Fistulifera alcalina sp. nov. (Naviculales, Stauroneidaceae) a new alkaliphilic diatom species from Lake Okeechobee, Florida (USA)

References

• Archibald R.E. 1981. An investigation into the taxonomy of the diatoms (Bacillariophyceae) of the Sundays and the great fish rivers, with ecological observations on the Sundays River. Ph.D. Dissertation, Rhodes University, Eastern Cape: 600 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard D., Casanueva A., Tuffin M. & Cowan D. 2010. Extremophiles in biofuel synthesis. Environmental Technology 31: 871–888. doi: 10.1080/09593331003710236
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bella V.D., Puccinelli C., Marcheggiani S. & Mancini L. 2007. Benthic diatom communities and their relationship to water chemistry in wetlands of central Italy. Annales de Limnologie – International Journal of Limnology 43: 89–99. doi: 10.1051/limn/2007021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthold D.E., de la Rosa N., Engene N., Jayachandran K., Gantar M., Laughinghouse IV H.D. & Shetty, K.G. 2020. Omega-7 producing alkaliphilic diatom Fistulifera sp. (Bacillariophyceae) from Lake Okeechobee, Florida. Algae 35: 91–106. doi: 10.4490/algae.2020.35.12.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox E.J. 1996. Identification of freshwater diatoms from live material. Chapman and Hall, London. 168 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Edgar R.C. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Research 32: 1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gaiser E.E., Sullivan P., Tobias F.A.C., Bramburger A.J. & Trexler J.C. 2014. Boundary effects on benthic microbial phosphorus concentrations and diatom beta diversity in a hydrologically-modified, nutrient-limited wetland. Wetlands 34: 55–64. doi: 10.1007/s13157-013-0379-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevrey M., Rimet F., Park Y.S., Giraudel J.-L., Ector L. & Lek S. 2004. Water quality assessment using diatom assemblages and advanced modelling techniques. Freshwater Biology 49: 208–220. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2426.2003.01174.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guindon S. & Gascuel O. 2003. A simple, fast, and accurate algorithm to estimate large phylogenies by maximum likelihood. Systematic Biology 52: 696–704. doi: 10.1080/10635150390235520
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2020. AlgaeBase [online]. Worldwide Electronic Publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. Available from: http://www.algaebase.org [Accessed June 2020].
   Google Scholar
• Hamsher, S.E., Evans K.M., Mann D.G., Poulíčková A. & Saunders G.W. 2011. Barcoding diatoms: exploring alternatives to COI-5P. Protist 162: 405–422. doi: 10.1016/j.protis.2010.09.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt F. 1962. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter Berücksichtigung der übrigen Länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden Meeresgebiete. In: Kryptogamen Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst), pp. 161–348. Akademische Verlagsgesellschaft m.b.h. Leipzig 7(Teil 3, Lief. 2).
   Google Scholar
• Ishihara S. 2009. Studies on risk assessment procedure of rice herbicides for microalgae in river ecosystem. Journal of Pesticide Science 34: 184–186. doi: 10.1584/jpestics.J09-04
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones H., Simpson G.E., Stickle A.J. & Mann D.G. 2005. Life history and systematics of Petroneis (Bacillariophyta), with special reference to British waters. European Journal of Phycology 40: 61–87. doi: 10.1080/09670260400024675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae In: Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/1. (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer) Gustav Fisher Verlag, Jena. 876 pp
   Google Scholar
• Kulikovskiy M.S. 2006. To study of morphology and distribution of certain species from genera Mayamaea Lange-Bertalot and Fistulifera Lange-Bertalot (Bacillariophyta) from Russia and Mongolia. International Journal on Algae 8: 325–340. doi: 10.1615/InterJAlgae.v8.i4.30
   Google Scholar
• Kulikovskiy M.S., Maltsev E., Andreeva S., Glushchenko A., Gusev E.S., Podunay Y., Ludwig T. & Kociolek J.P. 2019. Description of a new diatom genus Dorofeyukea gen. nov. with remarks on phylogeny of the family Stauroneidaceae. Journal of Phycology 55: 173–185. doi: 10.1111/jpy.12810
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kützing F.T. 1849. Species algarum. Brockhaus, Lipsiae, FA. 922 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 1997. Frankophila, Mayamaea und Fistulifera: drei neue Gattungen der Klasse Bacillariophyceae. Archiv für Protistenkunde 148: 65–76. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9365(97)80037-1
   Google Scholar
• Lewin J.C. 1955. The capsule of the diatom Navicula pelliculosa. Microbiology 13: 162–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsumoto M., Mayama S., Nemoto M., Fukuda Y., Muto M., Yoshino T. & Tanaka T. 2014. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic analysis of the high triglyceride-producing marine diatom, Fistulifera solaris sp. nov. (Bacillariophyceae). Phycological Research 62: 257–268. doi: 10.1111/pre.12066
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelutti N., Hermanson M.H., Smol J.P., Dillon P.J. & Douglas M.S.V. 2007. Delayed response of diatom assemblages to sewage inputs in an Arctic lake. Aquatic Sciences 69: 523–533. doi: 10.1007/s00027-007-0928-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller M.A., Pfeiffer W. & Schwartz T. 2010. Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, LA, pp. 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Nodine E.R. & Gaiser E.E. 2014. Distribution of diatoms along environmental gradients in the Charlotte Harbor, Florida (USA), estuary and its watershed: implications for bioassessment of salinity and nutrient concentrations. Estuaries and Coasts 37: 864–879. doi: 10.1007/s12237-013-9729-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilný J. 2009. Biofuels from algae: physiological characterization of candidate diatom species. M.S. Thesis in English. Faculty of Science, University of Bohemia, Czech Republic. 51 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Pniewski F., Friedl T. & Latała A. 2010. Identification of diatom isolates from the Gulf of Gdańsk: testing of species identifications using morphology, 18S rDNA sequencing and DNA barcodes of strains from the culture collection of Baltic Algae (CCBA). Oceanological and Hydrobiological Studies 39: 3–20. doi: 10.2478/v10009-010-0031-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimet F., Kermarrec L., Bouchez A., Hoffmann L., Ector L. & Medlin L.K. 2011. Molecular phylogeny of the family Bacillariaceae based on 18S rDNA sequences: focus on freshwater Nitzschia of the section Lanceolatae. Diatom Research 26, 273–291. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2011.597988
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronquist F. & Huelsenbeck J.P. 2003. Mrbayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19, 1572–1574. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Round F.E., Crawford R.M. & Mann D.G. 1990. The diatoms: biology and morphology of the genera. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 747 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Rowan R. & Powers D.A. 1991. Molecular genetic identity of symbiotic dinoflagellates (Zooxanthellae). Marine Ecology Progress Series 71: 65–73. doi: 10.3354/meps071065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders G.W. & McDevit D.C. 2012. Methods for DNA barcoding photosynthetic protists emphasizing the macroalgae and diatoms. Methods in Molecular Biology 858: 207–222. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-591-6_10
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Simonsen R. 1987. Atlas and catalogue of the diatom types of Friedrich Hustedt. J. Cramer, Berlin & Stuttgart (1) 525 pp.; (2) 2–106; (3) 107–175.
   Google Scholar
• Stancheva R., Mancheva A. & Ivanov P. 2007. Taxonomic composition of the epilithic diatom flora from rivers Vit and Osum, Bulgaria. Phytologia Balcanica 13: 53–64.
   Google Scholar
• Szabó K., Kiss K.T., Taba G. & Ács É. 2005. Epiphytic diatoms of the Tisza River, Kisköre reservoir and some oxbows of the Tisza River after the cyanide and heavy metal pollution in 2000. Acta Botanica Croatica 64: 1–46.
   Google Scholar
• Torrisi M., Scuri S., Dell’Uomo A. & Cocchioni M. 2010. Comparative monitoring by means of diatoms, macro invertebrates and chemical parameters of an Apennine watercourse of central Italy: the river Tenna. Ecological Indicators 10: 910–913. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2010.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vonshak A. 1993. Microalgae: laboratory growth techniques and the biotechnology of biomass production. In: Photosynthesis and production in a Changing Environment (Ed. by D. O. Hall, J. M. O. Scurlock, H. R. Bolhàr-Nordenkampf, R. C. Leegood & S. P. Long), Springer, Dordrecht. 337–355.
   Google Scholar
• Vouilloud A.S., Sala S.Y. & Sabbatini M.R. 2005. Diatomeas perifíticas de la Cuenca del Rio Sauce Grande (Buenos Aires, Argentina). Iheringia, serie Botanica 60: 77–89.
   Google Scholar
• Zgrundo A., Lemke P., Pniewski F., Cox E.J. & Latała, A. 2013. Morphological and molecular phylogenetic studies on Fistulifera saprophila. Diatom Research 28: 431–443. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.2013.833136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar