Dialogical Research Design: Practising Ethical, Useful and Safe(r) Research

References

• Ackerly, B., and J. True. 2008. “Reflexivity in Practice: Power and Ethics in Feminist Research on International Relations.” International Studies Review 10 (4): 693–707. doi:10.1111/misr.2008.10.issue-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adichie, C. N. 2009. “Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: The Danger of a Single Story.” (TEDGlobal conference). https://www.ted.com/talks/chimamanda_adichie_the_danger_of_a_single_story/transcript?language=en
   Google Scholar
• Artz, L., T. Meer, H. Galgut, and A. Müller. 2017. “Participation in Practice: A Case Study of A Collaborative Project on Sexual Offences in South Africa.” Feminist Review 115 (1): 79–96. doi:10.1057/s41305-017-0040-4.
   Google Scholar
• Bakhtin, M. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin. Edited by Michael Holquist. Translated by Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. Austin: Univ. of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barkawi, T., and M. Laffey. 2006. “The Postcolonial Moment in Security Studies.” Review of International Studies 32: 329–352. doi:10.1017/S0260210506007054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blaney, D. L., and N. Inayatullah. 2004. International Relations and the Problem of Difference. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bliesemann de Guevara, B., and B. Poopuu. Forthcoming. “Preparing for Fieldwork Interviews.” In The Companion to Peace and Conflict Fieldwork, edited by R. Mac Ginty, B. Vogel, and R. Brett. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Bouka, Y. 2018. “Collaborative Research as Structural Violence.” Blog post in Political Violence @ a Glance, https://politicalviolenceataglance.org/2018/07/12/collaborative-research-as-structural-violence/
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, J. D. 2016. “The Ethics of Ethical Debates in Peace and Conflict Research: Notes Towards the Development of a Research Covenant.” Methodological Innovations 9: 1–11. doi:10.1177/2059799116630657.
   Google Scholar
• Browne, B., and L. Moffett. 2014. “Finding Your Feet in the Field: Critical Reflections of Early Career Researchers on Field Research in Transitional Societies.” Journal of Human Rights Practice 6 (2): 223–237. doi:10.1093/jhuman/huu010.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, S. P. 2017. “Ethics of Research in Conflict Environments.” Journal of Global Security Studies 2 (1): 89–101. doi:10.1093/jogss/ogw024.
   Google Scholar
• Coles, J., and N. Mudaly. 2010. “Staying Safe: Strategies for Qualitative Child Abuse Researchers.” Child Abuse Review 19: 56–69. doi:10.1002/car.v19:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dzuverovic, N. 2018. “Why Local Voices Matter. Participation of Local Researchers in the Liberal Peace Debate.” Peacebuilding 6 (2): 111–126. doi:10.1080/21647259.2018.1449186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enloe, C. 2010. Nimo’s War, Emma’s War: Making Feminist Sense of the Iraq War. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 2016a. “Just Methods in Revolting Times.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 13 (4): 347–365. doi:10.1080/14780887.2016.1219800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fine, M. 2016b. “Participatory Designs for Critical Literacies from Under the Covers.” Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice 65: 47–68. doi:10.1177/2381336916661527.
   Google Scholar
• Fontes, L. A. 2004. “Ethics in Violence against Women Research: The Sensitive, the Dangerous, and the Overlooked.” Ethics & Behaviour 14 (2): 141–174. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1402_4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. 2016. “Politics of the ‘Field’.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (4): 1147–1152. doi:10.1017/S1537592716003236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujii, L. A. 2018. Interviewing in Social Science Research: A Relational Approach. New York and London: Routledge. Kindle.
   Google Scholar
• Go, J. 2018. “Relational Sociology and Postcolonial Theory: Sketches of a ‘Postcolonial Relationalism’ .” In The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, edited by F. Dépelteau, 357–373. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Holquist, M. 2002. Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2017. “Pacifism: The Anatomy of a Subjugated Knowledge.” Critical Studies on Security 6 (2): 160–175. doi:10.1080/21624887.2017.1342750.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. 2018. “Post-liberal Peacebuilding and the Pacifist State.” Peacebuilding 6 (1): 1–16. doi:10.1080/21647259.2017.1303871.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Julian, R., B. Bliesemann de Guevara, and R. Redhead. 2019. “From Expert to Experiential Knowledge: Exploring the Inclusion of Local Experiences in Understanding Violence in Conflict.” Peacebuilding 7: 210–225. doi:10.1080/21647259.2019.1594572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappler, S. 2013. “Coping with Research: Local Tactics of Resistance against (Mis-)representation in Academia.” Peacebuilding 1 (1): 125–140. doi:10.1080/21647259.2013.756279.
