Diversity and distribution of the planktonic diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in the Golden Horn Estuary (Sea of Marmara)

References

• Balkis N. 2003. Seasonal variations in the phytoplankton and nutrient dynamics in the neritic water of Büyükçekmece Bay, Sea of Marmara. Journal of Plankton Research 25: 703–717. doi: 10.1093/plankt/25.7.703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balkis N. 2004. List of phytoplankton of the Sea of Marmara. Journal of Black Sea/Mediterranean Environment 10: 123–141.
   Google Scholar
• Balkis N., Ergor B. & Giresunlu M. 2004. Summer phytoplankton composition in the neritic waters of the Sea of Marmara. Pakistan Journal of Botany 36: 115–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargu S., Koray T. & Lundholm N. 2002. First report of Pseudo-nitzschia calliantha Lundholm, Moestrup and Hasle 2003, a new potentially toxic species from Turkish coasts. Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 19: 479–483.
   Google Scholar
• Bérard-Therrıault L., Poulın, M. & Bossé L. 1999. Guide d’identification du phytoplancton marin de l’estuaire et du golfe du Saint-Laurent incluant également certains protozoaires. Publication Spéciale Canadienne des Sciences Halieutiques et Aquatiques 128: 1–387.
   Google Scholar
• Brunel J. 1962. Le phytoplancton de la baie des Chaleurs. Québec, Contributions du Ministére de la Chasse et Pêcheries 91: 1–365.
   Google Scholar
• Cetinic I., Vilicic D., Buric Z. & Olujic G. 2006. Phytoplankton seasonality in a highly stratified karstic estuary (Krka, Adriatic Sea). Hydrobiologia 555: 31–40. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-1103-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chamnansınp A., Moestrup Ø. & Lundholm N. 2015. Diversity of the marine diatom Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in Thai waters – revisiting Chaetoceros compressus and Chaetoceros contortus. Phycologia 54: 161–175. doi: 10.2216/14-074.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cupp E.E. 1943. Marine plankton diatoms of the west coast of North America. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp. 1–237.
   Google Scholar
• Deniz N. & Tas S. 2009. Seasonal variations in the phytoplankton community in the north-eastern Sea of Marmara and a species list. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 89: 269–276. doi: 10.1017/S0025315409003117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domıngues R.B., Anselmo T.P., Barbosa A.B., Sommer U. & Galvão H.M. 2011. Light as a driver of phytoplankton growth and production in the freshwater tidal zone of a turbid estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Sciences 91: 526–535. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2010.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domıngues R.B., Barbosa A.B., Sommer U. & Galvão H.M. 2012. Phytoplankton composition, growth and production in the Guadiana estuary (SW Iberia): Unraveling changes induced after dam construction. Science of the Total Environment 416: 300–313. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drebes G. 1974. Marines phytoplankton eine Auswahl der Helgolander planktonalgen (Diatomeen, Peridineen). Georg Thieme, Stuttgart, pp. 14–107.
   Google Scholar
• Gogorev R.M., Orlova T.Yu., Shevchenko O.G. & Stonik I.V. 2006. The diatoms of Russia and adjacent countries. Fossil and recent. Vol. II, No. 4. Chaetocerotales (Chaetocerotaceae, Acanthocerotaceae, Atheyaceae). St. Petersburg: St. Petersburg University Press, pp. 1–177.
   Google Scholar
• Guıry M.D. 2012. How many species of algae are there? Journal of Phycology 48: 1057–1063. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01222.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo Y. & Qian S. 2003. Flora algarum marinarum sinicarum. Tomus V Bacillariophyta, No. I, Centricae. Science Press, Beijing, pp. 1–493.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1997. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–386. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Part V. Bacillariophyceae (Diatoms). Fishery Investigations, series IV. Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, pp. 1–317.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Granados C.F. 1998. Species of the diatom genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in the plankton from the southern Gulf of Mexico. Botanica Marina 41: 505–519. doi: 10.1515/botm.1998.41.1-6.505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernández-Becerril D.U. 1996. A morphological study of Chaetoceros species (Bacillariophyta) from the plankton of the Pacific Ocean of Mexico. Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. London (Botany) 26: 1–73.
   Google Scholar
• Hoppenrath M., Elbraechter M. & Drebes G. 2009. Diatoms. In: Marine phytoplankton. Selected microphytoplankton species from the North Sea around Helgoland and Sylt. E. Schweizerbart’scheVerlagsbuchhandlung, Stuttgart, pp. 21–112.
   Google Scholar
• Jasprıca N., Carıć M., Kršınıć F., Kapetanovıć T., Batıstıć M. & Njıre J. 2012. Planktonic diatoms and their environment in the lower Neretva River estuary (Eastern Adriatic Sea, NE Mediterranean). Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 141: 405–430.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen K.G. & Moestrup Ø. 1998. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyceae) in inner Danish coastal waters. Opera Botanica 133: 1–68.
   Google Scholar
• Kooistra W.H.C.F., Sarno D., Hernández-Becerril D.U., Assmy P., Di Prisco C. & Montresor M. 2010. Comparative molecular and morphological phylogenetic analyses of taxa in the Chaetocerotaceae (Bacillariophyta). Phycologia 49: 471–500. doi: 10.2216/09-59.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koray T. 1995. Phytoplankton species succession, diversity and nutrients in neritic waters of the Aegean Sea (Bay of İzmir). Turkish Journal of Botany 19: 531–544.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S.D., Joo H.M. & Lee J.H. 2014. Critical criteria for identification of the genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) based on setae ultrastructure. II. Subgenus Hyalochaete. Phycologia 53: 614–638. doi: 10.2216/14-51R2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malvıya S., Scalco E., Audıc S., Vıncent F., Veluchamy A., Poulaın J., Wıncker P., Iudıcone, B., De Vargas C., Bıttner L., Zıngone A. & Bowler C. 2016. Insights into global diatom distribution and diversity in the world’s ocean. PNAS 113: E1516–E1525. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1509523113
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Droop S.J.M. 1996. Biodiversity, biogeography and conservation of diatoms. Hydrobiologia 336: 19–32. 14. doi: 10.1007/BF00010816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. & Vanormelıngen P. 2013. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60: 414–420. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12047
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLusky D.S. & Elliot M. 2004. The estuarine environment. In: The estuarine ecosystem, ecology, threats and management (Ed. by D.S. McLusky & M. Elliot), Third edition. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–214.
   Google Scholar
• Meunier A. 1913. Microplankton de la Mer Flamande. 1ere Partie: Le genre Chaetoceros Ehrg. Mémories du Musée Royal d’Histoire Naturelle de Belgique 7: 1–87.
   Google Scholar
• Polat S. & Işik O. 2002. Phytoplankton distribution, diversity and nutrients at the north-eastern Mediterranean coast of Turkey (Karataş–Adana). Turkish Journal of Botany 26: 77–86.
   Google Scholar
• Rines J.E.B. & Hargraves P.E. 1988. The Chaetoceros Ehrenberg (Bacillariophycea) Flora of Narragansett Bay, Rhode Island, U.S.A. Bibliotheca Phycologica 79, J. Cramer, Berlin, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Rınes J.E.B. 1999. Morphology and taxonomy of Chaetoceros contortus Schütt 1895, with preliminary observations on Chaetoceros compressus Lauder 1964 (subgenus Hyalochaete, section Compressa). Botanica Marina 42: 539–551. doi: 10.1515/BOT.1999.061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G., Orlova T.Yu. & Maslennıkov S.I. 2004. Seasonal dynamics of the diatoms of the genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg in Amursky Bay (Sea of Japan). Russian Journal of Marine Biology 30: 11–19. doi: 10.1023/B:RUMB.0000020564.12182.b8
   Google Scholar
• Shevchenko O.G., Orlova T.Yu. & Hernández-Becerril D.U. 2006. The genus Chaetoceros (Bacillariophyta) from Peter the Great Bay, Sea of Japan. Botanica Marina 42: 236–258.
