Morphology and taxonomy of an almost forgotten fossil diatom, Gaillonella sculpta Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyceae)

References

• Anonymous. 1975. Proposals for a standardisation of diatom terminology and diagnosis. – Nova Hedwigia Beiheft 53: 323–354.
   Google Scholar
• Bory de Saint-Vincent J.B.M. 1823. Confervées. Dictionaire Classique des Sciences Naturelles 4: 392–394.
   Google Scholar
• Brattseva G.M., Vituzhin D.I., Giterman R.E., Gladenkov Y.B., Gladicov V.M., Grechin V.I., Dolmatova L.M., Kafanov A.I., Konova L., Krishtofofich L.V., Kuklina T.A., Lin'kova T.I., Lupikina E.G., Oreshkina E.G., Popov C.V., Remizovskiy R.I. & Serova M.Ya. 1984. Atlas fauny i flory Neogenovych otlozhenyi Dalnego Vostoka Tochilinskiy oporniy razrez zapadnoi Kamchatki (Atlas of Fauna and Flora of the Neogene sediments of the Far East: Tochilinski Key Section of Western Kamchatka): 272, Pl. 75: Figs 1–15. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Crawford R.M. & Likhoshway Y.V. 1999. The frustule structure of original material of Aulacoseira distans (Ehrenberg) Simonsen. Diatom Research 14: 239–250. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1999.9705468
   Google Scholar
• Crawford R.M. & Likhoshway Y.V. 2002. The velum of species of the diatom genus Aulacoseira Thwaites. In: John J. (ed.): In: Proceedings of the 15th International Diatom Symposium, Perth, Australia, 1998, Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein: 275–287.
   Google Scholar
• Crawford R.M., Likhoshway Y.V. & Jahn R. 2003. Morphology and identity of Aulacoseira italica and typification of Aulacoseira (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Research 18: 1–19. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2003.9705569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford R.M. & Sims P.A. 2006. The diatoms Radialiplicata sol (Ehr.) Gleser and R. clavigera (Grun.) Gleser and their transfer to Ellerbeckia Crawford, thus a genus with freshwater and marine representatives. In: Microalgal biology, evolution and ecology. Volume dedicated to Professor Frank E. Round (Ed. by R.M. Crawford, B. Moss, D.G. Mann & H.R. Preisig). Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 130: 37–62.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg G.C. 1845. Neue Untersuchungen über das kleinste Leben als geologisches Moment. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich Preußischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1845: 53–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1854. Mikrogeologie. Das Erden und Felsen schaffende Wirken des unsichtbar kleinen selbstandigen Lebens auf der Erde. Tafeln. Leopold Voss, Leipzig. 374 pp., 40.
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes L.F. & Souza-Mosimann R.M.de 2001. Triceratium moreirae sp. nov. and Triceratium dubium (Triceratiaceae – Bacillariophyta) from estuarine environments of Southern Brazil, with comments on the genus Triceratium C. G. Ehrenberg. Revista Brasileira de Biologia 61: 159–170.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Gebiete. – In: Dr. L. Rabenhorst`s Kryptogamen-Flora Band VII, 1. Teil. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig. 920 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Khursevich G.K. 1977. The first data about the Neogene diatom flora of the Byelorussian Poniemania. (About the boundary between Neogene and Anthropogene). Minsk: Nauka i tekhnika, 197–220. (In Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Kuntze O. 1891. Revisio Generum Pantarum. Arthur Felix, Leipzig, Pars II, 377–1011 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kozyrenko F.T., Strelnikova N.I., Khursevich G.K., Tsoy I.B., Jakovschikova T.K., Muchina V.V., Olshtynskaya A.P. & Semina G.I. 2007. Diatomovye Vodorosli Rossii i sopredelenykh stran. Iskopaemye I Sovremennye 2(The Diatoms of Russia and adjacent countries. Fossil and recent. Vol. II, issue 4), 171 pp. St. Petersburg's University Publishing House . (In Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1849. Species Algarum. F. A. Brockhaus, Leipzig. 922 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lupikina E.G. & Khursevich G.K. 1991. Pseudoaulacosira – novyi rod presnovodnykh vodoroslei classa Centrophyceae [Pseudoaulacosira – a new genus of freshwater diatoms of the class Centrophyceae]. Botanicheskii Zhurnal 76: 290–291. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Mc Neill J., Barrie F.R., Buck W.R., Demoulin V., Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., Herendeen P.S., Knapp S., Marhold K., Prado J., Prud'homme Van Reine W.F., Smith G.F., Wiersema J.H. & Turland N.J. (eds.). 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code) adopted by the Eighteenth International Botanical Congress Melbourne, Australia, July 2011. Koeltz Scientific Books 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Beihefte Nova Hedwigia 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Moiseeva A.I. 1986. Reviziya sistematicheskogo polozheniya presnovodnykh vidov roda Melosira Ag. SL (Bacillariophyta). (Aktual'nye voprosy sovremennoi paleoalgologii). Sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Akad. Nauk. SSSR, Inst. Geol. Nauk, Ukrainskoe Paleontol. Obsch: 70–73.
   Google Scholar
• Silva P.C. 2009. Gaillonella vs. Gallionella. Diatom Research 24: 191–195. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2009.9705790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuji A. 2009. Examination of type material and typification of seven diatoms described by C. E. Ehrenberg. (Joint Haeckel and Ehrenberg Project: reexamination of the Haeckel and Ehrenberg Microfossil Collections as a Historical and Scientific Legacy, Y. Tanimura and Y. Aita – eds.). National Museum of Nature and Science Monographs 40: 13–21.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1880–1885. Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique. Atlas, Taf. 78–103 (1882). Text, 235 pp. Anvers (1885).
   Google Scholar