Science Advice in an Environment of Trust: Trusted, but Not Trustworthy?

References

• Almassi, B. 2012. “Climate Change, Epistemic Trust, and Expert Trustworthiness.” Ethics & The Environment 17 (2): 29–49. doi:10.2979/ethicsenviro.17.2.29.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. 2008. Scandinavian Politics Today. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bågenholm, A., M. Bauhr, M. Grimes, and B. Rothstein. 2021. The Oxford Handbook of the Quality of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, A. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–260. doi:10.1086/292745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, C. 2004. “Behind Closed Doors: Publicity, Secrecy, and the Quality of Deliberation.” The Journal of Political Philosophy 12 (4): 389–410. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. 2017. “Balancing Epistemic Quality and Equal Participation in a System Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” Social Epistemology 31 (3): 266–276. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., and C. Holst. 2017. “Advisory Commissions, Academic Expertise and Democratic Legitimacy: The Case of Norway.” Science & Public Policy 44 (6): 821–833. doi:10.1093/scipol/scx016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J. 2018. “Economic Knowledge and the Scientization of Policy Advice.” Policy Sciences 51 (3): 291–311. doi:10.1007/s11077-018-9316-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, J., and S. Hesstvedt. 2019. “Expertization or Greater Representation? Evidence from Norwegian Advisory Commissions.” European Politics and Society 20 (1): 83–100.
   Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. 2012. “Rational Deliberation Among Experts and Citizens.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, edited by J. Parkinson and J. Mansbridge, 27–51. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, H. M., and R. Evans. 2002. “The Third Wave of Science Studies: Studies of Expertise and Experience.” Social Studies of Science 32 (2): 235–296. doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579. doi:10.1086/392855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, H. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlap, R. E., and A. M. McCright. 2011. “Organized Climate Change Denial.” In The Oxford Handbook of Climate Change and Society. Vol. 1, edited by J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, and D. Schlosberg, 144–160. Oxford: Oxford.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, K. C. 2020. “A Taxonomy of Transparency in Science.” Canadian Journal of Philosophy 1–14. doi:10.1017/can.2020.21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engelstad, F., C. Holst, & G. Aakvaag, eds. 2018. Democratic State and Democratic Society. Berlin: De Gruyter Open.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, A. 2020. “The Political Literacy of Experts.” Ratio Juris 33 (1): 82–97. doi:10.1111/raju.12269.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, P. J. 2002. “The Impact of Conflict of Interest on Trust in Science.” Science and Engineering Ethics 8 (3): 413–420. doi:10.1007/s11948-002-0063-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldenberg, M. J. 2021. Vaccine Hesitancy: Public Trust, Expertise, and the War on Science. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, A. I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110. doi:10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00093.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greiling, D. 2014. “Accountability and Trust.” In The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability, edited by M. Bovens, R. E. Goodin, and T. Schillemans, 617–631. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, R. 2016. “The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies.” Minerva 55 (1): 25–48. doi:10.1007/s11024-016-9308-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen, T. 2018. “Scientists as Experts: A Distinct Role?” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 69: 52–59. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.02.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. 2006. Trust. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Hesstvedt, S. 2021. “The Politics of Expert Advice.” PhD dissertation. University of Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Hesstvedt, S., and J. Christensen. 2021. “Political and Administrative Control of Expert Groups—a Mixed‐methods Study.” Governance, March 30. doi:10.1111/gove.12599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., and A. Molander. 2017. “Public Deliberation and the Fact of Expertise: Making Experts Accountable.” Social Epistemology 31 (3): 235–250. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1317865.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., and A. Molander. 2019. “Epistemic Democracy and the Role of Experts.” Contemporary Political Theory 18 (1): 541–561. doi:10.1057/s41296-018-00299-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holst, C., H. L. Kjos, E. Krick, and T. Gundersen. 2021. “Science Advice Mechanisms: Varieties and Reform.” PEriTiA White Paper. https://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/documents/downloadPublic?documentIds=080166e5dc61d3b2&appId=PPGMS .
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, G., and F. Kurtulmus. 2019. “What is Epistemic Public Trust in Science?” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 70 (4): 1145–1166. doi:10.1093/bjps/axy007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John, S. 2018. “Epistemic Trust and the Ethics of Science Communication: Against Transparency, Openness, Sincerity and Honesty.” Social Epistemology 32 (2): 75–87. doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1410864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst, Prometheus Books.
   Google Scholar
• Krick, E. 2015. “Negotiated Expertise in Policy-Making. How Governments Use Hybrid Advisory Committees.” Science & Public Policy 42 (4): 487–500. doi:10.1093/scipol/scu069.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krick, E., J. Christensen, and C. Holst. 2018. “Between ‘Scientisation’ and a ‘Participatory Turn’. Tracing Shifts in the Governance of Policy Advice.” Science & Public Policy 46 (6): 927–939. doi:10.1093/scipol/scz040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martini, C. 2014. “Experts in Science: A View from the Trenches.” Synthese 191 (1): 3–15. doi:10.1007/s11229-013-0321-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer, H. 1969. “Bureaucracy and Policy Formulation in Sweden.” Scandinavian Political Studies 4 (A4): 103–116. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.1969.tb00522.x.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, A. 2017. Critical Elitism. Deliberation, Democracy, and the Problem of Expertise. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’-Neill, O. 2018. “Linking Trust to Trustworthiness.” International Journal of Philosophical Studies 26 (2): 293–300. doi:10.1080/09672559.2018.1454637.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oppenheimer, M., N. Oreskes, D. Jamieson, K. Brysse, J. O’-Reilly, M. Shindell, and M. Wazeck. 2019. Discerning Experts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., and E. M. Conway. 2011. Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
   Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N. 2019. Why Trust Science?. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Origgi, G., T. Branch-Smith, and T. Morisseau. 2021. “Trust, Expertise and the Controversy over Chloroquine.” Social Epistemology a Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S. 2015. Knowledge, Policy, and Expertise: The UK Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution 1970–2011. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K. H. 2020. “Trust in Science.” In The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy, edited by J. Simon, 354–366. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rolin, K. H. 2021. “Objectivity, Trust and Social Responsibility.” Synthese 199 (1): 513-533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. 2021. Controlling Corruption: The Social Contract Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• SAPEA. 2019. “Making Sense of Science for Policy Under Conditions of Complexity and Uncertainty.” Evidence Review Report No. 6.
   Google Scholar
• Schroeder, S. A. 2020. “Democratic Values: A Better Foundation for Public Trust in Science.” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (2): 545–562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tellmann, S. M. 2016. “Experts in Public Policymaking: Influential, yet Constrained.” PhD. Dissertation, Oslo and Akershus University College of Applied Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. 2014. “What is the Problem with Experts?” Social Studies of Science 31 (1) (2001): 123–149. doi:10.1177/030631201031001007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolff, J. 2019. Ethics and Public Policy: A Philosophical Inquiry. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, J. 2019. “Pluralism and Social Epistemology in Economics.” PhD. Dissertation, University of Cambridge.
   Google Scholar