Typification of Eocene–Oligocene diatom taxa proposed by Grove & Sturt (1886–1887) from the Oamaru Diatomite

References

• Agardh C.A. 1824. Systema algarum. Literis Berlingianis, Lund. 312 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth M.P., Nakov T. & Theriot E.C. 2013. Revisiting Ross & Sims (1971): toward a molecular phylogeny of the Biddulphiaceae and Eupodiscaceae (Bacillariophyceae). Journal of Phycology 49: 1207–1222. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12131
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey J.W. 1854. Notes on new species and localities of microscopical organisms. Smithsonian Contributions to Knowledge 7(3): 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Barrar W. 2017. The Oamaru diatomite: in and out of the archive. Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand. doi: 10.1080/03036758.2016.1208253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron J.A., Bukry D. & Gersonde R. 2014. Diatom and silicoflagellate biostratigraphy for the late Eocene: ODP site 1090 (sub-Antarctic Atlantic). Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 143: 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Barron J.A. & Mahood A.D. 1993. Exceptionally well-preserved early Oligocene diatoms from glacial sediments of Prydz Bay, East Antarctica. Micropaleontology 39: 29–45. doi: 10.2307/1485972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron J.A., Stickley C.E. & Bukry D. 2015. Paleoceanographic, and paleoclimatic constraints on the global Eocene diatom and silicoflagellate record. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 422: 85–100. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2015.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biodiversity Heritage Library [online]. Available from: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org [Accessed 1 February 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Bohaty S.M., Zachos J.C. & Delaney M.L. 2012. Foraminiferal Mg/Ca evidence for Southern Ocean cooling across the Eocene–Oligocene transition. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 317–318: 251–261. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2011.11.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bory de St.-Vincent J.B.G.M. 1822. Dictionnaire Classique d'Histoire Naturelle. Tome second. Rey & Gravier, libraires-éditeurs; Baudouin Frères, libraires-éditeurs, Paris. 636 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Charles N. 2017. Oamaru diatoms [online]. Available from: http://www.oamarudiatoms.co.uk [Accessed 1 February 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1894. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms, part I. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 26: 1–194.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. 1895. Synopsis of the naviculoid diatoms, part II. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 27: 1–219.
   Google Scholar
• Cleve P.T. & Grunow A. 1880. Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Arctischen Diatomeen. Kongliga Svenska-Vetenskaps Akademiens Handlingar 17: 1–121.
   Google Scholar
• Coxall H., Wilson P.A., Pälike H., Lear C.H. & Backman J. 2005. Rapid stepwise onset of Antarctic glaciation and deeper calcite compensation in the Pacific Ocean. Nature 433: 53–57. doi: 10.1038/nature03135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies A., Kemp A.E.S. & Pike J. 2009. Late Cretaceous seasonal ocean variability from the Arctic. Nature 460: 254–258. doi: 10.1038/nature08141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deflandre G. 1932. Enkystement et stade loriqué chez les ébriacées. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France Année 1932: 514–523.
   Google Scholar
• Deflandre G. 1934. Nomenclature du squelette des Ebriacées et description de quelques formes nouvelles. Annales de Protistologie 4: 75–96.
   Google Scholar
• Desikachary T.V. & Sreelatha P.M. 1989. Oamaru diatoms. Bibliotheca Diatomologica, Vol. 19. J. Cramer, Berlin-Stuttgart. 330 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Toni G.B. 1892. Sylloge algarum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Vol. II. Bacillarieae. Sectio II. Pseudorhaphideae. Typis Seminarii, Patavii. 326 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Toni G.B. 1894. Sylloge algarum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Vol. II. Bacillarieae. Sectio III. Cryptorhaphideae. Typis Seminarii, Patavii. 139 pp.
   Google Scholar
• De Toni G.B. & Levi-Morenos D. 1888. Algae novae: Diatomaceae. Notarisia 3: 463–475.
   Google Scholar
• Doig A.J. 1991. Diatoms from the Oamaru Diatomite. In: The Oamaru Diatomite (Ed. by A.R. Edwards). New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, Vol. 64, pp. 105–117. DSIR Geology & Geophysics, Lower Hutt.
   Google Scholar
• Dzinoridze R.N., Jousé A.P. & Strelnikova N.I. 1979. Description of the diatoms. In: The history of the microplankton of the Norwegian Sea (Ed. by A.A. Strelkov & M.G. Petrushevskaya), pp. 32–70. Nauka, Leningrad, Russian.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards A.R. 1991. Detailed stratigraphy of the Oamaru Diatomite. In: The Oamaru Diatomite (Ed. by A.R. Edwards). New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, Vol. 64, pp. 37–78. DSIR Geology & Geophysics, Lower Hutt.
   Google Scholar
• Egan K.E., Rickaby R.E.M., Hendry K.R. & Halliday A.N. 2013. Opening the gateways for diatoms primes Earth for Antarctic glaciation. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 375: 34–43. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.04.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1837. Zusätze zur Erkenntniss grosser organischer Ausbildung in den kleinsten theirischen Organismen. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1835: 151–180.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1839. Über jetzt wirklich noch zahlreich lebende Thier-Arten der Kreideformation der Erde. Bericht über die Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1839: 152–159.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1840. Über noch zahlreich jetzt lebende Thierarten der Kreidebildung und den Organismus der Polythalamien. Abhandlungen der Königlichen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1839: 81–174.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1843. Beobachtungen des bedeutenden Einflusses unsichtbar kleiner Organismen auf die untern Stromgebeithe, besonders der Elbe, Jahde, Ems und Schelde. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1844: 259–272.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1844. Mittheilung über 2 neue Lager von Gebirgsmassen aus Infusorien als Meeres-Absatz in Nord-Amerika und eine Vergleichung derselben mit den organischen Kreide-Gebilden in Europa und Afrika. Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1844: 57–97.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C.G. 1845. Neue Untersuchungen über das kleinste Leben als geologisches Moment. Bericht über die Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlichen Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1845: 53–87.
   Google Scholar
• Falkowski P.G., Katz M.E., Knoll A.H., Quigg A., Raven J.A., Schofield O. & Taylor F.J.R. 2004. The evolution of modern eukaryotic phytoplankton. Science 305: 354–360. doi: 10.1126/science.1095964
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenner J. 1977. Cenozoic diatom biostratigraphy of the equatorial and southern Atlantic Ocean. Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project. Supplement to Volumes 38, 39, 40 and 41: 491–624. doi: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.38394041s.201.1978
   Google Scholar
• Fenner J. 1981. Diatoms in the Eocene and Oligocene sediments off NW-Africa. Their stratigraphic and paleogeographic occurrences. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kiel, Germany. 231 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner J. 1985. Late Cretaceous to Oligocene planktic diatoms. In: Plankton stratigraphy, Vol. 2 (Ed. by H.M. Bolli, J.M. Saunders & K. Perch-Nielsen), pp. 713–762. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner J. 2015. Description of a new fossil diatom species, Haslea antiqua (Bacillariophyceae), with comments on its valve structure, and habitat. In: Diatoms and the continuing relevance of morphology to studies on taxonomy, systematics and biogeography (Ed. by J. Witkowski, D.M. Williams & J.P. Kociolek). Nova Hedwigia Beiheft, Vol. 144, pp. 107–124. J. Cramer, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Fenner J. & Hoff U. 2011. Marine diatoms in the Paleocene of the SW-Pacific. In: Climate and biota of the Early Paleogene. 5–8 June 2011, Salzburg, Austria. Conference program and abstracts (Ed. by H. Egger). Berichte der Geologischen Bundestanstalt, Vol. 85, p. 73. Geological Survey of Austria, Vienna.
   Google Scholar
• Fourtanier E. & Kociolek J.P. 2011. Catalogue of diatom names [online]. Available from: http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp [Accessed 1 February 2017]
   Google Scholar
• Fricke F. 1902. Verzeichnis der in A. Schmidt's Atlas der Diatomaceenkunde. Tafel 1-240 (Serie I–V) adgebildeten und benannten Formen. O.R. Reisland, Leipzig. 69 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Fuge D.P. 1937. Kittonia (?) virgata G. & S. with a note on the genus Hemiaulus and its ‘mucro’. Watson’s Microscope Record 40: 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Gladenkov A.Y. 2014. Bipolar distribution of some earliest Oligocene marine diatoms. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 143: 337–368.
   Google Scholar
• Gleser S.I. 1984. Significance of research on the systematics of diatoms for biostratigraphy and paleogeography. Ezhegodnik Vsyesoyuznogo Paleontologicheskogo Obshchestva 27: 284–298 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Gleser S.I., Makarova I.V., Moisseeva A.I. & Nikolaev V.A. 1988. The diatoms of the USSR. Fossil and recent. Vol. II, Fasc. 1. Nauka, St. Petersburg. 120 pp (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Gleser S.I., Makarova I.V., Moisseeva A.I. & Nikolaev V.A. 1992. The diatoms of the USSR. Fossil and recent. Vol. II, Fasc. 2. Nauka, St. Petersburg. 125 pp (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Gleser S.I. & Sheshukova-Poretzkaya V.S. 1967. De speciebus tertiariis Barbadossicis ac Novozeelandicis in Aeocaeno superiore Ucrainae. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum Non Vascularium 1967: 25–38 (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Gombos A.M., Jr. 1977. Paleogene and Neogene diatoms from the Falkland Plateau and Malvinas Outer Basin: Leg 36, Deep Sea Drilling Project. In: Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 36 (Ed. by P. Barker, I.W.D. Dalziel, et al.), pp. 575–687. doi: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.36.111.1977
   Google Scholar
• Gombos A.M., Jr. 19840. Late Paleocene diatoms in the Cape Basin. In: Initial reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 73 (Ed. by K.J. Hsü, J.L. Labrecque, et al.), pp. 495–511. doi: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.73.116.1984
   Google Scholar
• Gosden R. 1966. Note on Biddulphia reversa Grove & Sturt. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club 30: 117.
   Google Scholar
• Gradstein F.M., Ogg J.G., Schmitz M.D. & Ogg G.M. (Eds). 2012. The geologic time scale 2012. Elsevier, Amsterdam. 1144 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Gray S.F. 1821. A natural arrangement of British plants, according to their relations to each other. Baldwin, Cradock & Joy, London. 824 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1861. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series I. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 9: 39–45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1861.tb06238.x
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1862. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series VII. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, New Series 2: 231–236.
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1863a. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series IX. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 11: 63–76. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1863.tb01262.x
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1863b. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series X. Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science, New Series 3: 227–237.
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1864a. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XI. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 12: 8–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1864.tb01621.x
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1864b. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XIII. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 12: 87–94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1864.tb01630.x
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1865a. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XIV. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 13: 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1865b. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XV. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 13: 24–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.1865.tb05043.x
   Google Scholar
• Greville R.K. 1865c. Descriptions of new and rare diatoms. Series XVII. Transactions of the Microscopical Society of London, New Series 13: 97–105.
   Google Scholar
• Grove E. & Sturt G. 1886. On a fossil diatomaceous deposit from Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Part I. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, New Series 2: 321–330.
   Google Scholar
• Grove E. & Sturt G. 1887a. On a fossil diatomaceous deposit from Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Part II. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, New Series 3: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• Grove E. & Sturt G. 1887b. On a fossil diatomaceous deposit from Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Part III. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, New Series 3: 63–78.
   Google Scholar
• Grove E. & Sturt G. 1887c. On a fossil diatomaceous deposit from Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Appendix. Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club, New Series 3: 131–148.
   Google Scholar
• Grunow A. 1863. Über einige neue und ungenügend bekannte Arten und Gattungen von Diatomaceen. Verhandlungen der Kaiserlich-Königlichen Zoologisch-Botanischen Gesellschaft in Wien 13: 137–162.
   Google Scholar
• Grunow A. 1888. Grove, E. & Sturt, G. On a fossil marine diatomaceous deposit from Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. (Journal of the Quekett Microscopical Club. Ser. II. Vol. III. No. 18 and No. 19. 1887. Part III and appendix). Botanisches Centralblatt 34: 34–41.
   Google Scholar
• Hajós M. 1977. Upper Eocene and lower Oligocene Diatomaceae, Archaemonadaceae, and Silicoflagellatae in Southwestern Pacific sediments, DSDP Leg 29. In: Initial Reports of the Deep Sea Drilling Project 35 (Ed. by Hollister C.D., Craddock C., et al.), pp. 817–882. doi: 10.2973/dsdp.proc.35.29chap1.1976
   Google Scholar
• Harwood D.M. 1989. Siliceous microfossils. In: Antarctic Cenozoic history from the CIROS-1 drillhole, McMurdo sound (Ed. by P.J. Barrett). DSIR Bulletin, Vol. 245, pp. 67–97. DSIR Publishing, Wellington.
   Google Scholar
• Hassall A.H. 1845. A history of the British freshwater algae (including descriptions of the Diatomaceae and Desmidiaceae) with upwards of one hundred plates. Vol. I. Taylor, Walton, and Maberly, London. 462 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, P.-R. 2015. Die fossilen Diatomeen Oamarus (Neuseeland). Siegen, privately published (in German, with English foreword). 190 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Heiberg, P.A.C. 1863. Conspectus criticus diatomacearum danicarum — Kritisk oversigt over de Danske Diatomeer. Wilhelm Priors Vorlag, Kjøbenhavn, 135 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Hinde G.J. & Holmes W.M. 1892. On the sponge-remains in the lower tertiary Strata near Oamaru, Otago, New Zealand. Journal of the Linnean Society of London, Zoology 24: 177–262. doi: 10.1111/j.1096-3642.1892.tb02480.x
   Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1959. A. Schmidts Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 117–118, pp. 465–472. Akademie-Verlag, Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Jousé A.P. (Ed.) 1977. Atlas of microorganisms in bottom sediments of the oceans. Diatoms, Radiolaria, silicoflagellates and coccoliths. Nauka, Moscow, 160 pls. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Karsten G. 1928. Abteilung Bacillariophyta (Diatomeae). In: Die Natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, Peridineae (Dinoflagellatae), Diatomeae (Bacillariophyta), Myxomycetes (Ed. by A. Engler & K. Prantl). Vol. 2, pp. 105–303. Wilhelm Engelmann, Leipzig.
   Google Scholar
• Kuntze O. 1898. Revisio generum plantarum vascularium omnium atque cellularium multarum secundum leges nomenculaturae internationales cum enumeratione plantarum exoticarum in itineribus mundi collectarum. Pars III-II (in German, with French and English fragments).
   Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1844. Die kieselschaligen Bacillarien oder Diatomeen. W. Köhne, Nordhausen. 152 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Laporte L.J. & Lefébure P. 1929. Diatomées rares et curieuses. Vol. I. Paris, privately published.
   Google Scholar
• Laporte L.J. & Lefébure P. 1930. Diatomées rares et curieuses. Vol. II. Paris, privately published.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarus D., Barron J.A., Renaudie J., Diver P. & Türke A. 2014. Cenozoic planktonic marine diatom diversity and correlation to climate change. PLoS ONE 9: e84857. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0084857
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lear C.H, Bailey T.R., Pearson P.N., Coxall H.K. & Rosenthal Y. 2008. Cooling and ice growth across the Eocene–Oligocene transition. Geology 36: 251–254. doi: 10.1130/G24584A.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long J.A, Fuge D.P. & Smith J. 1946. Diatoms of the Moreno Shale. Journal of Paleontology 20: 89–118.
   Google Scholar
• MacGillivary M.L. & Kaczmarska I. 2013. Lectotypification of Paralia sulcata and description of P. obscura sp. nov. (Bacillariophyta) from the Ehrenberg collection. Diatom Research 28: 221–235. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2013.791646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarova I.V., Strelnikova N.I. & Kozyrenko T.F. 2002. The diatoms of Russia and adjacent coutries: fossil and recent. Vol. II, Fasc. III. St. Petersburg University Press, St. Petersburg, 111 pp. (in Russian).
   Google Scholar
• Mandra Y.T. & Mandra H. 1971. Upper Eocene silicoflagellates from New Zealand. Antarctic Journal of the US 6: 177–178.
   Google Scholar
• Mann A. 1907. Report on the diatoms of the Albatross voyages in the Pacific Ocean, 1888–1904. Contributions from the United States National Herbarium 10: 221–445.
   Google Scholar
• Mann A. 1925. Marine diatoms of the Philippine Islands. United States National Museum Bulletin 100: 1–182.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Buck W.R., Demoulin V., Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., Herendeen P.S., Knapp S., Marhold K., Prado J., Prud’Homme van Reine W.F., Smith G.F., Wiersema J.H. & Turland N.J. 2012. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum Vegetabile, Vol. 154, 240 pp. Koeltz Scientific Books, Oberreifenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer G.F.W. 1818. Primitiae Florae Essequeboensis Adjectis Descriptionibus Centum Circiter Stirpium Novarum, Observationibusque Criticis. H. Dieterich, Göttingen, 316 pp.
   Google Scholar
• O’Connor B. 1999. Radiolaria from the Late Eocene Oamaru Diatomite, South Island, New Zealand. Micropaleontology 45: 1–55. doi: 10.2307/1486201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olshtynskaya A.P. 2002. Morphological and taxonomic characteristics of some paleogene diatoms of Ukraine. International Journal on Algae 4: 118–126. doi: 10.1615/InterJAlgae.v4.i1.120
   Google Scholar
• Oreshkina T.V. & Radionova E.P. 2014. Diatom record of the Paleocene-Eocene thermal maximum in marine paleobasins of Central Russia, Transuralia and adjacent regions. In: Diatom research over time and space (Ed. by J.P. Kociolek, M.S. Kulikovskiy, J. Witkowski & D.M. Harwood). Nova Hedwigia Beiheft, Vol. 143, pp. 307–336. J. Cramer, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Pantocsek J. 1886. Beiträge zur Kenntnis der Fossilen Bacillarien Ungarns. I. Theil: Marine Bacillarien. Buchdrucherei von Julius Platzko, Nagy-Tapolcsány, 76 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Peragallo M. 1903. Le Catalogue Général des Diatomées, Vol. II. Clermont-Ferrand, Paris. pp. 472–973.
   Google Scholar
• Porguen V. & Sullivan M.J. 1997. Australodiscus peruvianus, gen. et sp. nov., a marine centric diatom from the Peruvian Eocene. European Journal of Phycology 32: 119–124. doi: 10.1080/09670269710001737039
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard A. 1861. A history of Infusoria, including the Desmidiaceae and Diatomaceae, Biritsh and foreign. Whittaker and Co., London. 968 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rabenhorst L. 1874. Die Algen Europa’s. Decas 238–239.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray J. 1888a. A revision of the Genus Aulacodiscus Ehrb. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 1888: 337–382.
   Google Scholar
• Rattray J. 1888b. A revision of the Genus Auliscus Ehrb. and of some allied genera. Journal of the Royal Microscopical Society 1888: 861–920.
   Google Scholar
• Reed F.S.C. 1946. A new diatom from the Oamaru Diatomite. Transactions of the Royal Society of New Zealand 76: 294.
   Google Scholar
• Reed F.S.C. 1991. An atlas of Oamaru Diatomite diatoms. In: The Oamaru Diatomite (Ed. by A.R. Edwards). New Zealand Geological Survey Paleontological Bulletin, Vol. 64, pp. 127–170. DSIR Geology & Geophysics, Lower Hutt.
   Google Scholar
• Renaudie J. 2016. Quantifying the Cenozoic marine diatom deposition history: links to the C and Si cycles. Biogeosciences 13: 6003–6014. doi: 10.5194/bg-13-6003-2016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Renema W., Bellwood D.R., Braga J.C., Bromfield K., Hall R., Johnson K.G., Lunt P., Meyer C.P., McMonagle L.B., Morley R.J., O’Dea A., Todd J.A., Wesselingh F.P., Wilson M.E. & Pandolfi J.M. 2008. Hopping hotspots: global shifts in marine biodiversity. Science 321: 654–657. doi: 10.1126/science.1155674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross R. 1990. Spinivinculum, a new genus of centric diatoms. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 100: 263–275.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. 1995. A revision of Rutilaria Greville (Bacillariophyta). Bulletin of the Natural History Museum. Botany Series 25: 1–93.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. & Sims P.A. 1972. The fine structure of the frustule in centric diatoms: a suggested terminology. European Journal of Phycology 7: 139–163. doi: 10.1080/00071617200650171
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. & Sims P.A. 1974. Observations on family and generic limits in the centrales. In: Second symposium on recent and fossil marine diatoms (Ed. by R. Simonsen), Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, Vol. 45, pp. 97–121. Verlag von J. Cramer, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. & Sims P.A. 1985. Some genera of the Biddulphiaceae (diatoms) with interlocking linking spines. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany Series 13: 277–381.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. & Sims P.A. 1987. Further genera of the Biddulphiaceae (diatoms) with interlocking linking spines. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany Series 16: 269–311.
   Google Scholar
• Ross R. & Sims P.A. 2002. Trossulus Ross & Sims, a new genus of the Heliopeltaceae. Diatom Research 17: 177–188. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2002.9705537
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer R.P., Gladenkov A.Y. & Barron J.A. 2007. Methods and applications of Cenozoic marine diatom biostratigraphy. In: Pond scum to carbon sink. geological and environmental applications of the diatoms (Ed. by S.W. Starratt), The Paleontological Society Papers, Vol. 13, pp. 61–83. The Paleontological Society, New Haven.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A.W.F. 1882. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 20. Ernst Schlegel’s Verlag, Ascherleben, plates 77–80.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A.W.F. 1885. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 21/22. Ludwig Siever’s Buchhandlung, Ascherleben, plates 81–92.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A.W.F. 1888. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 31/32. Verlag von Ludwig Siever, Ascherleben, plates 121–128.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A.W.F. 1890. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 34/35. Fues’s Verlag, Leipzig, plates 145–152.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt A.W.F. 1891. Atlas der Diatomaceen-Kunde. Heft 41/42. Fues’s Verlag, Leipzig, plates 161–168.
   Google Scholar
• Schrader H.-J. 1969. Die pennaten Diatomeen aus dem Obereozän von Oamaru, Neuseeland. Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, Vol. 28, 124 pp. Verlag von J. Cramer, Lehre.
   Google Scholar
• Silva P.C. 1970. Remarks on algal nomenclature. IV. Taxon 19: 941–945. doi: 10.2307/1218317
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1987. Atlas and catalogue of the diatom types of Friedrich Hustedt. Vol. 1–3. J. Cramer, Berlin-Stuttgart, 772 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. & Schrader H.-J. 1975. On the fine structure of the centric diatom Craspedoporus elegans Grove & Sturt. In: Second Symposium on recent and fossil marine diatoms, London, September 4–9, 1972. Proceedings (Ed. by R. Simonsen), Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 45: 147–158.
   Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. 2001. The genus Praetriceratium gen. nov.: a survey of eupodiscoid genera with a sipho marginalis. Diatom Research 16: 399–416. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2001.9705527
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. 2004. Isodiscus Rattray: a problematic fossil marine genus. Diatom 20: 67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. 2008. Ceratangula gen. nov. is proposed together with a discussion on the genera Cerataulus, Eupodiscus, Amphitetras, Amphipentas and Diommatetras. Diatom Research 23: 435–444. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2008.9705768
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. & Chambers P.M. 2002. The fossil marine genus Rhaphidophora Long, Fuge & Smith. Diatom Research 17: 205–217. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2002.9705539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. & Hendey N.I. 1996. Fontigonium, a new genus of biddulphioid diatoms. Diatom Research 11: 373–378. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1996.9705391
   Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. & Hendey N.I. 2002. A note on the valve structure of Triceratium heterogonum Barker & Meakin, an unusual species from Conset, Barbados. Diatom Research 17: 383–390. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2002.9705555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims P.A. & Ross R. 1996. Drewsandria, a new genus of araphid diatoms. In: Contributions in phycology. Volume in honor of Prof. T.V. Desikachary (Ed. by A.K.S.K. Prasad, J.A. Nienow & V.N.R. Rao), Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft, Vol. 112, pp. 301–306. J. Cramer, Stuttgart-Berlin.
   Google Scholar
• Sterrenburg F.A.S. & de Wolf H. 2004. The Kinker diatom collection: discovery – exploration – exploitation. In: VII International Symposium ‘Cultural Heritage in Geosciences, Mining and Metallurgy: Libraries – Archives – Museums’: “Museums and their collections”, Leiden (The Netherlands), 19–23 May 2003 (Ed. by C.F. Winkler Prins & S.K. Donovan), Scripta Geologica Special Issue, Vol. 4, pp. 253–260.
   Google Scholar
• Stickley C.E., St John K., Koç N., Jordan R.W., Passchier S., Pearce R.B. & Kearns L.E. 2009. Evidence for middle Eocene Arctic sea from diatoms and ice-rafted debris. Nature 460: 376–379. doi: 10.1038/nature08163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strelnikova N.I. 1974. Diatomei pozdnego mela. Nauka, Moskva. 201 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Strelnikova N.I., Fourtanier E., Kociolek J.P. & Barron J.A. 2001. Ultrastructure studies of Coscinodiscus and Cestodiscus species from the Eocene and Oligocene. In: Lange-Bertalot Festschrift. Studies on diatoms (Ed. By R. Jahn, J.P. Kociolek, A. Witkowski & P. Compère). Gantner Verlag, Ruggell, pp. 63–96.
   Google Scholar
• Suto I. 2006. The explosive diversification of the diatom genus Chaetoceros across the Eocene/Oligocene and Oligocene/Miocene boundaries in the Norwegian Sea. Marine Micropaleontology 58: 259–269. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2005.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suto I., Jordan R.W. & Watanabe M. 2009. Taxonomy of middle Eocene diatom resting spores and their allied taxa from the central Arctic Basin. Micropaleontology 55: 259–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tempère J. & Peragallo H. 1889. Diatomées collection. 7me Fascicle. Imprimerie Hy-Tribout, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Van Heurck H. 1883. Synopsis de diatomées de Belgique. Atlas. Ducaju and sons, Anvers. 33 plates.
   Google Scholar
• Weisse J.F. 1854. Mikroskopische Analyse eines organischen Polirschiefers aus dem Gouvernement Simbirsk. Mélanges Biologiques tirés du Bulletin de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Petersbourg 13: 237–250.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. 1988. An illustrated catalogue of the type specimens in the Greville diatom herbarium. Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History). Botany Series 18: 1–148.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. & Hasle G.R. 2015. Pat Sims: a bibliography with annotations concerning type material. In: Diatoms and the continuing relevance of morphology to studies on taxonomy, systematics and biogeography (Ed. by J. Witkowski, D.M. Williams & J.P. Kociolek). Nova Hedwigia Beiheft, Vol. 144, pp. 1–33. J. Cramer, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Williams D.M. & Reid G. 2006. Fossils and the tropics, the Eunotiaceae (Bacillariophyta) expanded: a new genus for the Upper Eocene fossil diatom Eunotia reedii and the recent tropical marine diatom Amphora reichardtiana. European Journal of Phycology 41: 147–154. doi: 10.1080/09670260600628564
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams D.M., Sims P.A. & Witkowski J. 2016. Edmund Grove (15th February 1823–11th February 1911) and his diatom collection at the Natural History Museum, London (BM). In: Program & Abstracts, 24th International Diatom Symposium, Québec, Canada, 21–26 August 2016 (Ed. by: R. Pienitz& C. Zimmermann). Université Laval: 243.
   Google Scholar
• Wise F.C. 1952. Notes on four Oligocene diatoms from Oamaru, New Zealand. Annals and Magazine of Natural History Series 12: 404–408. doi: 10.1080/00222935208654308
   Google Scholar
• Witkowski J., Bohaty S.M., Edgar K.M. & Harwood D.M. 2014. Rapid fluctuations in mid-latitude siliceous plankton production during the Middle Eocene Climatic Optimum (ODP Site 1051, western North Atlantic). Marine Micropaleontology 106: 110–129. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2014.01.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski J., Sims P.A. & Harwood D.M. 2011. Rutilariaceae redefined: a review of fossil bipolar diatom genera with centrally positioned linking structures, with implications for the origin of pennate diatoms. European Journal of Phycology 46: 378–398. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2011.629685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witkowski J., Sims P.A., Strelnikova N.I. & Williams D.M. 2015. Entogoniopsis gen. nov and Trilamina gen. nov. (Bacillariophyta): a survey of multipolar pseudocellate diatoms with internal costae, including comments on the genus Sheshukovia Gleser. Phytotaxa 209: 1–89. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.209.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar