Critical Realism: A Critical Evaluation

References

• Acemoglu, Daron, Simon Johnson, and James a Robinson. 2001. “The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation.” The American Economic Review 91 (5): 1369–1401. doi:10.1257/aer.91.5.1369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Archer, Margaret, Claire Decoteau, Philip Gorski, Daniel Little, Doug Porpora, Timothy Rutzou, Christian Smith, George Steinmetz, and Frederic Vandenberghe. 2016. “What is Critical Realism?” Perspectives: A Newsletter from ASA Theory Section 39: 4. http://www.asatheory.org/current-newsletter-online/what-is-critical-realism.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Sascha O, and Ludger Woessmann. 2009. “Was Weber Wrong? A Human Capital Theory of Protestant Economic History.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 124 (2): 531–596. doi:10.1162/qjec.2009.124.2.531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, Colin. 1981. “The Nobel Scientists and the Origins of Scientific Achievement.” The British Journal of Sociology 32 (3): 381–391. doi:10.2307/589284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. [1975] 2008. A Realist Theory of Science. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. [1979] 1998. The Possibility of Naturalism: A Philosophical Critique of the Contemporary Human Sciences. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2009. Scientific Realism and Human Emancipation. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bhaskar, Roy. 2013. Philosophy and the Idea of Freedom. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Chakravartty, Anjan. 2017. ”Scientific Realism.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N Zalta. Summer 2. Stanford: Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-realism/
   Google Scholar
• Cover, J. A., Martin Curd, and Christopher Pincock. 2012. Philosophy of Science: The Central Issues. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Cruickshank, Justin. 2004. “A Tale of Two Ontologies: An Immanent Critique of Critical Realism.” The Sociological Review 52 (4): 567–585. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00496.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duhem, Pierre M M. [1906] 1954. The Aim and Structure of Physical Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Einstein, Albert. 1918. “Principles of Research.” https://www.site.uottawa.ca/ yymao/misc/Einstein_PlanckBirthday.html.
   Google Scholar
• Feigl, Herbert 2020. “Positivism.” https://www.britannica.com/topic/positivism.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1963. ”How to Be a Good Empiricist – a Plea for Tolerance in Matters Epistemological.” In Philosophy of Science, the Delaware Seminar Vol. 2, edited by Bernard Baumrin, 3–39. New York: Interscience Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Feyerabend, Paul. 1975. Against Method. New York: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Giddings, Franklin. 1922. Studies in the Theory of Human Society. New York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, Geoffrey. 1999. “Marching to the Promised Land? Some Doubts on the Policy Affinities of Critical Realism.” Alethia 2 (2): 2–10. doi:10.1558/aleth.v2i2.2.
   Google Scholar
• Huntington, Samuel P. [1996] 2007. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Kalberg, Stephen. 2004. “The Past and Present Influence of World Views: Max Weber on a Neglected Sociological Concept.” Journal of Classical Sociology 4 (2): 139–163. doi:10.1177/1468795X04043931.
   Google Scholar
• Kalberg, Stephen. 2014. “Max Weber’s Sociology of Civilizations: The Five Major Themes.” Max Weber Studies 14 (2): 205–232. doi:10.15543/MWS/2014/2/5.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, Stephen. 2005. “Critical Realism and the Limits of Philosophy.” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2): 171–191. doi:10.1177/1368431005051762.
   Google Scholar
• Landes, David S. 1999. The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some are so Rich and Some so Poor. New York: W.W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Laudan, Larry. 1981. “A Confutation of Convergent Realism.” Philosophy of Science 48 (1): 19–49. doi:10.1086/288975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Tony. 2015. Essays on the Nature and State of Modern Economics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen E. 2020. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Macionis, John. 2013. Sociology. New York: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Magnus, P D., and Craig Callender. 2004. “Realist Ennui and the Base Rate Fallacy.” Philosophy of Science 71 (3): 320–338. doi:10.1086/421536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, Fabian T, and Nora Waitkus. 2021. “The Wealth Inequality of Nations.” American Sociological Review 86 (3): 1–36. doi:10.1177/00031224211027800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popper, Karl. [1959] 2005. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. Milton Park: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Porpora, Douglas. 2015. Reconstructing Sociology: The Critical Realist Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quine, Willard V O. 1951. “Two Dogmas of Empiricism.” The Philosophical Review 1 (60): 20–42. doi:10.1086/211003.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, Paul M. 1990. “Endogenous Technological Change.” The Journal of Political Economy 98 (5): 71–102. doi:10.1086/261725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayer, Andrew. 2000. Realism and Social Science. New York: SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, Christian. 2011. What is a Person?: Rethinking Humanity, Social Life, and the Moral Good from the Person Up. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stanford, Kyle. 2017. ”Underdetermination of Scientific Theory.” In The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, edited by Edward N Zalta. Winter 201. Metaphysics Research Lab, Stanford University.
   Google Scholar
• Thagard, Paul R. 1978. “Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience.” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1: 223–234. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1978.1.192639.
   Google Scholar
• Toynbee, Arnold J. 1961. A Study of History: Volume 12: Reconsiderations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1989. Laws and Symmetry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Fraassen, Bas C. 1994. “Gideon Rosen on Constructive Empiricism.” Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 74 (2): 179–192. doi:10.1007/BF00989802.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1963] 1993. “Introduction.” In The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press. xxix–lxxvii.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1905] 2013. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism. Amazon: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1915] 1951. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism. Glencoe: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1916] 1992. The Religion of India: The Sociology of Hinduism and Buddhism. New Delhi: Munshiram Manoharlal.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1917] 2010. Ancient Judaism. New York: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1920] 1993. The Sociology of Religion. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1922] 1978. Basic Concepts in Sociology. London: Peter Owen.
   Google Scholar
• Weber, Max. [1922] 1978. “The Nature of Social Action.” In Max Weber: Selections in Translation, edited by W. G. Runciman, 7–32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511810831.005.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Tong. 2021. “Was Weber Really Wrong? a Comment on Some Recent Empirical Studies on Economic Growth.” Max Weber Studies 21 (2): 203–212. doi:10.15543/maxweberstudies.21.2.203.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Tong. 2022. “Reinterpreting Science as a Vocation.” Max Weber Studies 22 (1): 55–73.
   Google Scholar