Both hydrology and physicochemistry influence diatom morphometry

References

• Ács É.,  Földi A., Vad C.F., Trábert Z., Kiss K.T., Duleba M., Borics G., Grigorszky I. & Botta-Dukát Z. 2019. Trait-based community assembly of epiphytic diatoms in saline astatic ponds: a test of the stress-dominance hypothesis. Scientific Reports 9: 15749. Nature Publishing Group. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52304-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aenor. 2004. Norma española UNE-EN 13946:2004 Calidad del agua. Guía para el muestreo en rutina y el pretratamiento de diatomeas bentónicas de ríos. 20 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Aenor. 2014. EN 13946: 2014 Calidad del agua. Guía para el muestreo de rutina y el pretratamiento de diatomeas bentónicas de ríos y lagos. 20 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Armand L.K., Crosta X., Romero O. & Pichon J.-J. 2005. The biogeography of major diatom taxa in Southern Ocean sediments: 1. Sea ice related species. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 223: 93–126. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.02.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergey E.A. 1999. Crevices as refugia for stream diatoms: effect of crevice size on abraded substrates. Limnology and Oceanography 44: 1522–1529. doi: 10.4319/lo.1999.44.6.1522
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortese G. & Gersonde R. 2007. Morphometric variability in the diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis: implications for Southern Ocean paleoceanography. Earth and planetary science letters 257: 526–544. doi: 10.1016/j.epsl.2007.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambra J., Ector L. & Sabater S. 2005. Metodología para el establecimiento el estado ecológico según la Directiva Marco del Agua: Protocolos de muestreo y análisis para fitobentos (microalgas bentonicas). Confederación Hidrográfica del Ebro.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2014. UNE-EN 13946:2014 Water quality – guidance for the routine sampling and preparation of benthic diatoms from rivers and lakes. 20 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Cortese G., Gersonde R., Maschner K. & Medley P. 2012. Glacial-interglacial size variability in the diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis: possible iron/dust controls? Paleoceanography 27: 14 pp. doi: 10.1029/2011PA002187
   Google Scholar
• Coste M. 1982. Etude des méthodes biologiques d'appréciation quantitative de la qualité des eaux. In: p. 218. Rapport Cemagref, QE Lyon-AF Bassin Rhône Méditerranée Corse.
   Google Scholar
• Crosta X. 2009. Holocene size variations in two diatom species off East Antarctica: productivity vs environmental conditions. Deep Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers 56: 1983–1993. doi: 10.1016/j.dsr.2009.06.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosta X., Romero O., Armand L.K. & Pichon J.-J. 2005. The biogeography of major diatom taxa in Southern Ocean sediments: 2. Open ocean related species. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 223: 66–92. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.03.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dao M.H. 2013. Reassessment of the cell surface area limitation to nutrient uptake in phytoplankton. Marine Ecology Progress Series 489: 87–92. doi: 10.3354/meps10434
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel Z.V., Vaillancourt C.J., Irwin A.J., Reavie E.D. & Smol J.P. 2009. Environmental control of diatom community size structure varies across aquatic ecosystems. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 276: 1627–1634. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2008.1610
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hillebrand H., Dürselen C.-D., Kirschtel D., Pollingher U. & Zohary T. 1999. Biovolume calculation for pelagic and benthic microalgae. Journal of Phycology 35: 403–424. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.1999.3520403.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann G., Werum M. & Lange-Bertalot H. 2011. Diatomeen im Süßwasser-Benthos von Mitteleuropa. Bestimmungsflora Kieselalgen für die ökologische Praxis. Über 700 der häufigsten Arten und ihre Ökologie. ARG Gantner.
   Google Scholar
• Horton R.E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins; hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. GSA Bulletin 56: 275–370. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1945)56[275:EDOSAT]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husson F., Josse J., Le S. & Mazet J. 2015. Package ‘FactoMineR’. R topics documented.
   Google Scholar
• Kassambara A. & Mundt F. 2016. ‘factoextra’: extract and visualize the results of multivariate data analyses. R topics documented.
   Google Scholar
• Kloster M., Kauer G. & Beszteri B. 2014. SHERPA: an image segmentation and outline feature extraction tool for diatoms and other objects. BMC Bioinformatics 15: 218. 17 pp. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-15-218
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kloster M., Esper O., Kauer G. & Beszteri B. 2017. Large-scale permanent slide imaging and image analysis for diatom morphometrics. Applied Sciences 7: 330. 22 pp. doi: 10.3390/app7040330
   Google Scholar
• Kloster M., Kauer G., Esper O., Fuchs N. & Beszteri B. 2018. Morphometry of the diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis from Southern Ocean sediment: high-throughput measurements show second morphotype occurring during glacials. Marine Micropaleontology 143: 70–79. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2018.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K. 2002. Cymbella. In: Diatoms of Europe. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G, Rugell. 579 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1986. Bacillariophyceae. 1. Teil: Naviculaceae, vol. 2/1. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer). G. Fischer Verlag, Jena. 876 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1988. Bacillariophyceae 2. Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae 2/2. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer). G. Fischer Verlag, Jena. 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991a. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Teil: Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. 2/3. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer). G. Fischer Verlag, Jena. 576 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991b. Bacillariophyceae. 4. Teil: Achnanthaceae, Kritische Ergänzungen zu Navicula (Lineolatae) und Gomphonema. In: Süßwasserflora von Mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Ettl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer). G. Fischer Verlag, Jena. 468 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lange-Bertalot H. 2001. Diatoms of Europe Volume 2. Navicula sensu stricto. 10 Genera separated from Navicula sensu lato. Frustulia. A. R. G. Gantner Verlag K. G, Rugell. 526 pp.
   Google Scholar
• Lavoie I., Lento J. & Morin A. 2010. Inadequacy of size distributions of stream benthic diatoms for environmental monitoring. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 29: 586–601. doi: 10.1899/09-062.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lecointe C., Coste M. & Prygiel J. 1993. ‘Omnidia’: software for taxonomy, calculation of diatom indices and inventories management. Hydrobiologia 269: 509–513. doi: 10.1007/BF00028048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levkov Z., Metzeltin D. & Pavlov A. 2013. Luticola and Luticolopsis. In: Diatoms of the European inland waters and comparable habitats (Ed. by H.L. Bertalot), p. 698. Koeltz Botanical Books, Oberreifenberg.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis W.M. 1976. Surface-volume ratio – implications for phytoplankton morphology. American Association for the Advancement of Science 192: 885–887. doi: 10.1126/science.192.4242.885
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litchman E., Klausmeier C.A. & Yoshiyama K. 2009. Contrasting size evolution in marine and freshwater diatoms. PNAS: 106: 2665–2670. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810891106
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu Z., Dreybrodt W. & Liu H. 2011. Atmospheric CO2 sink: silicate weathering or carbonate weathering? Applied Geochemistry 26: S292–S294. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.03.085
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meador M.R. & Goldstein R.M. 2003. Assessing water quality at large geographic scales: relations among land use, water physicochemistry, riparian condition, and fish community structure. Environmental Management 31: 504–517. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2805-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mevik B.-H. 2019. Introduction to the pls Package. R topics documented.
   Google Scholar
• Millot R., Gaillardet J., Dupré B. & Allègre C.J. 2002. The global control of silicate weathering rates and the coupling with physical erosion: new insights from rivers of the Canadian Shield. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 196: 83–98. doi: 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00599-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Agricultura A. y M. A. (MAGRAMA) 2008. ANEXO III. ORDEN ARM/2656/2008, de 10 de septiembre, por la que se aprueba la instrucción de planificación hidrológica. p. 38561–38573.
   Google Scholar
• Moberg E.A. & Sosik H.M. 2012. Distance maps to estimate cell volume from two-dimensional plankton images. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods 10: 278–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nair A., Mohan R., Crosta X., Manoj M.C., Thamban M. & Marieu V. 2019. Southern Ocean sea ice and frontal changes during the Late Quaternary and their linkages to Asian summer monsoon. Quaternary Science Reviews 213: 93–104. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2019.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nielsen S.L. & Sand-Jensen K. 1990. Allometric scaling of maximal photosynthetic growth rate to surface / volume ratio. Limnology and Oceanography 35: 177–181. doi: 10.4319/lo.1990.35.1.0177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey L.K. & Bergey E.A. 2016. Exploring the status of motility, lipid bodies, deformities and size reduction in periphytic diatom community from chronically metal polluted (Cu, Zn) polluted waterbodies as a biomonitoring tool + corrigendum. Science of the Total Environment 587–588: 523. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.02.239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pandey L.K., Sharma Y.C., Park J., Choi S., Lee H., Lyu J. & Han T. 2018. Evaluating features of periphytic diatom communities as biomonitoring tools in fresh, brackish and marine waters. Aquatic Toxicology 194: 67–77. doi: 10.1016/j.aquatox.2017.11.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinseel E., Vanormelingen P., Hamilton P.B., Vyverman W., Van de Vijver B. & Kopalová K. 2017. Molecular and morphological characterization of the Achnanthidium minutissimum complex (Bacillariophyta) in Petuniabukta (Spitsbergen, High Arctic) including the description of A. digitatum sp. nov. European Journal of Phycology 52: 264–280. doi: 10.1080/09670262.2017.1283540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Potapova M.G. & Hamilton P.B. 2007. Morphological and ecological variation within the Achnanthidium minutissimum (Bacillariophyceae) species complex. Journal of Phycology 43: 561–575. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-8817.2007.00332.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Principe R.E. & del Corigliano M.C. 2006. Benthic, drifting and marginal macroinvertebrate assemblages in a Lowland river: temporal and spatial variations and size structure. Hydrobiologia 553: 303–317. doi: 10.1007/s10750-005-0694-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Development Core Team. 2008. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F. & Bouchez A. 2012. Life-forms, cell-sizes and ecological guilds of diatoms in European rivers. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems 406: 1–12. doi: 10.1051/kmae/2012018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero O.E., Armand L.K., Crosta X. & Pichon J.-J. 2005. The biogeography of major diatom taxa in Southern Ocean surface sediments: 3. Tropical/subtropical species. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 223: 49–65. doi: 10.1016/j.palaeo.2005.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose D.T. & Cox E.J. 2013. Some diatom species do not show a gradual decrease in cell size as they reproduce. Fundamental and Applied Limnology / Archiv für Hydrobiologie 182: 117–122. doi: 10.1127/1863-9135/2013/0406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross C.A., Ali G., Spence C., Oswald C. & Casson N. 2019. Comparison of event-specific rainfall–runoff responses and their controls in contrasting geographic areas. Hydrological Processes 33: 1961–1979. doi: 10.1002/hyp.13460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S.K., Crespin J. & Crosta X. 2016. Thalassiosira lentiginosa size variation and associated biogenic silica burial in the Southern Ocean over the last 42 kyrs. Marine Micropaleontology 127: 74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.marmicro.2016.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shukla S.K., Crosta X., Cortese G. & Nayak G.N. 2013. Climate mediated size variability of diatom Fragilariopsis kerguelensis in the Southern Ocean. Quaternary Science Reviews 69: 49–58. doi: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2013.03.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snoeijs P. 1994. Distribution of epiphytic diatom species composition, diversity and biomass on different macroalgal hosts along seasonal and salinity gradients in the Baltic Sea. Diatom Research 9: 189–211. doi: 10.1080/0269249X.1994.9705296
   Google Scholar
• Snoeijs P., Busse S. & Potapova M.G. 2002. The importance of diatom cell size in community analysis. Journal of Phycology 38: 265–272. doi: 10.1046/j.1529-8817.2002.01105.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler A.N. 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. GSA Bulletin 63: 1117–1142. doi: 10.1130/0016-7606(1952)63[1117:HAAOET]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler A.N. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union 38: 913–920. doi: 10.1029/TR038i006p00913
   Google Scholar
• Sun J. & Liu D. 2003. Geometric models for calculating cell biovolume and surface area for phytoplankton. Journal of Plankton Research 25: 1334–1346. doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbg096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun X., Wu N., Faber C. & Fohrer N. 2018. Effects of hydrological variables on structuring morphological trait cell size of diatom community in a lowland river. Ecological Indicators 94: 207–217. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Triest L., Kaur P., Heylen S. & De Pauw N. 2001. Comparative monitoring of diatoms, macroinvertebrates and macrophytes in the Woluwe River (Brussels, Belgium). Aquatic Ecology 35: 183–194. doi: 10.1023/A:1011468615246
   Google Scholar
• Trobajo R., Rovira L., Mann D.G. & Cox E.J. 2011. Effects of salinity on growth and on valve morphology of five estuarine diatoms. Phycological Research 59: 83–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1835.2010.00603.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnes G.R., Bolker B., Bonebakker L., Gentleman R., Huber W., Liaw A., Lumley T., Maechler M., Magnusson A., Moeller S., Schwartz M. & Venables B.B. 2016. gplots: various R programming tools for plotting data.
   Google Scholar