Description and phylogenetic position of Plagiolemma distortum sp. nov., a new raphid diatom (Bacillariophyceae) from French coastal waters

References

• Al-Yamani F.Y. & Saburova M.A. 2011. Illustrated guide on the benthic diatoms of Kuwait’s marine environment. Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, Safat. 358 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen P. & Throndsen J. 2003. Estimating cell numbers. In: Manual on harmful marine microalgae (Ed. by G.M. Hallegraeff, D.M. Anderson & A.D. Cembella), pp. 99–129. UNESCO, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Ashworth M.P., Lobban C.S., Witkowski A., Theriot E.C., Sabir M.J., Baeshen M.N., Hajarah N.H., Baeshen N.A., Sabir J.S. & Jansen R.K. 2017. Molecular and morphological investigations of the stauros-bearing, raphid pennate diatoms (Bacillariophyceae): Craspedostauros E.J. Cox, and Staurotropis T.B.B. Paddock, and their relationship to the rest of the Mastogloiales. Protist 168: 48–70. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2016.11.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomérat N. & Couté A. 2008. Protoperidinium bolmonense sp. nov. (Peridiniales, Dinophyceae), a small dinoflagellate from a brackish hypereutrophic lagoon (South of France). Phycologia 47: 392–403. doi: 10.2216/PH07-82.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chomérat N., Sellos D.Y., Zentz F. & Nézan E. 2010. Morphology and molecular phylogeny of Prorocentrum consutum sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a new benthic dinoflagellate from South Brittany (Northwestern France). Journal of Phycology 46: 183–194. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2009.00774.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. 2015. Diatoms, diatomeae (Bacillariophyceae s.l., Bacillariophyta). In: Syllabus of plant families part 2/1 (Ed. by W. Frey), pp. 64–103. Borntraeger Science, Stuttgart.
   Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. & Williams D.M. 2000. Systematics of naviculoid diatoms: the interrelationships of some taxa with a stauros. European Journal of Phycology 35: 273–282. doi: 10.1080/09670260010001735871
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foged F. 1975. Some littoral diatoms from the coast of Tanzania. Bibliotheca Phycologia 16: 1–127.
   Google Scholar
• Guillard R.L.L. 1975. Culture of phytoplankton for feeding marine invertebrates. In: Culture of marine invertebrates animals (Ed. by W.L. Smith & M.H. Chanley), pp. 29–60. Plenum Press, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Guindon S. & Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2017. Algaebase. World-wide electronic publication. National University of Ireland, Galway. Available from: http://www.algaebase.org [Accessed 29 June 2017].
   Google Scholar
• Hall T.A. 1999. Bioedit: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucleic Acids Symposium Series 41: 95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. 1978. Diatoms. In: Phytoplankton manual (Ed. by A. Sournia), pp. 136–142. UNESCO, Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Hasle G.R. & Syvertsen E.E. 1996. Marine diatoms. In: Identifying marine phytoplankton (Ed. by C.R. Tomas), pp. 5–385. Academic Press, San Diego.
   Google Scholar
• Hendey N.I. 1964. Bacillariophyceae (diatoms), part V. In: An introductory account of the smaller algae of British coastal waters. Fisheries Investigations. Series IV, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, London, 317 pp., 45 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Hoagland K.D., Rosowski J.R., Gretz M.R. & Roemer S.C. 1993. Diatom extracellular polymeric substances: function, fine structure, chemistry, and physiology. Journal of Phycology 29: 537–566. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1993.00537.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Katoh K. & Standley D.M. 2013. Mafft multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular Biology and Evolution 30: 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leinweber K. & Kroth P.G. 2015. Capsules of the diatom Achnanthidium minutissimum arise from fibrillar precursors and foster attachment of bacteria. PeerJ 3: e858. doi: 10.7717/peerj.858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann D.G. 2011. Size and sex. In: The diatom world. series ‘cellular origin, life in extreme habitats and astrobiology 19’ (Ed. by J. Seckbach & J.P. Kociolek), pp. 145–166. Springer, Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• McNeill J., Barrie F.R., Buck W.R., Demoulin V., Greuter W., Hawksworth D.L., Herendeen P.S., Knapp S., Marhold K., Prado J., Prud’homme van Reine W.F., Smith G.F., Wiersema J.H. & Turland N.J. 2012. International code of nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Melbourne Code). Regnum vegetabile, Vol. 154. Koeltz Scientific Books, Königstein. 208 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Mizuno M. & Okuda K. 1985. Seasonal change in the distribution of cell size of Cocconeis scutellum var. ornata (Bacillariophyceae) in relation to growth and sexual reproduction. Journal of Phycology 21: 547–553. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1985.00547.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nézan E., Tillmann U., Bilien G., Boulben S., Chèze K., Zentz F., Salas R. & Chomérat N. 2012. Taxonomic revision of the dinoflagellate Amphidoma caudata: transfer to the genus Azadinium (Dinophyceae) and proposal of two varieties, based on morphological and molecular phylogenetic analyses. Journal of Phycology 48: 925–939. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2012.01159.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddock T.B.B. 1988. Plagiotropis Pfitzer and Tropidoneis Cleve, a summary account. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 16: 1–152 + 38 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Paddock T.B.B. & Sims P.A. 1981. A morphological study of keels of various raphe-bearing diatoms. Bacillaria 4: 177–222.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D. 2008. Jmodeltest: phylogenetic model averaging. Molecular Biology and Evolution 25: 1253–1256. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msn083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasband W.S. 1997–2006. ImageJ. 1.37c. (Ed. By National Institutes of Health), Bethesda, Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Reid G. 2012. A revision of the family Pleurosigmataceae (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Monographs 14: 1–163.
   Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 19: 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1974. The diatom plankton in the Indian ocean expedition of R/V ‘meteor’ 1964–1965. ‘Meteor’ Forschung-Ergebnisse Reihe D 19: 1–107.
   Google Scholar
• Staats N., Stal L.J., De Winder B. & Mur L.R. 2000. Oxygenic photosynthesis as driving process in exopolysaccharide production of benthic diatoms. Marine Ecology Progress Series 193: 261–269. doi: 10.3354/meps193261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanek J.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2014. Molecular phylogeny of Amphora sensu lato (Bacillariophyta): an investigation into the monophyly and classification of the Amphoroid diatoms. Protist 165: 177–195. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stepanek J.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2016. Re-examination of Mereschkowsky’s genus Tetramphora (Bacillariophyta) and its separation from Amphora. Diatom Research 31: 123–148. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2016.1183344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Worms Editorial Board. 2017. World register of marine species. Available from: http://www.marinespecies.org [Accessed 29 June 2017].
   Google Scholar