Molecular phylogeny suggests transfer of Hemidiscus into Actinocyclus (Coscinodiscales, Coscinodiscophyceae)

References

• Andersen R.A., Medlin L.K. & Crawford R.M. 1986. An investigation of the cell wall components of Actinocyclus subtilis (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 22: 466–479. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1986.tb02490.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ashworth M.P., Nakov T. & Theriot E.C. 2013. Revisiting Ross and Sims (1971); toward a molecular phylogeny of the Biddulphiaceae and Eupodiscaceae (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 49: 1207–1222. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannone J.J., Subramanian S., Schnare M.N., Collett J.R., D’Souza L.M., Du Y.S., Feng B., Lin N., Madabusi L.V., Muller K.M., Pande N., Shang Z.D., Yu N. & Gutell R.R. 2002. The comparative RNA web (CRW) site: an online database of comparative sequence and structure information for ribosomal, intron, and other RNAs. BMC Bioinformatics 3: 2. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-3-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupp E.E. 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America. Bulletin of the Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California 5: 1–238.
   Google Scholar
• Damste J.S., Muyzer G., Abbas B., Rampen S.W., Masse G., Allard W.G., Belt S.T., Robert J.M., Rowland S.J., Moldowan J.M., Barbanti S.M., Fago F.J., Denisevich P., Dahl J., Trindade L.A. & Schouten S. 2004. The rise of the rhizosolenid diatoms. Science 304: 584–587. doi: 10.1126/science.1096806
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fryxell G.A., Sims P.A. & Watkins T.P. 1986. Azpeitia (Bacillariophyceae): related genera and promorphology. Systematic Botany Monographs 13: 1–74. doi: 10.2307/25027634
   Google Scholar
• Fryxell G.A. & Semina H.J. 1981. Actinocyclus exiguus sp. nov. from the southern parts of the Indian and Atlantic Oceans. British Phycological Journal 16: 441–448. doi: 10.1080/00071618100650501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayashi T., Saito-Kato M. & Tanimura Y. 2012. Actinocyclus nipponicus sp. nov. and A. bradburyii sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta) from Miocene lacustrine sediments of the proto-Japan Sea. Phycologia 51: 98–112. doi: 10.2216/11-17.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. 1977. Morphology and taxonomy of Actinocyclus normanii f. subsalsa (Bacillariophyceae). Phycologia 16: 321–328. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-16-3-321.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. 1995. Nomenclatural notes on Palmerina nom. nov.: Pseudo-nitzschia turgiduloides sp. nov. Diatom Research 10: 357–358. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1995.9705356
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1974. A revised check-list of the British marine diatoms. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54: 277–300. doi: 10.1017/S0025315400058549
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1930. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz. In: Kryptogamen-Flora (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 1–920. Band VII, Teil 1. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Mann A. 1907. Report on the diatoms of the Albatross Voyages in the Pacific Ocean, 1888–1904. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 10: 221–419.
   Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K., Kooistra W.H., Gersonde R. & Wellbrock U. 1996. Evolution of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta). II. Nuclear-encoded small-subunit rRNA sequence comparisons confirm a paraphyletic origin for the centric diatoms. Molecular Biology and Evolution 13: 67–75. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medlin L.K. 2016. Evolution of the diatoms: major steps in their evolution and a review of the supporting molecular and morphological evidence. Phycologia 55: 79–103. doi: 10.2216/15-105.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakov T., Ashworth M. & Theriot E.C. 2015. Comparative analysis of the interaction between habitat and growth form in diatoms. The ISME Journal 9: 246–255. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.108
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawrocki E.P., Kolbe D.L. & Eddy S.R. 2009. Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics 25: 1335–1337. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nylander J.A.A. 2004. MrModeltest v2. Program distributed by the author. Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University.
   Google Scholar
• Romero O., Armand L.K., Crosta X. & Pichon J.-J. 2005. The biogeography of major diatom taxa in Southern Ocean sediments: 3. Tropical/subtropical species. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 223: 49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. MRBAYES 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schütt F. 1896. Bacillariales (Diatomeae). In: Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien (Ed. by A. Engler & K. Prantl) 1 (1b), pp. 1–153. Engelmann, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1972. On the diatom genus Hemidiscus Wallich and other members of the so-called “Hemidiscaceae”. Veröffentlichungen des Instituts für Meeresforschung in Bremerhaven 13: 265–273.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1975. On the pseudonodulus of the centric diatoms, or Hemidiscaceae reconsidered. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 53: 83–94.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1979. The diatom system: Ideas on phylogeny. Bacillaria 2: 9–71.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K., Stecher G., Peterson D., Filipski A., & Kumar S. 2013. MEGA6: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 2725–2729. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Cannone J.J., Gutell R.R. & Alverson A.J. 2009. The limits of nuclear-encoded SSU rDNA for resolving the diatom phylogeny. European Journal of Phycology 44: 277–290. doi: 10.1080/09670260902749159
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth M., Ruck E., Nakov T. & Jansen R.K. 2010. A preliminary multigene phylogeny of the diatoms (Bacillariophyta): challenges for future research. Plant Ecology and Evolution 143: 278–296. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2010.418
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth M.P., Nakov T., Ruck E. & Jansen R.K. 2015. Dissecting signal and noise in diatom chloroplast protein encoding genes with phylogenetic information profiling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 89: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Villareal T.A. & Fryxell G.A. 1983. The genus Actinocyclus (Bacillariophyceae): frustule morphology of A. sagittulus sp. nov. and two related species. Journal of Phycology 19: 452–466. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1983.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallich C.G. 1860. On the siliceous organisms found in the digestive cavities of the Salpae, and their relation to the Flint nodules of the Chalk Formation. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, new series 8: 36–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1860.tb01241.x
   Google Scholar
• Wang L., Lin X., Goes J.I. & Lin S. 2016. Phylogenetic analyses of three genes of Pedinomonas noctilucae, the green endosymbiont of the marine dinoflagellate Noctiluca scintillans, reveal its affiliation to the order Marsupiomonadales (Chlorophyta, Pedinophyceae) under the reinstated name Protoeuglena noctilucae. Protist 167: 205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.02.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watkins T.P. & Fryxell G.A. 1986. Generic characterization of Actinocyclus: Consideration in light of three new species. Diatom Research 1: 291–312. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1986.9704975
   Google Scholar
• Zhang H., Bhattacharya D. & Lin S. 2005. Phylogeny of dinoflagellates based on mitochondrial cytochrome B and nuclear small subunit rDNA sequence comparisons. Journal of Phycology 41: 411–420. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2005.04168.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar