Is There a New Conspiracism?

References

• Amarasingam, A., and M-A. Argentino. 2020. “The QAnon Conspiracy Theory: A Security Threat in the Making.” CTC Sentinel 13 (7): 37–44.
   Google Scholar
• Anbinder, T. 1994. Nativism and Slavery: The Northern Know Nothings and the Politics of the 1850s. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Balfour, L. 2020. “A Discussion of Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum’s A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (4): 1156–1157. doi:10.1017/S1537592720003503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basham, L. 2019. “‘They’ are Back (And Still Want to Cure Everyone): Psychologists’ Latest Bid to Curtail Public Epistemology.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (7): 23–33.
   Google Scholar
• Basham, L., and M. R. X. Dentith. 2018. “The Psychologists’ Conspiracy Panic: They Seek to Cure Everyone.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M. R. X. Dentith, 79–93. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Berlinski, N., M. Doyle, A. M. Guess, G. Levy, B. Lyons, J. M. Montgomery, B. Nyhan, and J. Reifler. Forthcoming. “The Effects of Unsubstantiated Claims of Votes Fraud on Confidence in Elections.” Journal of Experimental Political Science. doi:10.1017/XPS.2021.18.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, C., and J. Woodward. 1974. All the President’s Men. New York: Simon and Shuster.
   Google Scholar
• Bessi, A., M. Coletto, G. A. Davidescu, A. Scala, G. Caldarelli, W. Quattrociocchi, and F. Amblard. 2015. “Science Vs Conspiracy: Collective Narratives in the Age of Misinformation.” PLOS One 10 (2): e0118093. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118093.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezalel, G. Y. 2021. “Conspiracy Theories and Religion: Reframing Conspiracy Theories as Bliks.” Episteme 18: 674–692. doi:10.1017/epi.2019.46.
   Google Scholar
• Bronner, G., V. Campion-Vincent, S. Delouvée, S. Dieguez, K. Douglas, N. Gauvrit, A. Lantian, and P. Wagner-Egger. 2016. “Luttons Efficacement Contre Les Théories Du Complot.” Le Monde, June 5.
   Google Scholar
• Butter, M. 2014. Plots, Designs and Schemes: American Conspiracy Theories from the Puritans to the Present. Berlin: De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2007. “Conspiracy Theories and the Internet: Controlled Demolition and Arrested Development.” Episteme 4 (2): 167–180. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.167.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, S. 2014. The Justification of Religious Violence. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, D. 2003. “Conspiracy Theories and Official Stories.” International Journal of Applied Philosophy 17: 197–209. doi:10.5840/ijap200317210.
   Google Scholar
• Danto, E. A. 2012. “Have You No Shame – American Redbaiting of Europe’s Psychoanalysts.” In Freedom and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom, edited by J. Damousi and M. B. Plotkin, 244–263. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, D. 2014. In Plain Sight: The Life and Lies of Jimmy Savile. London: Quercus.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. 2019. “The Iniquity of the Conspiracy Inquirers.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (8): 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Dentith, M. R. X. 2021. “Debunking Conspiracy Theories.” Synthese 198: 9897–9911. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02694-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dentith, M, R. X., and M. Orr. 2018. “Secrecy and Conspiracy.” Episteme 15: 433–450. doi:10.1017/epi.2017.9.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, R. 2021. “Epistemic FOMO.” The Cambridge Humanities Review 16: 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fried, D. 1991. Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, J. 2020. “A Discussion of Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum’s A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy.” Perspectives on Politics 18 (4): 1152–1153. doi:10.1017/S1537592720003370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, R. 1987. The Politics of Fear: Joseph R. McCarthy and the State. 2nd ed. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstadter, R. 1971. The Paranoid Style in American Politics and Other Essays. London: Jonathan Cape.
   Google Scholar
• Icke, D. 1999. The Biggest Secret. Ryde: David Icke Books.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, D. K. 2006. The Lavender Scare: The Cold War Persecution of Gays and Lesbians in the Federal Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, S. E. 2006. “Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse?” Journal of 9/11 Studies 3: 1–47.
   Google Scholar
• Kalpokas, I. 2019. “Book Review: A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy by Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum.” LSE Review of Books, June 13. Accessed 28 April 2021 https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2019/06/13/book-review-a-lot-of-people-are-saying-the-new-conspiracism-and-the-assault-on-democracy-by-russell-muirhead-and-nancy-l-rosenblum/
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, D. E., and A. Marshall. 1996. The Cult at the End of the World. New York: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Karabell, Z. 2021. “Here’s What Happens to a Conspiracy Driven Party.” Politico, January 30. Accessed 15 March 2021 https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2021/01/30/heres-what-happens-to-a-conspiracy-driven-party-463944
   Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. 1999. “Of Conspiracy Theories.” The Journal of Philosophy 96: 109–126. doi:10.2307/2564659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeley, B. 2007. “God as the Ultimate Conspiracy Theory.” Episteme 4: 135–149. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.135.
   Google Scholar
• Lakatos, I. 1970. “Falsification and the Methodology of Research Programmes.” In Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, edited by I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave, 91–195. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, T., and R. Kahn. 2005. “The Reptoid Hypothesis: Utopian and Dystopian Motifs in David Icke’s Alien Conspiracy Theory.” Utopian Studies 16 (1): 45–74. doi:10.5325/utopianstudies.16.1.0045.
