109
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Taxonomy and Valve Ultrastructure of New and Interesting Freshwater Fossil Diatoms (Bacillariophyta) of Miocene age from the Espanola Formation of New Mexico, USA. I. Ontogeny of Tetracyclus stelloides sp. nov., with Comments on ‘Accepted Names’ and Hustedt's Concepts of ‘Convergence’ and ‘Miserable Forms’

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 107-117 | Received 14 Sep 2021, Accepted 20 Apr 2022, Published online: 09 Aug 2022

References

  • Abbott W.H. & VanLandingham S.L. 1972. Micropaleontology and paleoecology of Miocene non-marine diatoms from the Harper District, Malheur county, Oregon. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 23: 847–906.
  • Amitani Y. 2015. Prototypical reasoning about species and the species problem. Biological Theory 10: 289–300.
  • Bailey J.W. 1845. Diatomaceae. In: The report of the exploring expedition to the Rocky Mountains, Oregon and North California (Ed. by J.C. Fremont). United States Government Printing Office, Washington.
  • Benson M.E. & Kociolek J.P. 2012. Freshwater diatom floristics of the Late Eocene Florissant Formation, Clare's quarry site, central Colorado, USA. Bibliotheca Diatomologica 58: 1–136.
  • Bingler E.C. 1968. Geology and mineral resources of Rio Arriba, New Mexico. Bulletin New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 91: 1–158.
  • Bishop I.W., Tucker S.T., Joeckel R.M. & Spaulding S.A. 2018 Benthic fossil diatoms from the Upper Ogallala Group (Late Miocene) Near Scotia, NE (USA). Nova Hedwigia, Beiheft 147: 261–294.
  • Bradbury J.P. & Krebs W.N. 1995. The diatom genus Actinocyclus in the western United States. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1543 A–B: 1–47.
  • Bradbury J.P., Dieterich D.V. & Williams J.L., 1985. Diatom flora of the miocene lake beds near Clarkia in Northern Idaho. In Late cenozoic history of the Pacific Northwest: Pacific division of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (Ed. by C.J. Smiley), p. 33–59.
  • de Pinna M.C. 1999. Species concepts and phylogenetics. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 9: 353–373. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008911414399
  • Ehrenberg C.G. 1845. Neue Untersuchungen über das kleinste Leben als geologisches Moment Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin 1845: 53–87
  • Ehrenberg C.G. 1849. Über das mächtigste bis jetzt bekannt gewordene (angeblich 500 Fufs mächtige) Lager von mikroskopischen reinen kieselschaligen Süfswasser-Formen am Wasserfall-Flusse im Oregon Bericht über die zur Bekanntmachung geeigneten Verhandlungen der Königlich-Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu Berlin, Vol: 1849, 76–87.
  • Ehrenberg C.G. 1854. Mikrogeologie. Einundvierzig Tafeln mit über viertausend grossentheils colorirten Figuren, Gezeichnet vom Verfasser. [Atlas]. Leipzig: Leopold Voss.
  • Feth J.H. 1964. Review and annotated bibliography of ancient lake deposits (Pre Cambrian to Pleistocene) in the Western States. United States Geological Survey Bulletin 1080: 1–119.
  • Fourtanier E. & Kociolek J.P. 2011. Catalogue of diatom names. California Academy of Sciences, On-line Version updated 18 September 2011. Available online at http://researcharchive.calacademy.org/research/diatoms/names/index.asp
  • Galusha T. & Blick J.C. 1071. Stratigraphy of the Santa Fe group, New Mexico. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History. 144. 127 pp.
  • Geitler L. 1932. Der Formwechsel der pennaten diatomeen (kieselalgen). Archiv für Protistenkunde 78: 1–226.
  • Grunow A. 1878. Algen und Diatomaceen aus dem Kaspischen Meere In: O. Schneider (ed.), Naturwissenschafte Beiträge zur Kenntniss der Kaukasusländer, auf Grund seiner Sammelbeute. Dresden, pp. 98–132.
  • Guiry M.D. & Guiry G.M. 2021. AlgaeBase. World-wide electronic publication, National University of Ireland, Galway. https://www.algaebase.org
  • Héribaud J. 1902. Les diatomées fossiles D’Auvergne. Librarie des Sciences Naturelles, Paris. 79p.
  • Hustedt F. 1912. Tafeln 281-284. In Schmidt’s atlas der diatomaceenkunde. heft 71. O. Reisland, Leipzig.
  • Hustedt F. 1914. Die bacillariaceen-gattung Tetracyclus Ralfs. kritische studien über Bau systematik der bisher beschrieben formen. Abhandlungen Herausgegeben vom Naturwissenschaften Verein zu Bremen 23: 90–107.
  • Hustedt F. 1928. Die Kieselalgen Deutschlands, Österreichs und der Schweiz unter berücksichtigung der übrigen länder Europas sowie der angrenzenden meeresgebiete. In: Kryptogamenflora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. akademische verlagsgesellschaft m.b.h. Leipzig (Ed. by L. Rabenhorst) 7(Teil 1, Lief. 2): 273–464, figs 115–258.
  • Hustedt F. 1937. Zur systematik derDiatomeen. III. konvergenzerscheinungen und kümmerformen. Berichte der Deutsche Botanischen Gesellschaften 55: 468–472.
  • Hustedt F. 1952. Neue und wenig bekannte diatomeen. IV. Botanisker Notiser 1952: 366–410.
  • Khursevich G.K. & Kociolek J.P. 2002. New tertiarius (bacillariophyta: stephanodiscaceae) species from western North America. In: Proceedings of the 15th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by J. John), Perth, Australia, 28 September–2 October, 1998, A.R.G. Gantner Verlag K.G., pp. 331–350.
  • Khursevich G.K. & Kociolek J.P. 2008. Four new cyclotella species from pliocene lacustrine deposits in the U.S.A. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Diatom Symposium (Ed. by Y. Likhoshway), Listvyanka, Irkutsk, Russia, 28th August–3rd September 2006. Biopress Limited, Bristol, UK, pp. 39–54.
  • Khursevich G.K. & VanLandingham S.L. 1995. Morphology and stratigraphy of some Mesodictyon species (Bacillariophyta) from upper miocene freshwater deposits of Idaho and Nevada, USA. Nova Hedwigia 60: 467–478.
  • Kociolek J. P. & Khursevich G. K. 2013. Morphology of some fossil lacustrine centric species from the western United States assigned to the genus Cyclotella (Bacillariophyta), including four described as new. Phytotaxa 127(1): 81–99.
  • Kociolek J. P., Khursevich G. K. & Theriot E. C. 2014. Strelnikoviella incognita gen. nov., sp. nov., from Miocene sediments of New México, USA. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 143: 271–280.
  • Kociolek J.P. & Stoermer E.F. 1989. Phylogenetic relationships and evolutionary history of the diatom genus Gomphoneis. Phycologia 28: 438–454.
  • Kociolek J.P. & Stoermer E.F. 1990. Diatoms from the Upper Miocene Hot Springs Limestone, Snake River Plain, Idaho (U.S.A.). Micropaleontology 36: 331–352.
  • Kociolek J.P. & Williams D.M. 1987. Unicell ontogeny and phylogeny: examples from the diatoms. Cladistics 3: 274–284.
  • Kociolek J.P. 2018. A worldwide listing and biogeography of freshwater diatom genera: a phylogenetic perspective. Diatom Research 33: 509–534. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269249X.2019.1574243.
  • Kociolek J.P., Blanco S., Coste M., Ector L., Liu Y., Karthick B., Kulikovskiy M., Lundholm N., Ludwig T., Potapova M., Rimet F., Sabbe K., Sala S., Sar E., Taylor J., Van de Vijver B., Wetzel C.E., Williams D.M., Witkowski A. & Witkowski J. 2021. DiatomBase. Accessed at http://www.diatombase.org on 2021-09-07. https://doi.org/10.14284/504
  • Kociolek J.P., You Q., Wang X. & Liu Q. 2015. Consideration of some interesting freshwater gomphonemoid diatoms from North America and China, and the description of Gomphosinica, gen. nov. Nova Hedwigia, Beihefte 144: 175–198.
  • Koning D.J., Connell S.D., Morgan G.S., Peters L., & McIntosh W.C., 2005. Stratigraphy and depositional trends in the Santa Fe group near Española, north-central New Mexico: tectonic and climatic implications: New Mexico geological society, 56th field conference, guidebook, p. 237–257.
  • Krammer K. & Lange-Bertalot H. 1991. Bacillariophyceae. 3. Centrales, Fragilariaceae, Eunotiaceae. Süsswasserflora von mitteleuropa (Ed. by H. Etl, J. Gerloff, H. Heynig & D. Mollenhauer. Band 2/3. Gustav Fisher Verlag, Stuttgart, pp. 1–576.
  • Krebs W.N. & Bradbury J.P. 1995. Geologic ranges of lacustrine Actinocyclus species, western North America. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 1543-B: 49–71.
  • Lohman K.E. & Andrews G.W. 1968. Late eocene nonmarine diatoms from the Beaver Divide area, Fremont County, Wyoming. United States Geological Survey Professional Paper 593-E: 1–26.
  • Lohman K.E. 1957. Cenozoic nonmarine diatoms from the great basin. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California.
  • MacGinitie H. D., 1953. Fossil plants of the Florissant beds. Carnegie Institute of Washington Publication, Colorado, 534. 178 p.
  • Mahood A.D. 1981. Stephanodiscus rhombus, a new diatom species from Pliocene deposits at Chiloquin, Oregon. Micropaleontology 27(4): 379–383.
  • Mallett J. 1996. Reply from J. Mallett. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11: 174–175.
  • Manley K. & Mehnert H.H. 1981. New K-Ar ages for Miocene and Pliocene volcanic rocks in the northwestern Espanola Basin and their relationships to the history of the Rio Grande rift. Isochron/West 30: 5–8.
  • McLaughlin R.B. & Andrews G.W. 1990. Cymbella langii, a new Miocene diatom from the Espanola area, Rio Arriba County, New Mexico, U.S.A. Diatom Research 5: 55–61.
  • Mills F.W. 1935. An index to the genera and species of the Diatomaceae and their synonyms. 1816-1932. part 21 (Sy-Z, appendices, supplement). pp. 1571–1726. London: Wheldon & Wesley, Limited.
  • Moisseeva A.I. 1971. Atlas neogenovykh diatomovykh vodoroslei Primorskoga Kriya. Trudy Vsesoiunogo Neftianogo Nauchno-Issledovatelskogo Geologo-Razvedochnogo Instituta (VSEGEI) n.s., 171: 1–152.
  • Moore B.N. 1937. Non-metallic mineral resources of eastern Oregon. Bulletin of the United States Geological Survey 875: 1–180.
  • Patrick R.M. & Reimer C.W. 1966. The diatoms of the United States. Volume 1. Monograph Number 13, Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia. 688p.
  • Patterson S.H. 1965. Diatomite. mineral & water resources of New Mexico. G.O. Bachman (Ed.). Bulletin New Mexico Bureau of Mines and Mineral Resources 87: 322–324.
  • Ralfs J. 1843. On the Diatomaceae. Annals and Magazine of Natural History 12: 104–111.
  • Ross R. 1968. [Review of] Sam L. VanLandingham, Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of the diatoms and their synonyms. Part 1. Acanthoceras through Bacillaria. xi + 493 pp. 1967. Verlag von J. Cramer, 3301 Lehre, Germany. Taxon 17: 301–303.
  • Schmidt M. 1899. Atlas der diatomaceen-kunde. Leipzig. O.R. Reisland, Series V (Heft 54): pls. 213–216.
  • Servant-Vildary S., Fourtanier E., Kociolek J.P., MacDonald M.M., & Miette A. 2001. Nomenclatural issues, types and conserved material from Tempere and Peragallo's Diatomées du Monde Entier, Edition 2. Diatom Research 16: 363–398.
  • Silva P. 1969. Review of: VanLandingham, S.L., Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms. Phycologia 7(1): 68–70.
  • Simonsen R. 1987. Atlas and catalogue of the diatom types of Friedrich Hustedt. Volume 1. Catalogue. J. Cramer, Berlin.
  • Smedman G. 1969. An investigation of the diatoms from four tertiary lake bed deposits in western Nevada. PaleoBios 9: 1–16
  • Tempère J. & Peragallo H. 1909. Diatomées du Monde Entier, Edition 2, 30 fascicules. Fascicule 8-12. Chez J. Tempère, Arcachon, Gironde, pp. 113–208.
  • Tempère J. & Peragallo H. 1912. Diatomées du Monde Entier, Edition 2, 30 fascicules. Fascicule 20-23. Chez J. Tempère, Arcachon, Gironde, pp. 305–352.
  • Theriot E. & Bradbury J.P. 1987. Mesodictyon, a new fossil genus of the centric diatom family Thalassiosiraceae from the Miocene Chalk Hills Formation, western Snake River Plain, Idaho. Micropaleontology 33(4): 356–367.
  • Theriot E. 1990. New species of Mesodictyon. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia 142: 1–19
  • Theriot E.C. & Ladewski T.B. 1986. Morphometric analysis of shape of specimens from the neotype of Tabellaria flocculosa (Bacillariophyceae). American Journal of Botany 73(2): 224–229.
  • Turland N. 2019. The code decoded. A user’s guide to the International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants. Second edition. Pensoft Publishers, Sofia, Bulgaria.
  • Turland N. J., Wiersema J. H., Barrie F. R., Greuter W., Hawksworth D. L., Herendeen P. S., Knapp S., Kusber W.-H., Li D.-Z., Marhold K., May T. W., McNeill J., Monro A. M., Prado J., Price M. J. & Smith G. F. (eds.) 2018. International Code of Nomenclature for algae, fungi, and plants (Shenzhen Code) adopted by the Nineteenth International Botanical Congress Shenzhen, China, July 2017. Regnum Vegetabile 159. Glashütten: Koeltz Botanical Books. https://doi.org/10.12705/Code.2018
  • Usoltseva M., Kociolek J.P. & Khursevich G.K. 2013. Three new species of Alveolophora (Aulacoseiraceae) from miocene fossil deposits in western North America. Phycologia 52: 109–117 https://doi.org/10.2216/12-022.1.
  • Van Heurck H. 1880. Synopsis des Diatomées de Belgique Atlas. pls I-XXX. Anvers: Ducaju et Cie.
  • VanLandingham S.L. 1964. Miocene non-marine diatoms from the Yakima Basalt in South Central Washington. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 16: 74 pp.
  • VanLandingham S.L. 1967a. Paleoecology and microfloristics of Miocene diatomites. Beihefte zur Nova Hedwigia 26: 77, 25 pls.
  • VanLandingham S.L. 1967b. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part I. Acanthoceras Through Bacillaria. Verlag von J. Cramer, 1: 1–493.
  • VanLandingham S.L. 1978. Catalogue of the fossil and recent genera and species of diatoms and their synonyms. Part VII. Rhoicosphenia Through Zygoceros. Verlag von J. Cramer, 7: 3606–4241.
  • Wallace A.R., Frank D.G. & Founie A. 2006. Freshwater diatomite deposits in the western United States. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2006/3044/fs-2006-3044.pdf
  • Wilkins, John S. 2022. The good species. In: Species Problems and Beyond: Contemporary Issues in Philosophy and Practice (Ed. by John S. Wilkins, Frank E. Zachos and Igor Ya. Pavlinov), pp. 105–124. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press/Taylor & Francis.
  • Williams D. M. 1994. Ontogeny and phylogeny in the genus Tetracyclus. In: Proceedings of the 12th diatom symposium (Ed. by J.P. Kociolek), 247–256. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences, No. 17, San Francisco.
  • Williams D. M. 1996. Fossil species of the diatom genus Tetracyclus (Bacillariophyta, ‘ellipticus’ species group): morphology, interrelationships and the relevance of ontogeny. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 351, 1759–1782.
  • Williams D.M. & Kociolek J.P. 2017. Historical biogeography of diatoms in Australasia: a preliminary assessment. Pp. 17–46 In: Handbook of Australasian biogeography (Ed. by M. Ebach), CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fl.
  • Williams D.M. 1987. Observations on the genus Tetracyclus Ralfs (Bacillariophyta). I. Valve and girdle structure of the extant species. British Phycological Journal 22: 383–399.
  • Williams D.M. 2004. On diatom endemism and biogeography: Tetracyclus and lake Baikal endemic species. Pp. 433–459 In: Proceedings of the 17th Diatom Symposium (Ed. by M. Poulin). BioPress, Bristol.
  • Williams D.M. 2011. Synedra, Ulnaria: definitions and descriptions – a partial resolution. Diatom Research 26:149–153.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.