Publication Cover
Social Epistemology
A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy
Volume 31, 2017 - Issue 2
396
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Psychological Meaning of “Coauthorship” Among Scientists Using the Natural Semantic Networks Technique

References

  • Amabile, T. M., C. Patterson, J. Mueller, T. Wojcik, P. W. Odomirok, M. Marsh, and S. J. Kramer. 2001. “Academic-practitioner Collaboration in Management Research: A Case of Cross-profession Collaboration.” Academy of Management Journal 44 (2): 418–431.10.2307/3069464
  • Ancona, D. G., and D. F. Caldwell. 1992. “Bridging the Boundary: External Process and Performance in Organizational Teams.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 634–665.10.2307/2393475
  • Baddeley, A. 2012. “Working Memory: Theories, Models, and Controversies.” Annual Review of Psychology 63: 1–29.
  • Barresi, J., and C. Moore. 1996. “Intentional Relations and Social Understanding.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19: 107–154.10.1017/S0140525X00041790
  • Beaver, D. D. 2001. “Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its Study): Past, Present, and Future.” Scientometrics 52 (3): 365–377.10.1023/A:1014254214337
  • Bozeman, B., and E. Corley. 2004. “Scientists’ Collaboration Strategies: Implications for Scientific and Technical Human Capital.” Research Policy 33 (4): 599–616.10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.008
  • Bravo, F. P. 1991. “Análisis de la interacción de las estructuras linguísticas y los conceptos en la determinación del significado del lenguaje [Linguistic Structure Interaction Analysis and the Concepts in the Determination of Language Meaning].” PhD diss., Tesis de maestría, UNAM, México.
  • Bukvova, H. 2010. “Studying Research Collaboration: A Literature Review.” Journal of Information Science 6 (1): 33–38.
  • Burgess, C., and K. Lund. 2000. “The Dynamics of Meaning in Memory.” Chap. 6 in Cognitive Dynamics: Conceptual and Representational Change in Humans and Machines, edited by E. Dietrich and A. B. Markman, 117–156. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Cannon-Bowers, J. A., E. Salas, and S. A. Converse. 1993. “Shared Mental Models in Team Decision Making.” In Individual and Group Decision Making, edited by N. J. Castellan Jr., 221–246. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Collins, H. M. 2001. “Tacit Knowledge, Trust and the Q of Sapphire.” Social Studies of Science 31: 71–86.10.1177/030631201031001004
  • Collins, A. M., and M. R. Quillian. 1969. “Retrieval Time from Semantic Memory.” Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior 9: 240–247.10.1016/S0022-5371(69)80069-1
  • Ericsson, K. A., and W. Kintsch. 1995. “Long-term Working Memory.” Psychological Review 102 (2): 211–245.10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
  • Ferligoj, A., L. Kronegger, F. Mali, T. A. Snijders, and P. Doreian. 2015. “Scientific Collaboration Dynamics in a National Scientific System.” Scientometrics 104 (3): 985–1012.10.1007/s11192-015-1585-7
  • Figueroa, J. G., E. G. Gonzalez, and V. M. Solis. 1976. “An Approach to the Problem of Meaning: Semantic Networks.” Journal of Pyscholinguistic Research 5: 107–115.10.1007/BF01067252
  • Fiore, S. M. 2008. “Interdisciplinarity as Teamwork: How the Science of Teams Can Inform Team Science.” Small Group Research 39 (3): 251–277.10.1177/1046496408317797
  • Franceschet, M., and A. Costantini. 2010. “The Effect of Scholar Collaboration on Impact and Quality of Academic Papers.” Journal of Informetrics 4 (4): 540–553.10.1016/j.joi.2010.06.003
  • Gazni, A., C. R. Sugimoto, and F. Didegah. 2012. “Mapping World Scientific Collaboration: Authors, Institutions, and Countries.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63 (2): 323–335.10.1002/asi.v63.2
  • Glänzel, W., and A. Schubert. 2004. “Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-authorship.” Chap. 11 in Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S & T Systems, edited by H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel and U. Schmoch, 257–276. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  • Gorman, M. 2008. “Scientific and Technological Expertise.” Journal of Psychology of Science and Technology 1 (1): 23–31.10.1891/1939-7054.1.1.23
  • Grosz, B. J., and S. Kraus. 1996. “Collaborative Plans for Complex Group Action.” Artificial Intelligence 86 (2): 269–358.10.1016/0004-3702(95)00103-4
  • Kanter, P. F., L. A. Medrano, and H. Conn. 2015. “Does Mood Affect Self-concept? Analysis through a Natural Semantic Networks Based Approach.” International Journal of Behavioral Research and Psychology 3 (5): 114–120.10.19070/2332-3000
  • Katz, J. S., and B. R. Martin. 1997. “What is Research Collaboration?” Research Policy 26 (1): 1–18.10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00917-1
  • Kraut, R. E., C. Egido, and J. R. Galegher. 1990. “Patterns of Contact and Communication in Scientific Collaborations.” In Intellectual Teamwork: Social and Technological Foundations of Cooperative Work, edited by J. R. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, and C. Egido, 31–58. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Kraut, R. E., J. Galegher, and C. Egido. 1987. “Relationships and Tasks in Scientific Research Collaboration.” Human-Computer Interaction 3 (1): 31–58.10.1207/s15327051hci0301_3
  • Laudel, G. 2002. “What Do We Measure by Coauthorships?” Research Evaluation 11: 3–16.10.3152/147154402781776961
  • Liberman, S. S., and C. R. Galán Díaz. 2005. “Shared Semantic Meaning of the Concept of International Collaboration among Scientists.” Journal of Information Management and Scientometrics 2 (2): 27–34.
  • Liberman, S., and G. Lozano Razo. 2011. “Semantic Meaning of Tacit Knowledge according to Scientists.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the 4S Annual Meeting – Abstract and Session Submissions, Crowne Plaza Cleveland City Center Hotel, Cleveland, OH. http://citation.allacademic.com/meta/p518090_index.html.
  • Liberman, S., and J. M. Russell. 2004. “Task Assignment in Scientific Groups and Its Relationship with Coauthorship Patterns.” In Studying Scientific Collaboration. Part 1: Methodology for Investigating Collaboration. Part 2: Research Papers – Collaboration in Action, edited by M. Davis, H. Small, E. Geisler, C. Chen, J. Qin, J.-H. Park, S. Liberman, et al. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 41: 545–549. doi:10.1002/meet.1450410166.
  • Liberman, S., and K. B. Wolf. 1997. “The Flow of Knowledge: Scientific Contacts in Formal Meetings.” Social Networks 19 (3): 271–283.10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00303-6
  • Liberman, S., and K. B. Wolf. 1998. “Bonding Number in Scientific Disciplines.” Social Networks 20 (3): 239–246.10.1016/S0378-8733(98)00003-3
  • Liberman, S., and K. B. Wolf. 2013. “Scientific Communication in the Process to Coauthorship.” Chap. 6 in Handbook of the Psychology of Science, edited by G. J. Feist and M. Gorman, 123–147. New York: Springer. ISBN-13: 978-0-8261-0624-7.
  • Lima, M., S. Liberman, and M. J. Russell. 2005. “Scientific Group Cohesiveness at the National University of México.” Scientometrics 64: 55–66.
  • Lopez, E. O., and J. Theios. 1992. “Semantic Analyzer of Schemata Organization (saso).” Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 24 (2): 277–285.
  • Marra, R. M., and D. H. Jonassen. 2002. “Transfer Effects of Semantic Networks on Expert Systems: Mindtools at Work.” Journal of Educational Computing Research 26: 1–24.10.2190/WMLN-N7JC-21PA-47TH
  • Mathieu, J. E., T. S. Heffner, G. F. Goodwin, E. Salas, and J. A. Cannon-Bowers. 2000. “The Influence of Shared Mental Models on Team Process and Performance.” The Journal of Applied Psychology 85 (2): 273–283.10.1037/0021-9010.85.2.273
  • Morales, G. E., and M. G. Santos-Alcantara. 2015. “Alternative Empirical Directions to Evaluate Schemata Organization.” Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal 2 (9): 51–58.
  • Moscovici, S. 1973. “Foreword.” In Health and Illness: A Social Psychological Analysis, edited by C. Herzlich, xvii. London: Academic Press.
  • Novak, J. D. 1998. Learning, Creating, and Using Knowledge: Concept Maps as Facilitative Tools in Schools and Corporations. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Osgood, C. E. 1952. “The Nature and Measurement of Meaning.” Psychological Bulletin 49: 197–237.10.1037/h0055737
  • Osgood, C. E., G. J. Suci, and P. H. Tannenbaum. 1957. The Measurement of Meaning, 7. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
  • Pérez-Corona, N., D. Hernández-Colín, C. Bustillo-Hernández, and J. Figueroa-Nazuno. 2012. “Model of Natural Semantic Space for Ontologies’ Construction.” International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems & Informatics 3 (2): 93–108.
  • Rieser, D. C., and O. Bernhard. 2016. “Measuring Trust: The Simpler the Better?” In Proceedings of the 2016 CHI Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, CA: ACM, May 2940–2946.
  • Romney, A. K., J. P. Boyd, C. C. Moore, W. H. Batchelder, and T. J. Brazill. 1996. “Culture as Shared Cognitive Representations.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 93 (10): 4699–4705.10.1073/pnas.93.10.4699
  • Rosch, E., and C. B. Mervis. 1975. “Family Resemblances: Studies in the Internal Structure of Categories.” Cognitive Psychology 7 (4): 573–605.10.1016/0010-0285(75)90024-9
  • Sonnenwald, D. H. 2007. “Scientific Collaboration.” Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 41 (1): 643–681.10.1002/aris.2007.1440410121
  • Sowa, J. F., ed. 2014. Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.
  • Thagard, P. 2005. “How to Collaborate.” The Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (Supplement): 177–196.
  • Valdez, J. L. 1998. Las redes semánticas naturales, Usos y aplicaciones en Psicología Social [Natural Semantic Networks, Uses and Applications in Social Psychology]. México: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México.
  • Verhagen, T., B. van Den Hooff, and S. Meents. 2015. “Toward a Better use of the Semantic Differential in is Research: An Integrative Framework of Suggested Action.” Journal of the Association for Information Systems 16 (2): 108–143.
  • Wheelan, S. A., and C. L. Krasick. 1993. “The Emergence, Transmission, and Acceptance of Themes in a Temporary System of Interacting Groups.” Group & Organization Management 18 (2): 237–260.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.