Transformational Fallibilism and the Development of Understanding

References

• Anderssen, N., C. Amlie, and E. A. Ytterøy. 2002. “Outcomes for Children with Lesbian or Gay Parents. A Review of Studies from 1978 to 2000.” Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 43 (4): 335–351.10.1111/sjop.2002.43.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, M. 1995. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511557675
   Google Scholar
• Bamford, G. 1993. “Popper’s Explications of Ad Hocness: Circularity, Empirical Content, and Scientific Practice.” British Journal of the Philosophy of Science 44 (2): 335–355.10.1093/bjps/44.2.335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, B. 1982. T.S. Kuhn and Social Science. London: Macmillan.10.1007/978-1-349-16721-0
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1986. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, R. 1997. A Realist Theory of Science. 2nd ed. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Biblarz, T. J., and J. Stacey. 2010. “How Does the Gender of Parents Matter?” Journal of Marriage and Family 72 (1): 3–22.10.1111/jomf.2010.72.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter, B., and S. Virdee. 2008. “Racism and the Sociological Imagination.” The British Journal of Sociology 59 (4): 661–679.10.1111/(ISSN)1468-4446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, H. 2012. Is H₂0 Water? Evidence, Realism and Pluralism. Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-94-007-3932-1
   Google Scholar
• Collier, A. 1994. Critical Realism: An Introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s Philosophy. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, J. 2004. “A Tale of Two Ontologies: An Immanent Critique of Critical Realism.” The Sociological Review 52 (4): 567–585.10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demir, I. 2006. “Thomas Kuhn’s Construction of Scientific Communities.” In Returning (to) Communities: Theory, Culture and Political Practice of the Communal, edited by S. Herbrechter and M. Higgins, 89–109. New York: Rodopi.
   Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2007. “For Emergence: Refining Archer’s Account of Social Structure.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (1): 25–44.10.1111/jtsb.2007.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elder-Vass, D. 2012. The Reality of Social Construction. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9781139169202
   Google Scholar
• Fay, B. 1990. “Critical Realism?” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 20 (1): 33–41.10.1111/jtsb.1990.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garrison, J. 1994. “Realism, Deweyan Pragmatism, and Educational Research.” Educational Researcher 23 (1): 5–14.10.3102/0013189X023001005
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, N. 1962. “Leverrier: The Zenith and Nadir of Newtonian Mechanics.” Isis 53 (3): 359–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hentschel, K. 1992. “Einstein’s Attitude towards Experiments: Testing Relativity Theory 1907–1927.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 23 (4): 593–624.10.1016/0039-3681(92)90014-W
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesse, M. 1974. The Structure of Scientific Inference. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. 1996. Founding Sociology? Talcott Parsons and the Idea of General Theory. London: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J. 2001. “Gender and Critical Realism: A Critique of Sayer.” Sociology 35 (4): 947–965.10.1177/0038038501035004009
   Google Scholar
• Holmwood, J., and A. Stewart. 1991. Explanation and Social Theory. London: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holton, G. 1969. “Einstein, Michelson, and the “Crucial” Experiment.” Isis 60 (2): 133–197.10.1086/350468
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, A. 2007. “Why I Am Not an Individualist.” Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 37 (2): 211–219.10.1111/jtsb.2007.37.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, T. S. [1962] 1970. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. New York: New American Library.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1978. The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers Volume 1. Edited by J. Worrall and G. Currie. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511621123
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, L. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 19–49.10.1086/288975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leplin, J. 1997. A Novel Defense of Scientific Realism. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• New, C. 2005. “Sex and Gender: A Critical Realist Approach.” New Formations 56: 54–70.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. 1949. The Structure of Social Action. 2nd ed. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Popenoe, D. 1996a. “A World without Fathers.” The Wilson Quarterly 20 (2): 12–29.
   Google Scholar
• Popenoe, D. 1996b. Life without Father: Compelling New Evidence That Fatherhood and Marriage Are Indispensable for the Good of Children and Society. London: Martin Kessler.
   Google Scholar
• Popper, K. 1959. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. 2004. “Objectivity and Phallogocentrism.” In Defending Objectivity: Essays in Honour of Andrew Collier, edited by M. Archer and W. Outhwaite, 48–60. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, D. 2005. “The Spiritual Turn in Critical Realism.” New Formations 56: 147–161.
   Google Scholar
• Psillos, S. 1999. Scientific Realism: How Science Tracks Truth. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, W. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 60 (1): 20–43.10.2307/2181906
   Google Scholar
• Rorty, R. 1991. Objectivity, Relativism and Truth. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.
   Google Scholar
• Rule, J. 1997. Theory and Progress in Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge UP.10.1017/CBO9780511600883
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. [1984] 1992. Method in Social Science: A Realist Approach. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000a. Realism and Social Science. London: Sage.10.4135/9781446218730
   Google Scholar
• Sayer, A. 2000b. “System, Lifeworld and Gender: Associational versus Counterfactual Thinking.” Sociology 34 (4): 707–725.10.1177/S0038038500000432
   Google Scholar
• Silverstein, L. B., and C. F. Auerbach. 1999. “Deconstructing the Essential Father.” American Psychologist 54 (6): 397–407.10.1037/0003-066X.54.6.397
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tasker, F. 2010. “Same-sex Parenting and Child Development: Reviewing the Contribution of Parental Gender.” Journal of Marriage and Family 72 (1): 35–40.10.1111/jomf.2010.72.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dongen, J. 2009. “On the Role of the Michelson–Morley Experiment: Einstein in Chicago.” Archive for History of Exact Sciences 63 (6): 655–663.10.1007/s00407-009-0050-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, B. 1980. The Scientific Image. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0198244274.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Vanfraussen, K., I. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen, and A. Brewaeys. 2002. “What Does It Mean for Youngsters to Grow up in a Lesbian Family Created by Means of Donor Insemination?” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 20 (4): 237–252.10.1080/0264683021000033165
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will, C. 1988. Was Einstein Right?. Oxford: Oxford UP.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, M. 2001. Problems of Knowledge: A Critical Introduction to Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Woolgar, S. 1988. Science: The Very Idea. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar