Cocconeis cascadensis, a new monoraphid diatom from mountain streams in Northern California, USA

References

• Al-Handal A.Y., Riaux-Gobin C., Abdulla D.S. & Ali M.H. 2014. Cocconeis sawensis sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae) from a saline lake (Sawa Lake), South Iraq: comparison with allied taxa. Phytotaxa 181: 216–228. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.181.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs B.J.E. & Gerbeaux P.J. 1994. Epilithic periphyton in temperate rivers: community composition in relation to differences in disturbance regimes. NIWA-Christchurch Miscellaneous Report 177: 1–33.
   Google Scholar
• Bond T.A. 1968. A postglacial diatom assemblage from Caddo County, Oklahoma. Micropaleontology 14: 484–488. doi: 10.2307/1485091
   Google Scholar
• Delgado C. & Pardo I. 2015. Comparison of benthic diatoms from Mediterranean and Atlantic Spanish streams: community changes in relation to environmental factors. Aquatic Botany 120: 304–314. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2014.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Stefano M. & Romero O.E. 2005. A survey of alveolate species of the diatom genus Cocconeis (Ehr.) with remarks on the new section Alveolatae. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 52: 133.
   Google Scholar
• De Stefano M., Romero O.E. & Totti C. 2008. A comparitive study of Cocconeis scutellum Ehrenberg and its varieties (Bacillariophyta). Botanica Marina 51: 506–536. doi: 10.1515/BOT.2008.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fetscher A.E., Stancheva R., Kociolek J.P, Sheath R.G., Stein E.D., Mazor R.D., Ode P.R. & Busse L.B. 2014. Development and comparison of stream indices of biotic integrity using diatoms vs. non-diatom algae vs. a combination. Journal of Applied Phycology 26: 433–450. doi: 10.1007/s10811-013-0088-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• García M.L., Echazú D.M., Romero O.E. & Maidana N.I. 2018. Cocconeis neuquina Frenguelli (Bacillariophyta): emended description, lectotypification, ecology, and geographical distribution. Diatom Research, doi:10.1080/0269249X.2018.1485596.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohn M.H. 1961. The relationship between species diversity and population density in diatom populations from Silver Springs, Florida. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 80: 140–165. doi: 10.2307/3223904
   Google Scholar
• Jahn R. & Kusber W.H. 2004. Algae of the Ehrenberg collection — 1. Typification of 32 names of diatom taxa described by C. G. Ehrenberg. Willdenowia 34: 577–595. doi: 10.3372/wi.34.34219
   Google Scholar
• Jahn R., Kusber W.H. & Romero O.E. 2009. Cocconeis pediculus Ehrenberg and C. placentula Ehrenberg var. placentula (Bacillariophyta): typification and taxonomy. Fottea 9: 275–288. doi: 10.5507/fot.2009.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaczmarska I. & Rushforth S.R. 1983. The Diatom Flora of Blue Lake Warm Spring, Utah, U.S.A. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 2: 43.
   Google Scholar
• Kociolek J.P. 2005. A checklist and preliminary bibliography of the recent, freshwater diatoms of inland environments of the continental United States. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences (Fourth Series) 56: 395–525.
   Google Scholar
• Kociolek J.P. 2011. Cocconeis klamathensis. In: Diatoms of the United States. Available from: http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/cocconeis_klamathensis [Accessed 16 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Kociolek J.P. & Rosen B.H. 1984. Observations on North American Gomphoneis (Bacillariophyceae) I. Valve ultrastructure of G. mammilla with comment on the taxonomic status of the genus. Journal of Phycology 20: 361–368. doi: 10.1111/j.0022-3646.1984.00361.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 1990. Zur Identität von Cocconeis diminuta Pantocsek und Cocconeis thumensis Mayer. In: Ouvrage dédié a Henri Germain (Ed. by M. Ricard & M. Coste), Koeltz Scientific Books, Koenigstein. 145–156 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Bacillariophyceae. 4 Teil. Achnanthaceae. Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl., G. Gärtner, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer), Vol. 2/4, Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena. 437 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Kulikovskiy M.S., Lange-Bertalot H., Kuznetsova I.V. 2016. Cocconeis nanoburyatica sp. nov.—a new monoraphid diatom species from Lake Baikal. Inland Water Biology 9: 112–115. doi: 10.1134/S1995082916020103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majewska R., D’Alelio D. & De Stefano M. 2014. Cocconeis Ehrenberg (Bacillariophyta), a genus dominating diatom communities associated with Posidonia oceanica Delile (monocotyledons) in the Mediterranean Sea. Aquatic Botany 112: 48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2013.07.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ode, P.R., Fetscher A.E. & Busse L.B. 2016. Standard operating procedures for the collection of field data for bioassessments of California wadeable streams: benthic macroinvertebrates, algae, and physical habitat. California State Water Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP 004. Available from: https://www.waterboards.ca.gov/water_issues/programs/swamp/bioassessment/docs/combined_sop_2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick R. & Reimer C.W. 1966. The diatoms of the United States exclusive of Alaska and Hawaii. Volume 1: Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae, Achnanthaceae, Naviculaceae. Monographs of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 13: 1–688.
   Google Scholar
• Potapova M. 2010. Cocconeis fluviatilis. In: Diatoms of the United States. Available from http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/cocconeis_fluviatilis [Accessed 16 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Potapova M. & Spaulding S. 2013. Cocconeis placentula sensu lato. In: Diatoms of the United States. Available from http://westerndiatoms.colorado.edu/taxa/species/cocconeis_placentula [Accessed 16 February 2018].
   Google Scholar
• Reimer C.W. 1961. Some aspects of the diatom flora of Cabin Creek raised bog, Randolph Co., Indiana. Proceedings of the Indiana Academy of Sciences 71: 305–319.
   Google Scholar
• Riaux-Gobin C., Romero O.E., Compère P. & Al-Handal A.Y. 2010. Two new Cocconeis taxa (Bacillariophyceae) from coral sands off the Mascarenes (Western Indian Ocean) and some related unidentified taxa. European Journal of Phycology 45: 278–292 doi: 10.1080/09670260903560076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaux-Gobin C., Romero O.E., Compère P. & Al-Handal A.Y. 2011. Small-sized Achnanthales (Bacillariophyta) from coral sands off Mascarenes (Western Indian Ocean). Bibliotheca Diatomologica 57: 234.
   Google Scholar
• Riaux-Gobin C., Witkowski A., Compère P., Romero O.E. 2015. Cocconeis Ehrenberg taxa (Bacillariophyta) with a marginal row of simple processes: relationship with the valvocopula system and distinctive features of related taxa. Fottea, Olomouc 15: 139–154. doi: 10.5507/fot.2015.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riaux-Gobin C., Compère P., Straub F., Ector L. & Taxböck, L. 2017. Cocconeis voigtii F. Meister (Bacillariophyta) and other species from Meister’s and Voigt’s Nagasaki (Japan) material. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 146: 43–62. doi: 10.1127/1438-9134/2017/043
   Google Scholar
• Romero O.E. & Jahn, R. 2013. Typification of Cocconeis lineata and Cocconeis euglypta (Bacillariophyta). Diatom Research 28: 175–184. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2013.770801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero O.E. & Van De Vijver B. 2011. Cocconeis crozettensis, a new monoraphid diatom from subantarctic freshwater and moss habitats. Diatom Research 26: 89–98. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2011.575118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosemond, A.D. 1994. Multiple factors limit seasonal variation in periphyton in a forest stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 13: 333–344. doi: 10.2307/1467363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E. & Bukhtiyarova L. 1996. Epipsammic diatoms – communities of British rivers. Diatom Research 11: 363–372. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1996.9705390
   Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms Biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Schumann J. 1862. Preussische Diatomeen. Schriften der koniglichen physikalisch-okonomischen Gesellschaft zu Konigsberg 3: 166–192.
   Google Scholar
• Sovereign H.E. 1958. The diatoms of Crater Lake, Oregon. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 77: 96–134. doi: 10.2307/3224112
   Google Scholar
• Stancheva R., Fetscher A.E. & Sheath R.G. 2012. A novel quantification method for stream-inhabiting, non-diatom benthic algae, and its application in bioassessment. Hydrobiologia 684: 225–239. doi: 10.1007/s10750-011-0986-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancheva R., Busse L., Kociolek J.P. & Sheath R.G. 2015. Standard operating procedures for laboratory processing and identification of stream algae. California State Water Resources Control Board Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program (SWAMP) Bioassessment SOP 0003.
   Google Scholar
• Stancheva R., Sheath R.G. & Kociolek J.P. 2016. New freshwater gomphonemoid diatoms from streams in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, California, USA. Phytotaxa 289: 118–134. doi: 10.11646/phytotaxa.289.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wallace J. 1960. New and variable diatoms. Notulae Naturae 331: 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Werum M. & Lange-Bertalot H. 2004. Diatoms in springs from Central Europe and elsewhere under the influence of hydrologeology and anthropogenic impacts. Iconographia Diatomologica 13: 417.
   Google Scholar
• Wojtal A.Z. 2013. Species composition and distribution of diatom assemblages in spring waters from various geological formations in Southern Poland. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 59: 436.
   Google Scholar