Do functional or morphological classifications explain stream phytobenthic community assemblages?

References

• Berthon V., Bouchez A. & Rimet F. 2011. Using diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess organic pollution and trophic level in rivers: a case study of rivers in south-eastern France. Hydrobiologia 673: 259–271. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0786-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besemer K., Singer G. Limberger R., Chlup A.K., Hochedlinger G., Hodl I., Baranyi C. & Battin T.J. 2007. Biophysical controls on community succession in stream biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 4966–4974. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00588-07
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beven K.J. 2011. Rainfall-runoff modeling; The Primer, 2nd ed. J. Wiley & Sons, Chichester, UK, pp. 25–111.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs B.J.F. & Close M.E. 1989. Periphyton biomass dynamics in gravel bed rivers – the relative effects of flows and nutrients. Freshwater Biology 22: 209–231. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1989.tb01096.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs B.J.F. & Kilroy C. 2000. New Zealand periphyton guideline: detecting, monitoring and managing enrichment of streams. NIWA, New Zealand, 226 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs B.J.F., Goring D.G. & Nikora V.I. 1998b. Subsidy and stress responses of stream periphyton to gradients in water velocity as a function of community growth form. Journal of Phycology 34: 598–607. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1998.340598.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs B.J.F., Stevenson R.J. & Lowe R.L. 1998a. A habitat matrix conceptual model for stream periphyton. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 143: 21–56.
   Google Scholar
• Birk S., Willby N.J., Kelly M.G., Bonne W., Borja A., Poikane S. & Van De Bund W. 2013. Intercalibrating classifications of ecological status: Europe's quest for common management objectives for aquatic ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment 454–455: 490–499. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borcard D., Legendre P. & Drapeau P. 1992. Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73: 1045–1055. doi: 10.2307/1940179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowes M.J., Smith J.T., Hilton J., Sturt M.M. & Armitage P.D. 2007. Periphyton biomass response to changing phosphorus concentrations in a nutrient-impacted river: a new methodology for phosphorus target setting. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 227–238. doi: 10.1139/f06-180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS EN ISO 10304–1. 1995. Water quality – Determination of dissolved fluoride, chloride, nitrite, orthophosphate, bromide, nitrate and sulfate ions, using liquid chromatography of ions – Part 1: Method for water with low contamination.
   Google Scholar
• BS ENV 12260. 2003. Water quality. Determination of nitrogen. Determination of bound nitrogen (TNb), following oxidation to nitrogen oxide.
   Google Scholar
• Carrick H.J. & Steinman A.D. 2001. Variation in periphyton biomass and species composition in Lake Okeechobee, Florida (USA): Distribution of algal guilds along environmental gradients. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 152: 411–438.
   Google Scholar
• Consalvey M., Paterson D.M. & Underwood G.J.C. 2004. The ups and downs of life in a benthic biofilm: migration of benthic diatoms. Diatom Research 19: 181–202. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2004.9705870
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott J.A., Irish A.E., Reynolds C.S. & Tett P. 2000. Modelling freshwater phytoplankton communities: an exercise in validation. Ecological Modelling 128: 19–26. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(99)00221-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Parliament & Council. 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities L327: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh M. & Gaur J.P. 1998. Current velocity and the establishment of stream algal periphyton communities. Aquatic Botany 60: 1–10. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3770(97)00073-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grime J.P. 1977. Evidence for existence of 3 primary strategies in plants and its relevance to ecological and evolutionary theory. American Naturalist 111: 1169–1194. doi: 10.1086/283244
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D., Feld C.K., Moog O. & Ofenbock T. 2006. Cook book for the development of a Multimetric Index for biological condition of aquatic ecosystems: Experiences from the European AQEM and STAR projects and related initiatives. Hydrobiologia 566: 311–324. doi: 10.1007/s10750-006-0087-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D., Borja A., Carstensen J., Carvalho L., Elliott M., Feld C.K., Heiskanen A.-S., Johnson R.K., Moe J., Pont D., Solheim A.L. & De Bund W.V. 2010. The European water framework directive at the age of 10: A critical review of the achievements with recommendations for the future. Science of the Total Environment 408: 4007–4019. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.05.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H., Dürselen C.-D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. & Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HMSO. 1981a. Ammonia in water. In: Methods for the examination of waters and associated materials.
   Google Scholar
• HMSO. 1981b. Oxidized nitrogen in waters. In: Methods for the examination of waters and associated materials.
   Google Scholar
• HMSO. 1992. Phosphorus and silicon in waters, effluents and sludges. In: Methods for the examination of waters and associated materials.
   Google Scholar
• Horner R.R., Welch E.B., Seeley M.R. & Jacoby J.M. 1990. Responses of periphyton to changes in current velocity, suspended sediment and phosphorus concentration. Freshwater Biology 24: 215–232. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1990.tb00704.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudon C. & Legendre P. 1987. The ecological implications of growth forms in epibenthic diatoms 1. Journal of Phycology 23: 434–441. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1987.tb02529.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John D.M., Whitton B.A., & Brook A.J. 2002. The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. Cambridge University press, UK. 702 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson R.E., Tuchman N.C. & Peterson C.G. 1997. Changes in the vertical microdistribution of diatoms within a developing periphyton mat. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 16: 503–519. doi: 10.2307/1468140
   Google Scholar
• Jüttner I., Ector L., Reichardt E., Van De Vijver B., Jarlman A., Krokowski J. & Cox E.J. 2013. Gomphonema varioreduncum sp. nov., a new species from northern and western Europe and a re-examination of Gomphonema exilissimum. Diatom Research 28: 303–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kahlert M., Kelly M., Albert R.L., Almeida S.P., Bešta T., Blanco S., Coste M., Denys L., Ector L., Fránková M., Hlúbiková D., Ivanov P., Kennedy B., Marvan P., Mertens A., Miettinen J., Picinska-Fałtynowicz J., Rosebery J., Tornés E., Vilbaste S. & Vogel A. 2012. Identification versus counting protocols as sources of uncertainty in diatom-based ecological status assessments. Hydrobiologia 695: 109–124. doi: 10.1007/s10750-012-1115-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M.G. 2001. Use of similarity measures for quality control of benthic diatom samples. Water Research 35: 2784–2788. doi: 10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00554-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly M.G. 2012. The semiotics of slime: visual representation of phytobenthos as an aid to understanding ecological status. Freshwater Reviews, 5: 105–119.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly M.G., Adams C., Graves A.C., Jamieson J., Krokowski J., Lycett E.B. & Murray-Bligh J. 2001. The trophic diatom index: a user’s manual: revised edition. Environment Agency, Bristol. 135 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly M.G., Bennion H., Cox E.J., Goldsmith B., Jamieson J., Juggins S., Mann D.G. & Telford R.J. 2005. Common freshwater diatoms of Britain and Ireland: an interactive key. Environment Agency, Bristol.
   Google Scholar
• Kelly M., King L. & Chathain B.N. 2009. The conceptual basis of ecological status assessments using diatoms. Biology and Environment-Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy 109B: 175–189. doi: 10.3318/BIOE.2009.109.3.175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knudson B.M. & Kipling T.H. 1957. Ecology of the Epiphytic Diatom Tabellaria Flocculosa (Roth) Kütz. var. Flocculosa in Three English Lakes. Journal of Ecology 45: 93–112. doi: 10.2307/2257078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff & D. Mollenhauer), Fischer, Stuttgart & New York.
   Google Scholar
• Kruk C., Huszar V.L.M., Peeters E., Bonilla S., Costa L., Lurling M., Reynolds C.S. & Scheffer M. 2010. A morphological classification capturing functional variation in phytoplankton. Freshwater Biology 55: 614–627. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02298.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kutka F.J. & Richards C. 1996. Relating diatom assemblage structure to stream habitat quality. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 15: 469–480. doi: 10.2307/1467799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwandrans J., Eloranta P., Kawecka B. & Wojtan K. 1998. Use of benthic diatom communities to evaluate water quality in rivers of southern Poland. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 193–201. doi: 10.1023/A:1008087114256
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberti G.A. & Resh V.H. 1983. Stream periphyton and insect herbivores: An experimental study of grazing by a caddisfly population. Ecology 64: 1124–1135. doi: 10.2307/1937823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lamberti G.A. & Resh V.H. 1985. Comparability of introduced tiles and natural substrates for sampling lotic bacteria, algae and macroinvertebrates. Freshwater Biology 15: 21–30. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1985.tb00693.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange K., Liess A., Piggott J.J., Townsend C.R. & Matthaei C.D. 2011. Light, nutrients and grazing interact to determine stream diatom community composition and functional group structure. Freshwater Biology 56: 264–278. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02492.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law R.J. 2011. A review of the function and uses of, and factors affecting, stream phytobenthos. Freshwater Reviews 4: 135–166.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis W.M.Jr. 1976. Surface/volume ratio: Implications for phytoplankton morphology. Science 192: 885–887. doi: 10.1126/science.192.4242.885
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund J.W.G., Kipling C. & Le Cren E.D. 1958. The inverted microscope method of estimating algal numbers and the statistical basis of estimations by counting. Hydrobiologia 11: 143–170. doi: 10.1007/BF00007865
   Google Scholar
• Madgwick G., Jones I.D., Thackeray S.J., Elliott J.A. & Miller H.J. 2006. Phytoplankton communities and antecedent conditions: high resolution sampling in Esthwaite Water. Freshwater Biology 51: 1798–1810. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2006.01607.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechler M., Rousseeuw P., Struyf A., Hubert M. & Hornik K. 2012. Cluster analysis basics and extensions. R package, version 1.14.3.
   Google Scholar
• McAuliffe J.R. 1984. Resource depression by a stream Herbivore: Effects on distributions and abundances of other grazers. Oikos 42: 327–333. doi: 10.2307/3544401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick P.V. 1996. Resource competition and species coexistence in freshwater benthic algal assemblages. In: Algal ecology; Freshwater benthic ecosystems (Ed. by R. J. Stephenson, M. L. Bothwell & R. L. Lowe), pp. 229–252. Academic Press, Inc., California.
   Google Scholar
• McGrady-Steed J. & Morin P.J. 2000. Biodiversity, density compensation, and the dynamics of populations and functional groups. Ecology 81: 361–373. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2000)081[0361:BDCATD]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moog O. 2002. Fauna aquatica austriaca, Wasserwirtschaftskataster, Bundesministerium für Land und Forstwirtschaft. Umwelt und Wasserwirtschaft, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Nagendra H. 2002. Opposite trends in response for the Shannon and Simpson indices of landscape diversity. Applied Geography 22: 175–186. doi: 10.1016/S0143-6228(02)00002-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Dell J. (Ed.) 1993. Method 365.1; Determination of phosphorus by semi-automated colorimetry. US Environmental Protection Agency, Ohio.
   Google Scholar
• Oksanen J., Blanchet F.G., Kindt R., Legendre P., Minchin P.R., O'Hara R.B., Simpson G.L., Solymos P., Henry M., Stevens H. & Wagner H. 2012. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0–5.
   Google Scholar
• OMNIDIA 2011. [online] http://omnidia.free.fr/omnidia_english.htm[Accessed 20 January 2013].
   Google Scholar
• Passy S.I. 2002. Environmental randomness underlies morphological complexity of colonial diatoms. Functional Ecology 16: 690–695. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2435.2002.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy S.I. 2007. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquatic Botany 86: 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passy S. & Larson C. 2011. Succession in stream biofilms is an environmentally driven gradient of stress tolerance. Microbial Ecology 62: 414–424. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9879-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pringle C.M., Naiman R.J., Bretschko G., Karr J.R., Oswood M.W., Webster J.R., Welcomme R.L. & Winterbourn M.J. 1988. Patch dynamics in lotic systems – the stream as a mosaic. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 7: 503–524. doi: 10.2307/1467303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prygiel J., Carpentier P., Almeida S., Coste M., Druart J.-C., Ector L., Guillard D., Honoré M.-A., Iserentant R., Ledeganck P., Lalanne-Cassou C., Lesniak C., Mercier I., Moncaut P., Nazart M., Nouchet N., Peres F., Peeters V., Rimet F., Rumeau A., Sabater S., Straub F., Torrisi M., Tudesque L., Van De Vijver B., Vidal H., Vizinet J. & Zydek N. 2002. Determination of the biological diatom index (IBD NF T 90–354): results of an intercomparison exercise. Journal of Applied Phycology 14: 27–39. doi: 10.1023/A:1015277207328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.S. 1984. Phytoplankton periodicity: the interactions of form, function and environmental variability. Freshwater Biology 14: 111–142. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1984.tb00027.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.S. 1988. Functional morphology and the adaptive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton. In: Growth and reproductive strategies of freshwater phytoplankton (Ed. by C. D. Sandgren) Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. pp. 388–433.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.S. 2006. The ecology of phytoplankton. Cambridge University Press, New York. 535 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Reynolds C.S., Huszar V., Kruk C., Naselli-Flores L. & Melo S. 2002. Towards a functional classification of the freshwater phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 24: 417–428. doi: 10.1093/plankt/24.5.417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2011. Use of diatom life-forms and ecological guilds to assess pesticide contamination in rivers: Lotic mesocosm approaches. Ecological Indicators 11: 489–499. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Cauchie H.M., Hoffmann L. & Ector L. 2005. Response of diatom indices to simulated water quality improvements in a river. Journal of Applied Phycology 17: 119–128. doi: 10.1007/s10811-005-4801-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soininen J., Paavola R. & Muotka T. 2004. Benthic diatom communities in boreal streams: community structure in relation to environmental and spatial gradients. Ecography 27: 330–342. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03749.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinman A.D., Mulholland P.J. & Hill W.R. 1992. Functional Responses Associated with Growth Form in Stream Algae. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 11: 229–243. doi: 10.2307/1467388
   Google Scholar
• Taylor J., Prygiel J., Vosloo A., De La Rey P. & Van Rensburg L. 2007. Can diatom-based pollution indices be used for biomonitoring in South Africa? A case study of the Crocodile West and Marico water management area. Hydrobiologia 592: 455–464. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0788-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak C.J.F. & Smilauer P. 2002. CANOCO reference manual and user's guide to Canoco for windows: Software for canonical community ordination (version 4.5). Microcomputer Power, Ithaca, USA. 242 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Tuchman N.C. 1996. The role of heterotrophy in algae. In: Algal ecology; freshwater benthic ecosystems (Ed. by R. J. Stephenson, M. L. Bothwell & R. L. Lowe), pp. 299–319. Academic Press, Inc., California.
   Google Scholar
• UK National Ecosystem Assessment 2011. The UK national ecosystem assessment: Synthesis findings. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, 85 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dam H., Mertens A. & Sinkeldam J. 1994. A coded checklist and ecological indicator values of freshwater diatoms from The Netherlands. Aquatic Ecology 28: 117–133. doi: 10.1007/BF02334251
   Google Scholar
• Winter J. & Duthie H. 2000. Stream epilithic, epipelic and epiphytic diatoms: habitat fidelity and use in biomonitoring. Aquatic Ecology 34: 345–353. doi: 10.1023/A:1011461727835
   Google Scholar