Re-examination of Mereschkowsky’s genus Tetramphora (Bacillariophyta) and its separation from Amphora

References

• Brébisson, A. 1854. Note sur quelques diatomées marines rares ou peu connues, du littoral de Cherbourg. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg. Paris. 2: 241–258, 1 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1895. Synopsis of naviculoid diatoms. II. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 27: 1‒219.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond A.J., Ashton B., Buxton S., Cheung M., Cooper A., Duran C., Heled J., Kearse M., Markowitz S., Moir R., Stones-Havas S., Sturrock S., Swidan F., Thierer T. & Wilson A. 2012. Geneious v5.6. Available from: http://www.geneious.com.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edlund M.B., Brant L.A., Levkov Z. & Nakov T. 2006. An emended description of Decussata (Patrick) Lange-Bertalot & Metzeltin that includes protoplast organization and detailed valve and cingulum ultrastructure. Diatom Research 21: 269–280. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2006.9705669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1838. Die Infusionsthierchen als vollkommene Organismen. Verlag von Leopold Voss, Leipzig. 548 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fourtanier E. & Kociolek J.P. 2011. Catalogue of diatom names. California Academy of Sciences. Available from: http://www.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp.
   Google Scholar
• Grunow, A. 1867. Diatomeen auf Sargassum von Honduras, gesammelt von Lindig. Hedwigia 6 (1–3): 1–8, 17–32, 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Gusylakov N.E. 1985. 0 morfologii pantsirei nekotorykh predstabitelei roda Amphora (Bacillariophyta) iz Chernogo Morya. [On the morphology of the frustules in some representatives of genus Amphora (Bacillariophyta) from the Black Sea.] Botanicheskii Zhurnal 70: 1478–1481.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt, F. 1927. Fossile Bacillariaceen aus dem Loa-Becken in der Atacama-Wüste, Chile. Archiv für Hydrobiologie 18 (2): 224–251, Tafs 7–9.
   Google Scholar
• Jahn R. & Kusber W. 2004. Algae of the Ehrenberg collection: 1. Typification of 32 names of diatom taxa described by C.G. Ehrenberg. Wildenowia 34: 577–595. doi: 10.3372/wi.34.34219
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 1980. Morphologic and taxonomic investigations of some freshwater species of the diatom genus Amphora Ehr. Bacillaria 3: 197–225.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae. I. Teil. Naviculaceae. In Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa. Band 2/1. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, New York. 876 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1849. Species Algarum. F.A. Brockhaus, Lipsiae. 922 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.S., Gaiser E.E., Van De Vijver B., Edlund M.B. & Spaulding S.A. 2014. Morphology and typification of Mastogloia smithii and M. lacustris, with descriptions of two new species from the Florida Everglades and the Caribbean region. Diatom Research 29: 325–350. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2014.889038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkov Z. 2009. Amphora sensu lato. In: Diatoms of Europe (Ed. by H. Lange-Bertalot), Vol. 5, pp. 1–196. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., Ruggell.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S., Schefter M., Jordan R.W., Arai Y., Sasaki A, Theriot E.C., Ashworth M., Ruck E.C. & Pennesi C. 2012. Coral-reef diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from Guam: new records and preliminary checklist, with emphasis on epiphytic species from farmer-fish territories. Micronesica 43: 237–479. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 1994. The systematics of amphoroid diatoms: the life history of Amphora arcus. Nova Hedwigia 58: 335–352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mereschkowsky C. 1903. Les types de l’endochrome chez les diatomées. Botanicheskiia Zhurnal 21: 1–106.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J.N. 1982. A survey of the marine diatoms of Puerto Rico V. Suborder Raphidineae: families Achnanthaceae and Naviculaceae (excluding Navicula and Mastogloia). Botanica Marina 25: 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander J.A.A., Wilgenbusch J.C., Warren, D.L. & Swofford D.L. 2008. AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics. Bioinformatics 24: 581–583. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm388
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddock T.B.B. & Sims P.A. 1980. Observations on the marine diatom genus Auricula and two new genera Undatella and Proboscidea. Bacillaria 3: 161–196.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897–1908. Diatomées marines de France et des districts maritimes voisins. M.J. Tempère micrographe-éditeur, Grez-sur-Loing. 492 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Richlen M.L. & Barber P.H. 2005. A technique for the rapid extraction of microalgal DNA from single live and preserved cells. Molecular Ecology Notes 5: 688–691. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01032.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F., Teslenko M., van der Mark P., Ayres D.L., Darling A., Höhna S., Larget B., Liu L., Suchard M.A. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61: 539–542. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/sys029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sato S., Nagumo T. & Mann D.G. 2013. Morphology and life history of Amphora commutata (Bacillariophyta) I: the vegetative cell and phylogenetic position. Phycologia 52: 225–238. doi: 10.2216/12-072.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., Schmidt M., Fricke F., Heiden H., Müller O. & Hustedt F. 1874‒1959. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. O.R. Reisland, Leipzig. 460 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeman F.R. & Archibald R.E.M. 1986. Observations on Amphora species (Bacillariophyceae) in the British Museum (Natural History) I. Some species from the subgenus Oxyamphora Cleve. Nova Hedwigia 43: 113–127.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvestro D. & Michalak I. 2012. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution 12: 335–337. doi: 10.1007/s13127-011-0056-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith H.L. 1873. Conspectus of Diatomaceae. Analysis of the species of the genus Amphora. The Lens 2: 65–91.
   Google Scholar
• Stamatakis A. 2006. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22: 2688–2690. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanek J.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyta): and investigation into the monophyly and classification of the amphoroid diatoms. Protist. 165: 177–195. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth, M.P., Nakov T., Ruck E. & Jansen R.K. 2015. Dissecting signal and noise in diatom chloroplast protein encoding genes with phylogenetic information profiling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 89: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wachnicka A.H. & Gaiser E.E. 2007. Characterization of Amphora and Seminavis from South Florida, U.S.A. Diatom Research 22: 387–455. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2007.9705722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. & Reid G. 2006. Fossils and the tropics, the Eunotiaceae (Bacillariophyta) expanded: a new genus for the Upper Eocene fossil diatom Eunotia reedii and the recent tropical marine diatom Amphora reichardtiana. European Journal of Phycology 41: 147–154. doi: 10.1080/09670260600628564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski A., Lange-Bertalot H. & Metzeltin D. 2000. Diatom flora of marine coasts I. Iconographia Diatomologica 7: 1–925.
   Google Scholar