   Google Scholar
• Sournia A., Chrétiennot-Dinet M.J. & Ricard M. 1991. Marine Phytoplankton: How many species in the world? Journal of Plant Research 13: 1093–1099.
   Google Scholar
• Sundstrom B. 1973. Chaetoceros-arter i Öresund. MSc thesis, University of Lund. 77 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Sunesen I., Hernández-Becerril D.U. & Sar E.A. 2008. Marine diatoms from Buenos Aires coastal waters (Argentina). V. Species of the genus Chaetoceros. Revista de Biologia Marina Oceanografia 43: 303–326.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sur H.I., Okus E., Sarikaya H.Z., Altiok H., Eroglu V. & Ozturk I. 2002. Rehabilitation and water quality monitoring in the Golden Horn. Water Science and Technology 46: 29–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabassum E. & Saifullah S.M. 2010. The planktonic diatom of the genus Chaetoceros Ehrenberg from northwestern Arabian Sea bordering Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42: 1137–1151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas S. & Lundholm N. 2016. Temporal and spatial variability of the potentially toxic Pseudo-nitzschia spp. in a eutrophic estuary (Sea of Marmara). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK. doi:10.1017/S0025315416000837.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas S. & Okus E. 2003. The effects of pollution on the distribution of phytoplankton in the surface water of the Golden Horn. Turkish Journal of Marine Sciences 9: 163–176.
   Google Scholar
• Tas S., Okus E., Unlu S. & Altiok H. 2011. A study on phytoplankton following ‘Volgoneft-248′ oil spill on the north-eastern coast of the Sea of Marmara. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the UK 91: 715–725. doi: 10.1017/S0025315410000330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas S. & Yılmaz I.N. 2015. Potentially harmful microalgae and algal blooms in a eutrophic estuary in the Sea of Marmara (Turkey). Mediterranean Marine Science 16: 432–443. doi: 10.12681/mms.1042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas S., Yilmaz I.N. & Okus E. 2009. Phytoplankton as an indicator of improving water quality in the Golden Horn Estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 32: 1205–1224. doi: 10.1007/s12237-009-9207-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tas S., Yuksek A. & Yilmaz I.N. 2011. The investigation of temporal variation of harmful phytoplankton species in the north-eastern Sea of Marmara. Istanbul University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. Project number: 3292. Final report. 75 pp. (In Turkish)
   Google Scholar
• Trıgueros J.M. & Orıve E. 2001. Seasonal variations of diatoms and dinoflagellates in a shallow, temperate estuary, with emphasis on neritic assemblages. Hydrobiologia 444: 119–133. doi: 10.1023/A:1017563031810
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turkoglu M. & Koray T. 2002. Phytoplankton species succession and nutrients in the southern Black Sea (Bay of Sinop). Turkish Journal of Botany 26: 235–252.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP/MAP/MED POL. 2005. Sampling And Analysis Techniques for the Eutrophication Monitoring Strategy of MED POL. MAP Technical Reports Series No. 163, p. 43, UNEP/MAP, Athens.
   Google Scholar
• UtermÖhl H. 1958. Zur Vervollkommnung der quantitativen Phytoplankton-methodik. Mitteilungen der Internationalen Vereinigung der Theoretischen und Angewandten Limnologie 9: 1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Uysal Z. & Unsal M. 1996. Spatial distribution of net diatoms along adjacent water masses of different origin. Turkish Journal Botany 20: 519–527.
   Google Scholar
• VanLandingham S.L. 1968. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part II. Bacteriastrum through Coscinodiscus. Cramer.
   Google Scholar
• Yuksek A., Okus E., Yilmaz I.N., Yilmaz A.A. & Tas S. 2006. Changes in biodiversity of the extremely polluted Golden Horn Estuary following the improvements in water quality. Marine Pollution Bulletin 52: 1209–1218. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2006.02.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar