Publication Cover
Social Epistemology
A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy
Volume 34, 2020 - Issue 5
773
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Climate Science Denial as Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance

ORCID Icon

References

  • Ballew, M. T., A. Leiserowitz, C. Roser-Renouf, S. A. Rosenthal, J. E. Kotcher, J. R. Marlon, E. Lyon, M. H. Goldberg, and E. W. Maibach. 2019. “Climate Change in the American Mind: Data, Tools, and Trends.” Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development 61 (3): 4–18. doi:10.1080/00139157.2019.1589300.
  • Brulle, R. J. 2014. “Institutionalizing Delay: Foundation Funding and the Creation of U.S. Climate Change Counter-movement Organizations.” Climatic Change 122 (4): 681–694. doi:10.1007/s10584-013-1018-7.
  • Coady, D., and R. Corry. 2013. The Climate Change Debate: An Epistemic and Ethical Enquiry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Collomb, J. D. 2014. “The Ideology of Climate Change Denial in the United States.” European Journal of American Studies [ Online]: 9–1. doi:10.4000/ejas.10305.
  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Grice, H. P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge: Harvard Univesity Press.
  • Hart, P. S., and E. C. Nisbet. 2012. “Boomerang Effects in Science Communication: How Motivated Reasoning and Identity Cues Amplify Opinion Polarization about Climate Mitigation Policies.” Communication Research 39 (6): 701–723. doi:10.1177/0093650211416646.
  • Hennes, E. P., I. Feygina, C. A. Monteiro, and J. T. Jost. 2016. “Motivated Recall in the Service of the Economic System: The Case of Anthropogenic Climate Change.” Journal of Experimental Psychology 145 (6): 755–771. doi:10.1037/xge0000148.
  • Jacquet, J., M. Dietrich, and J. T. Jost. 2014. “The Ideoloigcal Divide and Climate Change Opinion: “Top-down” and “Bottom-up” Approaches.” Fronteirs in Psychology 5: 1458. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01458.
  • Jamieson, D. 2014. Reason in a Dark Time: Why the Struggle against Climate Change Failed–and What It Means for Our Future. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kahan, D. M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L. L. Ouellette, D. Braman, G. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547.
  • Kozak, A. (2018). “Understanding Pseudoscience Vulnerability through Epistemological Development, Critical Thinking, and Science Literacy.” In Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science, edited by A. B. Kaufman, and J. C. Kaufman, 223–238. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Lack, C. W., and J. Rousseau. 2016. Critical Thinking, Science, and Pseudoscience: Why We Can’t Trust Our Brains. New York: Springer Publishing Company.
  • Lewandowsky, S., G. Gignac, and S. Vaughan. 2013. “The Pivotal Role of Perceived Scientific Consensus in Acceptance of Science.” Nature Climate Change 3 (4): 399–404. doi:10.1038/nclimate1720.
  • Medina, J. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Pohlhaus, G. 2012. “Relational Knowing and Epistemic Injustice: Toward a Theory of Willful Hermeneutical Ignorance.” Hypatia 27 (4): 715–735. doi:10.1111/hypa.2012.27.issue-4.
  • Pohlhaus, G. 2017. “Varieties of Epistemic Injustice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by I. J. Kidd, J. Medina, and G. Pohlhaus, 13–26. New York: Routledge.
  • Torcello, L. 2011. “The Ethics of Inquiry, Scientific Belief, and Public Discourse.” Public Affairs Quarterly 25 (3): 197–215.
  • Torcello, L. 2016. “The Ethics of Belief, Cognition, and Climate Change Pseudoskepticism: Implications for Public Discourse.” Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1): 19–48. doi:10.1111/tops.12179.
  • Yale Program on Climate Change Communication (YPCCC) & George Mason University Center for Climate Change Communication (Mason4C). 2019. “Climate Change in the American Mind: National Survey Data on Public Opinion (2008–2017).” [Data file and codebook]. doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/W36GN

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.