Designing a Transformative Epistemology of the Problematic: A Perspective for Transdisciplinary Sustainability Research

References

• Bachelard, G. 2012. “Corrationalism and the Problematic.” Radical Philosophy 173: 27–32.
   Google Scholar
• Banz, C. 2016. “Zwischen Widerstand und Affirmation. Zur wachsenden Verzahnung von Design und Politik.” In Social Design: Gestalten für die Transformation der Gesellschaft, edited by C. Banz, 11–26. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, C. 2015. “On Problematization Elaborations on a Theme in ‘Late Foucault’.” nonsite.org, 16. https://nonsite.org/article/on-problematization
   Google Scholar
• Dorst, K. 2003. “The Problem of Design Problems.” In: Expertise in Design: Design Thinking Research Symposium, edited by E. Edmonds and N. Cross. Sydney: Creativity and Cognition Studios Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet, I., and N. Janssens. 2011. “Editorial: Transdisciplinarity, the Hybridisation of Knowledge Production and Space-Related Research.” In Transdisciplinary Knowledge Production in Architecture and Urbanism, edited by I. Doucet and N. Janssens, 1–14. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Engbers, M. 2018. “Kultur und Differenz in der transdisziplinären Nachhaltigkeitsforschung: Analysen und konzeptionelle Beiträge zur Gestaltung von Lern-/Forschungsprojekten.” PhD dissertation, Leuphana University, Lüneburg.
   Google Scholar
• Escobar, A. 2018. Designs for the Pluriverse: Radical Interdependence, Autonomy, and the Making of Worlds. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fichant, M. 1975. “Die Epistemologie in Frankreich.” In Geschichte der Philosophie, Band VIII, edited by F. Châtelet, 118–158. Frankfurt am Main/Berlin/Wien: Ullstein.
   Google Scholar
• Fry, T. 2011. Design as Politics. Oxford: Berg Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Haley, D. 2011. “Ecology and the Art of Sustainable Living.” Field Journal 4 (1): 17–32.
   Google Scholar
• Harrasser, K., and K. Solhdju. 2016. “Wirksamkeit verpflichtet – Herausforderungen einer Ökologie der Praktiken.” Zeitschrift für Medienwissenschaft 14 (1): 72–86.
   Google Scholar
• Hörl, E., and O. Leistert, eds. 2019. Thinking the Problematic: Genealogies, Tracings, and Currents of a Persistent Force. Bielefeld: transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn, T., M. Bergmann, and F. Keil. 2012. “Transdisciplinarity: Between Mainstreaming and Marginalization.” Ecological Economics 79: 1–10. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.04.017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klein, J. T., W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, R. Häberli, A. Bill, R. W. Scholz, and M. Welti. 2001. Transdisciplinarity: Joint Problem Solving among Science, Technology, and Society: An Effective Way for Managing Complexity. Basel: Birkhäuser.
   Google Scholar
• Krohn, W., A. Grunwald, and M. Ukowitz. 2017. “Transdisziplinäre Forschung Revisited: Erkenntnisinteresse, Forschungsgegenstände, Wissensform Und Methodologie.” GAIA 26 (4): 341–347. doi:10.14512/gaia.26.4.11.
   Google Scholar
• Lang, D., A. Wiek, M. Bergmann, M. Stauffacher, P. Martens, P. Moll, M. Swilling, and C. Thomas. 2012. “Transdisciplinary Research in Sustainability Science: Practice, Principles, and Challenges.” Sustainability Science 7 (S1): 25–43. doi:10.1007/s11625-011-0149-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maguire, K. 2018. “Transdisciplinarity: Towards an Epistemology of What Matters. .” In Transdisciplinary Theory, Practice and Education: The Art of Collaborative Research and Collective Learning, edited by D. Fam, L. Neuhauser, and P. Gibbs, 103–116. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Maniglier, P. 2012. “What Is a Problematic?” Radical Philosophy 173: 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• Manzini, E. 2015. Design, When Everybody Designs: An Introduction to Design for Social Innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Max-Neef, M. 2005. “Foundations of Transdisciplinarity.” Ecological Economics 53 (1): 5–16. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. Forthcoming a. “The Problematic of Transdisciplinary Sustainability Sciences.” In Thinking the Problematic: Genealogies, Tracings, and Currents of a Persistent Force, edited by E. Hörl and O. Leistert, Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, E. Forthcoming b. “Solvable Problems or Problematic Solvability? A Collocation Analysis of the Problem Conceptualization in Transdisciplinary Sustainability Sciences and a Possible Contribution from the Philosophy of Science.” GAIA 29 (1).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, C., D. Cordell, and D. Fam. 2015. “Beginning at the End: The Outcome Spaces Framework to Guide Purposive Transdisciplinary Research.” Futures 65: 86–96. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2014.10.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolescu, B. 2010. “Methodology of Transdisciplinarity – Levels of Reality, Logic of the Included Middle and Complexity.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 1 (1): 19–38. doi:10.22545/2010/0009.
   Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. 2013. Practice Theory, Work and Organization: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, H. 2006. “The Potential of Transdisciplinarity”. First published in: interdisciplines, http://helganowotny.eu/texts.php
   Google Scholar
• Papanek, V. 1971. Design for the Real World: Human Ecology and Social Change. New York: Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Peukert, D., and U. Vilsmaier. 2019. “Entwurfsbasierte Interventionen in der transdisziplinären Forschung.” In Wege der Vermittlung – Intervention – Partizipation, edited by M. Ukowitz and H. Renate, 227–250. Wiesbaden: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, C., L. van Kerkhoff, G. H. Hadorn, and G. Bammer. 2008. “Integration.” In Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, edited by G. H. Hadorn, H. Hoffmann-Riem, S. Biber-Klemm, W. Grossenbacher-Mansuy, D. Joye, C. Pohl, U. Wiesmann, and E. Zemp, 411–424. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, P., and S. Elahi. 2015. “The New Narrative: Applying Narratology to the Shaping of Futures Outputs.” Futures 74: 49–61. doi:10.1016/j.futures.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Repko, A. F., and R. Szostak. 2008. Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Savransky, M. 2016. The Adventure of Relevance: An Ethics of Social Inquiry. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Scholz, R. 2011. Environmental Literacy in Science and Society: From Knowledge to Decisions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schrickel, I. Forthcoming. “The Future of Modern Societies: Problems as Epistemic Design around 1970.” In Thinking the Problematic: Genealogies, Tracings, and Currents of a Persistent Force, edited by E. Hörl and O. Leistert. Bielefeld: Transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, D. 2014. Gilbert Simondon’s Psychic and Collective Individuation: A Critical Introduction and Guide. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. 1969. The Sciences of the Artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 2007. “Das Individuum und seine Genese.” In Struktur, Figur, Kontur: Abstraktion in Kunst und Lebenswissenschaften, edited by C. Blümle and S. Armin, 29–46. Zürich: diaphanes.
   Google Scholar
• Simondon, G. 2017. On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects. Minneapolis: Univocal.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2005. “Introductory Notes on an Ecology of Practices.” Cultural Studies Review 11 (1): 183–196. doi:10.5130/csr.v11i1.3459.
   Google Scholar
• Stengers, I. 2010. Cosmopolitics I. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tejedor, G., and J. Segalas. 2018. “Action Research Workshop for Transdisciplinary Sustainability Science.” Sustainability Science 13: 493–502. doi:10.1007/s11625-017-0452-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiles, M. 2012. “What Does Bachelard Mean by Rationalism Appliqué?” Radical Philosophy 173: 24–26.
   Google Scholar
• Van Breda, J., and M. Swilling. 2019. “The Guiding Logics and Principles for Designing Emergent Transdisciplinary Research Processes: Learning Experiences and Reflections from a Transdisciplinary Urban Case Study in Enkanini Informal Settlement, South Africa.” Sustainability Science 14 (3): 823–841. doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0606-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vilsmaier, U. 2018. “Grenzarbeit in integrativer und grenzüberschreitender Forschung.” In Grenzen: Theoretische, konzeptionelle und praxisbezogene Fragestellungen zu Grenzen und deren Überschreitungen, edited by M. Heintel, R. Musil, and N. Weixlbauer, 113–134. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar
• Vilsmaier, U., V. Brandner, and M. Engbers. 2017. “Research In-between: The Constitutive Role of Cultural Differences in Transdisciplinarity.” Transdisciplinary Journal of Engineering & Science 8: 169–179. doi:10.22545/2017/00093.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, D. 2018. “Simondon on the Notion of the Problem.” Angelaki 23 (2): 94–112. doi:10.1080/0969725X.2018.1451471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welch, J. 2011. “The Emergence of Interdisciplinarity from Epistemological Thought.” Issues in Integrative Studies 22: 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, L., T. Bunda, N. Claxton, and I. Mackinnon. 2017. “A Global De-colonial Praxis of Sustainability – Undoing Epistemic Violences between Indigenous Peoples and Those No Longer Indigenous to Place.” The Australian Journal of Indigenous Education 47 (1): 41–53. doi:10.1017/jie.2017.25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wulz, M. 2014. “Technik im Wissen: Zur wechselseitigen Hervorbringung von Wissen, Technik, Geschichte und Gesellschaft in der französischen Wissenschaftsgeschichte und –philosophie.” In Schlüsselwerke der Science & Technology Studies, edited by D. Lengersdorf and M. Wieser, 54–67. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
   Google Scholar