Potential for cross-contamination of benthic diatom samples when using toothbrushes

References

• Besse-Lotoskaya, A, Verdonschot, P. F.M., Sinkeldam, J. A. (2006). Uncertainty in diatom assessment: sampling, identification and counting variation. Hydrobiologia, 566, 247–260. (doi:10.1007/s10750-006-0092-5) doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0092-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEMAGREF (1982). In RapportQ. E.Lyon-A.F. B. (Ed.), Etude de méthodes biologiques quantitatives d'appréciation de la qualité des eaux, (pp. 218 Rhône-Méditerrannée-Corse.
   Google Scholar
• CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2003). Water quality – Guidance standard for the routine sampling and pretreatment of benthic diatoms from rivers, (pp. 14 Geneva: Comité Europeén de Normalisation. EN 13946:
   Google Scholar
• CEN (Comité Européen de Normalisation) (2004). Water quality – Guidance standard for the identification, enumeration and interpretation of benthic diatom samples from running waters, (pp. 12 Geneva: Comité Européen de Normalisation. EN 14407:
   Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. T. (2013). Estimating confidence of European WFD ecological status class and WISERBUGS (WISER Bioassessment Uncertainty Guidance Software). Hydrobiologia, 704, 39–56. (doi:10.1007/s10750-012-1245-3) doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1245-3
   Google Scholar
• Dalgaard, P (2002). Introductory statistics with R, (pp. 267 New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Dines, R. A., Murray-Bligh, J (2000). Quality assurance and RIVPACS. In WrightJ. F.SutcliffeD. W.FurseM. T. (Ed.), Assessing the biological quality of freshwaters: RIVPACS and other techniques, (pp. 71–78). Cumbria: Freshwater Biological Association.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities Series L, 327, 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Gillett, N, Pan, Y, Parker, C (2009). Should only live diatoms be used in the bioassessment of small mountain streams?. Hydrobiologia, 620, 135–147. (doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9624-5) doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9624-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, G, Werum, M, Lange-Bertalot, H (2011). Diatomeen im Süsswasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie, (pp. 908 Ruggell: A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlert, M, Albert, R.-L., Antilla, E. L., Bengtsson, R, Bigler, C, Eskola, T, Gälman, V, Gottschalk, S, Herlitz, E, Jarlman, A, Kasperoviciene, J, Kokocinski, M, Luup, H, Miettinen, J, Paunksnyte, I, Piirsoo, K, Quintana, I, Raunio, J, Sandell, B, Simola, H, Sundberg, H, Vilbaste, S, Weckström, J (2007). Harmonization is more important than experience – results of the first Nordic–Baltic diatom intercalibration exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology, 21, 471–482. (stream monitoring). (doi:10.1007/s10811-008-9394-5) doi: 10.1007/s10811-008-9394-5
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G., Cazaubon, A, Coring, E, Dell'uomo, A, Ector, L, Goldsmith, B, Guasch, H, Hürlimann, J, Jarlman, A, Kawecka, B, Kwandrans, J, Laugaste, R, Lindstrøm, E.-A., Leitao, M, Marvan, P, Padisák, J, Pipp, E, Prygiel, J, Rott, E, Sabater, S, Van Dam, H, Vizinet, J (1998). Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology, 10, 215–224. (doi:10.1023/A:1008033201227) doi: 10.1023/A:1008033201227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G., Juggins, S, Guthrie, R, Pritchard, S, Jamieson, J, Rippey, B, Hirst, H, Yallop, M (2008). Assessment of ecological status in U.K. rivers using diatoms. Freshwater Biology, 53, 403–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G., Bennett, C, Coste, M, Delgado, C, Delmas, F, Denys, L, Ector, L, Fauvlle, C, Ferreol, M, Golub, M, Jarlman, A, Kahlert, M, Lucey, J, ní Chatháin, B, Pardo, I, Pfister, P, Picinska-Faltynowicz, J, Rosebery, J, Schranz, C, Schaumburg, J, Van Dam, H, Vilbaste, S (2009a). A comparison of national approaches to setting ecological status boundaries in phytobenthos assessment for the European Water Framework Directive: results of an intercalibration exercise. Hydrobiologia, 621, 169–182. (doi:10.1007/s10750-008-9641-4) doi: 10.1007/s10750-008-9641-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, M. G., Bennion, H, Burgess, A, Ellis, J, Juggins, S, Guthrie, R, Jamieson, J, Adriaenssens, V, Yallop, M (2009b). Uncertainty in ecological status assessments of lakes and rivers using diatoms. Hydrobiologia, 633, 5–15. (doi:10.1007/s10750-009-9872-z) doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-9872-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer, K, Lange-Bertalot, H (1986). Bacillariophyceae 1. Teil: Naviculaceae. In EttlH.GerloffJ.HeynigH.MollenhauerD. (Ed.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, (pp. 876 Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.2/1
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, K, Lange-Bertalot, H (1988). Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In EttlH.GerloffJ.HeynigH.MollenhauerD. (Ed.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, (pp. 596 Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.2/2
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, K, Lange-Bertalot, H (2004). Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In EttlH.GerloffJ.HeynigH.MollenhauerD. (Ed.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, (pp. 598 Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.2/3
   Google Scholar
• Krammer, K, Lange-Bertalot, H (1997). Bacillariophyceae 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In EttlH.GerloffJ.HeynigH.MollenhauerD. (Ed.), Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Second edition. (pp. 594 Stuttgart & New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag.2/2
   Google Scholar
• Mackereth, F. J.H., Heron, J., Talling, J. F. (1978). Scientific Publication of the Freshwater Biological Association No. 36. Freshwater Biological Association. Water analysis, (pp. 120 Ambleside:
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen, J, Kindt, R, Legendre, P, O'Hara, R. B. (2013). Vegan: Community Ecology Package version 1.8-5. http://cran.r-project.org/ [Accessed 12 February
   Google Scholar
• Passy, S. I. (2001). Spatial paradigms of lotic diatom distribution: a landscape ecology perspective. Journal of Phycology, 37, 370–378. (doi:10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037003370.x) doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2001.037003370.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel, J, Carpentier, P, Almeida, S, Coste, M, Druart, J.-C., Ector, L, Guillard, D, Honoré, M.-A., Iserentant, R, Ledeganck, P, Lalanne-Cassou, C, Lesniak, C, Mercier, I, Moncaut, P, Nazart, M, Nouchet, N, Peres, F, Peeters, V, Rimet, F, Rumeau, A, Sabater, S, Straub, F, Torrisi, M, Tudesque, L, Van De Vijver, B, Vidal, H, Vizinet, J, Zydek, N (2002). Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90-354): results of an intercomparison exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology, 14, 27–39. (doi:10.1023/A:1015277207328) doi: 10.1023/A:1015277207328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team (2006). R: A language and environment for statistical computing, ViennaAustria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org [Accessed 12 February 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Rott, E, Pipp, E, Pfister, P, Van Dam, H, Ortler, K, Binder, N, Pall, K (1999). Indikationslisten für Aufwuchsalgen in Österreichischen Fliessgewassern. Teil 2: Trophieindikation, (pp. 248 Wien: Bundesministerium für Land- und Forstwirtschaft.
   Google Scholar
• ZgrundoA (2006), Sources of uncertainty in sampling during diatom-based ecological status assessment, 6th international symposium on use of algae for monitoring rivers. program, abstracts & extended absracts ÁcsK. É.T.KissJ.PadisákSzabóK.É. Hungarian Algological Society Göd 185
   Google Scholar