Morphological and genetic variability of assemblages of Cyclotella ocellata Pantocsek/C. comensis Grunow complex (Bacillariophyta, Thalassiosirales)

References

• Alfasane M.A., Ullah M.U. & Khondker M. 2013. Limnology of Lake Rainkhyongkain with a new record of Marchantia polymorpha L. var aquatica Nees. Bangladesh Journal of Botany 42: 223–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altschul S.F., Gish W., Miller W., Myers E.W. & Lipman D.J. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of Molecular Biology 215: 403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J., Jansen R.K. & Theriot E.C. 2007. Bridging the Rubicon: phylogenetic analysis reveals repeated colonizations of marine and fresh waters by thalassiosiroid diatoms. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 45: 193–210. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.03.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alverson A.J. & Kolnick L. 2005. Intragenomic nucleotide polymorphism among small subunit rDNA paralogs in the diatom genus Skeletonema (Bacillariophyta). Journal of Phycology 41: 1248–1257. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.00136.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anonymous. 1975. Proposals for standardization on diatom terminology and diagnoses. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 53: 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Birks H.J.B. 1994. The importance of pollen and diatom taxonomic precision in quantitative palaeoenvironmental reconstructions. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 83: 107–117. doi: 10.1016/0034-6667(94)90062-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cherepanova M.V., Usol'steva M.V., Pushkar V.S. & Dubrovina Y.F. 2010. Morphogenesis in Cyclotella ocellata–Complex from Lake El'gygytgyn (Chukchi Peninsula) during the Pleistocene–Holocene. Paleontological Journal 44: 1252–1261. doi: 10.1134/S0031030110100035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cremer H., Wagner B., Juschus O. & Melles M. 2005. A microscopical study of diatom phytoplankton in deep crater Lake El’ gygytgyn, Northeast Siberia. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Algological Studies 116: 147–169.
   Google Scholar
• Danielidis D.B., Spartinou M. & Economou-Amilli A. 1996. Limnological survey of Lake Amvrakia, western Greece. Hydrobiologia 318: 207–218. doi: 10.1007/BF00016682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druart J.C. & Straub F. 1988. Description de deux nouvelles Cyclotelles (Bacillariophyceae) de milieux alcalins et eutrophes: Cyclotella costei nov. sp. et Cyclotella wuetrichiana nov. sp. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Hydrobiologie 50: 182–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duleba M., Ector L., Horváth Zs., Kiss K.T., Molnár L.F., Pohner Zs., Szilágyi Zs., Tóth B., Vad Cs.F., Várbíró G. & Ács É. 2014. Biogeography and phylogenetic position of a warm-stenotherm centric diatom, Skeletonema potamos (C.I. Weber) Hasle and its long-term dynamics in the River Danube. Protist 165: 715–729. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.08.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton A.D., Clesceri L.S., Rice E.W. & Greenberg A.E. (Ed. by) 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (21st ed.), APHA, AWW, WEF, Washington, DC, USA. 1296 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Economou-Amilli A. 1982. SEM-studies on Cyclotella trichonidea (Bacillariophyceae). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Algological Studies 30: 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Edlund M.B., Williams R.M. & Soninkhishig N. 2003. The planktonic diatom diversity of ancient Lake Hovsgol, Mongolia. Phycologia 42: 232–260. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-42-3-232.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans K.M., Wortley A.H. & Mann D.G. 2007. An assessment of potential diatom ”barcode” genes (cox1, rbcL, 18S and ITS rDNA) and their effectiveness in determining relationships in Sellaphora (Bacillariophyta). Protist 158: 349–364. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2007.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fricke F. (Ed.) 1906. Schmidt's Atlas der Diatomaceenkunde. O.R. Reisland, Aschersleben, Leipzig & Berlin. 266 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fritz S.C., Kingston J.C. & Engstrom D.R. 1993. Quantitative trophic reconstruction from sedimentary diatom assemblages: a cautionary tale. Freshwater Biology 30: 1–23. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.1993.tb00784.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genkal S.I. 1977. K metodike podscheta nekotorykh taksonomicheski znachimykh strukturnykh ehlementov stvorki u diatomovykh vodoroslej sem. Thalassiosiraceae Lebour emend. Hasle (Bacillariophyta). [On counting of some taxonomically significant structural elements of valves in the diatom algae of the family Thalassiosiraceae Lebour emend. Hasle (Bacillariophyta).] Botanicheskii Zhurnal 62: 848–851. [In Russian.]
   Google Scholar
• Genkal S.I. 1984. O morfologicheskoj izmenchivosti osnovn ykh elementov stvorki u vidov roda Stephanodiscus (Bacillariophyta). [On morphological variability of the main structural valve elements in the species of the genus Stephanodiscus (Bacillariophyta).] Botanicheskii Zhurnal 69: 403–408. [In Russian.]
   Google Scholar
• Genkal S.I., Chekryzheva T.A. & Komulaynen S.F. 2015. To the taxonomy of Cyclotella comensis (Bacillariophyta). Botanicheskii Zhurnal 100: 389–394. [In Russian.]
   Google Scholar
• Genkal S.I. & Popovskaya G.I. 2008. Morphological variability of Cyclotella ocellata from lake Khubsugul (Mongolia). Diatom Research 23: 75–91. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2008.9705738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Håkansson H. 1993. Morphological and taxonomic problems in four Cyclotella species (Bacillariophyceae). Diatom Research 8: 309–316. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1993.9705264
   Google Scholar
• Håkansson H. & Chepurnov V. 1999. A study of variation in valve morphology of the diatom Cyclotella meneghiniana in monoclonal cultures: the effect of auxospore formation and different salinity conditions. Diatom Research 14(2): 251–272. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1999.9705469
   Google Scholar
• Hammer Ø., Harper D.A.T. & Ryan P.D. 2001. PAST: Paleontological Statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologica Electronica 4: 9. Available from: http://palaeo-electronica.org/2001_1/past/issue1_01.htm [Accessed 29 April 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Hamsher S.E., Evans K.M., Mann D.G., Poulíčková A. & Saunders G.W. 2011. Barcoding diatoms: Exploring alternatives to COI–5P. Protist 162: 405–422. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasegawa M., Kishino H. & Yano T. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22: 160–174. doi: 10.1007/BF02101694
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausmann S. & Lotter F.A. 2001. Morphological variation within the diatom taxon Cyclotella comensis and its importance for quantitative temperature reconstructions. Freshwater Biology 46: 1323–1333. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2001.00752.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hegewald E. & Hindákova A. 1997. Variabilität von einer natürlichen Population und von Klonen des Cyclotella ocellata–Komplexes (Bacillariophaceae) aus dem Gallbergweiher, Nordwestdeutschland. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Algological Studies 86: 17–37.
   Google Scholar
• Houk V., Klee R. & Tanaka H. 2010. Atlas of freshwater centric diatoms with a brief key and descriptions. Part III. Stephanodiscaceae A. Cyclotella, Tertiarius, Discostella. Fottea 10 ( Suppl): 1–498.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1928. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz mit Berücksichtung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. Lief. 2. Akad. Verlag, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In: Dr. L. Rabenhorst's Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, Österreich und Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst). Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig. 466 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Iwamura T., Nagai H. & Ichimura S. 1970. Improved methods for determining contents of chlorophyll, protein, ribonucleic acid and deoxyribonucleic acid in planktonic populations. Internationale Revue der gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie. 55: 131–147. doi: 10.1002/iroh.19700550106
   Google Scholar
• Jung S.W., Han M.-S. & Ki J.-S. 2010. Molecular genetic divergence of the centric diatom Cyclotella and Discostella (Bacillariophyceae) revealed by nuclear ribosomal DNA comparisons. Journal of Applied Phycology 22: 319–329. doi: 10.1007/s10811-009-9462-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ki J.-S. 2009. Comparative molecular analysis of freshwater centric diatoms with particular emphasis on the nuclear ribosomal DNA of Stephanodiscus (Bacillariophyceae). Algae 24: 129–138. doi: 10.4490/ALGAE.2009.24.3.129
   Google Scholar
• Kiss K.T., Rojo C. & Álvarez-Cobelas M. 1996. Morphological variability of a Cyclotella ocellata (Bacillariophyceae) population in the lake Las Madres (Spain). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Algological Studies 82: 37–55.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss K.T., Klee R. & Hegewald E. 1999. Reinvestigation of the original material of Cyclotella ocellata Pantocsek (Bacillariophyceae). Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplement Algological Studies 93: 39–53.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss K.T., Hegewald E. & Ács É. 2002. Cyclotella hispanica a new dimorphic centric diatom species. Algological Studies 106: 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Kiss K.T., Klee R., Ector L. & Ács É. 2012. Centric diatoms of large rivers and tributaries in Hungary: morphology and biogeographic distribution. Acta Botanica Croatia 71: 311–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kistenich S., Dreßler M., Zimmermann J., Hübener T., Bastrop R. & Jahn R. 2014. An investigation into the morphology and genetics of Cyclotella comensis and closely related taxa . Diatom Research 29: 423–440. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2014.922125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knie M. & Hübener T. 2007. Morphological variability of the Cyclotella ocellata–krammeri–rossii complex in field samples and cultures. In: Proceedings of the 1st central European diatom meeting 2007 (Ed. by W.-H. Kusber & R. Jahn), Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem, Freie Universität, Berlin, pp. 83–86.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Bacillariophyceae, 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. – Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/3. G. Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart & Jena. 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lee M.-A., Faria D.G., Han M.-S., Lee J. & Ki J.-S. 2013. Evaluation of nuclear ribosomal RNA and chloroplast gene markers for the DNA taxonomy of centric diatoms. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 50: 163–174. doi: 10.1016/j.bse.2013.03.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luddington I.A., Kaczmarska I. & Lovejoy C. 2012. Distance and character-based evaluation of the V4 region of the 18S rRNA gene for the identification of diatoms (Bacillariophyceae). PLoS ONE 7: e45664–45674. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045664
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGillivary M.L. & Kaczmarska I. 2011. Survey of the efficacy of a short fragment of the rbcL gene as a supplemental DNA barcode for diatoms. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 58: 529–536. doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2011.00585.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L., Elwood H.J., Stickel S. & Sogin M.L. 1988. The characterization of enzymatically amplified eukaryotic 16S–like rRNA–coding regions. Gene 71: 491–499. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(88)90066-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pantocsek J. 1901. Die Kieselalgen oder Bacillarien des Balaton. Im Auftrage des ungarischen geographischen Gesellschaft auf Basis eigener Aufsammlungen. In: Resultate der wissenschaftlichen Erforschung des Balatonsees. II. Band. Anhang zur II. Section des 2. Theiles, K. und K. Hofbuchdruckerei des Victor Hornyánszky, Budapest. 112 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F. 2013. Phytoplancton du Léman (The phytoplankton of the Lake Geneva). Rapport Commission internationale pour la protection des eaux du Léman Campagne 2012, 2013: 82–93. [in French]
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2012. Biomonitoring river diatoms: Implications of taxonomic resolution. Ecological Indicators 15: 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Trobajo R., Mann D.G., Kermarrec L., Franc A., Domaizon I. & Bouchez A. 2014. When is sampling complete? The effects of the geographical range and marker choice on perceived diversity Nitzschia palea (Bacillariophyta). Protist 165: 245–259. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.03.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera P., Cruces F. & Vila I. 2003. Cyclotella ocellata Pantocsek (Bacillariophyceae): Primera cita en Chile y comentarios sobre su variabilidad morfologica. Gayana Botánica 60: 123–131. doi: 10.4067/S0717-66432003000200007
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler W. 1994. Cyclotella pseudocomensis nov. spec. (Bacillariophyceae) aus norddeutschen Seen. Diatom Research 9: 355–369. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1994.9705313
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler W. & Morabito G. 2003. Topical observations on centric diatoms (Bacillariophyceae, Centrales) of Lake Como (N. Italy). Journal of Limnology 62: 47–60. doi: 10.4081/jlimnol.2003.47
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler W., Nicklisch A. & Hepperle D. 2003. Dimorphism in Cyclotella pseudocomensis (Heterokontophyta, Bacillariophyceae) as revealed by morphological, ecological and molecular methods. Advances in Limnology 58: 157–173.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffler W., Nicklisch A. & Schönfelder I. 2005. Beiträge zur Morphologie, Ökologie und Ontogenie der planktischen Diatomee Cyclotella comensis Grunow: Untersuchungen an historischem und rezentem Material. Diatom Research 20: 171–200. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2005.9705626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlegel I. & Scheffler W. 1999. Seasonal development and morphological variability of Cyclotella ocellata (Bacillariophyceae) in the eutrophic Lake Dagow (Germany). International Review of Hydrobiology 84: 469–478.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solak C.N. & Kulikovskiy M. 2013. Species composition and distribution of centric diatoms from Türkmen Mountain (Sakarya River Basin/Turkey). Turkish Journal of Botany 37: 589–596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoermer E.E. & Yang J.J. 1969. Plankton diatom assemblages in Lake Michigan. Great Lakes Research Division, Institute of Science and Technology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, GLRD, Special Report No. 47. 268 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Stoof-Leichenring K.R., Epp L.S., Trauth M.H. & Tiedemann R. 2012. Hidden diversity in diatoms of Kenyan Lake Naivasha: a genetic approach detects temporal variation. Molecular Ecology 21: 1918–1930. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05412.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K. & Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial-DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 10: 512–526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamura K. Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A. & Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis Version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teubner K. 1995. A light microscopical investigation and multivariate statistical analyses of heterovalvar cells of Cyclotella–species (Bacillariophyceae) from lakes of the Berlin–Brandenburg region. Diatom Research 10: 191–205. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1995.9705337
   Google Scholar
• Theriot E. 1987. Principal component analysis and taxonomic interpretation of environmentally related variation in silicification in Stephanodiscus (Bacillariophyceae). British Phycological Journal 22: 359–373. doi: 10.1080/00071618700650431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E. & Serieyssol K. 1994. Phylogenetic systematics as a guide to understanding features and potential characters of the centric diatom family Thalassiosiraceae. Diatom Research 9: 429–450. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1994.9705318
   Google Scholar
• Vijayasarathy P.R. 2011. Engineering chemistry (2nd ed.). PHI Learning Private Ltd., New Delhi, pp. 310.
   Google Scholar
• Werner P. & Smol J.P. 2006. The distribution of the diatom Cyclotella comensis in Ontario (Canada) lakes. Nova Hedwigia 130: 373–391.
   Google Scholar
• Wolin J.A. & Stoermer E.F. 2005. Response of a Lake Michigan coastal lake to anthropogenic catchment disturbance. Journal of Paleolimnology 33: 73–94. doi: 10.1007/s10933-004-1688-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wunsam S., Schmidt R. & Klee R. 1995. Cyclotella–taxa (Bacillariophyceae) in lakes of the Alpine region and their relationship to environmental variables. Aquatic Sciences 57: 360–386. doi: 10.1007/BF00878399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye J., Coulouris G., Zaretskaya I., Cutcutache I., Rozen S. & Madden T.L. 2012. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics 13: 134–144. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann J., Jahn R. & Gemeinholzer B. 2011. Barcoding diatoms: evaluation of the V4 subregion on the 18S rRNA gene, including new primers and protocols. Organisms, Diversity and Evolution 11: 173–192. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0050-6
   Google Scholar