Salinity responses of benthic diatoms inhabiting tidal flats

References

• Admiraal W. 1977. Salinity tolerance of benthic estuarine diatoms as tested with a rapid polarographic measurement of photosynthesis. Marine Biology 39: 11–18. doi: 10.1007/BF00395587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Admiraal W. 1984. The ecology of estuarine sediment-inhabiting diatoms. Progress in Phycological Research 3: 269–322.
   Google Scholar
• Anonymous 1958. The Venice system for the classification of marine waters according to salinity. Limnology and Oceanography 3: 346–347. doi: 10.4319/lo.1958.3.3.0346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzano S., Sarno D. & Kooistra W.H.C. 2011. Effects of salinity on the growth rate and morphology of ten Skeletonema strains. Journal of Plankton Research 33: 937–945. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbq150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand L.E. 1984. The salinity tolerance of forty-six marine phytoplankton isolates. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 18: 543–556. doi: 10.1016/0272-7714(84)90089-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman P.M. & Brinkhurst R.O. 1981. Seasonal changes in interstitial salinities and seasonal movements of subtidal benthic invertebrates in the Fraser river estuary, B. C. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 12: 49–66. doi: 10.1016/S0302-3524(81)80117-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiba T. & Sawai Y. 2014. Reexamination and updating of diatom species for paleoenvironmental reconstructions. Diatom 30: 17–30.
   Google Scholar
• Clavero E., Hernández-Mariné M., Grimalt J.O. & Garcia-Pichel F. 2000. Salinity tolerance of diatoms from thalassic hypersaline environments. Journal of Phycology 36: 1021–1034. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.99177.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. 1994. Ecological tolerances and optima–real or imaginary? Verhandlungen der Internationale Vereinigung für Theoretische und Angewandte Limnologie 25: 2238–2241.
   Google Scholar
• Créach V., Ernst A., Sabbe K., Vanelslander B., Vyverman W. & Stal L.J. 2006. Using quantitative PCR to determine the distribution of a semicryptic benthic diatom, Navicula phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 42: 1142–1154. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2006.00268.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong L. & Admiraal W. 1984. Competition between three estuarine benthic diatom species in mixed cultures. Marine Ecology Progress Series 18: 269–275. doi: 10.3354/meps018269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Descamps-Julien B. & Gonzalez A. 2005. Stable coexistence in a fluctuating environment: an experimental demonstration. Ecology 86: 2815–2824. doi: 10.1890/04-1700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton J.W. & Moss B. 1966. The estimation of numbers and pigment content in epipelic algal populations. Limnology and Oceanography 11: 584–595. doi: 10.4319/lo.1966.11.4.0584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford R.B. & Honeywill C. 2002. Grazing on intertidal microphytobenthos by macrofauna: is pheophorbide a a useful marker? Marine Ecology Progress Series 229: 33–42. doi: 10.3354/meps229033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillard R.R.L. & Lorenzen C.J. 1972. Yellow-green algae with chlorophyllide C. Journal of Phycology 8: 10–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guillard R.R.L. & Ryther J.H. 1962. Studies of marine planktonic diatoms: I. Cyclotella nana Hustedt, and Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Canadian Journal of Microbiology 8: 229–239. doi: 10.1139/m62-029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haubois A.-G., Sylvestre F., Guarini J.-M., Richard P. & Blanchard G.F. 2005. Spatio-temporal structure of the epipelic diatom assemblage from an intertidal mudflat in Marennes-Oléron Bay, France. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 64: 385–394. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2005.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huisman J. & Weissing F.J. 1999. Biodiversity of plankton by species oscillations and chaos. Nature 402: 407–410. doi: 10.1038/46540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutchinson G.E. 1961. The paradox of the plankton. The American Naturalist 95: 137–145. doi: 10.1086/282171
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi Y. & Kurihara Y. 1988. Tidal rivers. In: Ecology and ecotechnology in estuarine-coastal areas (Ed. by Y. Kurihara), pp. 150–160. Tokai University Press, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Kobayasi H., Idei M., Mayama S., Nagumo T. & Osada K. 2006. H. Kobayasi’s Atlas of Japanese Diatoms based on electron microscopy, Vol. 1. Uchida Rokakuho Publishing Co., Tokyo. 531 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kosugi M. 1987. Limiting factors on the distribution of benthic diatoms in coastal regions: salinity and substratum. Diatom 3: 21–31.
   Google Scholar
• Kosugi M. 1988. Classification of living diatom assemblages as the indicator of environments, and its application to reconstruction of paleoenvironments. The Quaternary Research 27: 1–20. doi: 10.4116/jaqua.27.1
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Bacillariophyceae 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer), Vol. 2/3. Gustav Fischer, Jena. 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Navicula sensu stricto 10 genera separated from Navicula sensu lato Frustulia. In: Diatoms of Europe (Ed. by H. Lange-Bertalot), Vol. 2. A.R.G. Ganter Verlag K.G., Ruggel. 526 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lewin J. & Mackas D. 1972. Blooms of surf-zone diatoms along the coast of the Olympic Peninsula, Washington. I. Physiological investigations of Chaetoceros armatum and Asterionella socialis in laboratory cultures. Marine Biology 16: 171–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meteorological Agency 2003. Observation of water quality. In: Manual on oceanographic observation Part 1 (Ed. by Meteorological Agency), pp. 38–40. Japan Meteorological Business Support Center, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Miyazaki T., Tainaka K., Togashi T., Suzuki T. & Yoshimura J. 2006. Spatial coexistence of phytoplankton species in ecological timescale. Population Ecology 48: 107–112. doi: 10.1007/s10144-006-0256-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizuno M. 1992. Influence of salinity on the growth of marine and estuarine benthic diatoms. Japanese Journal of Phycology 40: 33–37.
   Google Scholar
• Ohgai M. 1986. Studies on the morphology and ecology of epiphytic and epilithic diatoms in Nori cultivation grounds. The Journal of Shimonoseki University of Fisheries 34: 37–89.
   Google Scholar
• Orsini L., Procaccini G., Sarno D. & Montresor M. 2004. Multiple rDNA ITS-types within the diatom Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima (Bacillariophyceae) and their relative abundances across a spring bloom in the Gulf of Naples. Marine Ecology Progress Series 271: 87–98. doi: 10.3354/meps271087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penton M. (2013). Tryblionella apiculata. In: Diatoms of the United States [online]. Available from: http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/tryblionella_apiculata [Accessed 10 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E. & Bukhtiyarova L. 1996. Four new genera based on Achnanthes (Achnanthidium) together with a re-definition of Achnanthidium. Diatom Research 11: 345–361. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1996.9705389
   Google Scholar
• Rovira L., Trobajo R., Sato S., Ibáñez C. & Mann D.G. 2015. Genetic and physiological diversity in the diatom Nitzschia inconspicua. The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 62: 815–832. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12240
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimizu N. 2006. Growth and conditions. In: Microbiology (Ed. by A. Inoue), pp. 52–54. Ohmsha, Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Shonai River Office, Chubu Regional Bureau, Ministry Of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism 2006. Shonaigawa, Shinkawa kakouhigata chousakai houkokusho (Investigation report of estuarine tidal flat of Shonai River and Shin River). Aichi Prefecture River Work Office, Nagoya. 326 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel D.A. 1998. Resource competition in a discrete environment: why are plankton distributions paradoxical? Limnology and Oceanography 43: 1133–1146. doi: 10.4319/lo.1998.43.6.1133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner T., Adams J.B. & Gama P.T. 2006. The effect of mouth opening on the biomass and community structure of microphytobenthos in a small oligotrophic estuary. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 70: 161–168. doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2006.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smayda T.J. 1969. Experimental observations on the influence of temperature, light, and salinity on cell division of the marine diatom, Detonula confervacea (Cleve) Gran. Journal of Phycology 5: 150–157. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1969.tb02596.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suzuki H., Yamamoto M., Nagumo T. & Tanaka J. 2017. Morphology and taxonomy of marine benthic diatoms (8), genus Karayevia (Achnanthidaceae, Achnanthales) (part 1). The Journal of Japanese Botany 92: 99–108.
   Google Scholar
• Takamura N. 2003. Phytoplankton. In: Encyclopedia of measurement and analysis of global environment. Vol. 2. Terrestrial environment (Ed. by H. Takeuchi), pp. 187–191. Fuji Techno System Co., Tokyo.
   Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Quintana X.D. & Sabater S. 2004. Factors affecting the periphytic diatom community in Mediterranean coastal wetlands (Empordà wetlands, NE Spain). Archiv für Hydrobiologie 160: 375–399. doi: 10.1127/0003-9136/2004/0160-0375
   Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Rovira L., Mann D.G. & Cox E.J. 2011. Effects of salinity on growth and on valve morphology of five estuarine diatoms. Phycological Research 59: 83–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2010.00603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuji A. 2000. The effect of irradiance on the growth of different forms of freshwater diatoms: implications for succession in attached diatom communities. Journal of Phycology 36: 659–661. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2000.99212.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underwood G. J. C. 1994. Seasonal and spatial variation in epipelic diatom assemblages in the Severn estuary. Diatom Research 9: 451–472. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1994.9705319
   Google Scholar
• Underwood G.J.C., Phillips J. & Saunders K. 1998. Distribution of estuarine benthic diatom species along salinity and nutrient gradients. European Journal of Phycology 33: 173–183. doi: 10.1080/09670269810001736673
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanelslander B., Créach V., Vanormelingen P., Ernst A., Chepurnov V.A., Sahan E., Muyzer G., Stal L.J., Vyverman W. & Sabbe K. 2009. Ecological differentiation between sympatric pseudocryptic species in the estuarine benthic diatom Navicula phyllepta (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 45: 1278–1289. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00762.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vos P.C. & De Wolf H. 1993. Diatoms as a tool for reconstructing sedimentary environments in coastal wetlands; methodological aspects. Hydrobiologia 269–270: 285–296. doi: 10.1007/BF00028027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams R.B. 1964. Division rates of salt marsh diatoms in relation to salinity and cell size. Ecology 45: 877–880. doi: 10.2307/1934940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yagi A., Suzuki Y., Sakazaki K. & Neriki K. 1998. The presumption of aqueous exchange by chlorine ion concentration fluctuations in sea and interstitial waters at the time of the low and high tides in Fujimae Tidal Flat. Journal of Nagoya Women’s University 45: 183–188.
   Google Scholar