Transformative science: a new index and the impact of non-funding, private funding, and public funding

References

• Adam, D. 2002. “Citation Analysis: The Counting House.” Nature 415 (6873): 726–729.10.1038/415726a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrés, A. 2009. Measuring Academic Research: How to Undertake a Bibliometric Study. Oxford: Chandos Publishing.10.1533/9781780630182
   Google Scholar
• Austin, F. C. 2008. “High-risk High-reward Research Demonstration Project.” Presentation given to the NIH Council of Councils, Bethesda, MD.
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., H. V. Van de Sompel, A. Hagberg, L. Bettencourt, R. Chute, A. A. Rodriguez, and L. Balakireva. 2009. “Clickstream Data Yields High-resolution Maps of Science.” PLoS One 4 (3): e4803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0004803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bollen, J., H. V. Van de Sompel, A. Hagberg, and R. Chute. 2009. “A Principal Component Analysis of 39 Scientific Impact Measures.” PLoS One 4 (6): e6022. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0006022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., and H. D. Daniel. 2008. “What Do Citation Counts Measure? A Review of Studies on Citing Behavior.” Journal of Documentation 64 (1): 45–80.10.1108/00220410810844150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., R. Mutz, C. Neuhaus, and H. D. Daniel. 2008. “Use of Citation Counts for Research Evaluation: Standards of Good Practice for Analyzing Bibliometric Data and Presenting and Interpreting Results.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8: 93–102.10.3354/esep00084
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, P. 2008. “Escape from the Impact Factor.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1): 5–7.10.3354/esep00078
   Google Scholar
• Cronin, B., and L. Meho. 2006. “Using the H-index to Rank Influential Information Scientists.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 57 (9): 1275–1278.10.1002/(ISSN)1532-2890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Bellis, N. 2009. Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feist, G. J. 2006. The Psychology of Science and the Origins of the Scientific Mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, R. C., F. Antoneli, and M. R. S. Briones. 2013. “The Hidden Factors in Impact Factors: A Perspective from Brazilian Science.” Frontiers in Genetics 4 (130): 1–2. doi:10.3389/fgene.2013.00130.
   Google Scholar
• Frodeman, R., and J. B. Holbrook. 2012. “The Promise and Perils of Transformative Research.” Report on the workshop: Transformative research: Ethical and societal implications, Arlington, VA.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E. 2006. “The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor.” JAMA-Journal of the American Medical Association 295 (1): 90–93.10.1001/jama.295.1.90
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholson, B., W. R. Shadish, R. A. Neimeyer, and A. C. Houts, eds. 1989. The Psychology of Science: Contributions to Metascience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. 2008. “Validating Research Performance Metrics against Peer Rankings.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (11). Accessed August 2, 2015. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/265619/1/esep-harnad.html
   Google Scholar
• Harzing, A. W. K., and R. van der Wal. 2008. “Google Scholar as a New Source for Citation Analysis.” Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics 8 (1): 62–71.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, P., and Z. Walton. 2012. “The Consequences of Predicting Scientific Impact in Psychology Using Journal Impact Factors.” Perspectives on Psychological Science 7 (1): 72–78.10.1177/1745691611429356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. 2005. “An Index to Quantify an Individual’s Scientific Research Output.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 102 (46): 16569–16572.10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, D. C. 1997. Statistical Methods for Psychology. 4th ed. Belmont, CA: Duxbury Press.
   Google Scholar
• H.R. 5116–111th Congress: America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2010. 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kurmis, A. P. 2003. “Understanding the Limitations of the Journal Impact Factor.” The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery 85 (12): 2449–2454.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, J. 2010. “Let’s Make Science Metrics More Scientific.” Nature 464 (7288): 488–489.10.1038/464488a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Largent, M. A., and J. I. Lane. 2012. “STAR METRICS and the Science of Science Policy.” Review of Policy Research 29 (3): 431–438.10.1111/ropr.2012.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meho, L. I. 2006. The Rise and Rise of Citation Analysis. Physics World 20 (1): 32.
   Google Scholar
• Meho, L. I., and K. Yang. 2007. “A New Era in Citation and Bibliometric Analyses: Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar.” Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 58: 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, M., and C. Oppenheim. 2007. “Comparing Alternatives to the Web of Science for Coverage of the Social Sciences’ Literature.” Journal of Informetrics 1 (2): 161–169.10.1016/j.joi.2006.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheim, C. 1996. “Do Citations Count? Citation Indexing and the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE).” Serials: The Journal for the Serials Community 9 (2): 155–161.10.1629/09155
   Google Scholar
• Opthof, T. 1997. “Sense and Nonsense about the Impact Factor.” Cardiovascular Research 33 (1): 1–7.10.1016/S0008-6363(96)00215-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, J. 2002. “Notes on the Use of Data Transformations.” Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 8 (6). Accessed July 25, 2015. http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=6
   Google Scholar
• The PLoS Medicine Editors. 2006. “The Impact Factor Game.” PLoS Medicine 3 (6): e291. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1972. Objective Knowledge: An Evolutionary Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radicchi, F., S. Fortunato, and C. Castellano. 2008. “Universality of Citation Distributions: Toward an Objective Measure of Scientific Impact.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105 (45): 17268–17272.10.1073/pnas.0806977105
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieppel, O. 2010. “The Series, the Network, and the Tree: Changing Metaphors of Order in Nature.” Biology & Philosophy 25: 475–496.10.1007/s10539-010-9216-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment. 2013. Accessed July 23, 2013. http://am.ascb.org/dora/
   Google Scholar
• Seglen, P. O. 1997. “Why the Impact Factor of Journals Should Not Be Used for Evaluating Research.” BMJ: British Medical Journal 314 (7079): 498–502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simonton, D. K. 2004. Creativity in Science: Chance, Logic, Genius, and Zeitgeist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165358
   Google Scholar