Influence of a tributary stream on benthic communities in a Didymosphenia geminata impacted stream in the Sierra Nevada, USA

REFERENCES

• Arens W. 1989. Comparative functional morphology of the mouthparts of stream animals feeding on epilithic algae. Archiv für Hydrobiologie/Supp 83: 253–354.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D. & Stribling J.B. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers:periphyton. Benthic Macroinvertebrates and Fish, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Office of Water, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Benda L.N., Poff L., Miller D., Dunne T., Reeves G., George P. & Pollock M. 2004. The network dynamic hypothesis; how channel networks structure riverine habitat. Bioscience 54: 413–427. doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0413:TNDHHC]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergey E.A., Cooper J.T. & Phillips B.C. 2010. Substrate characteristics affect colonization by bloom-forming diatom Didymosphenia geminata. Aquatic Ecology 44: 33–40.
   Google Scholar
• Bothwell M.L. & Kilroy C. 2011. Phosphorous limitation of the freshwater benthic diatom Didymosphenia geminata determined by the frequency of cell division. Freshwater Biology 56: 565–578. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2010.02524.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunn S.E. & Arthington A.H. 2002. Basic Principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30: 492–507. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2737-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewson Z.S., James A.B.W. & Death R.G. 2007. A review of the consequences of decreased flow for instream habitat and macroinvertebrates. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26: 401–415. doi: 10.1899/06-110.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellwood N.T. & Whitton B.A. 2007. Importance of organic phosphate hydrolyzed in stalks of the lotic diatom Didymosphenia geminata and the possible impact of atmospheric and climatic changes. Hydrobiologia 592: 121–133. doi: 10.1007/s10750-007-0728-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Floder S. & Kilroy C. 2009. Didymosphenia geminata (Protista, Bacillariophyceae) invasion, resistance of native periphyton communities, and implications for dispersal and management. Biodiversity and Conservation v18: 3809–3824. doi: 10.1007/s10531-009-9681-8
   Google Scholar
• Gillis C. & Chalifour M. 2010. Changes in the macrobenthic community structure following the introduction of the invasive algae Didymosphenia geminata in the Matapedia River, Quebec, Canada. Hydrobiologia 647: 63–70. doi: 10.1007/s10750-009-9832-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf W.L. 2006. Downstream hydrologic and geomorphic effects of large dams on American rivers. Geomorphology 79: 336–360. doi: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graneli E. & Turner J.T. 2006. An introduction to harmful algae. In: Ecology of Harmful Algae (Ed.by E. Graneli & J.T. Turner), pp. 15–17. Springer, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H.C. & Kahlert M. 2001. Effects of grazing and nutrient supply on periphyton biomass and nutrient stoichiometry in habits of different productivity. Limnology and Oceanography 46(8): 1881–1898. doi: 10.4319/lo.2001.46.8.1881
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H., Durselen C.D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. & Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D.A., Ranney S.H., Chipps S.R., & Spindler B.D. 2010. Invertebrate composition and abundance associated with Didymosphenia geminata in a montane stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology 25: 235–241. doi: 10.1080/02705060.2010.9665073
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James D.A., Mosel K. & Chipps S.R. 2013. The influence of light, stream gradient, and iron on Didymosphenia geminata bloom development in the Black Hills, South Dakota. Hydrobiologia 721: 117–127. doi: 10.1007/s10750-013-1654-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilroy C. 2004. A new alien diatom, Didymosphenia geminata (Lyngbye) Schmidt: its biology, distribution, effects and potential risks for New Zealand fresh waters. National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Client Report, CHC2004–128, Christchurch, NZ.
   Google Scholar
• Kilroy C. & Bothwell M.L. 2012. Didymosphenia geminata growth rates and bloom formation in relation to ambient dissolved phosphorous concentration. Freshwater Biology 57: 641–653.
   Google Scholar
• Kilroy C., Larned S.T. & Biggs B.J.F. 2009. The non-indigenous diatom Didymosphenia geminata alters benthic community in New Zealand Rivers. Freshwater Biology 54: 1990–2002. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02247.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood A.E., Shea T., Jackson L.J. & McCauley E. 2007. Didymosphenia geminata in two Alberta headwater rivers; an emerging invasive species that challenges conventional views on algal bloom development. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 64: 1703–1709. doi: 10.1139/f07-152
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkwood A.E., Jackson L.J. & McCauley E. 2009. Are dams hotspots for Didymosphenia geminata blooms? Freshwater Biology 54: 1856–1863. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02231.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar S.S., Spaulding S.A., Stohlgren T.J., Hermann K.A., Schmidt T.S. & Bahls L.L. 2009. Potential habitat distribution for freshwater diatom Didymosphenia geminata in the continental US. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 415–420. doi: 10.1890/080054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landsberg J.H. 2002. The effects of harmful algal blooms on aquatic organisms. Reviews in Fisheries Sciences 10(2): 113–390. doi: 10.1080/20026491051695
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCune B. & Mefford M.J. 2006. PC-ORD. Mutlivariate Analysis of Ecological data, version 5.10, MJM Software. Gleneden Beach, Oregon, USA.
   Google Scholar
• McCutchan J.H. & Lewis W.M. 2002. Relative importance of carbon sources for macroinvertebrates in a Rocky Mountain Stream. Limnology and Oceanography 47(3): 742–752. doi: 10.4319/lo.2002.47.3.0742
   Google Scholar
• Merritt R.W. & Cummins K.W. 1996. An Introduction to Aquatic Insects of North America. 3rd ed. Kendall Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Minshall G.W. 1978. Autotrophy in stream ecosystems. Bioscience 28: 767–770. doi: 10.2307/1307250
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poff N.L., Allan J.D., Bain M.B., Karr J.R., Prestegaard K.L., Richter D.B., Sparks R.E. & Stromberg J.C. 1997. Natural flow regime; a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47: 769–784. doi: 10.2307/1313099
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Power M.E. & Dietrich W.E. 2002. Food webs in river networks. Ecological Research 17: 451–471. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1703.2002.00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice S.P., Greenwood M.T. & Joyce C.B. 2001. Tributaries, sediment sources, and the longitudinal organisation of macroinvertebrate fauna along river systems. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 58: 824–840. doi: 10.1139/f01-022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson C.T. & Uehlinger U. 2008. Experimental floods cause ecosystem regime shift in a regulated river. Ecological Applications 18: 511–526. doi: 10.1890/07-0886.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rost A.R., Fritsen C.H. & Davis C.J. 2011. Distribution of Didymosphenia geminata in streams in the Sierra Nevada, USA in relationship to water chemistry and bedrock geology. Hydrobiologia 665: 157–167. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0617-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherbot D.M J. & Bothwell M.L. 1993. A review of the ecology of D. geminata and the physiochemical data of endemic catchments on Vancouver Island. Environmental Sciences Division, National Hydrology Research Institute. N. 93005. 1–55.
   Google Scholar
• Sunda W.G., Graneli E. & Gobler C.J. 2006. Positive feedback and the development and persistence of ecosystem disruptive algal blooms. Journal of Phycology 42: 963–974. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp K.H. 2002. Domnance of autochthonous autotrophic carbon in food webs of heterotrophic rivers. Okios 96(3): 543–550. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0706.2002.960315.x
   Google Scholar
• Ward J.V. & Stafford J.A. 1979. The ecology of regulated rivers. Plenum Press, New York and London.
   Google Scholar
• Ward J.V. & Stanford J.A. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regulated Rivers: Research and Management 10: 159–168. doi: 10.1002/rrr.3450100211
   Google Scholar
• Welschmeyer N.A. 1994. Flourometric analysis of chlorophyll-a in the presence of chlorophyll b and pheopigments. Limnology and Oceanography 39: 1985–1992. doi: 10.4319/lo.1994.39.8.1985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar