Enhanced Epistemic Trust and the Value-Free Ideal as a Social Indicator of Trust

References

• Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. 2006. “Over and Over and Over Again: College Students’ Views of Nature of Science.” In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education, edited by Lawrence B. Flick and Norman G. Lederman, 389–425. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_18.
   Google Scholar
• Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad. 2014. “The Evolving Landscape Related to Assessment of Nature of Science, Volume II.” In Handbook of Research on Science Education, edited by Norman G. Lederman and Sandra K. Abell, 621–650. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203097267-42.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, Douglas. 1999. “Values in Science: An Educational Perspective.” Science & Education 8 (1): 1–12. doi:10.1023/A:1008600230536.
   Google Scholar
• Allchin, Douglas. 2011. “Evaluating Knowledge of the Nature of (Whole) Science.” Science Education 95 (3): 518–542. doi:10.1002/sce.20432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allchin, Douglas. 2017. “Beyond the Consensus View: Whole Science.” Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education 17 (1): 18–26. doi:10.1080/14926156.2016.1271921.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Elizabeth. 2011. “Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony.” Episteme 8 (2): 144–164. doi:10.3366/epi.2011.0013.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, Shamim M., Otis W. Brawley, and Leonard S. Marks. 2005. “Effects of Untreated Syphilis in the Negro Male, 1932 to 1972: A Closure Comes to the Tuskegee Study, 2004.” Urology 65 (6): 1259–1262. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2004.10.023.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Martin. 2008. ”Survey Research and the Public Understanding of Science.” In Handbook of Public Communication on Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench. 1st ed., 111–130. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203928240-14.
   Google Scholar
• Bell, Randy L. 2006. “Perusing Padora’s Box: Exploring the What, When, and How of Nature of Science Instruction.” In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science, edited by Lawrence B. Flick and Norman G. Lederman, 427–446. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_19.
   Google Scholar
• Berlivet, Luc, and Ilana Lowy. 2020. “Hydroxychloroquine Controversies: Clinical Trials, Epistemology, and the Democratization of Science.” Medical Anthropology Quarterly 34 (4): 525–541. doi:10.1111/maq.12622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betz, Gregor. 2013. “In Defence of the Value-Free Ideal.” European Journal for Philosophy of Science 3 (2): 207–220. doi:10.1007/s13194-012-0062-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, Sumita, Mary Junot, and Hillary Clark. 2013. “Can You Hear Us? Voices Raised Against Standardized Testing by Novice Teachers.” Creative Education 4 (10): 633–639. doi:10.4236/CE.2013.410091.
   Google Scholar
• Borba, Mayla Gabriela Silva, Fernando Fonseca Almeida Val, Vanderson Souza Sampaio, Marcia Almeida Araújo Alexandre, Gisely Cardoso Melo, Marcelo Brito, Maria Paula Gomes Mourão, et al. 2020. ”Effect of High Vs Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (Sarscov-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” JAMA Network Open 3 (4.23): e208857. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.8857.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, Valerie. 1998. “Communal and Exchange Trust Norms: Their Value Base and Relevance to Institutional Trust.” In Trust and Governance, edited by Valerie Braithwaite and Margaret Levi, 46–74. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Branch-Smith, T. Y. 2019. “Contextualizing Science for Value-Conscious Communication.” PhD diss., University of Waterloo.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, T. Y., Gloria Origgi, and Tiffany Morisseau. 2022. “Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts.” Social Epistemology 36 (3): 299–316. doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2042421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandon, Dwayne T., Lydia A. Isaac, and Thomas A. LaVeist. 2005. “The Legacy of Tuskegee and Trust in Medical Care: Is Tuskegee Responsible for Race Differences in Mistrust of Medical Care?” Journal of the National Medical Association 97 (7): 951–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandt, Allan M. 1978. “Racism and Research: The Case of the Tuskegee Syphilis Study.” The Hastings Center Report 8 (6): 21–29. doi:10.2307/3561468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Matthew J. 2020. Science and Moral Imagination: A New Ideal for Values in Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv18b5d19.
   Google Scholar
• Bucchi, Massimiano. 2008. ”Of Deficits, Deviations and Dialogues: Theories of Public Communication of Science.” In Handbook of Public Communication on Science and Technology, edited by Massimiano Bucchi and Brian Trench. 1st ed., 57–76. London: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203928240-11.
   Google Scholar
• Bunch, Lauren. 2021. “A Tale of Two Crises: Addressing Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy as Promoting Racial Justice.” HEC Forum : An Interdisciplinary Journal on Hospitals’ Ethical and Legal Issues 33 (1–2): 143–154. doi:10.1007/s10730-021-09440-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clough, Michael P. 2011. “Teaching and Assessing the Nature of Science: How to Effectively Incorporate the Nature of Science in Your Classroom.” The Science Teacher 78 (6): 56–60.
   Google Scholar
• Cobern, William W., and Cathleen C. Loving. 2001. “Defining ‘Science’ in a Multicultural World: Implications for Science Education.” Science Education 85 (1): 50–67. doi:10.1002/1098-237X(200101)85:1<50:AID-SCE5>3.0.CO;2-G.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corsan, O. 2020. “Covid-19: 59% des Français Croient À L’éfficacité de la Chloroquine.” Le Parisien. April 5. https://www.leparisien.fr/societe/sante/covid-19-59-des-francais-croient-a-l-efficacite-de-la-chloroquine-05-04-2020-8294535.php
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2000. “Inductive Risk and Values in Science.” Philosophy of Science 67 (4): 559–579. doi:10.1086/392855.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2009. Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctt6wrc78.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather. 2016. “Values in Science.” In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Science, edited by Paul Humphreys, 609–630. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199368815.013.28.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Heather, and T.Y. Branch. Forthcoming. Rethinking the Conceptual Space for Science in Society After the VFI.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas, Mary, and Aaron Wildavsky. 1983. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duschl, Richard A., and Richard Grandy. 2013. “Two Views About Explicitly Teaching Nature of Science.” Science & Education 22 (9): 2109–2139. doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9539-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, Timothy C., and George T. Cvetkovich. 1995. Social Trust: Toward a Cosmopolitan Society. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, Timothy C., and George T. Cvetkovich. 1999. “Social Trust and Culture in Risk Management.” In Social Trust and the Management of Risk, edited by George Cvetkovich and Ragnar E. Löfstedt, 9–21. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, Timothy C., and Micheal. Siegrist 2008. “On the Relation Between Trust and Fairness in Environmental Risk Management.” Risk Analysis 28 (5): 1395–1413. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2008.01091.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, Kevin. 2017. A Tapestry of Values: An Introduction to Values in Science. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190260804.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Fausto-Sterling, A. 1985. Myths of Gender: Biological Theories About Women and Men. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Flick, Lawrence B., and Norman G. Lederman. 2004. Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science: Implications for Teaching, Learning, and Teacher Education. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1.
   Google Scholar
• Funk, Cary, Meg Hefferon, Brian Kennedy, and Courtney Johnson. 2019. “Trust and Mistrust in Americans’ Views of Scientific Experts.” Pew Research Center. August 2. https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2019/08/02/trust-and-mistrust-in-americans-views-of-scientific-experts/
   Google Scholar
• Gardner, P. L. 1975. “Attitudes to Science: A Review.” Studies in Science Education 2 (1): 1–41. doi:10.1080/03057267508559818.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, Alvin. 2001. “Experts: Which Ones Should You Trust?” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 63 (1): 85–110. doi:10.2307/3071090.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, Fred. 1998. The Tuskegee Syphilis Study. Montgomery, AL: NewSouth Books.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, Alan. 1994. “The Roles of Rhetoric in the Public Understanding of Science.” Public Understanding of Science 3 (1): 3–23. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/3/1/001.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra G. 1986. The Science Question in Feminism. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking from Women’s Lives. New York: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heller, J. R., and P. T. Bruyere. 1946. “Untreated Syphilis in the Male Negro: II. Mortality During 12 Years of Observation.” Venereal Disease Information 27 (February): 34–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hempel, Carl G. 1965. “Science and Human Values.” In Aspects of Scientific Explanation and Other Essays in the Philosophy of Science, edited by Carl G. Hempel, 81–96. New York: The Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holman, Bennett, and Torsten Wilholt. 2022. “The New Demarcation Problem.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 91 (February): 211–220. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2021.11.011.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horby, Peter, and Martin Landray. 2020. “Statement from the Chief Investigators of the Randomised Evaluation of Covid-19 Therapy Trial on Hydroxychloroquine.” Recovery, June 5. https://www.recoverytrial.net/news/statement-from-the-chief-investigators-of-the-randomised-evaluation-of-covid-19-therapy-recovery-trial-on-hydroxychloroquine-5-june-2020-no-clinical-benefit-from-use-of-hydroxychloroquine-in-hospitalised-patients-with-covid-19
   Google Scholar
• Irzik, Gürol, and Faik Kurtulmus. 2018. “Well-Ordered Science and Public Trust in Science.” Synthese 198 (19): 4731–4748. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-02022-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, James. 1981. Bad Blood: The Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment. New York: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, Gareth R., and Jennifer M. George. 1998. “The Experience and Evolution of Trust: Implications for Cooperation and Teamwork.” Academy of Management Review 23 (3): 531–546. doi:10.2307/259293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan. 2010. “Fixing the Communications Failure.” Nature 463: 296–297. doi:10.1038/463296a.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M., Donald Braman, Paul Slovic, John Gastil, and Geoffrey Cohen. 2009. “Cultural Cognition of the Risks and Benefits of Nanotechnology.” Nature Nanotechnology 4 (2): 87–90. doi:10.1038/nnano.2008.341.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahan, Dan M., E. Peters, M. Wittlin, P. Slovic, L. Ouellette, D. Braman, and G. Mandel. 2012. “The Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–735. doi:10.1038/nclimate1547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, Philip. 2011. Science in a Democratic Society. Amherst: Prometheus Books. doi:10.1007/s11024-013-9233-y.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, Nicole M., Dominique Brossard, Dietram A. Scheufele, Michael A. Xenos, and Keith Franke. 2019. “Trends—Americans’ Trust in Science and Scientists.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (4): 817–836. doi:10.1093/poq/nfz041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laudan, Larry, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard, and Steve Wykstra. 1986. “Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research.” Synthese 69 (2): 141–223. doi:10.1007/BF00413981.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lederman, Norman G. 2004. “Syntax of Nature of Science Within Inquiry and Science Instruction.” In Scientific Inquiry and Nature of Science, edited by Lawrence B. Flick and Norman G. Lederman, 301–317. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-5814-1_14.
   Google Scholar
• Lederman, Norm G., Fouad Abd-El-Khalick, Randy L. Bell, and Renée S. Schwartz. 2002. “Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward Valid and Meaningful Assessment of Learners’ Conceptions of Nature of Science.” Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39 (6): 497–521. doi:10.1002/tea.10034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctvx5wbfz.
   Google Scholar
• Longino, Helen. 1995. “Gender, Politics, and the Theoretical Virtues.” Synthese 104 (3): 383–397. doi:10.1007/BF01064506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magagnoli, Joseph, Siddharth Narendran, Felipe Pereira, Tammy Cummings, W. Hardin James, S. Scott Sutton, and Jayakrishna Ambati. 2020. “Outcomes of Hydroxychloroquine Usage in United States Veterans Hospitalized with Covid-19.” Clinical Advances 1 (1): 114–127. doi:10.1016/j.medj.2020.06.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsick, Victoria J., and Karen E. Watkins. 2001. “Informal and Incidental Learning.” New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education 2001 (89): 25–34. doi:10.1002/ace.5.
   Google Scholar
• McComas, William F., and Joanne K. Olson. 1998. “The Nature of Science in International Science Education Standards Documents.” In The Nature of Science in Science Education, edited by William F. McComas, 41–52. Vol. 5. Dordrecht: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47215-5_2.
   Google Scholar
• McCurdy, Richard C. 1958. “Toward a Population Literate in Science.” The Science Teacher 25 (7): 366–408.
   Google Scholar
• McLellan, D. 2004. “Ernest Hendon, 96; Tuskegee Syphilis Study’s Last Survivor.” Los Angeles Times. January 25. https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2004-jan-25-me-hendon25-story.html
   Google Scholar
• Mehra, Mandeep R., Sapan Desai, Frank Ruschitzka, and Amit Patel. 2020. “Hydroxychloroquine or Chloroquine with or Without a Macrolide for Treatment of COVID-19: A Multinational Registry Analysis.” The Lancet, May 22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31180-6.
   Google Scholar
• Millar, Robin and Jonathan F. Osborne, eds. 1998 . Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future a Report with Ten Recommendations. London: King’s College London.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Timothy. 1991. Colonising Egypt. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, Jean Michel, Constance Delaugerre, J. Le Go, Breno Mela-Lima, Diane Ponscarme, Lauriane Goldwirt, and Nathalie de Castro. 2020. “No Evidence of Rapid Antiviral Clearance or Clinical Benefit with the Combination of Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in Patients with Severe COVID-19 Infection.” Médecine Et Maladies Infectieuses 50 (4): 384. doi:10.1016/j.medmal.2020.03.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakayachi, Kazuya, and George Cvetkovich. 2010. “Public Trust in Government Concerning Tobacco Control in Japan.” Risk Analysis 30 (1): 143–152. doi:10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01306.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbet, Matthew C., and Dietram A. Scheufele. 2009. “What’s Next for Science Communication? Promising Directions and Lingering Distractions.” American Journal of Botany 96 (10): 1767–1778. doi:10.3732/ajb.0900041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Jesse J., James H. Peers, Sidney Olansky, John C. Cutler, and Geraldine Gleeson. 1955. “Untreated Syphilis in the Male Negro: Pathologic Findings in Syphilitic and Non-Syphilitic Patients.” Journal of Chronic Diseases 1 (2): 127–148. doi:10.1016/0021-9681(55)90204-6.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Piso, Zachary, Ian Werkheiser, Samantha Noll, and Christina Leshko. 2016. “Sustainabilityof What? Recognising the Diverse Values That Sustainable Agriculture Works to Sustain.” Environmental Values 25 (2): 195–214. doi:10.3197/096327116X14552114338864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potter, Nancy Nyquist. 2002. How Can I Be Trusted?: A Virtue Theory of Trustworthiness. Washington: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Prakash, Gyan. 1999. Another Reason: Science and the Imagination of Modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press. doi:10.2307/j.ctv10h9d8r.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, Robert. 1991. Value-Free Science?: Purity and Power in Modern Knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rayner, Steve. 1992. “Cultural Theory and Risk Analysis.” In Social Theories of Risk, edited by Sheldon Krimsky and Dominic Goldin, 83–115. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Razai, Mohammad S., Tasnime Osama, Douglas G. J. McKechnie, and Azeem Majeed. 2021. “Covid-19 Vaccine Hesitancy Among Ethnic Minority Groups.” BMJ 372 (513): 1–2. doi:10.1136/bmj.n513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockefeller Brothers Fund. 1958. ”The Pursuit of Excellence: Education and the Future of America.” In Panel Report V of the Special Studies Project. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Rooney, Phyllis. 1992. “On Values in Science: Is the Epistemic/Non-Epistemic Distinction Useful?” PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1992 (1): 13–22. doi:10.1086/psaprocbienmeetp.1992.1.192740.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Eli S., Elizabeth M. Dufort, Tomoko Udo, Larissa A. Wilberschied, Jessica Kumar, James Tesoriero, Patti Weinberg, et al. 2020. ”Association of Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients with COVID-19 in New York State.” Jama 323 (24): 2493–2502. doi:10.1001/jama.2020.8630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sayare, Scott. 2020. “He Was a Science Star. Then He Promoted a Questionable Cure for Covid-19.” New York Times Magazine, May 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/12/magazine/didier-raoult-hydroxychloroquine.html
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Terri A. 2003. “The Legacy of the Tuskegee Syphilis Experiments for Emergency Exception from Informed Consent.” Annals of Emergency Medicine 41 (1): 79–81. doi:10.1067/mem.2003.17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schofer, Evan. 2003. “The Global Institutionalization of Geological Science, 1800 to 1990.” American Sociological Review 68 (5): 730–759. doi:10.2307/1519760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shavers, Vickie L., Charles F. Lynch, and Leon F. Burmeister. 2002. “Racial Differencesin Factors that Influence the Willingness to Participate in Medical Research Studies.” Annals of Epidemiology 12 (4): 248–256. doi:10.1016/S1047-2797(01)00265-4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael. 2021. “Trust and Risk Perception: A Critical Review of the Literature.” Risk Analysis 41 (3): 480–490. doi:10.1111/risa.13325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, G. Cvetkovich, and C. Roth. 2000. “Salient Value Similarity, Social Trust, and Risk/Benefit Perception.” Risk Analysis 20 (3): 353–362. doi:10.1111/0272-4332.203034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siegrist, Michael, Timothy C. Earle, and Heinz Gutscher. 2003. “Test of a Trust and Confidence Model in the Applied Context of Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Risks.” Risk Analysis 23 (4): 705–716. doi:10.1111/1539-6924.00349.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simis, Molly J., Haley Madden, Michael A. Cacciatore, and Sara K. Yeo. 2016. “The Lure of Rationality: Why Does the Deficit Model Persist in Science Communication?” Public Understanding of Science 25 (4): 400–414. doi:10.1177/0963662516629749.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, Judith. 2020. The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy. New York: Routledge. doi:10.4324/9781315542294.
   Google Scholar
• Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–393. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thagard, Paul. 2012. The Cognitive Science of Science: Explanation, Discovery, and Conceptual Change. Cambridge: MIT Press. doi:10.7551/mitpress/9218.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden, Sander. 2016. “A Conceptual Critique of the Cultural Cognition Thesis.” Science Communication 38 (1): 128–138. doi:10.1177/1075547015614970.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villarosa, Linda. 2022. Under the Skin: The Hidden Toll of Racism on American Lives and on the Health of Our Nation. New York: DoubleDay.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenknecht, Susann. 2015. “Facing the Incompleteness of Epistemic Trust: Managing Dependence in Scientific Practice.” Social Epistemology 29 (2): 160–184. doi:10.1080/02691728.2013.794872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilholt, Torsten. 2016. “Collaborative Research, Scientific Communities, and the Social Diffusion of Trustworthiness.” In The Epistemic Life of Groups: Essays in the Epistemology of Collectives, edited by Micheal S. Brady and Miranda Fricker, 218–234. New York: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198759645.003.0012.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon, Carol Kaesuk. 2000. “Families Emerge as Silent Victims of Tuskegee Syphilis Experiment.” The New York Times, May 12, 1997. https://www.nytimes.com/1997/05/12/us/families-emerge-as-silent-victims-of-tuskegee-syphilis-experiment.html
   Google Scholar