   Google Scholar
• Kappler, S., and N. Lemay-Hébert. 2019. “From Power-Blind Binaries to the Intersectionality of Peace: Connecting Feminism and Critical Peace and Conflict Studies.” Peacebuilding 7: 160–177. doi:10.1080/21647259.2019.1588456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurowska, X. 2019. “When One Door Closes, Another Opens? the Ways and Byways of Denied Access, or a Central European Liberal in Fieldwork Failure.” Journal of Narrative Politics 5 (2): 71–85.
   Google Scholar
• Kurowska, X., and B. Bliesemann de Guevara. Forthcoming. “Interpretive Approaches in Political Science and International Relations.” In The SAGE Handbook of Research Methods in Political Science & IR, edited by L. Curini and R. J. Franzese. London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Linabary, J. R., and S. A. Hamel. 2017. “Feminist Online Interviewing: Engaging Issues of Power, Resistance and Reflexivity in Practice.” Feminist Review 115 (1): 97–113. doi:10.1057/s41305-017-0041-3.
   Google Scholar
• Ling, L. H. M. 2014. The Dao of World Politics: Towards a Post-Westphalian, Worldist International Relations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Loyle, C. E., and A. Simoni. 2017. “Researching Under Fire: Political Science and Researcher Trauma.” PS: Political Science & Politics 50 (1): 141–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Močnik, N. 2018. Sexuality after War Rape: From Narrative to Embodied Research. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R. 2014. Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism. Chicago, Springfield: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. 2003. “International Relations as Emergent Bakhtinian Dialogue.” International Studies Review 5 (1): 137–140. doi:10.1111/misr.2003.5.issue-1.
   Google Scholar
• Rutazibwa, O. U. 2019. “What’s There to Mourn? Decolonial Reflections on (the End Of) Liberal Humanitarianism.” Journal of Humanitarian Affairs 1 (1): 65–67. doi:10.7227/JHA.010.
   Google Scholar
• Sajed, A. 2013. Postcolonial Encounters in International Relations: The Politics of Transgression in the Maghreb. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Selg, P. 2018. “Power and Relational Sociology.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Relational Sociology, edited by F. Dépelteau, 539–557. Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. C. 1988. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Basingstoke: Macmillan Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sylvester, C. 1994. “Empathetic Cooperation: A Feminist Method for IR.” Millennium: Journal of International Studies 23 (2): 315–334. doi:10.1177/03058298940230021301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Temple, B., and R. Moran. 2011. “Introduction.” In Doing Research with Refugees: Issues and Guidelines, edited by B. Temple and R. Moran, 1–20. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tickner, A. B. 2013. “Core, Periphery and (neo)imperialist International Relations.” European Journal of International Relations 19 (3): 627–646. doi:10.1177/1354066113494323.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torre, M. E., B. G. Stoudt, E. Manoff, and M. Fine. 2018. “Critical Participatory Action Research on State Violence: Bearing Wit(h)ness across Fault Lines of Power, Privilege and Dispossession.” In The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research, edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 492–515. 5th ed. California: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Vastapuu, L. 2018. Liberia’s Women Veterans: War, Roles, Reintegration. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• von Benzon, N., and L. van Blerk. 2017. “Research Relationships and Responsibilities: ‘Doing’ Research with ‘Vulnerable’ Participants: Introduction to the Special Edition.” Social & Cultural Geography 18 (7): 895–905. doi:10.1080/14649365.2017.1346199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitt-Woosley, A., and G. Sprang. 2018. “Secondary Traumatic Stress in Social Science Researchers of Trauma-Exposed Populations.” Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma 27 (5): 475–486. doi:10.1080/10926771.2017.1342109.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wibben, A. T. R., C. C. Confortini, S. Roohi, S. B. Aharoni, L. Vastapuu, and T. Vaittinen. 2018. “Collective Discussion: Piecing-Up Feminist Peace Research.” International Political Sociology. doi:10.1093/ips/oly034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., and P. Schwartz-Shea. 2015. “Doing Social Science in a Humanistic Manner.” In Interpretation and Method: Empirical Research Methods and the Interpretive Turn, edited by D. Yanow and P. Schwartz-Shea, 433–447. New York: M. E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar