Morphological discoveries in the genus Diploneis (Bacillariophyceae) from the tropical west Pacific, including the description of new taxa

References

• Álvarez-Blanco I. & Blanco S. 2014. Benthic diatoms from Mediterranean coasts. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 60: 1–409.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Yamani F.Y. & Saburova M.A. 2011. Illustrated guide on the benthic diatoms of Kuwait’s marine environment. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Kuwait. 352 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Brébisson A. 1854. Note sur quelques diatomées marines rares ou peu connues, du littoral de Cherbourg. Mémoires de la Société des Sciences Naturelles de Cherbourg 2: 241–259.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal A., Poulin M. & Bérard-Therriault L. 1984. Les diatomées benthiques de substrats durs des eaux marines et saumâtres du Québec 4. Naviculales, Naviculaceae (à l’exclusion des genres Navicula, Donkinia, Gyrosigma et Pleurosigma). Naturaliste Canadien 111: 369–394.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1894. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Part I. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 26: 1–194.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1895. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms. Part II. Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Handlingar 27: 1–220.
   Google Scholar
• Crosby L.H. & Wood E.J.F. 1959. Studies on Australian and New Zealand diatoms II. Normally epontic and benthic genera. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 86: 1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Donkin A.S. 1870. The natural history of the British Diatomaceae. John van Voorst, London.
   Google Scholar
• Droop S.J.M. 1994. Morphological variation in Diploneis smithii and D. fusca (Bacillariophyceae). Archiv für Protistenkunde 144: 249–270. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9365(11)80137-5
   Google Scholar
• Droop S.J.M. 1996. The identity of Diploneis splendida (Bacillariophyta) and some related species. Phycologia 35: 404–420. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-35-5-404.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droop S.J.M. 1998. Diploneis sejuncta (Bacillariophyta) and some new species from an ancient lineage. Phycologia 37: 340–356. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-37-5-340.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Droop S.J.M., Mann D.G. & Lokhorst G. 2000. Spatial and temporal stability of demes in Diploneis smithii/D. fusca (Bacillariophyta) supports a narrow species concept. Phycologia 39: 527–546. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-39-6-527.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourtanier E. & Kociolek J.P. 1999. Catalogue of the diatom genera. Diatom Research 14: 1–190. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1999.9705462
   Google Scholar
• Fourtanier E. & Kociolek J.P. 2007. Catalogue of diatom names. California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco. Available from: http://research.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp [Version updated 7 February 2011].
   Google Scholar
• Gaul U., Geissler U., Henderson M., Mahoney R. & Reimer C.W. 1993. Bibliography on the fine structure of diatom frustules (Bacillariphyceae). Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 144: 69–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerloff J. & Helmcke J-G. 1975. Der Feinbau der Schalen von Diploneis papula (A. S.) Cleve, Diploneis smithii (Bréb.) Cleve und Diploneis parca (A. S.) Boyer. Willdenowia 7: 539–563.
   Google Scholar
• Germain H. 1979. Details of structure in three small freshwater Diploneis. Nova Hedwigia 64: 207–217.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory W. 1857. On new forms of marine Diatomaceae found in the Firth of Clyde and in Loch Fyne, illustrated by numerous figures drawn by K.K. Greville, LL. D., F. R. S. E. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh 21: 473–542, pls. 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hein M.K., Winsborough B.M. & Sullivan M.J. 2008. Bacillariophyta (diatoms) of the Bahamas. Iconographia Diatomologica 19: 1–303.
   Google Scholar
• Helmcke J-G & Krieger W. 1962. Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild. Teil II. Verlag von J. Cramer, Weinheim. 254 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson M.V. & Reimer C.W. 2003. Bibliography on the fine structure of diatom frustules (Bacillariophyceae). II. A.R.G. Gantner Verlag, Ruggell. 372 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal water. V. Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Fishery Investigations Series IV. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London. 317 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1937. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete, Tiel 2, Lief. 5. In: Kryptogamen-Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 578–718. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Idei M. 2013. Three new species of freshwater Diploneis from Japan. Diatom Research 28: 1–11. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2012.734527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Idei M & Kobayasi H. 1986. Observations on the valve structure of fresh water Diploneis (Bacillariophyceae), D. oculata (Bréb.) Cleve and D. minuta Petersen. Japanese Journal of Phycology 34: 87–93.
   Google Scholar
• Idei M. & Kobayasi H. 1988a. Examination of the type specimens of Diploneis parma Cl. In: Proceedings of the ninth international diatom symposium (Ed. by Round FE), 397–403. Biopress Ltd., Bristol & Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein.
   Google Scholar
• Idei M. & Kobayasi H. 1988b. A light and electron microscopic study of the benthic diatom Diploneis marginestriata Hust. (Bacillariophyceae). Japanese Journal of Phycology 36: 277–284.
   Google Scholar
• Idei M. & Kobayasi H. 1989a. Examination of the type material of Diploneis boldtiana CI. (Bacillariophyceae). Japanese Journal of Phycology 37: 137–143.
   Google Scholar
• Idei M. & Kobayasi H. 1989b. The fine structure of Diploneis finnica with special reference to the marginal openings. Diatom Research 4: 25–37. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1989.9705049
   Google Scholar
• Jahn R. & Kusber W.H. 2004. Algae of the Ehrenberg collection – 1. Typification of 32 names of diatom taxa described by C. G. Ehrenberg. Willdenowia 34: 577–595. doi: 10.3372/wi.34.34219
   Google Scholar
• Jensen N.G. 1985. The pennate diatoms: a translation of Hustedt’s ‘Die Kieselalgen, 2. Teil’ with supplement. Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein. 918 pp.
   Google Scholar
• John J. 1983. The diatom flora of the Swan River Estuary, West Australia. Bibliotheca Phycologica 64: 1–359.
   Google Scholar
• Jovanovska E., Nakov T. & Levkov Z. 2013. Observations of the genus Diploneis from Lake Ohrid, Macedonia. Diatom Research 28: 237–262. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2013.797219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuntze O. 1898. Revisio Generum Plantarum. Part III. A. Felix, Leipzig. pp. 1–576.
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844. Die Kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. Verlag von ferd Förstemann, Nordhausen. 152 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S. 2015a. External ultrastructure of Progonoia diatreta sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta, Scoliotropidaceae) differs from P. musca and P. intercedens comb. nov. Phytotaxa 234: 246–254. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.234.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S. 2015b. Grammatophora ornata (Fragilariophyceae: Grammatophoraceae), a new species with areolate valvocopulae, from a coral reef. Diatom Research 31: 12–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lobban C.S., Schefter M., Jordan R.W., Arai Y., Sasaki A., Theriot E.C., Ashworth M., Ruck E.C. & Pennesi C. 2012. Coral-reef diatoms (Bacillariophyta) from Guam: new records and preliminary checklist, with emphasis on epiphytic species from farmer-fish territories. Micronesica 43: 237–244. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 1999. The species concept in diatoms. Phycologia 38: 437–495. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-38-6-437.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mereschkowsky M.C. 1902. Note sur quelques diatomées de la mer Noire suivie d’une liste de formes observées dans cette mer. Journal de Botanique (Paris) 16: 319–324.
   Google Scholar
• Mills F.W. 1934. An index to the genera and species of the diatomaceae and their synonyms 1816–1932. Part 15 (Na–Na). Wheldon & Wesley Limited, London. pp. 1081–1161.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery R.T. 1978. Environmental and ecological studies of the diatom communities associated with the coral reefs of the Florida Keys. Volumes I and II. Ph.D. Dissertation, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro J.N. 1982. A survey of the marine diatoms of Puerto Rico. V. Suborder Raphidineae: Families Achnanthaceae and Naviculaceae (excluding Navicula and Mastogloia). Botanica Marina 25: 321–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuno H. 1964. Fossil diatoms. In: Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild (Ed. by J.-G. Helmcke, W. Krieger), Vol. 5, pp. 1–48. J. Cramer, Weinheim.
   Google Scholar
• O’Meara E. 1875. Report of the Irish Diatomaceae. Part I. Proceedings of the Royal Irish Academy, Second Series 2: 235–425.
   Google Scholar
• Paddock T.B.B. & Kemp K-D. 1990. An illustrated survey of the morphological features of the diatom genus Mastogloia. Diatom Research 5: 73–103. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1990.9705095
   Google Scholar
• Patrick R. & Reimer C.W. 1966. The diatoms of the United States, exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 13: 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Pennesi C., Poulin M., De Stefano M., Romagnoli T. & Totti C. 2012. Morphological studies of some marine Mastogloia (Bacillariophyceae) belonging to section sulcatae, including the description of new species. Journal of Phycology 48: 1248–1264. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01215.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennesi C., Poulin M., Hinz F., Romagnoli T., De Stefano M. & Totti C. 2013. Comparison of two new species of Mastogloia (Bacillariophyceae) with other small members of section Ellipticae. Phytotaxa 126: 1–21. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.126.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennesi C., Poulin M. & Totti C. 2016. Phylogenetic relationships and biogeography of the diatom genus Mastogloia (Bacillariophyceae): revision of the section Ellipticae including the description of new taxa. Protist 167: 148–173. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.02.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peragallo H. & Peragallo M. 1897–1908. Diatomées marines de France et des districts maritimes voisins. Tempère M.J., Grez-sur-Loing, reprinted bv Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein. 492 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ricard M. 1987. Diatomophycées. Atlas du phytoplancton marin, Vol. 2. Edition du Center National de la Recherche Scientifique, Paris. 297 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R., Cox E.J., Karayeva N.I., Mann D.G., Paddock T.B.B., Simonsen R. & Sims P.A. 1979. An amended terminology for the siliceous components of the diatom cell. Nova Hedwigia Beihefte 64: 513–533.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E. 1971. Benthic marine diatoms. Oceanography and Marine Biology Annual Review 9: 83–139.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E. 1981. The ecology of algae. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 653 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A. 1873. Uber Navicula weissflogii und N. grundleri. Zeitschrift für die Gesammten Naturwissenschaften, Halle 41: 403–409.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A., Schmidt M., Fricke F., Heiden H., Müller O. & Hustedt F. 1874–1959. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Aschersleben Leipzig, Berlin. 120 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schönfeldt H. 1907. Diatomaceae Germaniae. Die deutschen Diatomeen des Süfsswassers und des Brackwassers. W. Junk, Berlin. 263 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1987. Atlas and catalogue of the diatom types of Friedrich Hustedt. Volume 1: Catalogue, Volumes 2–3: Atlas, plates. J. Cramer, Berlin-Stuttgart. 619 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. & Paddock T.B.B. 1979. Observations and comments on some prominent morphological features of Naviculoid genera. Nova Hedwigia 64: 169–191.
   Google Scholar
• Snoeijs P. & Vilbaste S. 1994. Intercalibration and distribution of diatom species in the Baltic Sea. The Baltic Marine Biologist Publication 2. 16b. Opulus Press, Uppsala.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding S.A., Kociolek J.P. and Wong D. 1999. A taxonomic and systematic revision of the genus Muelleria (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 38: 314–341. doi: 10.2216/i0031-8884-38-4-314.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theriot E.C., Ashworth M.P., Nakov T., Ruck E. & Jansen R.K. 2015. Dissecting signal and noise in diatom chloroplast protein encoding genes with phylogenetic information profiling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 89: 28–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ympev.2015.03.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1880–1885. Synopsis des diatomées de Belgique. Anvers, Belgium. 235 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1896. A treatise on the Diatomaceae. Wesley, W. & Son, London. 558 pp.
   Google Scholar
• VanLandingham S.L. 1969. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part III. Coscinophaena through Fibula. Verlag J. Cramer, Lehre. 1087–1756 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski A, Lange-Bertalot H, Metzeltin D. 2000. Diatom flora of marine coasts. I. Iconographia Diatomologica 7: 1–925.
   Google Scholar