   Google Scholar
• Lipton, P. 2004. Inference to the Best Explanation. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mackey, R. 2008. “On Debunking 9/11 Debunking.” Accessed 15 August 2021 https://dickatlee.com/issues/911/asc/pdfs/griffin_nist_ch3_rebuttal.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Marler, S. P. 2020. “Featured Reviews.” American Historical Review 125 (2): 600–604. doi:10.1093/ahr/rhz813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEvoy, J. 2020. “These are the Voter Fraud Allegations that Trump Tried (And Failed) to Overturn the Election With.” Forbes December 17. Accessed 12 March 2021 https://www.forbes.com/sites/jemimamcevoy/2020/12/17/these-are-the-voter-fraud-claims-trump-tried-and-failed-to-overturn-the-election-with/?sh=2de2631a58c5
   Google Scholar
• Muirhead, R., and N. L. Rosenblum. 2019. A Lot of People are Saying: The New Conspiracism and the Assault on Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• National Constitution Center. 2016. “Five Other Presidential “Birther” Controversies from American History.” Constitution Daily, January 14. Accessed 29 January 2021 https://constitutioncenter.org/blog/five-other-presidential-Birther-controversies-from-american-history/
   Google Scholar
• Oksman, O. 2016. “Conspiracy Craze: Why 12 Million Americans Believe Alien Lizards Rule Us.” The Guardian, April 7. Accessed 21 March 2021 https://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2016/apr/07/conspiracy-theory-paranoia-aliens-illuminati-beyonce-vaccines-cliven-bundy-jfk
   Google Scholar
• Pagán, V. E. 2004. Conspiracy Narratives in Roman History. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pagliarini, M. A. 1999. “The Pure American Woman and the Wicked Catholic Priest: An Analysis of Anti-Catholic Literature in Antebellum America.” Religion and American Culture: A Journal of Interpretation 9 (1): 97–128. doi:10.2307/1123928.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papakyriakopoulos, O., J. C. M. Serrano, S. Hegelich, A. Sangraula, M C. Smith, and S C. Quinn. 2020. “The Spread of COVID-19 Conspiracy Theories on Social Media and the Effect of Content Moderation.” The Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 1. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-034.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pennycook, G., and D. G. Rand. 2021. “Examining False Beliefs about Voter Fraud in the Wake of the 2020 Presidential Election.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 2. doi:10.37016/mr-2020-51.
   Google Scholar
• Pham, V. N. 2015. “Our Foreign President Barack Obama: The Racial Logics of Birther Discourses.” Journal of International and Intercultural Communication 8 (2): 86–107. doi:10.1080/17513057.2015.1025327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saad, L. 2019. “Americans Skeptical of UFOs but Say Government Knows More.” Gallup September 6, 2019. Accessed 24 March 2019 https://news.gallup.com/poll/266441/americans-skeptical-ufos-say-government-knows.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Shao, C., G. L. Ciampaglia, O. Varol, K. Yank, A. Flammini, and F. Menczer. 2018. “The Spread of Low-Credibility Content by Social Bots.” Nature Communications 9: 4787. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06930-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singal, J. 2019. “Even Conspiracy Theories Have Gotten Dumber, a New Book Shows.” New York, April 13. Accessed 28 April 2021 https://nymag.com/intelligencer/2019/04/the-new-conspiracism-is-conspiracy-theory-without-theory.html
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B., and B. Tau. 2011. “Birtherism: Where It All Began.” Politico April 24. Accessed 29 January 2021 https://www.politico.com/story/2011/04/Birtherism-where-it-all-began-053563
   Google Scholar
• Southwell, B. G., E. A. Thorson, and L. Sheble. 2018. Misinformation and Mass Audiences. Austin: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stokes, P. 2018. “Conspiracy Theory and the Perils of Pure Particularism.” In Taking Conspiracy Theories Seriously, edited by M. R. X. Dentith, 25–37. Lanham MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Swami, V., J. Pietschnig, U. S. Tran, I. W. Nader, S. Steiger, and M. Voracek. 2013. “Lunar Lies: The Impact of Informational Framing and Individual Differences in Shaping Conspiracist Beliefs about the Moon Landings.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 27: 71–80. doi:10.1002/acp.2873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tangherlini, T., S Shahsavari, B. Shahbazi, E. Ebrahimzadeh, V. Roychowdhury, and Y-R. Lin. 2020. “An Automated Pipeline for the Discovery of Conspiracy and Conspiracy Theory Narrative Frameworks: Bridgegate, Pizzagate and Storytelling on the Web.” PLOS One 15: e0233879. June 16. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0233879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbinati, N. 2019. “For a Tripartite Model of Conspiracy.” Contemporary Political Theory 19 (1): 163–168.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., D. DeWitt, and M. Atkinson. 2018. “A Web of Conspiracy? Internet and Conspiracy Theory.” In The Brill Handbook of Conspiracy Theory and Contemporary Religion, edited by E. Asprem, A. Dyrendal, and D. Robinson, 106–132. Leiden: Brill.
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., and A. M. Enders 2021. “Unfounded Fears about Sex Trafficking Did Not Begin with QAnon and Go Far beyond It.” LSE U.S.A. Centre Blog on American Politics and Policy, March 9. Accessed 24 March 2021 https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/usappblog/2021/03/09/unfounded-fears-about-sex-trafficking-did-not-begin-with-qanon-and-go-far-beyond-it/
   Google Scholar
• Uscinski, J. E., and J. M. Parent. 2014. American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner-Egger, P., G. Bronner, S. Delouvée, S. Dieguez, and N. Gauvrit. 2019. “Why ‘Healthy Conspiracy Theories’ are (Oxy)morons: Statistical, Epistemological, and Psychological Reasons in Favor of the (Ir)rational View.” Social Epistemology Review and Reply Collective 8 (3): 50–67.
   Google Scholar
• Winant, G. 2009. “What Orly Taitz Believes.” Salon, August 13. Accessed 29 January 2021 https://www.salon.com/2009/08/13/orly_taitz/
   Google Scholar