Status Distrust of Scientific Experts

References

• Abbott, Andrew. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Alsan, Marcella, and Marianne Wanamaker. 2018. “Tuskegee and the Health of Black Men.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 133 (1): 407–455. doi:10.1093/qje/qjx029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ancona, Matthew d’. 2017. Post-Truth: The New War on Truth and How to Fight Back. London: Ebury Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2011. “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.” Episteme 8 (2): 144–164. doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Baier, Annette. 1986. “Trust and Antitrust.” Ethics 96 (2): 231–260. doi:10.1086/292745.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakir, Vian, and Andrew McStay. 2018. “Fake News and the Economy of Emotions.” Digital Journalism 6 (2): 154–175. doi:10.1080/21670811.2017.1345645.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ballantyne, Angela, and G. Owen Schaefer. 2018. “Consent and the Ethical Duty to Participate in Health Data Research.” Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (6): 392–396. doi:10.1136/medethics-2017-104550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzac, Honoré de. 1856. Le Père Goriot: Honoré de Balzac. Paris: Librairie nouvelle.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, Robert, and Peter Richerson. 1985. Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brante, Thomas. 2011. “Professions as Science-Based Occupations.” Professions and Professionalism 1 (1). doi:10.7577/pp.v1i1.147.
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, Johnny. 2020. “Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism.” Social Epistemology 34 (3): 227–240. doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1703056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, Paul. 2016. The Politics of Evidence-Based Policy Making. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Jordan, William Brady, Molly Crockett, Rene Weber, and Walter Sinnott-Armstrong. 2021. “Political Polarization and Moral Outrage on Social Media.” Connecticut Law Review 52 (3): 1107–1120.
   Google Scholar
• Chapais, Bernard. 2015. “Competence and the Evolutionary Origins of Status and Power in Humans.” Human Nature 26 (2): 161–183. doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, Joey T., and Jessica L. Tracy. 2013. “The Impact of Wealth on Prestige and Dominance Rank Relationships.” Psychological Inquiry 24 (2): 102–108. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2013.792576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coady, David, ed. 2006. Conspiracy Theories: The Philosophical Debate. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Coady, David. 2007. “Are Conspiracy Theorists Irrational?” Episteme 4 (2): 193–204. doi:10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.193.
   Google Scholar
• Craciun, Catrinel, and Adriana Baban. 2012. “‘Who Will Take the Blame?’: Understanding the Reasons Why Romanian Mothers Decline HPV Vaccination for Their Daughters.” Vaccine 30 (48): 6789–6793. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.09.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Coninck, David, Thomas Frissen, Koen Matthijs, Leen D’Haenens, Grégoire Lits, Olivier Champagne-Poirier, Marie-Eve Carignan, et al. 2021. ”Beliefs in Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation About COVID-19: Comparative Perspectives on the Role of Anxiety, Depression and Exposure to and Trust in Information Sources”. Frontiers in Psychology 12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.646394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, Hugh. 2020. “Professionalism in Science: Competence, Autonomy, and Service.” Science and Engineering Ethics 26 (3): 1287–1313. doi:10.1007/s11948-019-00143-x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, Hugh. 2021a. “Incentivizing Replication is Insufficient to Safeguard Default Trust.” Philosophy of Science 88: 1–12. doi:10.1086/715657.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, Hugh. 2021b. “Precision Medicine, Data, and the Anthropology of Social Status.” The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4): 80–83. doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.1891345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond, Hugh. 2021c. “Expert Communication and the Self-Defeating Codes of Scientific Ethics.” The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (1): 24–26. doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1845862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Karen M., Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019. “Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Political Psychology 40 (S1): 3–35. doi:10.1111/pops.12568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin C. 2017. A Tapestry of Values. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, Eliot. 1970. Profession of Medicine: A Study of the Sociology of Applied Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Freidson, Eliot. 2001. Professionalism, the Third Logic: On the Practice of Knowledge. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaeser, Edward, David Laibson, Jose Scheinkman, and Christine Soutter. 1999. What is Social Capital? the Determinants of Trust and Trustworthiness. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. doi:10.3386/w7216.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin I. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110. doi:10.2307/3071090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansson, Sven Ove. 2017. “Science Denial as a Form of Pseudoscience.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 63 (June): 39–47. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2017.05.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, Keith. 2018. “What’s Epistemically Wrong with Conspiracy Theorising?” Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 84 (November): 235–257. doi:10.1017/S1358246118000619.
   Google Scholar
• Hawley, Katherine. 2014. “Trust, Distrust and Commitment.” Noûs 48 (1): 1–20. doi:10.1111/nous.12000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heise, Lori, Margaret E. Greene, Neisha Opper, Maria Stavropoulou, Caroline Harper, Marcos Nascimento, Debrework Zewdie, et al. 2019. ”Gender Inequality and Restrictive Gender Norms: Framing the Challenges to Health.” The Lancet 393 (10189): 2440–2454. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30652-X.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henrich, Joseph, and Francisco J. Gil-White. 2001. “The Evolution of Prestige: Freely Conferred Deference as a Mechanism for Enhancing the Benefits of Cultural Transmission.” Evolution and Human Behavior 22 (3): 165–196. doi:10.1016/S1090-5138(00)00071-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobbes, Thomas. [1651] 1996. Leviathan. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, Bennett, and Justin Bruner. 2017. “Experimentation by Industrial Selection.” Philosophy of Science 84 (5): 1008–1019. doi:10.1086/694037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ipsos. 2019. “Global Trust in Professions: Who Do Global Citizens Trust?” https://www.ipsos.com/sites/default/files/ct/news/documents/2019-09/global-trust-in-professions-trust-worthiness-index-2019.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. 2021a. “KFF COVID-19 Vaccine Monitor: January 2021.” KFF (blog). Accessed 22 January 2021a. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/report/kff-covid-19-vaccine-monitor-january-2021/
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser Family Foundation. 2021b. “Latest Data on COVID-19 Vaccinations Race/ethnicity.” KFF (blog). Accessed 18 February 2021b. https://www.kff.org/coronavirus-covid-19/issue-brief/latest-data-on-covid-19-vaccinations-race-ethnicity/
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Magali Sarfatti. 2003. “Professionalism: The Third Logic (Review).” Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 46 (3): 458–462. doi:10.1353/pbm.2003.0037.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, Heidi J. 2020. Stuck: How Vaccine Rumors Start – and Why They Don’t Go Away. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, Sandra Soo-Jin. 2021. “Obligations of the ‘Gift’: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Precision Medicine.” The American Journal of Bioethics 21 (4): 57–66. doi:10.1080/15265161.2020.1851813.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lount, Robert B., and Nathan C. Pettit. 2012. “The Social Context of Trust: The Role of Status.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 117 (1): 15–23. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.07.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McIntyre, Lee. 2018. Post-Truth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mckeown, Alex, Miranda Mourby, Paul Harrison, Sophie Walker, Mark Sheehan, and Ilina Singh. 2021. “Ethical Issues in Consent for the Re-Use of Data in Health Data Platforms.” Science and Engineering Ethics 27 (1). doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.15250.89286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naomi, Oreskes, and Erik M. Conway. 2011. “Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. A&C Black.” doi:10.1126/science.332.6030.663.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, Onora. 2002. A Question of Trust. The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, Elise, Andrew Steptoe, and Daisy Fancourt. 2021. ”Attitudes Towards Vaccines and Intention to Vaccinate Against COVID-19: Implications for Public Health Communications.” The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 1 February. doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2020.100012.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pew. 2019. “Most Americans are Wary of Industry-Funded Research.” Pew Research Center (blog). October 4. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/10/04/most-americans-are-wary-of-industry-funded-research/
   Google Scholar
• Pew. 2020. “Scientists are Among the Most Trusted Groups Internationally, Though Many Value Practical Experience Over Expertise.” Pew Research Center Science & Society (blog). Accessed 29 September 2020. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/scientists-are-among-the-most-trusted-groups-in-society-though-many-value-practical-experience-over-expertise/
   Google Scholar
• Price, Michael E., and Mark Van Vugt. 2014. “The Evolution of Leader–follower Reciprocity: The Theory of Service-For-Prestige.” Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 1–17. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prooijen, Jan-Willem van. 2017. “Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 31 (1): 50–58. doi:10.1002/acp.3301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rich, Timothy S., Ian Milden, and Mallory Treece Wagner. 2020. “Research Note: Does the Public Support Fact-Checking Social Media? It Depends Whom and How You Ask.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. November. 10.37016/mr-2020-46
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. “Unpacking the Gender System: A Theoretical Perspective on Gender Beliefs and Social Relations.” Gender & Society 18 (4): 510–531. doi:10.1177/0891243204265269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmuhl, Nicholas B., Katherine E. Mooney, Xiao Zhang, Laura G. Cooney, James H. Conway, and Noelle K. LoConte. 2020. “No Association Between HPV Vaccination and Infertility in U.S. Females 18–33 Years Old.” Vaccine 38 (24): 4038–4043. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.03.035.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scienceogram UK. 2013. “Global Private and Public R&D Funding.” Scienceogram UK (blog). Accessed 29 May 2013. https://scienceogram.org/blog/2013/05/science-technology-business-government-g20/
   Google Scholar
• Silva, Bruno Castanho, Federico Vegetti, and Levente Littvay. 2017. “The Elite is Up to Something: Exploring the Relation Between Populism and Belief in Conspiracy Theories.” Swiss Political Science Review 23 (4): 423–443. doi:10.1111/spsr.12270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TallBear, Kimberly. 2013. Native American DNA: Tribal Belonging and the False Promise of Genetic Science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO Institute for Statistics. 2020. “Global Investments in R&D.” Fact Sheet No. 59, June 2020. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs59-global-investments-rd-2020-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vicario, Michela Del, Alessandro Bessi, Fabiana Zollo, Fabio Petroni, Antonio Scala, Guido Caldarelli, H. Eugene Stanley, and Walter Quattrociocchi. 2016. “The Spreading of Misinformation Online.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 113 (3): 554–559. doi:10.1073/pnas.1517441113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogt, Henrik, Sara Green, Claus Thorn Ekstrøm, and John Brodersen. 2019. “How Precision Medicine and Screening with Big Data Could Increase Overdiagnosis.” BMJ 366 (September): l5270. doi:10.1136/bmj.l5270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, Jamie Carlin. 2020. Expertise: A Philosophical Introduction. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar