions-stem-vs-ssh/.
   Google Scholar
• Bird, A., and J. Ladyman. 2013. Free inquiry: The Haldane Principle and the significance of scientific research. Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 2 (7): 14–22. [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://wp.me/p1Bfg0-Of.
   Google Scholar
• BIS. 2010. UK Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. Science for All: Report and action plan from the science for all expert group [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://interactive.bis.gov.uk/scienceandsociety/site/all/2010/02/09/science-for-all-report-and-supporting-documents/.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B., and D. H. Guston. 2009. Science, democracy, and the right to research. Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3): 351–66.10.1007/s11948-009-9135-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgess, J., and J. Chilvers. 2006. Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments. Science and Public Policy 33 (10): 713–28.10.3152/147154306781778551
   Google Scholar
• Dingwall, R., and D. Allen. 2001. The implications of healthcare reforms for the profession of nursing. Nursing Inquiry 8 (2): 64–74.10.1046/j.1440-1800.2001.00100.x
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods, M., and R. E. Ashcroft. 2008. Regulation and the social licence for medical research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4): 381–91.10.1007/s11019-008-9152-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgerton, D. 2009. The “Haldane Principle” and other invented traditions in science policy. History and Policy [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://www.historyandpolicy.org/papers/policy-paper-88.html.
   Google Scholar
• Farrar, A. 2010. Time to end the big green biofuels con [cited November 24 2013]. Available from http://www.rspb.org.uk/community/getinvolved/b/specialplaces/archive/2010/12/22/time-to-end-the-big-green-biofuels-con.aspx.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., and B. Wynne. 2007. Taking European knowledge society seriously [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document_library/pdf_06/european-knowledge-society_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Felt, U., D. Barben, A. Irwin, P. B. Joly, A. Rip, A. Stirling, and T. Stöckelová. 2013. Science in Society: Caring for our futures in turbulent times. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation (ESF) Science Policy Briefing. Available from http://sandbox.esf.org/fileadmin/links/Social/Publications/spb50_ScienceInSociety.pdf. Accessed 28 May 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, S. 2006. The philosophy of science and technology studies. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., and J. Ravetz. 1993. Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25 (7): 739–55.10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldemberg, J., T. B. Johansson, A. K. N. Reddy, and R. H. Williams. 1988. Energy for a sustainable world. New Delhi: Wiley Eastern.
   Google Scholar
• Gunningham, N., R. A. Kagan, and D. Thornton. 2004. Social licence and environmental protection: Why businesses go beyond compliance. Law & Social Inquiry 29 (2): 307–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2000a. Between politics and science: Assuring the integrity and productivity of reseach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511571480
   Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2000b. Retiring the social contract for science. Issues in Science and Technology 16 (4): 32–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2004. Forget politicizing science. Let’s democratize science! Issues in Science and Technology Fall 2004 21 (1): 25–28
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. H. 2008. Innovation policy: Not just a jumbo shrimp. Nature 454 (7207): 940–41.10.1038/454940a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, D. O. 1991. Biomass energy. Energy Policy 19: 711–37.10.1016/0301-4215(91)90042-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. 2003. When nature goes public: The making and unmaking of bio-prospecting in Mexico. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hayden, C. 2007. Taking as giving: Bioscience, exchange, and the politics of benefit-sharing. Social Studies of Science 37 (5): 729–58.10.1177/0306312707078012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, E. C. 1959. The dual mandate of social science: Remarks on the academic division of labour. The Canadian Journal of Economics and Political Science 25 (4): 401–10.10.2307/138980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., and M. Michael. 2003. Science, social theory and public knowledge. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41 (3): 223–44.10.1023/A:1025557512320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. 2004. Ordering knowledge, ordering society. In States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order, edited by S. Jasanoff, pp. 13–45. New York: Routledge.10.4324/9780203413845
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, S. and S. Raman. in press. Energy poverty, institutional reform and the challenges of sustainable development: The case of India. Progress in Development Studies
   Google Scholar
• John, S., and T. Lewens. 2010. The Universal Ethical code for scientists and the “crisis of trust in science”. Report to the science and trust working group, UK Department of Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://bit.ly/1gbYPY2.
   Google Scholar
• Littlefield, M., and A. Pollock. 2011. Review essay: Troubling with ‘the ethics of the thing’ in culturing life: How cells became technologies and the immortal life of Henrietta lacks. Social Studies of Science 41 (4): 609–18.10.1177/0306312711408485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhiwalla, N. 2011. The NBC and the bioethics movement in India. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics 8 (1): 3–4.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mohr, A., and S. Raman. 2012. representing the public in public engagement: The case of the 2008 UK stem cell dialogue. PLoS Biology 10 (11): e1001418.10.1371/journal.pbio.1001418
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raman, S. 2014. Science, uncertainty and the normative question of epistemic governance. In Knowledge, technology and law: Interrogating the Nexus, edited by E. Cloatre and M. Pickersgill, Chapter 1. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raman, S., and A. Mohr. 2013. Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. Journal of Cleaner Production. Available from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057.
   Google Scholar
• Reardon, J. 2001. The human genome diversity project: A case study in coproduction. Social Studies of Science 31 (3): 357–88.10.1177/030631201031003002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Royal Society. 2012. Science as an open enterprise [cited November 25 2013]. Available from http://royalsociety.org/policy/projects/science-public-enterprise/.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J. 2013. Foreword: Why responsible innovation? In Responsible innovation. Managing the responsible emergence of science and innovation in society, edited by R. Owen, Bessant, J., and M. Heintz, pp. xi–xiv.London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., A. Irwin, and K. Jones. 2006. The received wisdom: Opening up expert advice. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Stilgoe, J., R. Owen, and P. Macnaghten. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy 42 (9): 1568–80.10.1016/j.respol.2013.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Testa, G. 2008. Stem cells through stem beliefs: The co-production of biotechnological pluralism. Science as Culture 17 (4): 435–48.10.1080/09505430802519199
   Google Scholar
• Thornton, D., R. A. Kagan, and N. Gunningham. 2009. When social norms and pressures are not enough: Environmental performance in the trucking industry. Law & Society Review 43 (2): 405–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tutton, R., and O. Corrigan, eds. 2004. Genetic databases: Socio-ethical issues in the collection and use of DNA. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wilsdon, J., B. Wynne, and J. Stilgoe. 2005. The public value of science. London: Demos.
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2002. Risk and environment as legitimatory discourses of technology: Reflexivity inside out? Current Sociology 50 (3): 459–77.10.1177/0011392102050003010
   Google Scholar
• Wynne, B. 2006. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science–hitting the notes, but missing the music? Public Health Genomics 9 (3): 211–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar