In-between: The Simultaneity of the Non-simultaneous

References

• Acham, Karl. 2020. “Cultural Relativity, Ethical Relativism and the Immutability of Human Nature: Some Considerations on Philosophical Anthropology.” Aoristo 1: 43–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.48075/aoristo.v3i1.24877.
   Google Scholar
• Adam, Barbara. 2003. “Reflexive Modernization Temporalized.” Theory, Culture & Society 20 (2): 59–78. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276403020002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adorno, Theodor W. [1967] 2019. Aspekte des neuen Rechtsradikalismus. Berlin: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Adorno, Theodor W., Else Frankel-Brunswick, Daniel J. Levinson, and R. Nevitt Sanford. [1950] 2019. The Authoritarian Personality. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Applebaum, Anne. 2020. Twilight of Democracy. The Seductive Lure of Authoritarianism. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, Barry. 2000. Understanding Agency. Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 1991. Modernity and Ambivalence. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauman, Zygmunt. 2012. “Times of Interregnum.” Ethics & Global Politics 5 (1): 49–56. doi:https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i1.17200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. [1986] 1992. Risk Society. Toward a New Modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. [2002] 2005. “Age.” In A New Global Political Economy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, Ulrich. 2006. “Europäisierung - Soziologie für das 21. Jahrhundert.” In Soziale Ungleichheit, kulturelle Unterschiede: Verhandlungen des 32. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in München. Teilband 1 und 2, edited by Rehberg Karl-Siegbert, S. 513–525. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel. 1973. The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Daniel. 1976. “Welcome to the Post-industrial Society.” Physics Today 29 (2): 46–49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3023314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berlin, Isaiah. [1958] 1969. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty, 118–172. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brose, Hanns-Georg, and Dennis Kirschsieper. 2014. “Un-/Gleichzeitigkeit und Synchronisation. Zum Verhältnis von Diachronie und Synchronie in der Theorie sozialer Systeme.” Zeitschrift für Theoretische Soziologie 2: 172–219.
   Google Scholar
• Boiset, Max H., Ian C. Macmillan and Kyeong Seok Han. 2007. “Data, information, and knowledge: Have we got it right?.” In Explorations in Information Space: Knowledge, Actors, and Firms, edited by Max H. Boiset, Ian C. Macmillan and Kyeong Seok Han, 15–47. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burchell, Graham, Colin Gordon, and Peter Miller, ed. 1991. The Foucault Effect: Studies in Governmentality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dahrendorf, Ralf. [1957] 1959. Class and Class Conflict in Industrialized Society. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, Peter. 1999. “Knowledge-worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge.” California Management Review 41 (2): 79–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/41165987.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichengreen, Barry, Cevat Giray Aksoy, and Orkun Saka. 2020. “Revenge of the Experts— Will Covid-19 Renew or Diminish Public Trust in Science?” NBER Working Paper No. 28112.
   Google Scholar
• Falk, Armin, Anke Becker, Thomas Dohmen, Benjamin Enke, David Huffman, and Uwe Sunde. 2018. “Global Evidence on Economic Preferences.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (4): 1645–1692. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjy013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, Niall. 2017. The Square and the Tower. Networks and Power, from the Freemasons to Facebook. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. [1994] 2019. “Potentially Every Culture Is All Cultures.” Common Knowledge 25: 13–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-7299054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finn, ed. 2019. “The Black Box of the Present: Time in the Age of Algorithms.” Social Research 86: 557–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleck, Ludwig. [1935] 1979. Genesis and Development of a Scientific Fact. Translated by Fred Bradley and Thaddeus J. Trenn. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, Sigmund. 1930. Das Unbehagen in der Kultur. Wien: Internationaler Psychoanalytischer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gershuny, Jonathan, and Oriewl Sullivan. 2020. Where Does It All Go? What we really do all day: Insights from the Centre of Time Research. London: Pelican.
   Google Scholar
• Goldfarb, Avi, and Catherine Tucker. 2019. “Digital economics,” Journal of Economic Literature. 57: 3–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gouldner, Alvin W. 1980. “Is Amnesia in Sociology Discontinuity, and the Problem of Permeable Boundaries of Culture.” Paper presented during an international conference “The Political Realization of Social Science Knowledge, Institute of Advanced Studies,” Vienna, June 18-20, 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Hardtwig, Wolfgang. 1993. “Der deutsche Weg in die Moderne. Die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen als Grundproblem der deutschen Geschichte 1789–1871.” In Deutschlands Weg in die Moderne. Politik, Gesellschaft und Kultur im 19. Jahrhundert, edited by Wolfgang Hardtwig and Harm-Hinrich Brandt, 9–31. München: C.H. Beck.
   Google Scholar
• Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1774. Ideen zur Philosophie der Geschichte der Menschheit. Carlsruhe: Christian Gottlieb Schmieder.
   Google Scholar
• Hirschman, Albert O. 1977. Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kocka, Jürgen. 2010. “The Borders of Europe,” In New Europe Growth to Limits, edited by Sven Eliasson and Nadezhda Georgieva, 32–39. Oxford: Bardwell Press.
   Google Scholar
• König, René. [1962] 1965. “Die Gesellschaft von heute zwischen gestern und morgen.” In Soziologische Orientierungen. Vorträge und Aufsätze, 79–91. Köln: Kiepenheuer & Witsch.
   Google Scholar
• Koselleck, Reinhart. 1977. “Neuzeit.” In Vergangene Zukunft, 300–348. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Landwehr, Achim. 2012. “Von der‚ Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen‘.” Historische Zeitschrift 295 (1): 1–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1524/hzhz.2012.0350.
   Google Scholar
• Law, Alex, and Eric Royal Lybeck, eds. 2015. Sociological Amnesia: Cross-currents in Disciplinary History. London: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Lehnert, Detlev. 2016. “Ungleichzeitigkeit des Gleichzeitigen.” Indes 5 (S1): 12–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.13109/inde.2016.5.S1.12.
   Google Scholar
• Leonhard, Jörn. 2009. “Historik der Ungleichzeitigkeit: Zur Temporalisierung politischer Erfahrung im Europa des 19.Jahrhunderts.” Journal of Modern European History 7 (2): 145–167. doi:https://doi.org/10.17104/1611-8944_2009_2_145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1975. “Weltgesellschaft.” In Soziologische Aufklärung. Volume 2: Aufsätze zur Theorie der Gesellschaft, 51–71. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1980. “Temporalisierung von Komplexität. Zur Semantik neuzeitlicher Zeitbegriffe.” In Gesellschaftsstruktur und Semantik. Studien zur Wissenssoziologie der modernen Gesellschaft, 235–300. Vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1990. Die Wissenschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, Niklas. 1997. Die Gesellschaft der Gesellschaft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Karl. [1928] 1952. “The Problem of Generations.” In Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, edited by Karl Mannheim and Paul Kecskemti, 278–320. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Mannheim, Karl. [1928] 1970. “Das Problem der Generation.” In Wissenssoziologie. Auswahl aus dem Werk. 2nd ed., edited by Karl Mannheim and Kurt H. Wolff, 509–565. Neuwied: Luchterhand.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. [1859] 1977. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. [1867] 1967. Capital. Volume 1. New York: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Mauss, Marcel. [1925] 1990. The Gift. The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• May, Christopher. 2000. “The Information Society as Mega-machine.” Information, Communication & Society 3 (2): 241–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180050123721.
   Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, Mariana. 2018. The Value of Everything: Making and Taking in the Global Economy. London: Allen Lane.
   Google Scholar
• Merton, Robert K. 1975. “The Uses of Institutionalized Altruism.” In Seminar Reports. Program of General and Continuing Education in the Humanities, 105–113. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, Lewis. 1964. “Authoritarian and Democratic Technics.” Technology and Culture 5 (1): 1–8. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/3101118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nassehi, Armin. 1993. Die Zeit der Gesellschaft. Auf dem Weg zu einer soziologischen Theorie der Zeit. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa, and Ronald Inglehart. 2019. Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit and the Authoritarian Populism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nowotny, Helga. 1993. Eigenzeit. Entstehung und Strukturierung eines Zeitgefühls. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Ogburn, William F. 1957. “Cultural Lag as Theory.” Sociology and Social Research 41: 167–174.
   Google Scholar
• Page, Scott E. 2006. “Path Dependence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1 (1): 87–115. doi:https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00000006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinder, Wilhelm. 1926. Das Problem der Generationen. Das Problem der Generation in der Kunstgeschichte Europas. Berlin: Frankfurter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Karl. [1944] 2001. The Great Transformation. The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Polanyi, Michael. 1944. “Patent Reform.” The Review of Economic Studies 11: 61–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/2295967.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn, Sara. 2008. “The Transformation of Morals in Markets: Death, Benefits, and the Exchange of Life Insurance Policies.” American Journal of Sociology 114 (3): 738–780. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/592861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, Wolf. 1994. Ungleichzeitigkeit als Ideologie. Beiträge zur historischen Aufklärung. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.
   Google Scholar
• Schluchter, Wolfgang. 1996. “Institutionen und Mentalitäten. Über die Gleichzeitigkeit des Ungleichzeitigen oder: Von dem schließlich doch nur allmählichen Untergang der DDR.” In Neubeginn durch Anpassung, 11–59. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, James C. 1990. Domination and the Arts of Resistance: Hidden Transcripts. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, Amartya. 1985. “The Moral Standing of the Market.” Social Philosophy & Policy 2 (2): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052500003186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, Sonia. 2020. The Next Great Migration. The Beauty and Terror of Life on the Move. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. [1917] 1990. Grundfragen der Soziologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Simmel, Georg. 1918. Lebensanschauung: Vier metaphysische Kapitel. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Sombart, Werner. 1930. “Capitalism.” In Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, edited by Edwin R. Seligman and Alvin Johnson, 195–208. Vol. 3. New York: Macmillan Company.
   Google Scholar
• Sorokin, Pitrim, and Robert K. Merton. 1937. “Social Time: A Methodological and Functional Analysis.” American Journal of Sociology 42 (5): 615–629. doi:https://doi.org/10.1086/217540.
   Google Scholar
• Stark, Christian. 2016. “Rechtsetzung und Rechtsanwendung.” Indes 5 (S1): 105–113. doi:https://doi.org/10.13109/inde.2016.5.S1.105. (Sonderheft).
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, Nico. 2022. Knowledge Capitalism. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, Nico, and Marian Adolf. 2017. Knowledge. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, Nico, and Reiner Grundmann, eds. [2001] 2018. Werner Sombart. Economic Life in the Modern Age. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stehr, Nico, and Reiner Grundmann. 2011. Experts. The Knowledge and Power of Expertise. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Suzman, James. 2020. Work. A History of how we spend our Time. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, H. Holden. 2020. “Do Us a Favor.” Science 367 (6483): 1169. doi:https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb6502.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uhl, Elke. 2003. “Gebrochene Zeit? Ungleichzeitigkeit als geschichtsphilosophisches Problem.” In Geschichtsphilosophie und Kulturkritik. Historische und systematische Studien, edited by Johannes Rohbeck and Herta Nagl-Docekal, 50–74. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Weitzman, Martin L. 2009. “On Modeling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change.” Review of Economics and Statistics 91 (1): 1–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.1162/rest.91.1.1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, Erik Olin. 2019. How to Be an Anticapitalist in the Twenty-First Century. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Ziemann, Benjamin. 2020. “Generationen im 20. und 21. Jahrhundert. Zur Kritik eines problembeladenen Begriffs.” Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte 52-53: 4–9.
   Google Scholar