Neo-liberalization Processes and Spatial Planning in France, Germany, and the Netherlands: An Exploration

References

• Aiginger , K. and Guger , A. 2006 . The ability to adapt: Why it differs between the Scandinavian and Continental European models . Intereconomics , 14 : 14 – 23 .
   Google Scholar
• Alber , J. 2006 . The European social model and the United States . European Union Politics , 7 : 393 – 419 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander , E. R. 1998 . Planning and implementation: Coordinative planning in practice . International Planning Studies , 3 : 303 – 320 .
   Google Scholar
• Allmendinger , P. and Haughton , G. 2012 . The evolution and trajectories of English neo-liberal spatial governance: ‘Neo-liberal’ episodes in planning . Planning Practice and Research , 27
   Google Scholar
• Balchin , P. N. and Sykora , L. 1999 . Regional Policy and Planning in Europe , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• BMVBS—Bundesministerium für Verkehr, Bau und Stadtentwicklung . 2006 . Leitbilder und Handlungsstrategien für die Raumentwicklung in Deutschland , Berlin : BMVBS .
   Google Scholar
• Booth , P. 2003 . Promoting radical change: The Loi Relative à la Solidarité et au Renouvellement Urbains in France . European Planning Studies , 11 : 949 – 963 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner , J. 2010 . Private initiatives in German urban development policy . Urban Research and Practice , 3 : 219 – 228 .
   Google Scholar
• CEC—Commission of the European Communities . 1997 . The EU Compendium of Spatial Planning Systems and Policies , Luxembourg : Regional Development Studies, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities .
   Google Scholar
• Comité Stratégique de la DATAR . 2003 . Une Nouvelle Politique de Développement des Territoires Pour la France , Paris : La Documentation Française .
   Google Scholar
• Cowell , R. 2012 . Planning and sustainability after the May 2010 Coalition government—Delivery, deliberation and divergence . Planning Practice and Research , 27
   Google Scholar
• Délégation interministérielle à l'Aménagement du Territoire et à l'Attractivité Régionale (DATAR) . 2011 . Available at http://territoires.gouv.fr/la-datar (accessed 12 April 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government . 2011a . National Planning Policy Framework: Myth-Buster , London : Department for Communities and Local Government . Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1984490.pdf (accessed 23 December 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Department for Communities and Local Government . 2011b . Draft National Planning Policy Framework , London : Department for Communities and Local Government . Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/planningandbuilding/pdf/1951811.pdf (accessed 23 December 2011)
   Google Scholar
• Dikeç , M. 2006 . Two decades of French urban policy: From social development of neighbourhoods to the republican penal state . Antipode , 38 : 59 – 81 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Direction Générale de la Coopération Internationale et du Développement (DgCID) . 2006 . Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development Policy in France , 53 Paris : Ministère des Affaires Etrangères .
   Google Scholar
• Falleth , E. I. , Hanssen , G. S. and Saglie , I. L. 2010 . Challenges to democracy in market-oriented urban planning in Norway . European Planning Studies , 18 : 737 – 753 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. 2001 . “ The performance of spatial planning ” . In Towards a New Role for Spatial Planning , Edited by: OECD . 105 – 132 . Paris : Territorial Development OECD Proceedings .
   Google Scholar
• Faludi , A. and Van der Valk , A. J. 1994 . Rule and Order. The Dutch Planning Doctrine in the Twentieth Century , Dordrecht : Kluwer Academic Publishers .
   Google Scholar
• Farinos Dasi , J. and Milder , J. 2006 . “ Evidence of convergence towards a common model of styles of planning in Europe ” . In Annex to the Final Report of the ESPON Project 2.3.2 Governance of Territorial and Urban Policies from EU to Local Level , Luxembourg : ESPON .
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann , J. 1993 . Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning . Journal of the American Planning Association , 59 : 482 – 485 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Government's White Paper . 2010 . Local Growth: Realising Every Place's Potential , London : The Stationary Office .
   Google Scholar
• Greed , C. 2000 . Introducing Planning , London : The Athlone Press .
   Google Scholar
• Hall , S. and Hickman , P. 2002 . Neighbourhood renewal and urban policy: A comparison of new approaches in England and France . Regional Studies , 36 : 693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey , D. 1989 . From managerialism to entrepreneurialism: The transformation in urban governance in late capitalism . Geografiska Annales, B , 71 : 3 – 18 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haughton , G. , Allmendinger , P. , Counsell , D. and Vigar , G. 2010 . The New Spatial Planning: Territorial Management with Soft Spaces and Fuzzy Boundaries , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Heinz , W. 2006 . “ Öffentlich-private Kooperationsansätze (Public Private Partnerships)—Eine Strategie mit wiederkehrender Relevanz ” . In Planung neu denken , Edited by: Selle , K. 146 – 162 . Dortmund : Verlag Dorothea Rohn . Bd 1-Zur räumlichen Entwicklung beitragen
   Google Scholar
• Jessop , B. 2004 . “ Multi-level governance and multi-level metagovernance changes in the European Union as integral moments in the transformation and reorientation of contemporary statehood ” . In Multi-Level Governance , Edited by: Bache , I. and Flinders , M. 49 – 74 . Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar
• Josserand , F. 2002 . The Spatial and Urban Dimensions in the 2000–06 Objective 2 Programmes: France , Glasgow : University of Strathclyde . EPRC Country Report to the European Commission
   Google Scholar
• Keil , R. 2009 . The urban politics of roll-with-it neoliberalization . City , 13 : 230 – 245 .
   Google Scholar
• Kleinhenz , G. 2005 . Marktwirtschaft und Sozialstaat: Zukunftsmodell für Deutschland . Aus Politik und Zeitgeschichte , 43 : 33 – 40 .
   Google Scholar
• Knieling , J. and Othengrafen , F. 2009 . “ En route to a theoretical model for comparative research on planning cultures ” . In Planning Cultures in Europe: Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning , Edited by: Knieling , J. and Othengrafen , F. 39 – 62 . Farnham , Surrey : Ashgate .
   Google Scholar
• Larsson , G. 2006 . Spatial Planning Systems in Western Europe , Amsterdam : IOS-Press .
   Google Scholar
• Mazet , P. 2000 . Aménagement du territoire , Paris : Armand Colin .
   Google Scholar
• Nadin , V. and Stead , D. 2008 . European spatial planning systems, social models and learning . disP—The Planning Review , 44 : 35 – 47 .
   Google Scholar
• Newman , P. and Thornley , A. 1996 . Urban Planning in Europe: International Competition, National Systems, and Planning Projects , London : Routledge .
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Weber , E. and Henckel , D. 2008 . The Planning System and Planning Terms in Germany , Hanover : Academy for Spatial Research and Planning (ARL) . Studies in Spatial Development, No. 7
   Google Scholar
• Peck , J. and Tickell , A . 2002 . Neoliberalizing space . Antipode , 34 : 380 – 404 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priemus , H. 2004 . Spatial memorandum 2004: A turning point in the Netherlands' spatial development policy . TESG , 95 : 578 – 583 .
   Google Scholar
• Pugalis , L. and Townsend , A. 2012 . Rescaling of planning and its interface with economic development . Planning Practice and Research , 27
   Google Scholar
• Purcell , M. 2009 . Resisting neo-liberalization: Communicative planning or counter-hegemonic movements? . Planning Theory , 8 : 140 – 165 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryser , J. and Franchini , T. 2008 . International Manual of Planning Practice , The Hague : ISOCARP (International Society of City and Regional Planners) .
   Google Scholar
• Sager , T. 2009 . Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities . European Planning Studies , 17 ( 1 ) : 65 – 84 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schubert , K. , Heelich , S. and Bazant , U. 2008 . “ Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme. Stand der Forschung—Theoretisch-methodische Überlegungen ” . In Europäische Wohlfahrtssysteme , Edited by: Schubert , K. , Hegelich , S. and Bazant , U. 13 – 43 . Wiesbaden : VS-Verlag .
   Google Scholar
• Stead , D. and V. , Nadin . 2009 . “ Planning cultures between models of society and planning systems ” . In Planning cultures in Europe. Decoding cultural phenomena in urban and regional planning , Edited by: Knieling , J. and Othengrafen , F. 283 – 300 . Farnham , Surrey : Ashgate .
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw , E. 2007 . “ Impossible ‘sustainability’ and the postpolitical condition ” . In The Sustainable Development Paradox , Edited by: Gibbs , D. and Krueger , R. 13 – 40 . New York : Guilford Press .
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw , E. 2005 . Governance innovation and the citizen: The janus face of governance-beyond-the-state . Urban Studies , 42 : 1991 – 2006 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw , E. , Moulaert , F. and Rodriguez , A. 2002 . Neo-liberal urbanisation in Europe: Large-scale urban development projects and the new urban policy . Antipode , 34 : 380 – 404 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams , R. H. 1996 . European Union Spatial Policy and Planning , London : Paul Chapman Publishing .
   Google Scholar
• Woessner , R. 2009 . La France: Aménager les territoires, , Editions Sedes , Paris : Armand Colin .
   Google Scholar
• Zukunftsrat der Bayrischen Landesregierung, c/o Bayrische Staatskanzlei . 2010 . Zukunftsfähige Gesellschaft: Bayern in der fortschreitenden Internationalisierung , München : Zukunftsrat der Bayrischen Landesregierung .
   Google Scholar
• Zweigert , K. and Kötz , H. 1998 . An Introduction to Comparative Law, , 3rd ed. , Oxford : Oxford University Press .
   Google Scholar