Gendered Embodiment of the Ethnographer during Fieldwork in a Conflict Region of India

References

• Abu-Lughod, L. 1991. “Writing Against Culture.” In Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present, edited by R. G. Fox, 466–479. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ashtalkovska, A. 2001. “How Did Things Become Complicated? Some Methodological and Ethical Issues on the Research of Gossip.” EthnoAnthropoZoom 7: 1063.
   Google Scholar
• Bachmann, V. 2011. “Participating and Observing: Positionality and Fieldwork Relations during Kenya’s Post-Election Crisis.” Area 43 (3): 362–368. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4762.2010.00985.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, S. 2005. Durable Disorder: Understanding the Politics of Northeast India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaumik, S. 2009. Troubled Periphery: Crisis of India’s North East. New Delhi: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Billo, E., and N. Hiemstra. 2013. “Mediating Messiness: Expanding Ideas of Flexibility, Reflexivity, and Embodiment in Fieldwork.” Gender, Place & Culture 20 (3): 313–328. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2012.674929.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bondi, L. 2003. “Empathy and Identification: Conceptual Resources for Feminist Fieldwork.” ACME: an International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 2: 64–76.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. (R. Nice, Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. 1990. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cerwonka, A., and L. H. Malkki. 2007. Improvising Theory: Process and Temporality in Ethnographic Fieldwork. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA. Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, J., and G. Marcus, eds. 1986. Writing Culture. The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coddington, K. 2016. “Voice under Scrutiny: Feminist Methods, Anticolonial Responses, and New Methodological Tools.” The Professional Geographer. doi:10.1080/00330124.2016.1208512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cope, M. 2002. “Feminist Epistemology in Geography.” In Feminist Geography in Practice: Research and Methods, edited by P. J. Moss, 43–56. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Delamont, S. 2009. “The Only Honest Thing: Autoethnography, Reflexivity and Small Crises in Fieldwork.” Ethnography and Education 4 (1): 51–63. doi:10.1080/17457820802703507.
   Google Scholar
• England, K. V. L. 1994. “Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research.” Professional Geographer 46: 80–89. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick, K., and A. Longley. 2014. “Embodiment and Affect in Research Collaborations.” Emotion, Space and Society 12: 49–54. doi:10.1016/j.emospa.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., and J. Ferguson. 1992. “Beyond Culture: Space, Identity and the Politics of Difference.” Cultural Anthropology 7 (1): 6–23. doi:10.1525/can.1992.7.1.02a00020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haksar, N. 2009. “Machiavelli’s Ceasefire and the Indo-Naga Peace Process.” Mainstream Weekly XLVII (16). http://www.mainstreamweekly.net/article1276.html
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1988. “The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective.” Feminist Studies 14 (3): 575–599. doi:10.2307/3178066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs and Women. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hazarika, S. 2004. “Land, Conflict, Identity in India’s Northeast: Negotiating the Future.” Futures 36 (6): 771–780. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2003.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiemstra, N. 2016. “Periscoping as a Feminist Methodological Approach for Researching the Seemingly Hidden.” The Professional Geographer 1–8. doi:10.1080/00330124.2016.1208514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jilangamba, Y. 2015. “Beyond the Ethno-territorial Binary: Evidencing the Hill and Valley Peoples in Manipur.” South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies 38 (2): 276–289. doi:10.1080/00856401.2015.1032361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabui, G. 1991. History of Manipur. New Delhi: National Publishing House.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 1994. “Playing the Field: Questions of Fieldwork in Geography.” Professional Geographer 46: 67–72. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00067.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katz, C. 1996. “The Expeditions of Conjures: Ethnography, Power and Pretense.” In Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork, edited by D. L. Wolf, 170–184. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayashi, A. 1994. “Coloring the Field: Gender, Race, and the Politics of Fieldwork.” Professional Geographer 46: 73–80. doi:10.1111/j.0033-0124.1994.00073.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kovats-Bernat, C. J. 2002. “Negotiating Dangerous Fields: Pragmatic Strategies for Fieldwork amid Violence and Terror.” American Anthropologist 104 (1): 208–222. doi:10.1525/aa.2002.104.1.208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis, R. P. 2007. “Can You Hear Us Now? Voices from the Margin: Using Indigenous Methodologies in Geographic Research.” Geographical Research 45: 130–139. doi:10.1111/ages.2007.45.issue-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahmood, S. 2004. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McDuie-Ra, D. 2016. Borderland City in New India. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQueeney, K., and M. L. Kristen. 2017. “Emotional Labor in Critical Ethnographic Work: In the Field and behind the Desk.” Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 46 (1): 81–107. doi:10.1177/0891241615602310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohanty, C. 2013. “Transnational Feminist Crossings: On Neoliberalism and Radical Critique.” Signs 38 (4): 967–991. doi:10.1086/669576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, H. L. 1987. Feminism and Anthropology. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Naga Women’s Union. 2018. The Place of Women in Naga Society. Guwahati: Christian Literature Center.
   Google Scholar
• Nagar, R. 2014. Muddying the Waters: Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nairn, K. 1999. “Embodied Fieldwork.” Journal of Geography 98 (6): 272–282. doi:10.1080/00221349908978941.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilan, P. 2002. “Dangerous Fieldwork Re-examined: The Question of Researcher Subject Position.” Qualitative Research 2 (3): 363–386. doi:10.1177/146879410200200305.
   Google Scholar
• Parratt, S., and J. Parratt. 2001. “The Second Women’s War and the Emergence of Democratic Government in Manipur.” Modern Asian Studies 35 (4): 905–919. doi:10.1017/S0026749X0100405X.
   Google Scholar
• Patel, K. 2017. “What Is in a Name? How Caste Names Affect the Production of Situated Knowledge.” Gender, Place & Culture 24 (7): 1011–1030. doi:10.1080/0966369X.2017.1372385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, G. 1997. “Situating Knowledges: Positionality, Reflexivities and Other Tactics.” Progress in Human Geography: an International Review of Geographical Work in the Social Sciences and Humanities 21 (3): 305–320. doi:10.1191/030913297673302122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouhani, F. 2004. “Multiple Sites of Fieldwork: A Personal Reflection.” Iranian Studies 37 (4): 685–693. doi:10.1080/0021086042000324224.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F. 2007. “Reflexivity, Positionality and Participatory Ethics: Negotiating Fieldwork Dilemmas in International Research.” ACME: an International E-Journal for Critical Geographies 6: 374–385.
   Google Scholar
• Thong, T. 2016. Colonization, Proselytization, and Identity: The Nagas and Westernization in Northeast India. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Tsing, A. 2005. Friction: An Anthropology of Global Connections. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UCM. 2005. Influx of Migrants into Manipur: A Threat to the Indigenous Ethnic People. Imphal: United Committee Manipur.
   Google Scholar
• Valentine, G. 2002. “People like Us: Negotiating Sameness and Difference in the Research Process.” In Feminist Geography in Practice, edited by P. Moss, 116–132. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Verdery, K. 2012. “Observers Observed: An Anthropologist under Surveillance.” Anthropology Now 4 (2): 14–23. doi:10.1080/19492901.2012.11728357.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, K. 2005. “Ecofeminism and First Nations Peoples in Canada: Linking Culture, Gender and Nature.” Gender, Place and Culture 12 (3): 333–355. doi:10.1080/09663690500202574.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, D. L., ed. 1996. Feminist Dilemmas in Fieldwork. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yambem, S. 1976. “Nupi Lan: Manipur Women’s Agitation, 1939.” Economic and Political Weekly 11 (8): 325–331.
   Google Scholar
• Zadronza, A. 2016. “What are You Really Looking For? Ethnography while (feeling) under Surveillance.” Zeitschrift für Ethnologie, Special Issue: Under Suspicious Eyes –Surveillance States, Security Zones, and Ethnographic Fieldwork 141 (2): 215–232.
   Google Scholar