Publication Cover
Social Epistemology
A Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Policy
Volume 37, 2023 - Issue 5
281
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bots: Some Less-Considered Epistemic Problems

ORCID Icon

References

  • Basu, R. 2019a. “What We Epistemically Owe to Each Other.” Philosophical Studies 176 (4): 915–931. doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1219-z.
  • Basu, R. 2019b. “The Wrongs of Racist Beliefs.” Philosophical Studies 176 (9): 2497–2515. doi:10.1007/s11098-018-1137-0.
  • Begby, E. 2021a. “Evidential Preemption.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 102 (3): 515–530. doi:10.1111/phpr.12654.
  • Begby, E. 2021b. Prejudice: A Study in Non-Ideal Epistemology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bolinger, R. J. 2020. “The Rational Impermissibility of Accepting (Some) Racial Generalizations.” Synthese 197 (6): 1–17. doi:10.1007/s11229-018-1809-5.
  • Byskov, M. 2021. “What Makes Epistemic Injustice an ‘Injustice’?” Journal of Social Philosophy 52 (1): 114–131. doi:10.1111/josp.12348.
  • Caponetto, L. 2021. “A Comprehensive Definition of Illocutionary Silencing.” Topoi 40 (1): 191–202. doi:10.1007/s11245-020-09705-2.
  • Davis, E. 2021. ”A Tale of Two Injustices: Epistemic Injustice in Philosophy.” In Applied Epistemology, edited by Jennifer Lackey, 215–250. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dembroff, R., and D. Whitcomb. Forthcoming. ”Content-Focused Epistemic Injustice.” In Oxford Studies in Social Epistemology, edited by Tamar Gendler and John Hawthorne, Vol. 7. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Doan, M. 2018. ”Resisting Structural Epistemic Injustice.” Feminist Philosophical Quarterly 4(4). Article 5. doi:10.5206/fpq/2018.4.6230.
  • Fricker, M. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power & the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Frost-Arnold, K. 2014. “Trustworthiness and Truth: The Epistemic Pitfalls of Internet Accountability.” Episteme 11 (1): 63–81. doi:10.1017/epi.2013.43.
  • Gardiner, G. Manuscript. “Rape, Alcoholism, and Selling Sex: Against the New Ethics of Belief.”
  • Gardiner, G. 2018. ”Evidence and Moral Encroachment.” In Believing in Accordance with the Evidence, edited by Kevin McCain, 169–195. Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
  • Gendler, T. 2011. “On the Epistemic Costs of Implicit Bias.” Philosophical Studies 156 (1): 33–63. doi:10.1007/s11098-011-9801-7.
  • Goguen, S. 2016. ”Stereotype Threat, Epistemic Injustice, and Rationality.” In Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 1: Epistemology and Metaphysics, edited by Michael Browenstein and Jennifer Saul, 216–237. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Goldberg, S. 2010. “Comments on Miranda Fricker’s Epistemic Injustice.” Episteme 7 (2): 138–150. doi:10.3366/epi.2010.0004.
  • Haslanger, S. 2000. “Gender and Race: (What) are They? (What) Do We Want Them to Be?” Noûs 34 (1): 31–55. doi:10.1111/0029-4624.00201.
  • Hookway, C. 2010. “Some Varieties of Epistemic Injustice: Reflections on Fricker.” Episteme 7 (2): 151–163. doi:10.3366/epi.2010.0005.
  • Hornsby, J., and R. Langton. 1998. “Free Speech and Illocution.” Legal Theory 4 (1): 21–37. doi:10.1017/S1352325200000902.
  • Hornsby, J., and R. Langton. 2009. ”Freedom of Illocution? Response to Daniel Jacobson.” In Sexual Solipsism, edited by. Rae Langton, 75–87. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Huda, K. A. S. M. N. 2019. “The Expansionist View of Systematic Testimonial Injustice: South Asian Context.” Symposion 6 (2): 171–181. doi:10.5840/symposion20196212.
  • Jacobsen, D. 1995. “Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1): 64–79
  • Kukla, Q. 2014. ”Performative Force, Convention, and Discursive Injustice.” Hypatia. 29 (2): 440–457. Originally published under Kukla, R. doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2012.01316.x.
  • Langton, R. 1993. “Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 22: 305–330.
  • Langton, R., and C. West. 1999. “Scorekeeping in a Pornographic Language Game.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 77 (3): 303–319. doi:10.1080/00048409912349061.
  • Levenbook, J. C. 1984. “Harming Someone After His Death.” Ethics 94 (3): 407–419. doi:10.1086/292557.
  • Levy, N. 2022. “In Trust We Trust: Epistemic Vigilance and Responsibility.” Social Epistemology 36 (3): 283–298. doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2042420.
  • Lynch, M. 2019. Know-It-All Society: How Dogmatism and Arrogance are Defining Culture and What to Do About It. New York: Liveright/W. W. Norton.
  • MacKinnon, C. 1987. “Francis Biddle’s Sister.” In Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • McDonald, L. 2021. “Your Word Against Mine: The Power of Uptake.” Synthese 199 (1–2): 3505–3526. doi:10.1007/s11229-020-02944-1.
  • Medina, J. 2017. ”Varieties of Hermeneutical Injustice.” In The Routledge Handbook of Epistemic Injustice, edited by Ian James Kidd, José Medina, and Gaile Pohlhaus, 41–52. London: Routledge.
  • Paul, C., and M. Matthews 2016. “The Russian ‘Firehose of Falsehood’ Propaganda Model: Why It Might Work and Options to Counter It.” RAND Corporation. https://www.rand.org/pubs/perspectives/PE198.html.
  • Rini, R. 2017. ”Fake News and Partisan Epistemology.” Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal. 27 (2S): E-43-E–64. Supplement doi:10.1353/ken.2017.0025.
  • Strawson, P. F. 1962. “Freedom and Resentment.” Proceedings of the British Academy 48: 1–25.
  • Stukal, D., S. Sanovich, R. Bonneau, and J. A. Tucker. 2017. “Detecting Bots on Russian Political Twitter.” Big Data 5 (4): 310–324. doi:10.1089/big.2017.0038.
  • Tufekci, Z. 2017. Twitter and Tear Gas: The Power and Fragility of Networked Protest. London: Yale University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.