277
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The low temperature method for environmental scanning electron microscopy – a new method for observation of diatom assemblages in vivo

, , , , &
Pages 397-403 | Received 23 Jan 2018, Accepted 08 Oct 2018, Published online: 07 Jan 2019

References

  • Ács E., Ari E., Duleba M., Dreßler M., Genkal S.I., Jakó É., Rimer F., Ector L. & Kiss K.T. 2016. Pantocsekiella, a new centric diatom genus based on a morphological and genetic studies. Fottea 16: 56–78. doi: 10.5507/fot.2015.028
  • Adl S.M., Leander B.S., Simpson A.G.B., Archibald J.M., Anderson O.R., Bass D., Bowser S.S., Brugerolle G., Farmer M.A., Karpov S., Kolisko M., Lane C.H.E., Lodge D.J., Mann D.G., Meisterfeld R., Mendoza L., Moestrup Ø., Mozley-Standringe S.E., Smirnov A.V. & Spiegel F. 2007. Diversity, nomenclature, and taxonomy of protists. Systematic Biology 56: 684–689. doi: 10.1080/10635150701494127
  • Almeida S.P., Balzo D.R.D., Cairns J. Jr., Dickson K.L. & Lanza G.R. 1971. Holographic microscopy of diatoms. Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 74: 257–260. doi: 10.2307/3627204
  • B-Béres V., Lukács Á., Török P., Kókai Z., Novák Z., T-Krasznai E., Tóthmérész B. & Bácsi I. 2016. Combined eco-morphological functional groups are reliable indicators of colonisation processes of benthic diatom assemblages in a lowland stream. Ecological Indicators 64: 31–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.031
  • Bertilson M., Von Hofsten O., Vogt U., Holmberg A. & Hertz H.M. 2009. High-resolution computed tomography with a compact soft x-ray microscope. Optics Express 17: 11057. doi: 10.1364/OE.17.011057
  • Cohn S.A., Spurck T.P., Pickett-Heaps J.D. & Edgar L.A. 1989. Perizonium and initial valve formation in the diatom navicula cuspidata. Journal of Phycology 25: 15–26. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1989.00015.x
  • Crawford R.M. 1974. The auxospore wall of the marine diatom Melosira nummuloides (Dillw.) C. Ag. and related species. British Phycological Journal 9: 9–20. doi: 10.1080/00071617400650021
  • Decho A. 2000. Microbial biofilms in intertidal systems: an overview. Continental Shelf Research 20: 1257–1273. doi: 10.1016/S0278-4343(00)00022-4
  • Donald A.M. 2003. The use of environmental scanning electron microscopy for imaging wet and insulating materials. Nature Materials 2: 511–516. doi: 10.1038/nmat898
  • Drum R.W., Pankratz H.S. & Stoermer E.F. 1966. Electron microscopy of diatom cells. In: Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild Teil VI. (Ed. by J.G. Helmcke, W. Krieger & J. Gerloff), pp. 514–613. Verlag J. Cramer, Berlin.
  • Edgar L.A. & Pickett-Heaps J.D. 1984. Diatom locomotion. Progress in Phycological Research 3: 47–88.
  • Fránková M., Šumberová K., Potužák J. & Vild O. 2017. The role of plant substrate type in shaping the composition and diversity of epiphytic diatom assemblages in a eutrophic reservoir. Fundamental and Applied Limnology 189: 117–135. doi: 10.1127/fal/2016/0936
  • Friedrichs L., Maier M. & Hamm C. 2012. A new method for exact three-dimensional reconstruction of diatom frustules. Journal of Microscopy 248: 208–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2012.03664.x
  • Gabor D. 1948. A new microscopic principle. Nature 161: 177–178. doi: 10.1038/161777a0
  • Gerloff J. & Helmcke J.G. 1974. Marine diatoms bearb. In: Diatomeenschalen im elektronenmikroskopischen Bild Teil 8. (Ed. by J.G. Helmcke, W. Krieger & J. Gerloff), pp. 715–824. Verlag J. Cramer, Berlin.
  • Hoshino M., Uesugi K., Takeuchi A., Suzuki Y. & Yagi N. 2011. Development of x-ray laminography under an x-ray microscopic condition. Review of Scientific Instruments 82: 073706. doi: 10.1063/1.3609865
  • Ibáñez C., Caiola N., Sharpe P. & Trobajo R. 2010. Ecological indicators to assess the health of river ecosystem. In: Handbook of ecological indicators for assessment of ecosystem health (Ed. by S.E. Jorgensen, F.L. Xu & R. Costanza), pp. 447–464. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida.
  • Joubert E.D. & Pillay B. 2008. Visualization of the microbial colonization of a slow sand filter using an environmental scanning electron microscope. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology 11: 1–7.
  • Kelly M.G., Cazaubon A., Coring E., Dell’uomo A., Ector L., Goldsmith B., Guasch H., Hürlimann J., Jarlman A., Kawecka B., Kwandrans J., Lauguste R., Lindstrøm E.A., Leitao M., Marvan P., Padisák J., Pipp E., Prygiel J., Rott E., Sabater S., Van Dam H. & Vizinet J. 1998. Recommendations for the routine sampling of diatoms for water quality assessments in Europe. Journal of Applied Phycology 10: 215–224. doi: 10.1023/A:1008033201227
  • Kociolek J.P., Balasubramanian K., Blanco S., Coste M., Ector L., Liu Y., Kulikovskiy M., Lundholm N., Ludwig T., Potapova M., Rimet F., Sabbe K., Sala S., Sar E., Taylor J., Van de Vijver B., Wetzel C.E., Williams D.M., Witkowski A. & Witkowski J. 2018. DiatomBase. Available from: http://www.diatombase.org [Accessed on 23 January 2018].
  • Krausko J., Runštuk J., Neděla V., Klán P. & Heger D. 2014. Observation of a brine layer on an ice surface with an environmental scanning electron microscope at higher pressures and temperatures. Langmuir 30: 5441–5447. doi: 10.1021/la500334e
  • Letáková M., Cantonati M., Hašler P., Angeli N. & Poulíčková A. 2016. Substrate specificity and fine-scale distribution of epiphytic diatoms in a shallow tarn in the Brenta Dolomites (south-eastern Alps). Plant Ecology and Evolution 149: 144–156. doi: 10.5091/plecevo.2016.1206
  • Mann D.G. 1981. Sieves and flaps: siliceous minutiae in the pores of raphid diatoms. In: Proceedings of the 6th symposium on recent and fossil diatoms (Ed. by R. Ross), pp. 279–300. Koeltz, Koenigstein.
  • Mann D.G. 1982. Structure, life history and systematics of Rhoicosphenia II. Auxospore formation and perizonium structure of Rh. curvata. Journal of Phycology 18: 264–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.1982.tb03183.x
  • Mann D.G. & Poulíčková A. 2009. Incunabula and perizonium of Neidium (Bacillariphyta) Fottea 9: 211–222. doi: 10.5507/fot.2009.022
  • Mann D.G. & Vanormelingen P. 2013. An inordinate fondness? The number, distributions, and origins of diatom species. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 60: 414–420. doi: 10.1111/jeu.12047
  • McGregor J.E. & Donald A.M. 2010. ESEM imaging of dynamic biological processes: The closure of stomatal pores. Journal of Microscopy 239: 135–141.
  • Morales E.A., Siver P.A., & Trainor F.R. 2001. Identification of diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) during ecological assessments: comparison between light microscopy and scanning electron microscopy techniques. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 151: 95–103. doi: 10.1635/0097-3157(2001)151[0095:IODBDE]2.0.CO;2
  • Mutinová P.T., Neustupa J., Bevidacqua S. & Terlizzi A. 2016. Host specificity of epiphytic diatom (Bacillariophyceae) and desmid (Desmidiales) communities. Aquatic Ecology 50: 697–709. doi: 10.1007/s10452-016-9587-y
  • Neděla V., Konvalina I., Lencová B. & Zlámal J. 2011. Comparison of calculated, simulated and measured signal amplification in a variable pressure SEM. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A 645: 79–83. doi: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.12.200
  • Neděla V., Hřib J. & Vooková B. 2012. Imaging of early conifer embryogenic tissues with the environmental scanning electron microscope. Biologia Plantarum 56: 595–598. doi: 10.1007/s10535-012-0062-x
  • Neděla V., Tihlaříková E., Hřib J. & Runštuk J. 2014. Comparison of classical SEM and ESEM protocols for study of conifer embryogenic tissues with using low temperature conditions of ESEM. Microscopy and Microanalysis 20: 1230–1231. doi: 10.1017/S1431927614007880
  • Neděla V., Tihlaříková E. & Hřib J. 2015. The low-temperature method for study of coniferous tissues in the environmental scanning electron microscope. Microscopy Research and Technique 78: 13–21. doi: 10.1002/jemt.22439
  • Neděla V., Hřib J., Havel L., Hudec J. & Runštuk J. 2016. Imaging of Norway spruce early somatic embryos with the ESEM, Cryo-SEM and laser scanning microscope. Micron 84: 67–71. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2016.02.011
  • Norbäck Ivarsson L., Ivarsson M., Lundberg J., Sallstedt T. & Rydin C. 2013. Epilithic and aerophilic diatoms in the artificial environment of Kungsträdgården metro station, Stockholm, Sweden. International Journal of Speleology 42: 289–297. doi: 10.5038/1827-806X.42.3.12
  • Passy S.I. 2007. Diatom ecological guilds display distinct and predictable behavior along nutrient and disturbance gradients in running waters. Aquatic Botany 86: 171–178. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2006.09.018
  • Picket-Heaps J.D., Tippit D.H. & Andreozzi J.A. 1979a. Cell division in the pennate diatom Pinnularia III. The valve and associated cytoplasmic organelles. Biologie Cellulaire 35: 195–198.
  • Picket-Heaps J.D., Tippit D.H. & Andreozzi J.A. 1979b. Cell division in the pennate diatom Pinnularia IV. Valve morphogenesis. Biologie Cellulaire 35: 199–203.
  • Piper J. 2011. A review of high-grade imaging of diatoms and radiolarians in light microscopy optical- and software-based techniques. Diatom Research 26: 57–72. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2011.587377
  • Popielarska-Konieczna M., Kozieradzka-Kiszkurno M., Swierczynska J., Góralski G., Ślesak H. & Bohdanowicz J. 2008. Ultrastructure and histochemical analysis of extracellular matrix surface network in kiwi fruit endosperm-derived callus culture. Plant Cell Reports 27: 1137–1145. doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0534-9
  • Popielarska-Konieczna M., Bohdanowicz J. & Starnaeska E. 2010. Extracellular matrix of plant callus tissue visualized by ESEM and SEM. Protoplasma 247: 121–125. doi: 10.1007/s00709-010-0149-1
  • Poulíčková A., Mayama S., Chepurnov V.A. & Mann D.G. 2007. Heterothallic auxosporulation, incunabula and perizonium in Pinnularia (Bacillariophyceae). European Journal of Phycology 42: 367–390. doi: 10.1080/09670260701476087
  • Poulíčková A., Neustupa J., Hašler P., Tomanec O. & Cox E. 2016. A new species, Navicula lothargeitleri sp. nov. within the Navicula cryptocephala complex. Phytotaxa 273: 23–33. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.273.1.2
  • Richard C., Mitbavkar S. & Landoulsi J. 2017. Diagnosis of the diatom community upon biofilm development on stainless steels in natural freshwater. Scanning 2017: 1–13. doi: 10.1155/2017/5052646
  • Rimet F. 2012: Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia 683: 1–24. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0949-0
  • Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2012a. Biomonitoring river diatoms: implications of taxonomic resolution. Ecological Indicators 15: 92–99. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.09.014
  • Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2012b. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in Europe and rivers. Knowledge and Managements of Aquatic Ecosystems 406: 1–12.
  • Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms. Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
  • Stabentheiner E., Zankel A. & Pölt P. 2010. Environmental scanning electron microscopy (ESEM) – a versatile tool in studying plants. Protoplasma 246: 89–99. doi: 10.1007/s00709-010-0155-3
  • Stoermer E.F., Pantkratz H.S. & Drum R.W. 1964. The fine structure of Mastogloia grevillei Wm. Smith. Protoplasma 59: 1–13. doi: 10.1007/BF01247854
  • Taylor C.J., Cocquyt C. & Mayama S. 2016. Navicula nielsfogedii J.C.Taylor & Cocquyt sp. nov., a new diatom (Bacillariophyta) from tropical and sub-tropical Africa. Fottea 16: 201–208. doi: 10.5507/fot.2016.015
  • Tihlaříková E., Neděla V. & Shiojiri M. 2013. In situ study of live specimens in an environmental scanning electron microscope. Microscopy and Microanalysis 19: 914–918. doi: 10.1017/S1431927613000603
  • Timp W. & Matsudaira P. 2008. Electron microscopy of hydrated samples. In: Biophysical tools for biologists, Vol. 2: In vivo techniques (Ed. by J.J. Correia & H.W. Detrich), pp. 391–407, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.
  • Van De Poll W.H., Vrieling E.G. & Gieskes W.W.C. 1999. Location and expression of frustulins in the pennate diatoms Cylindrotheca fusiformis, Navicula pelliculosa and Navicula salinarum. Journal of Phycology 35: 1044–1053. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3551044.x
  • Vlašínová H., Neděla V., Đorđević B. & Havel L. 2017. Bottlenecks in bog pine multiplication by somatic embryogenesis and their visualization with the environmental scanning electron microscope. Protoplasma 254: 1487–1497. doi: 10.1007/s00709-016-1036-1
  • von Stosch H.A. 1982. On auxospore envelopes in diatoms. Bacillaria 5: 127–156.
  • Zetsche E.-M., El Mallahi A. & Meysman F.J.R. 2016. Digital holographic microscopy: a novel tool to study the morphology, physiology and ecology of diatoms. Diatom Research 31: 1–16. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2016.1140679
  • Zimmermann J., Abarca N., Enk N., Skibbe O., Kusber W.H. & Jahn R. 2014. Taxonomic reference libraries for environmental barcoding: A best practice example from diatom research. PLOS ONE 9: e114758. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114758

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.